Hepatic prohibitin 1 and methionine adenosyltransferase α1 defend against primary and secondary liver cancer metastasis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The liver is a common site of cancer metastasis, most commonly from colorectal cancer, and primary liver cancers that have metastasized are associated with poor outcomes. The underlying mechanisms by which the liver defends against these processes are largely unknown. Prohibitin 1 (PHB1) and methionine adenosyltransferase 1A (MAT1A) are highly expressed in the liver. They positively regulate each other and their deletion results in primary liver cancer. Here we investigated their roles in primary and secondary liver cancer metastasis. METHODS: We identified common target genes of PHB1 and MAT1A using a metastasis array, and measured promoter activity and transcription factor binding using luciferase reporter assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation, respectively. We examined how PHB1 or MAT1A loss promotes liver cancer metastasis and whether their loss sensitizes to colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). RESULTS: Matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) is a common target of MAT1A and PHB1 and its induction is responsible for increased migration and invasion when MAT1A or PHB1 is silenced. Mechanistically, PHB1 and MAT1A negatively regulate MMP7 promoter activity via an AP-1 site by repressing the MAFG-FOSB complex. Loss of MAT1A or PHB1 also increased MMP-7 in extracellular vesicles, which were internalized by colon and pancreatic cancer cells to enhance their oncogenicity. Low hepatic MAT1A or PHB1 expression sensitized to CRLM, but not if endogenous hepatic MMP-7 was knocked down first, which lowered CD4+ T cells while increasing CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Hepatocytes co-cultured with colorectal cancer cells express less MAT1A/PHB1 but more MMP-7. Consistently, CRLM raised distant hepatocytes' MMP-7 expression in mice and humans. CONCLUSION: We have identified a PHB1/MAT1A-MAFG/FOSB-MMP-7 axis that controls primary liver cancer metastasis and sensitization to CRLM. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Primary and secondary liver cancer metastasis is associated with poor outcomes but whether the liver has underlying defense mechanism(s) against metastasis is unknown. Here we examined the hypothesis that hepatic prohibitin 1 (PHB1) and methionine adenosyltransferase 1A (MAT1A) cooperate to defend the liver against metastasis. Our studies found PHB1 and MAT1A form a complex that suppresses matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) at the transcriptional level and loss of either PHB1 or MAT1A sensitizes the liver to metastasis via MMP-7 induction. Strategies that target the PHB1/MAT1A-MMP-7 axis may be a promising approach for the treatment of primary and secondary liver cancer metastasis.

Role of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases.

Peritoneal metastases from colon cancer are a particularly challenging disease process given the limited response to systemic chemotherapy. In patients with isolated peritoneal metastases, cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy offers a potential treatment option to these patients with limited peritoneal metastases as long as a complete cytoreduction is achieved. Decision about a patient's candidacy for this treatment modality should be undertaken by a multidisciplinary group at expert centers.

Socioeconomic disparities in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Demographic and socioeconomic disparities affect cancer specific outcomes in numerous malignancies, but the impact of these for patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) is not well understood. The primary objective was to investigate the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors on overall survival (OS) for patients with SBNETs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Database to assess patients diagnosed with SBNET between 2004 and 2015. Patients were stratified by demographics, socioeconomic factors, insurance status, and place of living. RESULTS: The 5-year OS for the entire cohort was 78.5%. The 5-year survival was worse in patients with lower income (p < 0.0001), lower education (p < 0.0001), not in proximity to a metro area (p = 0.0004), and treatment at a community cancer center (p < 0.0001). Adjusting for age and sex, factors associated with worse OS were lower income (<$38 000) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.28), lower education (>20% no HSD) (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02-1.26), no insurance (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.33-2.06), and not living in proximity to a metro area (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: Patient demographics and socioeconomic factors play an important role in survival of patients with SBNETs, specifically proximity to a metro area, median income, education level, and type of treatment center. Strategies to improve access to care must be considered in this at-risk population.

The Landmark Series: Appendiceal Primary Peritoneal Surface Malignancy.

Appendiceal primary peritoneal surface malignancies are rare and include a broad spectrum of pathologies ranging from indolent disease to aggressive disease. As such, the data that drive the management of appendiceal peritoneal surface malignancies is generally not based on prospective clinical trial data, but rather consists of level 1 data based on retrospective studies and high-volume institutional experiences. Complete surgical debulking typically offers the best chance for long-term survival. This review highlights the landmark articles on which management of primary appendiceal peritoneal surface malignancies are based.

Morbidity and Outcomes After Distal Pancreatectomy for Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: An Analysis by the Trans-Atlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group.

BACKGROUND: Multi-visceral resection often is used in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). The morbidity after distal pancreatectomy for primary pancreatic cancer is well-documented, but the outcomes after distal pancreatectomy for primary RPS are not. This study aimed to evaluate morbidity and oncologic outcomes after distal pancreatectomy for primary RPS. METHODS: In this study, 26 sarcoma centers that are members of the Trans-Atlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG) retrospectively identified consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for primary RPS from 2008 to 2017. The outcomes measured were 90-day severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate, and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2017, 280 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy for primary RPS. The median tumor size was 25 cm, and the median number of organs resected, including the pancreas, was three. In 96% of the operations, R0/R1 resection was achieved. The 90-day severe complication rate was 40 %. The grades B and C POPF complication rates were respectively 19% and 5% and not associated with worse overall survival. Administration of preoperative radiation and factors to mitigate POPF did not have an impact on the risk for the development of a POPF. The RPS invaded the pancreas in 38% of the patients, and local recurrence was doubled for the patients who had a microscopic, positive pancreas margin (hazard ratio, 2.0; p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Distal pancreatectomy for primary RPS has acceptable morbidity and oncologic outcomes and is a reasonable approach to facilitate complete tumor resection.

The Landmark Series: Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors are becoming increasingly prevalent, with many patients presenting with or developing metastatic disease to the liver. METHODS: In this landmark series paper, we highlight the critical studies that have defined the surgical management of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases, as well as several randomized control trials which have investigated strategies for systemic control of metastatic disease. RESULTS: Liver-directed surgical approaches and locally ablative procedures are recommended for patients with limited, resectable, and in some cases, nonresectable tumor burden. Angiographic liver-directed techniques, such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization, offer another approach for management in patients with liver-predominant disease. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a promising therapy for patients with hepatic and/or extrahepatic metastases. Various systemic medical therapies are also available as adjunct or definitive therapy for patients with metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: This article reviews current data regarding management of neuroendocrine liver metastases and highlights areas for future study.

Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors with Liver-only Metastases: Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection.

BACKGROUND: Management of metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNET) remains controversial. The benefits of resecting the primary tumor are not clear and advocated only for select patients. This study aimed to determine whether resection of the primary MNET in patients with untreated liver-only metastases has an impact on survival. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed data of the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 for patients with liver-only metastatic MNETs and compared those who received resection of their primary MNET with those who did not. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) after adjustment for patient, demographic, and tumor-related factors. RESULTS: The study identified 1952 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 18-90 years). The median primary tumor size was 2.4 cm (range, 0.1-20 cm). Of these patients, 1295 (66%) underwent resection of the primary tumor and 667 (34%) did not. The patients who underwent resection were younger (median age, 63 vs 65 years; p < 0.001) and had smaller primary tumors (median, 2.3 vs 3.0 cm; p < 0.001). The patients with clinical T1 or T2 tumors were significantly less likely to undergo resection than those with stage T3 or T4 tumors (58.5% vs 89.7%; p < 0.001). The median follow-up period was 43 months (range, 1-83 months). In the entire cohort, 483 deaths occurred, with a 5-year OS of 61%. The 5-year OS rate was 49% for the patients who underwent resection and 66% for those who did not (p < 0.001). When the patients were grouped according to T stage, no OS difference between resection and no resection for stages T1 (p = 0.07) and T2 (p = 0.40) was identified. However, the 5-year OS rate was significantly better for the resected patient cohort with T3 (67.5% vs 37.2%; p < 0.001) or T4 (59.8% vs 21.5%; p < 0.001) tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with treatment-naïve liver-only metastatic MNET had improved OS when the primary tumor was resected, particularly those with clinical stage T3 or T4 tumors. These patients may benefit from surgical resection of their primary tumor.

Surgical Principles in the Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors.

OPINION STATEMENT: Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB NETs) are increasing in frequency and becoming more common in surgical practice. It is often difficult to make the diagnosis of a SB NET at an early stage, as the primary tumor tends to be small and patients are asymptomatic until there is regional or distant metastasis, when they develop abdominal pain, partial obstruction, or bleeding and/or develop carcinoid syndrome. Despite this advanced presentation at the time of diagnosis, patients with metastatic SB NETs, as compared to other gastrointestinal malignancies, have favorable survival, which can be improved by appropriate surgical interventions. With the lack of randomized studies, there is reasonable controversy surrounding the optimal management of patients with SB NETs. As such, treatment of these patients is driven primarily by physician experience and available data based predominantly on retrospective studies. Based on this, current recommendations advocate for patients with SB NETs (localized or metastatic) to be managed at experienced centers by a multidisciplinary team. Eligible patients should undergo surgical resection of primary and regional disease as outlined in this article. Additionally, patients with metastatic disease should be evaluated on a case by case basis to evaluate surgical options that may mitigate bowel symptoms (i.e., pain, intestinal angina, obstruction) and carcinoid symptoms (flushing, diarrhea, hemodynamic instability) and prolong survival. Unlike other gastrointestinal malignancies, aggressive surgical management of these patients, even in the context of unresectable metastatic disease, can improve patients' symptoms and long-term survival. The principles outlined in this article are geared to guide appropriate management of SB NET patients with improvement in quality of life and overall survival outcomes.

The role of pre-operative imaging and double balloon enteroscopy in the surgical management of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: Is it necessary?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pre-operative localization of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNET) is important for operative planning. The aim was to determine the effectiveness of pre-operative imaging and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in identifying extent of disease. METHODS: Database review identified 85 patients with primary SBNET between 2006 and 2013. Analysis included patients who underwent imaging, endoscopy, and surgery at our institution. RESULTS: Average age was 60.7 years. Sixty-six (77.1%) patients had a primary NET in the ileum. Seventy-two patients (67.3%) underwent CT, 47 (46.7%) had MRI, 44 (46.7%) had somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI), and 41 (39.3%) underwent DBE. The sensitivity of each in identifying the NET was 59.7% for CT, 54% for MRI, 56% for SRI, and 88.1% for DBE. Eighteen (21.2%) patients had primary tumors not identified on imaging. Of these 18, 13 underwent DBE, and 12 of 13 (92.3%) DBEs identified the primary lesion. DBE was significantly better at identifying the primary NET than CT, MRI or SRI (P = 0.004, 0.007, and 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Most SBNETs are identified with a combination of imaging modalities. In those with unidentified primary tumors after imaging, DBE should be considered as it may provide valuable information as to the location of the primary tumor.

Recurrence patterns and associated factors of locoregional failure following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer, locoregional recurrence (LRR) is common and factors associated with LRR have not been clearly identified. METHODS: Patients were identified from a single institution, prospectively maintained database (1996-2013). Patterns of recurrence were described and associated factors of LRR were analyzed using competing risks regression models. RESULTS: Of the 456 patients treated with nCRT and surgery, 167 patients developed recurrence. Locoregional and distant recurrences were observed in 69 (15.1%) and 140 (30.9%) patients, respectively. Time to recurrence (13.6 vs 10.4 months, P = 0.20) and median overall survival (29.3 vs 19.1 months, P = 0.12) were no different among the 27 patients (6%) who developed a solitary LRR compared to patients who developed distant recurrence. Univariable analysis identified lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.46, P = 0.07), lymph node ratio >0.5 (HR 2.16, P = 0.02), positive margin (HR 1.95, P = 0.05), lack of response to neoadjuvant therapy (HR 1.99, P < 0.01), clinical T stage (HR 2.62, P < 0.01) and final T3/4 stage (HR 2.06, P < 0.01) as factors significantly associated with LRR. Clinical T stage and response to neoadjuvant treatment were independently associated with LRR on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although aggressive tumor biology plays a significant role in LRR, optimizing neoadjuvant treatments to obtain a complete pathologic response may lead to improved locoregional control.

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan in uveal melanoma: A safe and effective treatment modality in an orphan disease.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) carries a poor prognosis; liver is the most frequent and often solitary site of recurrence. Available systemic treatments have not improved outcomes. Melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion (M-PHP) allows selective intrahepatic delivery of high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of outcomes data of UM patients receiving M-PHP at two institutions was performed. Tumor response and toxicity were evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients received 134 M-PHP procedures (median of 2 M-PHPs). 25 (49%) achieved a partial (N = 22, 43.1%) or complete hepatic response (N = 3, 5.9%). In 17 (33.3%) additional patients, the disease stabilized for at least 3 months, for a hepatic disease control rate of 82.4%. After median follow-up of 367 days, median overall progression free (PFS) and hepatic progression free survival (hPFS) was 8.1 and 9.1 months, respectively and median overall survival was 15.3 months. There were no treatment related fatalities. Non-hematologic grade 3-4 events were seen in 19 (37.5%) patients and were mainly coagulopathic (N = 8) and cardiovascular (N = 9). CONCLUSIONS: M-PHP results in durable intrahepatic disease control and can form the basis for an integrated multimodality treatment approach in appropriately selected UM patients.

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Transarterial Yttrium-90 Glass Microsphere Radioembolization: Results of a Single Institution Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial yttrium-90 glass microsphere radioembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 85 consecutive patients (41 men and 44 women; age, 73.4 ± 9.3 years) was performed. Survival data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression models, and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 21.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.6-28.4); median OS from radioembolization was 12.0 months (95% CI: 8.0-15.2). Seven episodes of severe toxicity occurred. At 3 months, 6.2% of patients had partial response, 64.2% had stable disease, and 29.6% had progressive disease. Median OS from radioembolization was significantly longer in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0 and 1 than patients with an ECOG score of 2 (18.5 vs 5.5 months, P = .0012), and median OS from radioembolization was significantly longer in patients with well-differentiated histology than patients with poorly differentiated histology (18.6 vs 9.7 months, P = .012). Patients with solitary tumors had significantly longer median OS from radioembolization than patients with multifocal disease (25 vs. 6.1 months, P = .006). The absence of extrahepatic metastasis was associated with significantly increased median OS (15.2 vs. 6.8 months, P = .003). Increased time from diagnosis to radioembolization was a negative predictor of OS. The morphology of the tumor (mass-forming or infiltrative, hyper- or hypo-enhancing) had no effect on survival. Post-treatment increased cancer antigen 19-9 level, increased international normalized ratio, decreased albumin, increased bilirubin, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score were significant predictors of decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the therapeutic role of radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable ICC with good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile.

Bilateral Mastectomy as Overtreatment for Breast Cancer in Women Age Forty Years and Younger with Unilateral Operable Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Young women with breast cancer (BC) have an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) compared with older women. This may contribute to the rising rates of bilateral mastectomy (BM), but it is unclear if BM leads to improved outcomes. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics, survival, and rate of CBC were compared in women age ≤40 years treated for unilateral Stage 1-3 BC from January 2000 through December 2013. RESULTS: Patients ranged in age from 20 to 40 (mean 36) years. Of the 446 women, 188 had breast conservation surgery (BCS), 78 had unilateral mastectomy (UM), and 183 had BM. UM, BCS, and BM groups did not differ in mean age, tumor type, hormone receptor status, or Her2 status. Patients in the BCS and BM group had smaller, fewer node-positive (p = 0.02) and lower grade tumors (p < 0.01) compared with the UM group. With a median follow-up of 79 months, Disease-free survival was similar for patients treated with BM, BCS (p = 0.22), or UM (p = 0.75). OS was significantly worse in the patients treated with UM (0.02) but was not different between the BCS and BM groups. CBC incidence was 2% (5/263) in patients who underwent BCS or UM, and 0.4% (1/244) in patients without a germline genetic mutation. CONCLUSIONS: BCS and UM resulted in similar disease-free survival (DFS) as BM in patients age 40 years and younger with BC. BCS and BM had similar OS, whereas UM patients had worse OS. Invasive CBC incidence was less than 0.5% at 10 years in patients without identified germline genetic mutations.

Genomic Assays in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Implications for Management Decisions.

OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The management of breast cancer depends on clinical and pathologic prognostic factors that help guide patient treatment. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive form of breast cancer with an unpredictable risk of either progression to invasive disease or recurrence. To evaluate the utilization of the DCIS score in a large single-institution population and understand reasons for avoidance in eligible patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of eligible patients with pure DCIS treated by lumpectomy (January 2011-May 2015) was performed. Patients were considered eligible for the assay if they met the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E5194 pathology criteria. All of the patients underwent breast-conserving surgery and were estrogen receptor positive. RESULTS: Of 182 estrogen receptor-positive patients with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery, 31 (17%) had a DCIS assay performed; however, most of the patients did not have a DCIS score assay performed, yet 47.9% of this cohort would have met the pathologic eligibility criteria. Conversely, 82.5% of the patients having the DCIS score evaluated actually met these criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size, grade, ER status, and calcifications were drivers of patient selection for 12-gene assay use. E5194 eligibility criteria selected for low risk population. Although a large proportion of patients met eligibility criteria, DCIS Score was infrequently considered for recurrence risk estimation. When performed, assay scores supported omission of radiation for over 75% of cases.

Applicability of the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria in women with high-risk node-positive breast cancer undergoing breast conserving surgery.

BACKGROUND: The relevance of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial in patients with high-risk breast cancer has been questioned. We hypothesize that Z0011 applies to women with HER2-positive disease (HER2+), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and/or age <50 years at diagnosis (YA). METHODS: Women with node-positive HER2+, TNBC, or YA were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were grouped based on Z0011 trial eligibility criteria into those meeting criteria (eligible) and those who did not (ineligible). Patient and tumor characteristics were compared; survival of those meeting Z0011 criteria was determined. RESULTS: We identified 186 node-positive women undergoing lumpectomy/radiation for high-risk breast cancer: 57 of 186 (31 %) HER2+, 55 of 186 (30 %) TNBC, 74 of 186 (40 %) YA. Overall, 125 of 186 (67 %) met Z0011 criteria. HER2-positivity was associated with the lowest rate of ineligibility compared with TNBC and YA (16 vs. 53 and 31 %, respectively, p < 0.01). Larger tumor size, high grade, extranodal extension, and high Ki67 were associated with Z0011 ineligibility. Among those who were eligible, 105 of 125 (84 %) had ALND and 48 of 125 (38 %) had involvement of nonsentinel nodes (NSLN); median number of NSLNs involved was one (range 1-3). With median follow-up of 5.5 years, there was no difference in survival between those who had ALND and those who did not. After patients with clinically palpable nodes were excluded, 125 of 149 (84 %) met criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The Z0011 trial eligibility requirements apply to a significant proportion of patients with HER2+, TNBC, and YA. ALND can be avoided in 67 % node-positive cases and in 84 % of those with clinically negative nodes.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgical Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer: A Review of Current Data.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become the standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, large tumors, certain biologic subtypes of breast cancer, or locally inoperable disease, and for patients who desire breast conservation. It has the advantage of downstaging the tumor, thereby allowing for conversion from mastectomy to breast conservation, and perhaps decreasing the need for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In the past, axillary management involved complete ALND for all patients presenting with breast cancer and involved nodes. With neoadjuvant chemotherapy, some patients exhibit a complete clinical axillary response, which may make them candidates for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) rather than ALND, with its associated morbidities. While there is widespread use of SLNB in the treatment of breast cancer, its use following neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains widely debated.