Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Res ; 287: 1-7, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36827839

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis (PNAC) is a common morbidity in neonates requiring total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Previous studies in infants with intestinal failure have shown a benefit of mixed lipid emulsion (MLE) in reducing PNAC. It is not known whether this benefit extends to a general neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) population, where MLE is used on a selective basis. The objective of this study is to examine associations between MLE use and PNAC rate in the general NICU setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of NICU patients who received TPN for 7 or more days. We compared patients born between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2015 (pre-MLE) to patients born between 7/1/2017 and 12/31/2018 (post-MLE). Fisher's exact test and two-sample t-test were used to compare the two groups. RESULTS: There were 353 patients in 2014-2015 and 271 patients in 2017-2018. Demographics were similar between the two groups, but there were more patients with congenital heart disease in the MLE era (P < 0.001). Mortality was similar (6.2% pre-MLE versus 6.3% post-MLE). There was no significant difference in PNAC rate between the pre-MLE (11.5%) and post-MLE (14.1%) patient cohorts (P = 0.342). Among patients receiving MLE (n = 38), 58% developed PNAC, while only 6.4% of the post-MLE cohort not receiving MLE developed PNAC. Of the patients coded with a surgical diagnosis, there was no significant difference in PNAC rates between pre-MLE and post-MLE groups. Discharge rates of PNAC did differ between pre-MLE surgical patients (13.0%) and post-MLE surgical patients (8.2%). In the subgroup of post-MLE surgical patients, PNAC rate differed significantly between those receiving MLE (43.5%) and not receiving MLE (15.4%). However, this difference was resolved by discharge (8.7% versus 7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in PNAC rates between the pre-MLE and post-MLE cohorts. However, in surgical patients, MLE was associated with reduced PNAC at discharge, with levels equivalent to those seen in neonates receiving TPN for 7 or more days, despite having a higher starting rate of PNAC. Further studies are needed to determine whether the general NICU population may benefit from MLE or certain selective subpopulations like surgical patients.


Asunto(s)
Colestasis , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Emulsiones , Alta del Paciente , Nutrición Parenteral/efectos adversos , Colestasis/etiología , Colestasis/prevención & control , Colestasis/diagnóstico , Lípidos
2.
Clin Teach ; : e13715, 2023 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38035667

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Active-learning approaches, such as team-based learning, are infrequently used in internal medicine clerkship didactics even though there is increasing evidence to suggest medical students prefer it over traditional lecture-based learning. In this study, five team-based learning sessions were incorporated into three blocks of a 12-week internal medicine clerkship. METHODS: The goal of this quasi-experimental study was to compare learner engagement, satisfaction and preference between team-based learning and lecture-based learning in the internal medicine clerkship didactics. Outcomes were compared using the Classroom Engagement Survey, a satisfaction questionnaire and the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI). FINDINGS: There was a statistically significant difference in the classroom engagement scores between team- and lecture-based learning (P < 0.0001) with a median of 39.0 and 33.0 in the team-based learning and lecture-based learning groups. For learning preference, the median TBL-SAI score was substantially above neutral. Across all team-based learning sessions, 100% of students were satisfied or strongly satisfied with the learning style as a valuable experience and as a way to learn course material, and only one student was not satisfied or strongly satisfied with team-based learning to improve problem solving skills. DISCUSSION: The classroom engagement and learning style preference findings were consistent with previously published data in other clerkship settings. Student satisfaction was more consistent with team-based learning than with the lecture-based learning, which may be because of the consistent format whereas lecture-based learning style was faculty dependent. CONCLUSION: Students preferred team-based learning and had improved engagement and satisfaction when compared to lecture-based learning. This study provides evidence in favour of team-based learning as a strategy to incorporate active learning in clerkship didactics.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA