Universal screening of colorectal tumors for lynch syndrome: a survey of patient experiences and opinions.

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome represents the most common hereditary cause of both colorectal and endometrial cancer. It is caused by defects in mismatch repair genes, as well as EPCAM. Universal screening of colon tumors for Lynch syndrome via microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) can identify patients and families at risk to develop further cancers and potentially impact surveillance and treatment options. The approach to implementation of universal screening, taking ethical considerations into account, is critical to its effectiveness, with patient perspectives providing valuable insight. METHODS: Patients whose colon tumors underwent universal screening at Penn State Hershey Medical Center over a period of 2.5 years were mailed a survey on universal screening in 2017. Along with the survey, they received a recruitment letter and a summary explanation of research. The survey included both multiple choice and free-response questions that covered topics including respondent knowledge of Lynch syndrome, attitudes toward universal screening and experiences with the screening protocol as implemented. RESULTS: Sixty-six of 297 possible patients (22.2%) responded to the survey, including 13 whose screening results raised concern for Lynch syndrome. 75.8% of respondents supported universal tumor screening without informed consent. 92.4% preferred receiving screening results regardless of outcome. Respondents described benefits to screening for themselves and their families. CONCLUSIONS: While broadly supporting universal tumor screening without informed consent, respondents also wanted more information shared about the screening policy, as well as their results. These patient preferences should be one of many factors considered when implementing universal screening and can also inform practices regarding both tumor profiling and universal genetic testing, which is becoming more prevalent.

Moral distress in genetic counseling: A study of North American genetic counselors.

Moral distress is the phenomenon whereby healthcare providers experience the inability to take action or act in morally appropriate ways when encountering a morally compromising situation. The correlation of moral distress to burnout and resignation in nursing and other healthcare fields has led to increasing attention and concern among healthcare professionals to identify the sources of moral distress, as well as find ways to alleviate it. An online mix-method survey was sent to NSGC members to gain information on (1) sources of moral distress, (2) emotions involved, (3) coping strategies, and (4) suggestions to alleviate it. The ProQOL 5 scale was included to measure genetic counselor compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. Two hundred and thirteen genetic counselors from North America completed the survey. Forty-eight percent of respondents experienced moral distress and five sources were identified. The sources were situations involving other providers, family members, professional responsibility, personal beliefs, and access. Those more likely to experience moral distress worked in a prenatal setting, were over the age of 50, and worked for more than 21 years. Genetic counselors were more likely to talk to a co-worker for support, and seek social support, address the source of the problem, and sustain self through working with patients as coping strategies. Most genetic counselors recommended talking to another genetic counselor to alleviate moral distress. Moral distress did not correlate with genetic counselor burnout, but did correlate with higher levels of secondary traumatic stress (p < 0.01). Thirty-two percent of genetic counselors considered leaving their specialty, and 23% considered leaving their profession based on their experience(s) with moral distress. Our study establishes the existence of moral distress in the genetic counseling field and supports the need for coping strategies and recommendations in order to alleviate future genetic counselor moral distress.

Utility of genetic evaluation in infants with congenital heart defects admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit.

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are heterogeneous and present with a spectrum of severity, with roughly 25% of patients requiring intervention before age 1. The etiology of disease is unknown in many individuals; however, there is a rapidly expanding understanding of genetic risk factors that may contribute to pathogenesis. Through this work, we sought to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a clinical genetics evaluation and associated genetic testing among infants with critical CHDs. Furthermore, we aimed to both determine the utility of microarray and establish a strong baseline that can be used in future studies of the impact of exome sequencing in this population. We completed a retrospective chart review of 364 infants with CHDs admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit who underwent a clinical genetics evaluation. A genetic diagnosis was established in 25% of patients: 9% of infants were diagnosed prenatally, while 16% were diagnosed postnatally. Cardiac lesion subtype greatly influenced the diagnostic yield. On physical exam, the presence of dysmorphic features, as assessed by a clinical geneticist, was associated with a sevenfold increased likelihood of reaching a diagnosis. Directed by clinical acumen, diagnostic rates varied by testing modality with rates of 23% for karyotype, 12% for fluorescent in situ hybridization or multiplex-dependent ligation probe analysis, 9% for genome wide microarray, and 17% for targeted gene sequencing. Careful consideration of lesion subtype and physical exam findings clarify populations of infants with CHD that benefit from a genetics evaluation and inform an efficient testing paradigm. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Risk of congenital heart disease in relatives of probands with conotruncal cardiac defects: an evaluation of 1,620 families.

Current recurrence risk counseling for conotruncal cardiac defects (CTD) is based on empiric estimates from multiple studies. We examined the risk of congenital heart disease (CHD) in relatives of probands with CTDs to assist in counseling practices in the current era. One thousand six-twenty probands with CTDs and no reported chromosomal or genetic abnormalities were recruited sequentially. A three-generation pedigree was obtained for each proband by a genetic counselor detailing the presence and type of CHD in each family member. Risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for sub-groups of relatives based on degree of relationship for all probands and by individual lesion of the proband. For pairs of affected relatives, concordance rates were calculated. Severity of CHD in the affected relative was assessed. The risk of CHD was higher in siblings (4.4%, 95% CI 3.4-5.4) than in parents (1.5%, 95% CI 1.1-1.9). Risk varied by the cardiac lesion of the proband with the highest risk in first-degree relatives of probands with tetralogy of Fallot and the lowest in D-transposition of the great arteries. 39% of affected parents and 69% of affected siblings had a concordant lesion (i.e., CTD). Most affected siblings of probands with severe CTDs had complex defects (58%), whereas very few affected parents had complex defects (20%). These data suggest that recurrence risk varies by lesion and relationship, with substantial concordance observed by cardiac lesion and complexity of disease, particularly among siblings. These findings contribute to risk counseling in the current era.

22q11.2 deletions in patients with conotruncal defects: data from 1,610 consecutive cases.

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is characterized by multiple congenital anomalies including conotruncal cardiac defects. Identifying the patient with a 22q11.2 deletion (22q11del) can be challenging because many extracardiac features become apparent later in life. We sought to better define the cardiac phenotype associated with a 22q11del to help direct genetic testing. 1,610 patients with conotruncal defects were sequentially tested for a 22q11del. The counts and frequencies of primary lesions and cardiac features were tabulated for those with and those without a 22q11del. Logistic regression models investigated cardiac features that predicted deletion status in tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). Deletion frequency varied by primary anatomic phenotype. Regardless of the cardiac diagnosis, a concurrent aortic arch anomaly (AAA) was strongly associated with deletion status [odds ratio (OR), 5.07; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 3.66-7.04]. In the TOF subset, the strongest predictor of deletion status was an AAA (OR, 3.14; 95 % CI 1.87-5.27; p < 0.001), followed by pulmonary valve atresia (OR, 2.03; 95 % CI 1.02-4.02; p = 0.04). Among those with double-outlet right ventricle and transposition of the great arteries, only those with an AAA had a 22q11del. However, 5 % of the patients with an isolated conoventricular ventricular septal defect and normal aortic arch anatomy had a 22q11del, whereas no one with an interrupted aortic arch type A had a 22q11del. A subset of patients with conotruncal defects are at risk for a 22q11del. A concurrent AAA increases the risk regardless of the intracardiac anatomy. These findings help to direct genetic screening for the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in the cardiac patient.

Jagged1 (JAG1) mutations in patients with tetralogy of Fallot or pulmonic stenosis.

Mutations in the Notch pathway ligand Jagged1 (JAG1) cause Alagille syndrome (AGS), as well as cardiac defects in seemingly nonsyndromic individuals. To estimate the frequency of JAG1 mutations in cases with right-sided cardiac defects not otherwise diagnosed with AGS, we screened 94 cases with tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and 50 with pulmonic stenosis/peripheral pulmonary stenosis (PS/PPS) or pulmonary valve atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA) for mutations. Sequence changes were identified in three TOF and three PS/PPS/PA patients, that were not present in 100 controls. We identified one frameshift and two missense mutations in the TOF cases, and one frameshift and two missense mutations in cases with PS/PPS/PA. The four missense mutations were assayed for their effect on protein localization, posttranslational modification, and ability to activate Notch signaling. The missense mutants displayed heterogeneous behavior in these assays, some with complete haploinsufficiency, suggesting that there are additional modifiers leading to organ specific features. We identified functionally significant mutations in 2% (2/94) of TOF patients and 4% (2/50) of PS/PPS/PA patients. Patients with right-sided cardiac defects should be carefully screened for features of AGS or a family history of cardiac defects that might suggest the presence of a JAG1 mutation.

Variants of folate metabolism genes and risk of left-sided cardiac defects.

BACKGROUND: Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most common, serious group of birth defects. Although relatively little is known about the causes of these conditions and there are no established prevention strategies, evidence suggests that the risk of CHDs may be related to maternal folate status as well as genetic variants in folate-related genes. Efforts to establish the relationships between these factors and CHD risk have, however, been hampered by a number of factors, including small study sample sizes and phenotypic heterogeneity. METHODS: The present study examined the relationship between nine genetic variants in eight folate-related genes and a relatively homogeneous group of left-sided cardiac defects in a cohort of 386 case-parent triads. Log-linear analyses were used to assess both maternal and inherited genetic effects. RESULTS: Analyses of the study data provided marginal evidence that the maternal MTR A2756G (unadjusted p = 0.01) and the inherited BHMT G742A (unadjusted p = 0.06) genotypes influence the risk of this subset of CHDs. However, neither association achieved significance when the false-discovery rate was controlled at 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: These results, which are based on the largest study sample and most comprehensive assessment of the relationship between left-sided cardiac defects and folate-related genes reported to date, provide little evidence that this subset of CHDs is folate related. However, even larger studies and more comprehensive evaluations of the folate pathway genes are required to fully explore the relationship between folate and left-sided cardiac defects.