A slurry approach to identify nutrient critical source areas from subtropical catchment erosion.

Targeting catchment nutrient critical source areas (CSAs) (areas contributing most of the nutrients in a catchment) is an efficient way to prioritize remediation sites for reducing nutrient runoff to waterways. We tested if the soil slurry approach - with particle sizes and sediment concentrations representative of those in streams during high rainfall events - can be used to identify potential CSAs within individual land use types, examine fire impacts, and identify the contribution of leaf litter in topsoil to nutrient export in subtropical catchments. We first confirmed the slurry approach met the prerequisite to identify CSAs with relatively higher nutrient contribution (not absolute load estimation) by comparing the slurry sampling with stream nutrient monitoring data. We validated that: 1) differences in slurry total nitrogen to phosphorus mass ratios from different land uses were consistent with stream monitoring data; and 2) our estimated nutrient export contribution from agricultural land, via the slurry approach, was comparable to that derived from monitoring data. Additionally, we found nutrient concentrations in slurries differed across soil types and management practice within individual land uses, correlating with nutrient concentrations in fine particles. These results indicate the slurry approach can be used to identify potential small-scale CSAs. Slurry results from burnt soils were also comparable to other studies showing increased levels of dissolved nutrient loss and higher nitrogen than phosphorus loss, than non-burnt soils. The slurry method also showed the contribution of leaf litter to slurry nutrient concentrations from topsoil was greater for dissolved nutrients than particulate nutrients, indicating different forms of nutrients need to be considered for impacts of vegetation. Our study reveals that the slurry method can be used to identify potential small-scale CSAs within the same land use from erosion and can account for impacts of vegetation and bushfires, providing timely information to guide catchment restoration actions.

Scientific challenges and biophysical knowledge gaps for implementing nutrient offset projects.

Nutrient offsetting allows nutrient point source polluters to pay for diffuse source nutrient reductions, or improvements in nutrient load reductions from alternative point sources. These programs have the potential to provide a more cost-effective approach to achieve water quality goals in waterways compared to infrastructure upgrades. However, worldwide adoption of nutrient offset/trading has not been realized. Here, we identified the biophysical-chemical knowledge gaps that can act as barriers to adopting these programs and summarized areas where further research is needed. This includes a) evaluating if any appropriate spatial scale (local-, catchment-, or regional-scale) and time scale (especially for areas with dry/wet cycles) exists to achieve nutrient load management goals, and b) quantifying nutrient characteristic differences and load contributions between point and diffuse sources to determine possible offsets between the two. Where offsets are appropriate, there is also a need to 1) improve monitoring design and reduce modelling uncertainties to better quantify diffuse nutrient loads; 2) quantify and manage uncertainties in catchment interventions to reduce nutrient loads, and design effective long-term monitoring and maintenance to sustain intervention outcomes; 3) prioritize areas within catchments that are key nutrient sources for catchment interventions to achieve the optimal outcomes for nutrient load management and catchment and aquatic ecosystem health; and 4) develop methodologies to determine the environmental equivalency ratio between different nutrient sources in terms of ecosystem effects. This would include identifying the best metric to quantify equivalency ratios, determining discharge patterns for different nutrient sources, and linking this with ecosystem responses across seasons and in the downstream receiving environment. Addressing the identified knowledge gaps will improve the program feasibility assessment process as well as confidence and certainty in the environmental outcomes of nutrient offsetting.

Factors driving impacts of different nitrogen sources on freshwater and marine green algae.

The response of marine and freshwater algal species to both point and non-point sources of nitrogen have not been directly compared. We compared the photosynthetic yield response (Fv/Fm) of nitrogen-starved freshwater and marine green microalgae after a 3-day exposure to fourteen treated wastewater and nine aquaculture farm effluent as well as twenty-three soil erosion sources. The combination of inorganic and organic nutrients, organic carbon, and carbon-to­nitrogen ratios were most highly correlated with algal responses across all nitrogen sources (R2 = 0.69 for the freshwater species, and 0.63 for the marine species). The marine algal response also correlated with ammonium de-sorbed from sediment upon contact with marine waters. Our study highlights that organic carbon and salinity affect the bioavailability of nutrient sources for microalgae, although the mechanisms remain unclear. This provides new insights relevant to managing nitrogen pollution in both freshwater and coastal environments.

The bioavailability of nitrogen associated with sediment in riverine plumes of the Great Barrier Reef.

This study quantified the bioavailable nitrogen contribution from riverine plumes to Great Barrier Reef (GBR) coastal environments. The potential bioavailable nitrogen from two Dry Tropics riverine plumes was considerable [9 - 30% added to the end-of-catchment dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) load]. Particulate inorganic nitrogen conversion to DIN was an important process in short timeframes (25% to 100% of the generated load). The remaining load was contributed by microbial mineralisation of organic nitrogen. Flood plume sediment has potential to generate nitrogen once deposited and/or resuspended. Nitrogen generation was insignificant in a few plumes where immobilisation of nitrogen in bacteria biomass occurred. The source of organic matter in the plumes and availability of nitrogen relative to organic matter were important determinants of mineralisation/immobilisation. This research demonstrates that riverine plumes have potential to be considerable sources of bioavailable nitrogen to coastal environments of the GBR and that organic matter is a key bioavailability driver.

Soil organic matter formation is controlled by the chemistry and bioavailability of organic carbon inputs across different land uses.

Soil organic matter (SOM) formation involves microbial transformation of plant materials of various quality with physico-chemical stabilisation via soil aggregation. Land use and vegetation type can affect the litter chemistry and bioavailability of organic carbon (OC), and consequently influence the processing and stabilisation of OC into SOM. We used 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (13C NMR) and hot-water extraction to assess the changes in chemical composition and labile OC fractions during the transformation processes from leaf to litter to SOM depending on land use and vegetation type. The hot-water-extractable OC (HWEOC) decreased from leaf (43-65 g kg-1) to litter (19-23 g kg-1) to SOM (8-16 g kg-1) similar in four land use types: grassland, sugarcane, forest and banana. These trends demonstrated the uniform converging pathways of OC transformation and increasing stability by SOM formation. The preferential decomposition and decrease of labile OC fractions (∑% di-O-alkyl, O-alkyl and methoxyl) from leaf (54-69%) to SOM (41-43%) confirmed the increasing stability of the remaining compounds. Despite differences in the biochemical composition of the leaf tissues among the vegetation types, the proportions of labile OC fractions in SOM were similar across land uses. The OC content of soil was higher in forest (7.9%) and grassland (5.2%) compared to sugarcane (2.3%) and banana (3.0%). Consequently, the HWEOC per unit of soil weight was higher in forest and grassland (2.0 and 1.2 g kg-1 soil, respectively) compared to sugarcane and banana (0.3 and 0.4 g kg soil-1, respectively). The availability of labile SOM is dependent on the quantity of SOM not the chemical composition of SOM. In conclusion, labile OC fractions in SOM, as identified by 13C NMR, were similar across land use regardless of vegetation type and consequently, SOM formation leads to convergence of chemical composition despite diversity of OC sources.

Indicators of phytoplankton response to particulate nutrient bioavailability in fresh and marine waters of the Great Barrier Reef.

Sediments delivered to freshwater and marine environments can make important contributions to the aquatic bioavailable nutrient pool. In the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) catchments, particulate nutrients comprise an important fraction of the end of catchment loads; however, their contribution to the bioavailable nutrient pool is not well understood. This research determined which particulate nutrient parameters are the best indicators of the potential effect of fine sediment (<10 µm) on phytoplankton growth. Surface and subsurface sediments were lab-generated to cover a wide spectrum of particulate nutrient bioavailability from key soil types, land uses and erosion processes (hillslope and gully) in a wet and a dry tropics catchment of the GBR. Phytoplankton bioassays were used to assess freshwater and marine phytoplankton responses to sediments. The best indicators were selected by regressing measurements of phytoplankton growth against nutrient bioavailability parameters measured on the sediments. The selected indicator equations included organic carbon (C) pools for both fresh and marine water, highlighting the role of bacteria in mediating nutrient availability for phytoplankton. The equations also included various fractions of particulate nitrogen (N) (differentiating the adsorbed ammonium-N from the particulate organic N), and the ratios of C to N, which indicate the lability of the organic matter present in the sediment. Dissolved reactive phosphorus was also an important indicator in freshwater. The indicators performed better in assessing bioavailability potential than traditional methods to monitor particulate nutrients, e.g., particulate N and particulate phosphorus. Phytoplankton bioassays indicated that nutrients in sediment can promote phytoplankton growth, with nutrient bioavailability depending not only on sediment load, but also sediment characteristics associated with its parent soil. These characteristics vary with soil type, land use and erosion process. Findings will help prioritize erosion control to catchment areas which are most likely to contribute large amounts of bioavailable particulate nutrients to the GBR.

A novel bioassay to assess phytoplankton responses to soil-derived particulate nutrients.

Terrestrial particulate nutrients transported during flood events are known to indirectly fuel phytoplankton blooms in rivers, lakes and coastal waters, although the mechanisms are poorly understood. Quantifying the response of phytoplankton to nutrients in sediments eroded from catchments is fundamental to prioritizing areas for erosion control. This study developed a novel bioassay technique for rapidly assessing the effects of nutrients released from suspended sediments on the growth of marine and freshwater phytoplankton communities. A range of sediment slurries were placed in bioassay bottles within dialysis tubing in the presence of phytoplankton and their photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) was measured over 72 h. This allowed an assessment of the effects of dissolved nutrients released from sediments without the confounding effects of suspended sediments. Chlorophyll a concentrations were also measured for comparison with Fv/Fm. Our study showed Fv/Fm was an effective method for measuring phytoplankton responses to sediment slurries. Photosynthetic efficiency was a more sensitive response metric than chlorophyll a. Applying the method to a range of suspended sediments from two tropical catchments in Australia that drain into Great Barrier Reef coastal waters, we identified a subset of sediment types (~40%) that increased Fv/Fm under the bioassay conditions. These sediments have the potential to stimulate marine and freshwater phytoplankton growth under the loads simulated in this study. The bioassay has the advantage of being a rapid and relatively simple method where a large number of sediments can be simultaneously tested for a phytoplankton response. To our knowledge this is the first time Fv/Fm has been used to assess phytoplankton responses to sediments in a bioassay. This approach advances the use of Fv/Fm as a sensitive indicator of phytoplankton responses to nutrients and could be used to develop indices of the relative risk various sediments pose, hence support decision making for erosion control measures.

Differentiating the sources of fine sediment, organic matter and nitrogen in a subtropical Australian catchment.

Understanding the sources of sediment, organic matter and nitrogen (N) transferred from terrestrial to aquatic environments is important for managing the deleterious off-site impacts of soil erosion. In particular, investigating the sources of organic matter associated with fine sediment may also provide insight into carbon (C) and N budgets. Accordingly, the main sources of fine sediment, organic matter (indicated by total organic carbon), and N are determined for three nested catchments (2.5km2, 75km2, and 3076km2) in subtropical Australia. Source samples included subsoil and surface soil, along with C3 and C4 vegetation. All samples were analysed for stable isotopes (δ13C, δ15N) and elemental composition (TOC, TN). A stable isotope mixing model (SIAR) was used to determine relative source contributions for different spatial scales (nested catchments), climatic conditions and flow stages. Subsoil was the main source of fine sediment for all catchments (82%, SD=1.15) and the main N source at smaller scales (55-76%, SD=4.6-10.5), with an exception for the wet year and at the larger catchment, where surface soil was the dominant N source (55-61%, SD=3.6-9.9), though contributions were dependent on flow (59-680m3/s). C3 litter was the main source of organic C export for the two larger catchments (53%, SD=3.8) even though C4 grasses dominate the vegetation cover in these catchments. The sources of fine sediment, organic matter and N differ in subtropical catchments impacted by erosion, with the majority of C derived from C3 leaf litter and the majority of N derived from either subsoil or surface soil. Understanding these differences will assist management in reducing sediment, organic matter and N transfers in similar subtropical catchments while providing a quantitative foundation for testing C and N budgets.