Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 38(2): 265-275, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30430377

RESUMEN

A comparative study of the behaviour of left-sided infective endocarditis (left-sided IE) due to Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) with left-sided IE caused by Staphylococcus aureus (SA). A prospective, multicentre cohort study in eight public hospitals in Spain, from January 1984 to December 2015; comparative analysis and factors associated with mortality. In total, there were 1754 episodes of left-sided IE; 41 (2.3%) caused by GBS vs. 344 (19.6%) due to SA, definitive IE 39 vs. 324 cases, males, 25 vs. 213, respectively. There were no differences in age or comorbidity, and healthcare-associated acquirement was 10% vs. 43%, p 0.001. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed in 95% vs. 96.8% and a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) in 61% vs. 56%. Vegetations were detected in 80% and measured > 1 cm in a similar proportion. It affected native valves in 85.4% vs. 82.6% and late prosthetic valve in 14.6% vs. 9.6%. The course was acute in both groups. There were more skin manifestations in SA left-sided IE, 7.3% vs. 32%, p 0.001. Both groups had similar complications, but in SA, there was more renal failure, 24% vs. 45%, p 0.010. Surgical risk and operated patients were similar. Mortality was proportionally higher in the SA group, without significance 29% vs. 43% (150), p 0.09. Heart failure, septic shock and neurological deterioration conditioned mortality: HR 1.96, 1.69 and 1.37 (CI 95% 1.40-2.73; 1.19-2.39 and 0.99-1.88 respectively) and to a lesser degree SA as aetiology agent and age. Left-sided IE caused by GBS is similar in severity to left-sided IE caused by SA.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana/epidemiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/patología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/patología , Streptococcus agalactiae , Anciano , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/etiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , España/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/complicaciones , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/mortalidad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/patología , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/complicaciones , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/mortalidad
2.
BMC Nephrol ; 20(1): 8, 2019 01 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30626347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most people who make the transition to renal replacement therapy (RRT) are treated with a fixed dose thrice-weekly hemodialysis réegimen, without considering their residual kidney function (RKF). Recent papers inform us that incremental hemodialysis is associated with preservation of RKF, whenever compared with conventional hemodialysis. The objective of the present controlled randomized trial (RCT) is to determine if start HD with one sessions per week (1-Wk/HD), it is associated with better patient survival and other safety parameters. METHODS/DESIGN: IHDIP is a multicenter RCT experimental open trial. It is randomized in a 1:1 ratio and controlled through usual clinical practice, with a low intervention level and non-commercial. It includes 152 incident patients older than 18 years, with a RRF of ≥4 ml/min/1.73 m2, measured by renal clearance of urea (KrU). The intervention group includes 76 patients who will start with incremental HD (1-Wk/HD). The control group includes 76 patients who will start with thrice-weekly hemodialysis régimen. The primary outcome is assessing the survival rate, while the secondary outcomes are the morbidity rate, the clinical parameters, the quality of life and the efficiency. DISCUSSION: This study will enable to know the number of sessions a patient should receive when starting HD, depending on his RRF. The potentially important clinical and financial implications of incremental hemodialysis warrant this RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov . Number: NCT03239808 , completed 13/04/2017. SPONSOR: Foundation for Training and Research of Health Professionals of Extremadura.


Asunto(s)
Riñón/fisiopatología , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Creatinina/orina , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Urea/metabolismo
3.
Circulation ; 127(23): 2272-84, 2013 Jun 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23648777

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of neurological complications in patients with infective endocarditis, the risk factors for their development, their influence on the clinical outcome, and the impact of cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on a multicenter cohort of 1345 consecutive episodes of left-sided infective endocarditis from 8 centers in Spain. Cox regression models were developed to analyze variables predictive of neurological complications and associated mortality. Three hundred forty patients (25%) experienced such complications: 192 patients (14%) had ischemic events, 86 (6%) had encephalopathy/meningitis, 60 (4%) had hemorrhages, and 2 (1%) had brain abscesses. Independent risk factors associated with all neurological complications were vegetation size ≥3 cm (hazard ratio [HR] 1.91), Staphylococcus aureus as a cause (HR 2.47), mitral valve involvement (HR 1.29), and anticoagulant therapy (HR 1.31). This last variable was particularly related to a greater incidence of hemorrhagic events (HR 2.71). Overall mortality was 30%, and neurological complications had a negative impact on outcome (45% of deaths versus 24% in patients without these complications; P<0.01), although only moderate to severe ischemic stroke (HR 1.63) and brain hemorrhage (HR 1.73) were significantly associated with a poorer prognosis. Antimicrobial treatment reduced (by 33% to 75%) the risk of neurological complications. In patients with hemorrhage, mortality was higher when surgery was performed within 4 weeks of the hemorrhagic event (75% versus 40% in later surgery). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe ischemic stroke and brain hemorrhage were found to have a significant negative impact on the outcome of infective endocarditis. Early appropriate antimicrobial treatment is critical, and transitory discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Encefálico/etiología , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Hemorragia Cerebral/etiología , Encefalitis/etiología , Endocarditis/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Absceso Encefálico/epidemiología , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Hemorragia Cerebral/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiología , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Encefalitis/epidemiología , Endocarditis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endocarditis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis/epidemiología , Endocarditis/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Aneurisma Intracraneal/epidemiología , Aneurisma Intracraneal/etiología , Masculino , Meningitis/epidemiología , Meningitis/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/complicaciones , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía
4.
J Clin Med ; 13(6)2024 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38542036

RESUMEN

Background: In recent years, in Europe, there has been a growing concern about the use of sexualized drugs among men who have sex with men (MSM), due to its possible link to an increase in sexually transmitted infections. The aim of this review is to study the prevalence of chemsex, and the sexualized drug used in Europe, describing both different consumption patterns and other sexual behaviors considered risky and their possible relationship with positivity in diagnoses of sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus. Methods: We conducted a literature review in the main scientific databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science), filtering for articles published between January 2018 and April 2023 that collect information on sexualized drug use and sexual practices conducted in European countries among men who have sex with men, including whether these behaviors can lead to diagnoses of sexually transmitted infections. Results: The definition of drugs included in chemsex is not clearly defined and shows heterogeneity between study publications; the three drugs presented in all manuscripts are mephedrone, GHB/GBL, and crystal methamphetamine. The prevalence of chemsex in Europe is 16% [11-21%] among MSM. The most frequent risky sexual behavior associated with chemsex practice was unprotected sex with a high number of partners. The log risk ratio of STIs was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.49 to 1.23). Conclusions: Adherence to definitions, stringent research methodologies, and focused interventions are needed to tackle the intricate relationship between substance use, sexual behavior, and the risk of HIV/STI transmission in MSM.

5.
Clin Pract ; 14(1): 280-292, 2024 Feb 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38391408

RESUMEN

(1) Background: Aspergillus spp. is a widely distributed filamentous fungus in the environment due to its high sporulation capacity. Currently, invasive aspergillosis (IA) is the most common invasive fungal infection in patients with hematologic malignancies, with high rates of mortality and morbidity. The multifactorial nature of the disease requires appropriate risk stratification to enable the most appropriate preventive measures to be adapted and implemented according to the characteristics of the patient. In this sense, the present research aims to identify recent risk factors and environmental control measures against invasive aspergillosis to establish preventive actions to reduce the incidence of invasive aspergillosis in hospitals. (2) Methods: We conducted a qualitative systematic review of the scientific literature on environmental risk factors and preventive measures for invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies. The Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were consulted, following the PRISMA and STROBE guidelines. (3) Results: Adequate implementation of environmental control measures is presented as the most efficient intervention in terms of prevention to decrease the incidence of invasive aspergillosis in hospitals. Neutropenia, fungal contamination, insufficient environmental control measures in hospital and home settings, length of hospital stay, and anemia, are identified as independent risk factors. We show that HEPA, LAF, and Plasmair® systems are suitable methods to reduce the concentration of airborne fungal spores. Antifungal prophylaxis did not significantly influence IA reduction in our study. (4) Conclusions: Proper professional training and environmental control measures in hospitals are essential for the prevention of invasive aspergillosis. We should optimize risk stratification for patients with hematologic malignancies. Antifungal prophylaxis should be complementary to environmental control measures and should never be substituted for the latter. Studies should also be undertaken to evaluate the efficiency of environmental control measures against IA at patients' homes.

6.
Children (Basel) ; 11(3)2024 Mar 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38539366

RESUMEN

Effective monitoring throughout pregnancy and the first year of life is a crucial factor in achieving lower rates of maternal and infant mortality. Currently, research on socioeconomic factors that influence the lack of adherence to preventive and control measures during pregnancy and the first year of life is limited. The objective of this review is to examine the available evidence on social determinants that influence participation in health promotion and preventive activities throughout the pregnancy journey and in infants during their first year of life. We performed a systematic review of the literature searching in the major scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, WOS, and Cochrane Library) for articles from February 2017 to May 2023 containing information on health inequities that impact participation in health promotion and preventive measures from pregnancy through the first year of an infant's life. A total of 12 studies were selected; these studies were performed in ten different countries on five different continents. The selected studies cover preventive measures during maternal care, vaccination, and immunization during pregnancy and the first year of life, newborn screening, and follow-up of the first 12 months of life. The social factors associated with low adherence to health promotion activities during pregnancy and the first year of life include education, income, ethnicity, place of residence, and family characteristics. Despite the diverse geographical distribution, it is observed that there are common social factors linked to a decrease in the adherence to preventive measures during pregnancy and in the early years of life.

7.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 68(1): 206-13, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22945914

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We set out to identify the prognostic factors in adult patients with Candida spp. bloodstream infection, assessing the impact on in-hospital mortality of catheter removal and adequacy of antifungal therapy. METHODS: Patients with positive blood culture for Candida spp. and a central venous catheter in place at the time of candidaemia were included. Data collected included demographics, underlying diseases, severity of illness, clinical presentation, catheter withdrawal and adequacy of empirical therapy. RESULTS: We included 188 patients (mortality 36.7%). The mortality rate was 34.9% (23/66) in patients with early adequate antifungal treatment and 18.9% (7/37) in patients with early adequate antifungal therapy and catheter withdrawal in the first 48 h. The APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II score on the day of candidaemia [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.12; 95% CI 1.06-1.17; P < 0.001] was associated with death whereas early adequate therapy (aHR 0.4; 95% CI 0.23-0.83; P = 0.012) and catheter withdrawal (aHR 0.34; 95% CI 0.16-0.70; P = 0.03) were protective factors. In primary candidaemia, mortality was 28% (14/50) in patients with adequate therapy and decreased to 17.7% (6/34) in patients with both interventions in the first 48 h. Catheter removal was a protective factor and adequacy of antifungal therapy in the first 48 h showed a strong tendency to protection against death (aHR 0.46; 95% CI 0.19-1.08; P = 0.07). In secondary non-catheter-related candidaemia, only early adequate therapy was a protective factor for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Delay in catheter withdrawal and in administration of adequate antifungal therapy was associated with increased mortality in candidaemic patients. Catheter management did not influence the prognosis of secondary non-catheter-related candidaemia.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candidemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidemia/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/mortalidad , Remoción de Dispositivos/mortalidad , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Candida/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
8.
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res ; 8(4): 580-588, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37057959

RESUMEN

Background: Spasticity continues to be a very prevalent, highly invalidating, and difficult-to-manage symptom in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of cannabis and cannabinoids in these patients, evaluating its use as an additional therapy. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature searching in the major scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, WOS, and Cochrane Library) for articles from January 2017 to May 2022 containing information about the effectiveness of cannabis and cannabinoids in patients with insufficient response to first-line oral antispastic treatment. Results: A total of five medium high-quality articles were selected to be part of the study and all evaluated the effectiveness of the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) spray. The effectiveness of this drug and the significant improvements are produced on the patient-related spasticity assessment scales, obtaining improvement up to 45%; and on quality of life, producing a decrease in the appearance of symptoms related to spasticity, as well as an increase in the development of basic activities of daily living. The average dose is 5-7 sprays/day. The discontinuation rate for these treatments is around 40% due to lack of effectiveness and adverse events. All reported adverse effects are mild to moderate in severity and their incidence is ∼17%, although this figure tends to decrease with drug use. Conclusions: Adding the THC:CBD sprays have been shown to be more effective in treating MS spasticity than optimizing the dose of first-line antispastic drugs in selected responders patients. The safety and tolerability profiles remain in line with those obtained in other trials. More patients would benefit from treatment if the initial response search period was extended.


Asunto(s)
Cannabidiol , Cannabinoides , Cannabis , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Cannabinoides/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Dronabinol/efectos adversos , Actividades Cotidianas , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Cannabidiol/efectos adversos
9.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(13)2023 Jun 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37444713

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are barriers to deprescription that hinder its implementation in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to analyse the main barriers and limitations of the deprescription process perceived by physicians who care for multipathological patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The "deprescription questionnaire of elderly patients" was adapted to an online format and sent to physicians in geriatrics. Question 1 is a reference to establish agreement or disagreement with this practice. The influence of different aspects of deprescription was analysed via the demographic characteristics of the clinicians and perceptions of the various barriers (questions 2-9) by means of bivariate analysis. Based on the latter, a multivariate model was carried out to demonstrate the relationship between barriers and the degree of deprescription agreement among respondents. RESULTS: Of the 72 respondents, 72.2% were in favour of deprescribing. Regarding the analyses, the demographic characteristics did not influence rankings. The deprescription of preventive drugs and consensus with patients were associated with a positive attitude towards deprescribing, while withdrawing drugs prescribed by other professionals, time constraints and patient reluctance emerged as possible barriers. The only factor independently associated with deprescribing was lack of time. CONCLUSIONS: Time was found to be the main barrier to deprescription. Training, the creation of multidisciplinary teams and integrated health systems are key facilitators.

10.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 24(4): 511-516.e3, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36608936

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: LESS-CHRON (List of Evidence-Based Deprescribing for Chronic Patients) and STOPPFrail (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy) are criterion-based deprescribing tools. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) with these tools in an outpatient, polymedicated, older population with multimorbidity. DESIGN: Single-center cross-sectional observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: PIMs and criteria subject to deprescribing identified by each tool were collected in patients who were being followed up on outpatient internal medicine consultation. METHODS: PIMs were identified by STOPPFrail and LESS-CHRON criteria reviewing medical histories and pharmacologic treatments of the patients in the electronic health card system. Sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacologic variables were recorded. A correlation analysis between treatment tools and clinical values was performed using the nonparametric Spearman rho correlation. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with a median of 14.4 (interquartile range 12-17) prescribed drugs were included. The total number of PIMs identified with LESS-CHRON was 158 vs 127 with STOPPFrail. Eight of the 27 criteria (29.6%) for LESS-CHRON and 15 of the 25 for STOPPFrail were found to be not applicable. A significant correlation was obtained for both tools with the number of prescribed drugs at the time of inclusion. The Profund, Barthel, and Frail-VIG index only showed a significant correlation with LESS-CHRON. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Both tools have shown the capacity to identify PIMs that can be deprescribed in the population studied. However, LESS-CHRON appears to have a greater detection potential in the subgroup of patients analyzed. STOPPFrail brings a certain complementarity in other areas of therapy not covered by LESS-CHRON.


Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Multimorbilidad , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales
11.
J Clin Med ; 12(16)2023 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37629386

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery is a complex and invasive procedure that often requires blood transfusions to replace the blood lost during surgery. Blood products are a scarce and expensive resource. Therefore, it is essential to develop a standardized approach to determine the need for blood transfusions in cardiac surgery. The main objective of our study is to develop a simple prediction model for determining the risk of red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery. METHODS: Retrospective cohorts of adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2017 and 2019 were studied to identify hypothetical predictors of blood transfusion. Finally, a multivariable logistic regression model was developed to predict the risk of transfusion in cardiac surgery using the AUC and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. RESULTS: We included 1234 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Of the entire cohort, 875 patients underwent a cardiac procedure 69.4% [CI 95% (66.8%; 72.0%)]; 119 patients 9.6% [CI 95% (8.1%; 11.4%)] underwent a combined procedure, and 258 patients 20.9% [CI 95% (18.7; 23.2)] underwent other cardiac procedures. The median perioperative hemoglobin was 13.0 mg/dL IQR (11.7; 14.2). The factors associated with the risk of transfusion were age > 60 years OR 1.37 CI 95% (1.02; 1.83); sex female OR 1.67 CI 95% (1.24; 2.24); BMI > 30 OR 1.46 (1.10; 1.93); perioperative hemoglobin < 14 OR 2.11 to 51.41 and combined surgery OR 3.97 CI 95% (2.19; 7.17). The final model shows an AUC of 80.9% for the transfusion risk prediction [IC 95% (78.5-83.3%)]; p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a model with good discriminatory ability, which is more parsimonious and efficient than other models.

12.
J Pers Med ; 13(4)2023 Mar 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37108991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Survival in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on renal replacement therapy (RRT) is less than that of the general population of the same age, and depends on patient factors, the medical care received, and the type of RRT used. The objective of this study is to analyze the factors associated with survival in patients undergoing RRT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult patients with an incident of ESKD on RRT in Andalusia from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018. Patient characteristics, nephrological care received, and survival from the beginning of RRT were evaluated. A survival model for the patient was developed according to the variables studied. RESULTS: A total of 11,551 patients were included. Median survival was 6.8 years (95% CI (6.6; 7.0)). After starting RRT, survival at one year and five years was 88.7% (95% CI (88.1; 89.3)) and 59.4% (95% CI (58.4; 60.4)), respectively. Age, initial comorbidity, diabetic nephropathy, and a venous catheter were independent risk factors. However, non-urgent initiation of RRT and follow-up in consultations for more than six months had a protective effect. It was identified that renal transplantation (RT) was the most influential independent factor in patient survival, with a risk ratio of 0.13 (95% CI (0.11; 0.14)). CONCLUSIONS: The receiving of a kidney transplant was the most beneficial modifiable factor in the survival of incident patients on RRT. We consider that the mortality of the renal replacement treatment should be adjusted, taking into account both modifiable and nonmodifiable factors to achieve a more precise and comparable interpretation.

13.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 30(6): 338-43, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22503211

RESUMEN

The most common organism implicated in fungal infections in the critically ill patients is Candida spp. C. albicans continues to be the species that causes the largest number of invasive candidiasis. In critically ill patients, Candida spp. are frequently isolated in non-sterile sites. Candida colonization is documented in nearly 60% of non-neutropenic critically ill patients staying more than one week in the ICU. However, only 5% of colonized patients will develop invasive candidiasis. The diagnosis of invasive non-candidemic candidiasis remains elusive in the majority of the patients. Candida in a blood culture should never be viewed as a contaminant and should always prompt treatment initiation. Patients with multifocal colonization with a Candida score >3 should also receive antifungal therapy. Fluconazole is reserved for non-severely ill patients without recent exposure to azoles. The use of an echinocandin is recommended for hemodynamically unstable patients or with a history of recent fluconazole exposure.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Micosis/epidemiología , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candidiasis Invasiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidiasis Invasiva/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Fungemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fungemia/epidemiología , Humanos , Inmunocompetencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Micosis/microbiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Oportunistas/epidemiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/microbiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/transmisión
14.
J Clin Med ; 12(1)2022 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36614850

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is the non-communicable disease with the highest growth in morbidity and mortality. Renal transplantation (RT) is the first option of renal replacement in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and dialysis is an alternative. However, there is no objective quantification of the impact of both options on a patient's overall survival. The purpose of our study is to assess the potential years of life lost by patients on renal replacement therapy. METHODS: Retrospective study cohort conducted from 2008 to 2018 based on autonomic data registry. RESULTS: 11,551 patients included who received renal replacement therapy (RRT) in a range of age from 15 to 94 years. The mean age at the time of onset was 62.7 years, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) (62.4; 63.0). The mortality rate of RRT patients was 42.2%, 95% CI (41.5; 43.3) and the mean age at death was 72.7 years, 95% CI (72.4; 73.1). The number of patients with ESKD treated with RT was 3776, 32.7% of the total, 95% CI (31.8; 33.5). The total amount of years of potential life lost (YPLL) in the entire cohort was 77,831.3 years, 48,010.1 years in men, and 29,821.2 years in women. The mean number of YPLL per patient with RRT was 6.74 years in both sexes, 6.95 years in women, and 6.61 years in men. The mean number of potential years of life lost in dialysis patients was 9.0 years in both sexes, 8.8 years in men, and 9.2 years in women, while among kidney transplant recipients this figure decreased to 2.2 years in both men and women. CONCLUSIONS: End-stage chronic kidney disease in renal replacement therapy by dialysis causes an average of 9.0 years of life potentially lost for each patient on dialysis treatment, while having received a kidney transplant reduces this figure by 75.6%.

15.
Farm Hosp ; 46(2): 57-71, 2022 01 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35379097

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the baseline characteristics associated with higher  mortality at 42 days in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in Spain. METHOD: The study analyzed a prospective cohort of hospitalized COVID-19  patients. The dependent variable was 42-day mortality. Data on the subjects'  demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, usual therapy and  supportive interventions and treatments was collected within 48 hours from  admission. To determine the potential association of the data with mortality, a  multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: 15,628 patients were included, 18.2% of whom (n = 2,806) died  during the study period. According to the multivariate analysis, the variables  that were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with mortality upon admission  were: being referred from a nursing home (OR 1.9); having a high respiratory  rate (OR 1,5); having moderate (OR 1.7) or severe (OR 2.9) pneumonia  (CURB-65); aspartate aminotransferase transaminase ≥ 100 IU/l (OR 2.1);  lactate dehydrogenase ≥ 360 IU/L (OR 1.6); procalcitonin > 0.5 ng/mL (OR  1.8); creatine kinase ≥ 294 U/L (OR 1.5); D-dimer > 3,000 ng/mL (OR 1.5);  hemoglobin < 11.6 g/dL (OR 1.4) and C-reactive protein > 120 mg/L (OR 1.2;  requiring respiratory support within the first 48 hours (oxygen therapy [OR  2.0], non-invasive ventilation [OR 2.8], and mechanical ventilation [OR 3.5]);  and being treated with interferon-beta (OR 1.5). On the contrary, being under  80 years of age was associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis, based on the data in the RERFAR registry, showed that the factors associated with poorer prognosis were older age,  assessed using the CURB-65 scale, level of respiratory support required,  severe pneumonia (CURB-65), hypertransaminasemia, elevated creatine  kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-dimer levels, anemia, and elevated  respiratory rate.


OBJETIVO: Determinar las características basales que se asocian a una mayor  mortalidad a los 42 días en aquellos pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 en  España.Método: Cohorte prospectiva de pacientes COVID-19 hospitalizados. La  variable dependiente fue la mortalidad a los 42 días. Además, se recogieron  características demográficas, clínicas, comorbilidades, tratamiento habitual,  intervenciones de soporte y tratamientos en las primeras 48 horas del ingreso.  Para determinar la asociación con la mortalidad, se realizó un análisis  multivariante mediante regresión logística. Resultados: Se incluyeron 15.628 pacientes, de ellos falleció el 18,2% (n =  2.806). El análisis multivariante mostró que las variables asociadas significativamente (p < 0,05) con la mortalidad al ingreso fueron:  proceder de un centro sociosanitario (odds ratio OR 1,9), frecuencia  respiratoria (odds ratio 1,5), gravedad de neumonía (CURB-65) moderada  (odds ratio 1,7) o alta (odds ratio 2,9), transaminasa aspartato  aminotransferasa ≥ 100 UI/l (odds ratio 2,1), lactato-deshidrogenasa ≥ 360  UI/l (odds ratio 1,6), procalcitonina > 0,5 ng/ml (odds ratio 1,8), creatina- quinasa ≥ 294 U/l (odds ratio 1,5), dímero D > 3.000 ng/ml (odds ratio 1,5),  hemoglobina < 11,6 g/dl (odds ratio 1,4) y proteína C reactiva > 120 mg/l  (odds ratio 1,2), necesidad de soporte respiratorio en las primeras 48 horas  (odds ratio 2,0 de oxigenoterapia; odds ratio 2,8 ventilación no invasiva y odds ratio 3,5 ventilación mecánica) y tratamiento con interferón-beta (odds ratio  1,5). Por el contrario, ser menor de 80 años se asoció a una menor mortalidad. Conclusiones: El análisis del Registro Español de Resultados de  farmacoterapia frente a COVID-19 muestra que los factores asociados a peor pronóstico son: mayor edad, valoración mediante la escala CURB­65, el nivel de requerimiento de soporte respiratorio, neumonía grave (CURB­65), hipertransaminasemia, elevación de creatina-quinasa, lactato- deshidrogenasa, y dímero-D, anemia y elevación de la frecuencia respiratoria.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología
16.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(11)2022 Jun 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35681751

RESUMEN

The most appropriate duration of anticoagulant treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) remains unclear. We have conducted a prospective multicenter study in CAT patients with more than 6 months of anticoagulant treatment to predict the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence after anticoagulation discontinuation. Blood samples were obtained when patients stopped the anticoagulation, at 21 days and at 90 days. In each sample we assessed different coagulation-related biomarkers: D-dimer (DD), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), P-selectin (PS), phospholipids, soluble tissue factor, factor VIII and the thrombin generation test. It was evaluated 325 CAT patients and 166 patients were included in the study, mean age 64 ± 17 years. VTE recurrence until 6 months after stopping anticoagulation treatment was 9.87% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6−15]. The biomarkers sub-distribution hazard ratios were 6.32 for ratio DD basal/DD 21 days > 2 (95% CI: 1.82−21.90), 6.36 for hs-CRP > 4.5 (95% CI: 1.73−23.40) and 5.58 for PS > 40 (95% CI: 1.46−21.30) after 21 days of stopping anticoagulation. This is the first study that has identified the DD ratio, hs-CRP and PS as potential biomarkers of VTE recurrence in cancer patients after the discontinuation of anticoagulation treatment. A risk-adapted strategy may allow the identification of the optimal time to withdraw the anticoagulation in each CAT patient.

17.
Farm Hosp ; 46(7): 69-85, 2022 10 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520562

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To present the results of a survey about the Telemedicine outpatients experience and satisfaction of a pharmaceutical care  program through Telepharmacy, carried out from hospital pharmacy  departments in Spain during COVID-19 Pandemic (ENOPEX survey), and  identify differences across regions in Spain. METHOD: An analysis of results of the national survey ENOPEX on outpatient Telepharmacy services during the lockdown due to the COVID­19 pandemic, analyzed by autonomous community in Spain. Data was collected in relation to point of delivery; pharmacotherapeutic follow-up; patient's opinion and satisfaction with Telemedicine; confidentiality; future development of pharmaceutical care, through Telepharmacy services;  and coordination with the patient care team. Four multilevel regressions were performed to evaluate the differences between Spanish regions on the most relevant variables of the study, using the R version 4.0.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 8,079 interviews were valid, 52.8% of respondents were  female, age was 41-65 years in 54.3% of participants; 42.7% had been  receiving treatment for more than 5 years; 42.8% lived 10-50 km  from the  hospital; the journey to hospital took more than one hour for 60.2% of  participants. Globally, 85.7% received medicines at home. However, medicines  were delivered at a community pharmacy in some communities, such as  Cantabria (95.8%), or at primary care centers as in Castile La Mancha  (16.5%). In total, 96.7% of participants were satisfied or very satisfied with  Telemedicine pharmaceutical care, through Telepharmacy services, with  differences across communities, with users in Andalusia reporting the highest  satisfaction (OR = 1.58), and users in Castile-León being less satisfied with  Telepharmacy services (OR = 0.66). Users in Catalonia are the ones more  clearly in favor of Telemedicine pharmaceutical care, through Telepharmacy  services as a complementary service, with an OR = 5.85 with respect to other  users. The Telemedicine most frequently mentioned advantage was that  Telepharmacy services avoided visits, especially in Cantabria (92.5%) and  Extremadura (88.4%). Most patients prefer informed delivery of medicines at  home when they do not have an appointment at the hospital: total of 75.6 %,  from 50.1% of users in Cantabria to 96.3% in Catalonia (p < 0.001). The users  less willing to pay for Telepharmacy services were the ones from Castile- León and Galicia, with users in Catalonia and Navarra showing higher  willingness. CONCLUSIONS: In general terms, patients were satisfied with Telemedicine pharmaceutical care, through Telepharmacy services during the COVID­19 pandemic, being mostly in favor of maintaining these services to avoid travels.


OBJETIVO: Describir los resultados de la encuesta sobre experiencia y  atisfacción de la Telemedicina en pacientes externos relativo a un programa de  atención farmacéutica a través de la Telefarmacia, realizado desde los servicios de farmacia durante la pandemia COVID-19 (encuesta ENOPEX) e identificar  las diferencias entre las comunidades autónomas de España.Método: Se analizaron los resultados de la encuesta nacional ENOPEX sobre  Telefarmacia en pacientes externos durante el confinamiento debido a la  pandemia COVID-19, realizado en las diferentes comunidades autónomas de  España. Se recogieron datos relativos a lugar de entrega, seguimiento farmacoterapéutico, opinión y satisfacción del paciente con la  Telefarmacia, confidencialidad, desarrollo futuro de la atención farmacéutica a  través de los servicios de Telefarmacia, y coordinación con el equipo de atención al paciente. Se realizaron cuatro regresiones multinivel para  evaluar las diferencias entre comunidades autónomas sobre las variables más relevantes del estudio por medio del software R versión 4.0.3. RESULTADOS: Un total de 8.079 entrevistas fueron válidas: el 52,8% eran mujeres, el 54,3% tenía entre 41-65 años, el 42,9% estaban en  tratamiento  prodesde hacía más de 5 años, el 42,8% vivía a 10-50 km del  hospital y el 60,2%  tardaba más de una hora en acudir al hospital.  globalmente, el 85,7% recibieron medicación a domicilio, aunque hubo  comunidades autónomas en las que se optó también por las oficinas de  farmacia, como en Cantabria (95,8%), o los centros de atención primaria,  como en Castilla­La Mancha (16,5%). El 96,7% de los pacientes refirieron estar satisfechos o muy satisfechos con la Telemedicina en la atención farmacéutica  mediante el uso de la Telefarmacia, detectándose variabilidad en cuanto a la  opinión entre comunidades, desde la mejor opinión en Andalucía (odds ratio  =1,58) y la menos favorable en Castilla y León (odds ratio = 0,66). Por su  parte, Cataluña es la comunidad que estaría más claramente a favor de la  Telemedicina en la atención farmacéutica de usar la Telefarmacia como  actividad complementaria, con una odds ratio de 5,85 respecto al resto. Las  ventajas más mencionadas de la Telemedicina fue que los servicios de  Telefarmacia evitaban desplazamientos, especialmente en Cantabria (92,5%) y Extremadura (88,4%). Los pacientes mayoritariamente prefieren el  acercamiento y entrega informada de la medicación a domicilio cuando no  tienen que acudir al hospital, el 75,6% globalmente, desde el 50,1% de  pacientes de Cantabria al 96,3% en Cataluña (p < 0,001). Las comunidades  autónomas menos dispuestas a pagar por el servicio de Telefarmacia fueron  Castilla y León y Galicia, y las que más, Cataluña y Navarra. CONCLUSIONES: En líneas generales, los pacientes están satisfechos con la  Telemedicina aplicada a la atención farmacéutica a través de los servicios de  Telefarmacia durante la pandemia COVID-19, estando mayoritariamente a  favor de mantenerla para evitar desplazamientos.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicios Farmacéuticos , Telemedicina , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , España , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Pandemias , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Satisfacción Personal
18.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 54(8): 3149-54, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20498325

RESUMEN

Previous studies have sought to determine the risk factors associated with candidemia caused by non-albicans Candida spp. or with potentially fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. (C. glabrata and C. krusei). Non-albicans Candida strains are a heterogeneous group that includes species with different levels of virulence, and only a limited number of C. glabrata isolates are resistant to fluconazole. We set out to identify the risk factors associated with microbiologically proven fluconazole-resistant candidemia. A prospective study including adult patients with candidemia was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics; underlying diseases; exposure to corticosteroids, antibiotics, or fluconazole; and invasive procedures. Risk factors associated either with non-albicans Candida spp. or potentially fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. (C. glabrata or C. krusei) or with Candida spp. with microbiologically confirmed fluconazole resistance were assessed using logistic regressions. We included 226 candidemia episodes. Non-albicans Candida isolates accounted for 53.1% of the fungal isolates, but only 18.2% of the cases were caused by potentially fluconazole-resistant organisms. Thirty isolates exhibited microbiologically confirmed fluconazole resistance. The multivariate analysis revealed that independent predictors associated with fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. were neutropenia (odds ratio [OR]=4.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.50 to 16.20; P=0.008), chronic renal disease (OR=4.82; 95% CI=1.47 to 15.88; P=0.01), and previous fluconazole exposure (OR=5.09; 95% CI=1.66 to 15.6; P=0.004). Independently significant variables associated with non-albicans Candida bloodstream infection or with potentially fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. did not include previous fluconazole exposure. We concluded that prior fluconazole treatment is an independent risk factor only for candidemia caused by microbiologically confirmed fluconazole resistant species. Our findings may be of value for selecting empirical antifungal therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/farmacología , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica , Fluconazol/farmacología , Fungemia/epidemiología , Fungemia/microbiología , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Candida/clasificación , Candida/efectos de los fármacos , Candida albicans/efectos de los fármacos , Candida albicans/aislamiento & purificación , Candidiasis/diagnóstico , Candidiasis/microbiología , Fluconazol/administración & dosificación , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología
19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 10: 324, 2010 Nov 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21067624

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Listeria monocytogenes is the third most frequent cause of bacterial meningitis. The aim of this study is to know the incidence and risk factors associated with development of acute community-acquired Lm meningitis in adult patients and to evaluate the clinical features, management, and outcome in this prospective case series. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, and multicentric study carried out in 9 hospitals in the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI) over a 39-month period. All adults patients admitted to the participating hospitals with the diagnosis of acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis (Ac-ABM) were included in this study. All these cases were diagnosed on the basis of a compatible clinical picture and a positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture or blood culture. The patients were followed up until death or discharge from hospital. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-eight patients with Ac-ABM were included. Forty-six episodes of Lm meningitis were identified in 46 adult patients. In the multivariate analysis only age (OR 1.026; 95% CI 1.00-1.05; p = 0.042), immunosuppression (OR 2.520; 95% CI 1.05-6.00; p = 0.037), and CSF/blood glucose ratio (OR 39.42; 95% CI 4.01-387.50; p = 0.002) were independently associated with a Lm meningitis. The classic triad of fever, neck stiffness and altered mental status was present in 21 (49%) patients, 32% had focal neurological findings at presentation, 12% presented cerebellum dysfunction, and 9% had seizures. Twenty-nine (68%) patients were immunocompromised. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was intravenous ampicillin for 34 (79%) of 43 patients, in 11 (32%) of them associated to aminoglycosides. Definitive ampicillin plus gentamicin therapy was significantly associated with unfavourable outcome (67% vs 28%; p = 0.024) and a higher mortality (67% vs 32%; p = 0.040).The mortality rate was 28% (12 of 43 patients) and 5 of 31 (16.1%) surviving patients developed adverse clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly or immunocompromised patients, and a higher CSF/blood glucose ratio in patients with Ac-ABM must alert clinicians about Lm aetiology. Furthermore, we observed a high incidence of acute community-acquired Lm meningitis in adults and the addition of aminoglycosides to treatment should be avoid in order to improve the patients' outcome. Nevertheless, despite developments in intensive care and antimicrobial therapy, this entity is still a serious disease that carries high morbidity and mortality rates.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Meningitis por Listeria/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Listeria monocytogenes/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 42(3): 185-92, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20085422

RESUMEN

We set out to determine the factors influencing mortality in 125 adult patients with bacteraemic pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), assessing the impact on outcomes of early adequate therapy in particular. Presumed prognostic factors with p < 0.1 in the unadjusted model were subjected to multivariate Cox regression analysis, with in-hospital and 90-day mortalities as the dependent variables. A time period of >4 h from admission to start of adequate antibiotic treatment (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-6.45; p =0.037) and severe sepsis or septic shock (aHR 5.06, 95% CI 1.63-15.71; p = 0.005) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Variables associated with 90-day mortality were Charlson comorbidity index (aHR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.34; p = 0.018), severe sepsis or septic shock (aHR 3.03, 95% CI 1.22-7.51; p = 0.016) and delay of adequate antibiotic therapy >4 h (aHR 2.21, 95% CI 1.01-4.86; p = 0.048). The use of combination therapy was not included in these models but was a protective factor for delayed adequate therapy (aHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.95; p = 0.033). Administration of adequate antimicrobial therapy within 4 h of arrival is a critical determinant of survival in patients with bacteraemic pneumococcal CAP.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Neumonía Neumocócica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Neumocócica/mortalidad , Adulto , Humanos , Neumonía Neumocócica/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA