Developing a non-cadaveric brain tumour surgery lab in resource-constrained settings.

OBJECTIVE: To develop the country's first brain tumour surgery lab in resource-constrained settings, for training young neurosurgeons and residents. METHODS: A workshop was developed using mixed-fidelity models for assessing and training a participant's psychomotor skills, hand-eye coordination, and teaching the principles of brain tumour surgery. Affordable noncadaveric models were used to compare and contrast the benefit of each teaching model. Within the existing space for wet labs at our institution, 8 different dissection stations were set up with adequate space for 2 people to work at a time. Each station was equipped with an operating room-Caliber microscope, a lighting system and a camera linked to a screen and high-powered electric drills and basic surgical equipment. RESULTS: Our team was able to develop and use 3D-printed skull models and animal brain models for training in complex approaches and craniotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical simulation training, in a cost-effective manner, provides the benefit of training residents and students in neurosurgical techniques in a safe, controlled environment leading to improvement in skills and technique.

A guideline on guidelines: neuro-oncology guideline standards for low- and middle-income countries.

Guidelines for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are needed in complex, multidisciplinary areas such as oncology, requiring mobilising considerable resources and specialists for coordinated care. Neuro-oncology guidelines have been primarily established in countries where technological advancements and robust care pathways facilitate broad resource utilisation. In contrast, LMICs require complex and region-specific interventions to provide equitable care. The present opinion paper is a culmination of our own centre's experience collaborating and developing loco-regional guidelines for brain tumour care, keeping in mind LMIC experiences and expertise available. We intend for the process and methodology to apply to a broader audience of other LMIC authors and clinicians collaborating with LMIC institutions to develop guidelines and clinical recommendations.

Consensus guidelines for the management of pediatric medulloblastoma in low and middle-income countries.

The management of medulloblastoma, a pediatric brain tumor, has evolved significantly with the advent of genomic subgrouping, yet morbidity and mortality remain high in LMICs like Pakistan due to inadequate multidisciplinary care infrastructure. This paper aims to establish evidence-based guidelines tailored to the constraints of such countries. An expert panel comprising neuro-oncologists, neurosurgeons, radiologists, radiation oncologists, neuropathologists, and pediatricians collaborated to develop these guidelines, considering the specific challenges of pediatric brain tumor care in Pakistan. The recommendations cover various aspects of medulloblastoma treatment, including pre-surgical workup, neurosurgery, neuropathology, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. They offer both minimum required and additional optional protocols for more advanced centers, ensuring comprehensive patient management with attention to complications and complexities encountered in Pakistan. The paper's consensus guidelines strive for uniformity in healthcare delivery and address significant gaps in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of pediatric medulloblastoma patients.

Seizure control after surgical resection of insular glioma.

Insular gliomas most commonly present with drug-resistant seizures, irrespective of the tumour grade. Even though surgery is the mainstay of treatment, complex anatomical location and close proximity to eloquent cortex makes surgical resection difficult. Herein the authors have reviewed the literature with regards to seizure control after surgical management of these tumours. The review does not address quality of life, or survival benefits of surgery. In summary, excision of these gliomas significantly improves seizure control, and extent of resection along-with trans-cortical approach are important predictors of seizure outcome.

Venous sinus stenting versus ventriculoperitoneal shunting: comparing clinical outcomes for idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Venous sinus stenting (VSS) has been shown to reduce intracranial venous pressures and improve symptoms in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). However, long-term follow-up data are limited, raising concerns about sustained symptom improvement. We aimed to assess long-term outcomes of VSS compared with ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). METHODS: A retrospective case-control study assessed 87 patients with IIH who met inclusion criteria and underwent either VSS (n=27) or VPS (n=60) between 2017 and 2022. Descriptive statistics for baseline characteristics and outcomes were calculated, followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with headache recurrence. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between VSS and VPS groups, including age (p=0.58), sex (p=0.74), body mass index (p=0.47), and preoperative lumbar puncture opening pressure (p=0.62). Preoperative symptoms of headaches (p=0.42), papilledema (p=0.35), and pulsatile tinnitus (p=0.56) were also similar. Initial headache improvement was comparable (96% vs 91%, p=0.42). However, headache recurrence was less common in the VSS group (31% vs 60%, p=0.015) at the last follow-up, averaging over 1 year. Multivariate analysis showed VSS was independently associated with reduced odds of headache recurrence (OR 0.24, p=0.015). Longer follow-up was associated with increased odds of headache recurrence in both groups (OR 1.01, p=0.032). CONCLUSION: VSS was independently associated with reduced odds of headache recurrence compared with VPS in multivariate analysis. Longer follow-up was significantly associated with headache recurrence in both groups. This suggests that VSS may lead to better outcomes for continued headache relief, but headache recurrence may increase with longer follow-up regardless of treatment modality.

AB082. Navigating barriers to epilepsy surgery: a national survey of patient and neurologist perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Potential barriers to epilepsy surgery can be divided into two broad groups: reluctance of patients/caregivers and deficient knowledge of neurologists. Pakistan, in particular, faces an epilepsy surgery treatment gap of 70-94%. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of neurologists and the knowledge of the patients diagnosed with epilepsy to identify the barriers to adequate provision of this modality in Pakistan. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study comprising two surveys. Records of patients diagnosed with epilepsy at our hospital during 2.5 years were retrieved from the Neurophysiology database. The second form was designed for neurologists working in Pakistan. The questionnaires were disseminated via email to neurologists and phone calls to patients. RESULTS: In the patients' survey, we obtained 194 responses from caregivers. The median age of patients was 10 years [interquartile range (IQR): 6-14 years]. We found that 74.2% (n=144) of patients were unaware of surgical options in medically refractory epilepsy (MRE). Therefore, most did not comment on it due to the limited information. Forty-eight patients (24.8%) reported more than 1 seizure per month, and 29 (60.4%) were unaware of the surgical treatment. Seizures were disabling in 88% (n=171) of patients. Patients taking more AEDs were significantly more likely to be aware of surgical options (P=0.001). In the survey from neurologists, only 6.6% (n=4) always discussed epilepsy surgery with MRE patients. Around half of the neurologists, 44.3% (n=27), had never referred a patient for epilepsy surgery. However, 95.1% (n=58) were aware of the under-utilization of epilepsy surgery, and 67.2% (n=41) believed that epilepsy surgery is under-recommended. Almost all neurologists (n=60; 98.4%) believe that comprehensive epilepsy treatment centers are required in the country. CONCLUSIONS: In our survey, we found a lack of awareness in both patients and neurologists to be a major barrier. This contrasts the literature from developed or high-income countries, where physician awareness seems adequate, and stigmas associated with surgery seem to be the major barrier. Multifaceted approaches catered to local concerns are necessary to address these hindrances.

Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Awareness and Acceptability for Primary Prevention of Cervical Cancer in Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is the most effective option for primary prevention HPV, a well-known cause of cervical cancer.  The objective of the study was to assess awareness of HPV, the acceptability of its vaccine and factors associated with the acceptability among the adult population in Pakistan. MATERIALS & METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adult population of Pakistan from January 2022 and March 2022. Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, instead of face-to-face interviews, a self-administered questionnaire was developed and distributed through Google Forms. The questionnaire was available in both English and Urdu languages to cater to a diverse population. RESULTS: Overall, 313 (65.2 %) study participants had heard about HPV infection, while 297 (61.9%) knew HPV as the cause of genital warts and 256 (53.3 %) knew that HPV can cause any type of cancer, with a higher percentage of awareness among those who were in any health care setting compared to those who were in a non-healthcare setting. Regarding the acceptability to get HPV vaccine, 320 (66.7%) of the study participants were willing to get vaccinated, while only 15(3.1%) of the study population had previously received HPV vaccine. The most important factors associated with HPV vaccine acceptability were younger age of 18-25 years (Prevalence Ratio (PR) =1.60, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) =1.11, 2.32), and 26-35 years (PR= 1.65, 95% CI=1.09, 2.50). HPV vaccine acceptability was also associated with working in a healthcare setting due to better awareness of HPV vaccine (PR= 1.29, 95% CI=1.03, 1.62). CONCLUSION: It is important to address the knowledge gaps existing in the community about HPV vaccine acceptability and barriers against it for the successful rollout of the HPV vaccination program in Pakistan. Mass awareness campaigns about HPV, HPV vaccine, and cervical cancer are needed to increase the acceptability of HPV vaccine among public at the time of reintroducing HPV vaccine.

Eruptive Xanthomas Precipitated by Severe Hypertriglyceridemia From Diabetes and Alcohol Use.

Hypertriglyceridemia is a common abnormality found in patients in the clinical setting. Severe hypertriglyceridemia may manifest phenotypically as eruptive xanthomas, which are red or yellow papules found on the skin, most commonly on extensor surfaces and buttocks. We present a case of severe hypertriglyceridemia in a patient found in the outpatient setting, which manifested as eruptive xanthomas in his posterior upper arms, back, buttocks, axilla, and legs. Laboratory testing of his lipid profile revealed extremely high triglyceride levels, and the patient was immediately referred to the nearest hospital where he was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). He was promptly managed with a low-fat diet, anti-hypertriglyceridemic agents, and insulin infusion, with a dramatic reduction in triglyceride levels. He subsequently underwent a skin biopsy which confirmed the diagnosis of eruptive xanthoma. Rapid reduction in triglyceride levels is instrumental in the prevention of complications, most notably, acute pancreatitis. This article highlights the importance of a high index of suspicion for recognition of the signs and symptoms of severe hypertriglyceridemia, as well as the different management options available for the control of triglyceride levels and the prevention of complications.

Giant Central Nervous System Aspergilloma Mimicking Butterfly Neoplasm of the Corpus Callosum.

Radiological presentation of central nervous system (CNS) aspergillosis is variable and depends on the immune status of the patients. Typical features of meningoencephalitis, infarction, abscess, and mycotic aneurysms commonly occur in immunocompromised patients. A rare mass-like or tumoral form of cerebral aspergillosis has been described mostly in immunocompetent patients which results in a diagnostic dilemma, thus potentially causing a delay in the management. We present a case of a large CNS aspergilloma mimicking an infiltrative callosal neoplasm in a young immunocompetent patient. Careful evaluation of imaging features, anatomical location, enhancement pattern, concomitant sinonasal and orbital extension, and angio-aggressive nature of the mass lesion with a high index of suspicion can help diagnose CNS aspergillosis in such patients.

Vasopressin in Conjunction With Norepinephrine in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a Low Middle-Income Country.

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend use of norepinephrine as the first-line treatment for fluid-refractory septic shock and if septic shock persists vasopressin may be initiated. Since there are limited data from low middle-income countries with high disease burden of sepsis, we aimed to compare the outcomes of using vasopressin adjunct to norepinephrine in comparison with norepinephrine alone. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. PATIENTS: Six-hundred fifty-three patients diagnosed with septic shock from January 2019 to December 2019, with 498 given norepinephrine only and 155 given norepinephrine-vasopressin combination. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were duration of vasopressor used, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and days on ventilatory support. After adjustment by multivariable logistic regression, it was found that mortality was not significantly associated with the norepinephrine-vasopressin combination (adjusted odds ratio, 0.633 [95% CI, 0.370-1.081]). However, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at admission (1.100 [1.014-1.193]), lactate at admission (1.167 [1.109-1.227]), duration of vasopressor used (1.481 [1.316-1.666]), and level of care (3.025 [1.682-5.441]) were found to be independently associated with the adjunct usage of norepinephrine and vasopressin. CONCLUSIONS: The use of norepinephrine-vasopressin combination has remained debatable in literature. Our study showed that although there was no difference in mortality between the two groups, admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and admission lactate levels were found to be significantly higher in the norepinephrine-vasopressin group. Hence, physicians from Pakistan used the norepinephrine-vasopressin combination in resistant septic shock patients who were sicker to begin with. Furthermore, duration of vasopressor therapy and ICU admission were also significantly higher in the combination group. Considering the recent hyperinflation of vasopressors costs and that most healthcare expenditure for patients in Pakistan is out-of-pocket, this can consequently lead to unwarranted financial burden for patients and their families.