Lower Trunk Muscle Thickness Is Associated With Pain in Women With Patellofemoral Pain.

OBJECTIVES: To compare trunk muscle thickness of women with and without patellofemoral pain (PFP) and to assess the association of trunk muscle thickness with self-reported pain of women with PFP. METHODS: Forty-four women were recruited and divided into 2 groups: a PFP group (n = 22) and a pain-free group (n = 22). The thickness of the following trunk muscles was obtained by B-mode ultrasound imaging: transversus abdominis, obliquus internus (OI), obliquus externus (OE), rectus abdominis, and multifidus. Self-reported pain was measured on a visual analog scale. RESULTS: The 44 participants were 18 to 35 years old. Women with PFP had lower thickness of the OI and OE than pain-free women, with moderate or large effect sizes ranging from -0.78 to -0.98, which was negatively related to self-reported pain correlations (r = -0.53 to -0.40). The contraction ratios of the OI and OE were also lower in women with PFP than in pain-free women (P < .05). No differences between groups were found for the transversus abdominis, multifidus, and rectus abdominis, with also no correlation with self-reported pain. CONCLUSIONS: Lower thickness of the OI and OE is present in women with PFP, which is related to self-reported pain. These findings might help in understanding the alterations in trunk biomechanics of individuals with PFP and the mechanisms by which interventions targeting trunk muscle strength are beneficial to individuals with PFP.

Effects of the Russian current in the treatment of low back pain in women: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a high impact condition that affects the working population, generating social and economic repercussions, the most relevant symptoms being pain and functional disability. Conservative treatment is often based on stabilizing spinal muscles with exercises: the Russian current (RC) is reported as an alternative, because it promotes muscle contraction, providing muscle strengthening and hypertrophy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the RC in aiding the treatment of low back pain. METHODS: This randomized study included 23 women aged 18-30 years, divided into two groups: the control group (CG) and the Russian current group (RCG), for four weeks. Pain (visual analogue scale, VAS; pressure algometer, PA), function (Oswestry Low Back Disability Index), resistance (trunk resistance [TR] test) and thickness changes in the muscle (ultrasound image) were evaluated before and after the RC protocol and at one-month follow-up. RESULTS: There were significant VAS reductions in both groups, but at follow-up these had only been maintained in the RCG, which presented lower values than the CG in the second evaluation. For PA, Oswestry and TR, there were differences only in the RCG. In a comparison of LBP between the groups, the initial difference disappeared in subsequent evaluations; TR presented higher values in evaluation 2 and 3 in the RCG group. In terms of thickness changes, differences between the groups were reduced after treatment. CONCLUSION: The proposed treatment was effective in the reduction of LBP, with short-term improvement in resistance and thickness changes of the multifidus.