Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Radiol ; 33(7): 4895-4904, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36840765

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performances of lung ultrasonography (LUS) versus chest CT for assessing peripheric pulmonary lesions in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS). METHODS: Paired LUS and chest CT scan were prospectively performed and compared when in diagnosing five pathologies including region with alveolar-interstitial pattern (RAIP), alveolar-interstitial syndrome (AIS), lung consolidation, pleural effusion (PE), and pericardial effusion, in each patient with HFRS. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (aged 39.9 ± 15.0 years, 35 males) were included, from which 68 paired LUS and chest CT imaging data of 816 lung regions were obtained and analyzed. Compared with chest CT, LUS showed high sensitivity (92.19-100%) and negative predictive value (95.9-100%), but relatively low specificity (39.47-97.21%) and positive predictive value (37.5-76.47%) for diagnosing the above pathologies. McNemer's test showed LUS detected more positive findings than chest CT (all p ≤ 0.002). There was a strong correlation between LUS and chest CT scores (rs = 0.7141, p < 0.0001) and both scores correlated with the disease severity, hospital days, and partial laboratory profiles in HFRS patients. CONCLUSIONS: LUS was comparable with chest CT for diagnosing peripheric pulmonary lesions and clinical assessment in patients with HFRS. Given the high sensitivity and negative predictive value compared with chest CT, LUS can be used as an excellent rule-out tool in HFRS, while its use in rule-in still requires more evidence. Considering the obvious advantages of LUS being a bedside, less expansive, and non-radiating exam, future multi-center randomized LUS versus chest CT studies may help to guide the preferred method. KEY POINTS: • LUS could detect more positive findings than chest CT in assessing peripheric pulmonary lesions in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS). • Compared with chest CT, LUS showed high sensitivity but relatively low specificity when diagnosing the peripheric pulmonary lesions caused by HFRS. • Both LUS and chest CT scores correlated with the disease severity, hospital days, and partial laboratory profiles in HFRS.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre Hemorrágica con Síndrome Renal , Masculino , Humanos , Fiebre Hemorrágica con Síndrome Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA