Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
CRISPR J ; 2(6): 441-449, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31742431

RESUMEN

Advances in CRISPR technology and the announcement of the first gene-edited babies have sparked a global dialogue about the future of heritable genome editing (HGE). There has been an international call for public input to inform a substantive debate about benefits and risks of HGE. This study investigates the views of the sickle cell disease (SCD) community. We utilized a mixed-methods approach to examine SCD stakeholders' views in the United States. We found SCD stakeholders hold a nuanced view of HGE. Assuming the technology is shown to be safe and effective, they are just as supportive of HGE as genetics professionals, but more supportive than the general public. However, they are also concerned about the potential implications of HGE, despite this support. As discourse surrounding HGE advances, it is crucial to engage disease communities and other key stakeholders whose lives could be altered by these interventions.


Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes/genética , Anemia de Células Falciformes/terapia , Edición Génica/ética , Adulto , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas/genética , Repeticiones Palindrómicas Cortas Agrupadas y Regularmente Espaciadas/genética , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Edición Génica/métodos , Terapia Genética/ética , Terapia Genética/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación de los Interesados/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA