The menisci are not shock absorbers: A biomechanical and comparative perspective.

The lateral and medial menisci are fibrocartilaginous structures in the knee that play a crucial role in normal knee biomechanics. However, one commonly cited role of the menisci is that they function as "shock absorbers." Here we provide a critique of this notion, drawing upon a review of comparative anatomical and biomechanical data from humans and other tetrapods. We first review those commonly, and often exclusively, cited studies in support of a shock absorption function and show that evidence for a shock absorptive function is dubious. We then review the evolutionary and comparative evidence to show that (1) the human menisci are unremarkable in morphology compared with most other tetrapods, and (2) "shock" during locomotion is uncommon, with humans standing out as one of the only tetrapods that regularly experiences high levels of shock during locomotion. A shock-absorption function does not explain the origin of menisci, nor are human menisci specialized in any way that would explain a unique shock-absorbing function during human gait. Finally, we show that (3) the material properties of menisci are distinctly poorly suited for energy dissipation and that (4) estimations of meniscal energy absorption based on published data are negligible, both in their absolute amount and in comparison to other well-accepted structures which mitigate shock during locomotion. The menisci are evolutionarily ancient structures crucial for joint congruity, load distribution, and stress reduction, among a number of other functions. However, the menisci are not meaningful shock absorbers, neither in tetrapods broadly, nor in humans.

Cadaveric Study of the Safety and Device Functionality of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods After Exposure to Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. OBJECTIVE: To establish the safety and efficacy of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exposure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MCGRs are new and promising devices for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). A significant percentage of EOS patients have concurrent spinal abnormalities that need to be monitored with MRI. There are major concerns of the MRI compatibility of MCGRs because of the reliance of the lengthening mechanism on strongly ferromagnetic actuators. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen adult cadaveric torsos were used. After thawing, MRI was performed four times each: baseline, after implantation of T2-T3 thoracic rib hooks and L5-S1 pedicle screws, and twice after MCGR implantation. Dual MCGRs were implanted in varying configurations and connected at each end with cross connectors, creating a closed circuit to maximize MRI-induced heating. Temperature measurements and tissue biopsies were obtained to evaluate thermal injury. MCGRs were tested for changes to structural integrity and functionality. MRI images obtained before and after MCGR implantation were evaluated. RESULTS: Average temperatures increased incrementally by 1.1°C, 1.3°C, and 0.5°C after each subsequent scan, consistent with control site temperature increases of 1.1°C, 0.8°C, and 0.4°C. Greatest cumulative temperature change of +3.6°C was observed adjacent to the right-sided actuator, which is below the 6°C threshold cited in literature for clinically detectable thermal injury. Histologic analysis revealed no signs of heat-induced injury. All MCGR actuators continued to function properly according to the manufacturer's specifications and maintained structural integrity. Significant imaging artifacts were observed, with the greatest amount when dual MCGRs were implanted in standard/offset configuration. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate minimal MRI-induced temperature change, no observable thermal tissue injury, preservation of MCGR-lengthening functionality, and no structural damage to MCGRs after multiple MRI scans. Expectedly, the ferromagnetic actuators produced substantial MR imaging artifacts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Are We Underestimating the Significance of Pedicle Screw Misplacement?

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of charts, x-rays (XRs) and computed tomography (CT) scans was performed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using a novel classification system to determine potentially significant screw misplacement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The accuracy rate of pedicle screw (PS) placement varies from 85% to 95% in the literature. This demonstrates technical ability but does not represent the impact of screw misplacement on individual patients. This study quantifies the rate of screw misplacement on a per-patient basis to highlight its effect on potential morbidity. METHODS: A retrospective review of charts, XRs and low-dose CT scans of 127 patients who underwent spinal fusion with pedicle screws for spinal deformity was performed. Screws were divided into four categories: screws at risk (SAR), indeterminate misplacements (IMP), benign misplacements (BMP), accurately placed (AP). RESULTS: A total of 2724 screws were placed in 127 patients. A total of 2396 screws were placed accurately (87.96%). A total of 247 screws (9.07%) were BMP, 52 (1.91%) were IMP, and 29 (1.06%) were considered SAR. Per-patient analysis showed 23 (18.11%) of patients had all screws AP. Thirty-five (27.56%) had IMP and 18 (14.17%) had SAR. Risk factor analysis showed smaller Cobb angles increased likelihood of all screws being AP. Sub-analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic patients showed no curve or patient characteristic that correlated with IMP or SAR. Over 40% of patients had screws with either some/major concern. CONCLUSION: Overall reported screw misplacement is low, but it does not reflect the potential impact on patient morbidity. Per-patient analysis reveals more concerning numbers toward screw misplacement. With increasing pedicle screw usage, the number of patients with misplaced screws will likely increase proportionally. Better strategies need to be devised for evaluation of screw placement, including establishment of a national database of deformity surgery, use of intra-operative image guidance, and reevaluation of postoperative low-dose CT imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Triggered EMG Potentials in Determining Neuroanatomical Safe Zone for Transpsoas Lumbar Approach: Are They Reliable?

STUDY DESIGN: In vivo analysis in swine model. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of triggered EMG (t-EMG) and its reliability in lateral lumbar interbody fusions surgery. We also aim to document changes in psoas muscle produced during the approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lateral lumbar interbody fusions is preferred over direct anterior approach because of lower complications, blood loss, and shorter recovery time. Threshold-EMGs are utilized for real-time feedback about nerve location; however, neurological deficits are widely reported, and are unique to this approach. Multiple factors have been hypothesized including neuropraxia from retractors and compression from psoas hematoma/edema. The variable reports of neurological complication even with t-EMGs indicate the need to study them further. METHODS: Eight swines underwent left-sided retroperitoneal approach. The nerve on the surface of the psoas was identified and threshold-EMGs were obtained utilizing a ball-tip, and needle probe. First EMG and threshold responses required to elicit 20-µV responses were recorded for 2 mm incremental distances up to 10 mm. In the second part, a K-wire was inserted into the mid-lumbar disc space, and a tubular retractor docked and dilated adequately. Postmortem CT scans were carried out to evaluate changes in psoas muscle. RESULTS: A t-EMG stimulus threshold of <5 mA indicates a higher probability that the probe is close to or on the nerve, but this was not proportional to the distance suggesting limitations for nerve mapping. Negative predictive value of t-EMGs is 76.5% with the ball-tipped probe and 80% with the needle probe for t-EMG ≥10 mA and indicates that even with higher thresholds, the nerve may be much closer than anticipated. Postoperative hematoma was not seen on CT scans. CONCLUSION: Threshold measurements are unreliable in estimating distance from the nerve in an individual subject and higher values do not always correspond to a 'safe zone." LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

CT-Based Anatomical Evaluation of Pre-Vertebral Structures With Respect to Vertebral Body Using a Clock-Face Analogy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Chart and CT Scan Review. OBJECTIVE: To define the relationship of the pre-vertebral structures for each level to assist in easier intraoperative visualization. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vascular and visceral injuries from pedicle screws are well-known. This study will define the relationship of the pre-vertebral structures for each level to assist in avoiding potential complications. METHODS: Pre- and post-operative CT scans were reviewed to define the pre-vertebral structures in relation to a clock-face. On reformatted axial slices, a clock-face was superimposed so that the left transverse process (TP) represented 8 o'clock and the right TP represented 4 o'clock. The positions of the TP on the clock-face did not change with rotation of the vertebra. RESULTS: 108 patients had pre-operative CT scans. 78 had post-operative CT scans. Median age was 15 years, median Cobb angle was 50°, fused were 12, with 21 fixation points. 6324 axial CT slices were reformatted and analyzed. The trachea was located at 12 o'clock at T1, 1 o'clock at T2-T4, and between 12 and 1 o'clock at T5. The esophagus starts as a midline structure at 12 o'clock from T1-T2, moves to 11 o'clock from T3-T6, and further to 10 o'clock from T7-T9. The aorta starts at 10 o'clock at T5-T6, moves left at T7-T8 to 9 o'clock, and returns to 10 o'clock from T9-T11. It appears at 11'clock at T12, and at 12 o'clock from L1-L4. In about a third of cases, it is at 1 o'clock from L1 to L4, where it bifurcates. CONCLUSIONS: This CT-based anatomical study provides a simple reference frame to help surgeons visualize the vital structures at each level. This three-dimensional visualization is facilitated by fixing the position of TP on the clock-face. Knowledge of this anatomical relationship can help avoid direct injury, and is easier to recall intra-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.