Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 44(4): 480-491, 2024 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38167810

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study pregnant women's subjective viewpoints on what is important when receiving information prior to decision-making regarding prenatal testing for chromosomal anomalies. METHOD: Data were collected using Q methodology. During January 2020-October 2021, 45 pregnant women in Sweden completed a 50-item Q sort. Statements regarding what is important when receiving information about prenatal screening and diagnosis were prioritized through ranking in a fixed sorting grid on an 11-point scale, from "most important" to "least important." Socio-demographics and coping styles were surveyed through questionnaires. RESULTS: Three groups represented different viewpoints on what pregnant women consider important when receiving information about prenatal screening and diagnosis. Factor 1: Stepwise information and decision-making: viewing information and decision-making as a step-by-step process. Factor 2: Decision-making as a continuous process based on couple autonomy: Striving for an informed decision as a couple about tests, test results and conditions screened. Factor 3: As much information as early as possible-the importance of personal autonomy in decision-making: Prioritizing autonomous decision-making based on non-directive information early in the pregnancy. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the complexities involved when providing information. As shown by the differing viewpoints in this study, pregnant women's informational needs differ, making individual and personalized information preferable.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de los Cromosomas , Síndrome de Down , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Mujeres Embarazadas , Toma de Decisiones , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Aberraciones Cromosómicas
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 42(11): 1377-1389, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36146928

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) identifies the risk of abnormalities in pregnancy, potentially reducing the risk of miscarriage associated with invasive tests. This study aimed to understand the preferences of current and future mothers about the content, format and timing of information provision about NIPT. METHODS: An online discrete choice experiment was designed comprising four attributes: when in the pregnancy information is provided (4 levels); degree of detail (2 levels); information format (6 levels); cost to women for gathering information (5 levels). Respondents included women identified by an online-panel company in Sweden. The mathematical design was informed by D-efficient criteria. Choice data were analysed using uncorrelated random parameters logit and latent class models. RESULTS: One thousand Swedish women (56% current mothers) aged 18-45 years completed the survey. On average, women preferred extensive information provided at/before 9 weeks of pregnancy. There was heterogeneity in preferences about the desired format of information provision (website, mobile app or individual discussion with a midwife) in the population. CONCLUSION: Women had clear preferences about the desired content, format and timing of information provision about NIPT. It is important to tailor information provision to enable informed choices about NIPT.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Conducta de Elección , Femenino , Humanos , Madres , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 510, 2022 Jun 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35739466

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Access to information is essential to achieving individual empowerment; meaning the ability to exercise control, manage one's own condition and make informed decisions. However, studies have shown that information provided to women regarding physiological changes during the postpartum period and postpartum health was inadequate, incorrect, or inconsistent. METHODS: The aim of this study was to explore informational support about pain persisting after childbirth and its consequences. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used. In the first, quantitative phase, 1,171 women, who gave birth eight months earlier, completed a self-administered questionnaire. In the second, qualitative phase, 20 women who experienced chronic pain were interviewed. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: The majority of the women did not receive information about pain persisting after childbirth, or the information was insufficient or incorrect. They did not know when and where to seek help and did not consult health care professionals. In addition, the lack of information had a negative impact on women's psychological well-being. All women expressed the need to be informed by health care professionals, irrespective of the individual risk of developing chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Health services should ensure availability of information to give the women opportunity to achieve empowerment to make good health decisions, increase control over their health and well-being as well as to enhance their self-efficacy. We propose that a booklet or leaflet with relevant information about the risk of developing chronic pain, symptoms and treatment, along with advice about appropriate health care settings should be provided as part of antenatal or postnatal care.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Parto/psicología , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 1734, 2022 09 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36096783

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Following the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019, adequate public information was of outmost importance. The public used the Web extensively to read information about the pandemic, which placed significant responsibility in, for many, an unfamiliar situation as the disease spread across the globe. The aim of this review was to synthesize the quality of web-based information concerning the coronavirus disease 2019 published during the first year of the pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A rapid systematic review was undertaken by searching five electronic databases (CINAHL, Communication & Mass Media Complete, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus). Empirical infodemiology reports assessing quality of information were included (n = 22). Methodological quality and risk of bias was appraised with tools modified from previous research, while quality assessment scores were synthesized with descriptive statistics. Topics illustrating comprehensiveness were categorized with content analysis. RESULTS: The included reports assessed text-based content (n = 13) and videos (n = 9). Most were rated good overall methodological quality (n = 17). In total, the reports evaluated 2,654 websites or videos and utilized 46 assessors. The majority of the reports concluded that websites and videos had poor quality (n = 20). Collectively, readability levels exceeded the recommended sixth grade level. There were large variations in ranges of the reported mean or median quality scores, with 13 of 15 total sample scores being classified as poor or moderate quality. Four studies reported that ≥ 28% of websites contained inaccurate statements. There were large variations in prevalence for the six categories illustrating comprehensiveness. CONCLUSION: The results highlight quality deficits of web-based information about COVID-19 published during the first year of the pandemic, suggesting a high probability that this hindered the general population from being adequately informed when faced with the new and unfamiliar situation. Future research should address the highlighted quality deficits, identify methods that aid citizens in their information retrieval, and identify interventions that aim to improve the quality of information in the online landscape.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Infodemiología , Internet , Informe de Investigación
5.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 22(1): 131, 2022 05 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35562701

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality. To mitigate its spread, members in the general population were prompted to apply significant behavioral changes. This required an effective dissemination of understandable information accessible for people with a wide range of literacy backgrounds. The aim of this study was to investigate the readability, understandability and language accessibility of Swedish consumer-oriented websites containing information about COVID-19. METHODS: Websites were identified through systematic searches in Google.se (n = 76), and were collected in May 2020 when the pandemic spread started in Sweden. Readability and understandability were assessed with the Readability Index, the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool Understandability subscale (PEMAT-PU). RESULTS: The median total sample score for Readability Index was 42.0, with the majority of scores being classified as moderate (n = 30, 39%) or difficult (n = 43, 57%). Median total sample scores were for EQIP 54.0% (IQR = 17.0, Range = 8-75) and for PEMAT-PU 60.0% (IQR = 14.75, Range = 12-87). The majority of the websites did not have any texts or links containing information in an alternative language (n = 58, 76%). CONCLUSIONS: Swedish websites contained information of difficult readability and understandability at the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, with few providing information available in alternative languages. It is possible that these deficits contributed to the spread and impact of the virus. There is a need for studies investigating methods aiming to enhance the readability, understandability and language accessibility of web-based information at the beginning of an epidemic or pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Alfabetización en Salud , Comprensión , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Internet , Lenguaje , Pandemias , Suecia
6.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 1141, 2021 06 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34126962

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: reducing the spread and impact epidemics and pandemics requires that members of the general population change their behaviors according to the recommendations, restrictions and laws provided by leading authorities. When a new epidemic or pandemic emerges, people are faced with the challenge of sorting through a great volume of varied information. Therefore, the dissemination of high-quality web-based information is essential during this time period. The overarching aim was to investigate the quality of web-based information about preventive measures and self care methods at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: in May 2020, consumer-oriented websites written in Swedish were identified via systematic searches in Google (n = 76). Websites were assessed with inductive content analysis, the JAMA benchmarks, the QUEST tool and the DISCERN instrument. RESULTS: seven categories and 33 subcategories were identified concerning preventive measures (md = 6.0 subcategories), with few specifying a method for washing hands (n = 4), when to sanitize the hands (n = 4), and a method for sanitizing the hands (n = 1). Eight categories and 30 subcategories were identified concerning self care methods (md = 3.0 subcategories), with few referring to the national number for telephone-based counseling (n = 20) and an online symptom assessment tool (n = 16). Overall, the median total quality scores were low (JAMA = 0/4, QUEST =13/28, DISCERN = 29/80). CONCLUSIONS: at the beginning of the pandemic, substantial quality deficits of websites about COVID-19 may have counteracted the public recommendations for preventive measures. This illustrates a critical need for standardized and systematic routines on how to achieve dissemination of high-quality web-based information when new epidemics and pandemics emerge.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Internet , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Autocuidado
7.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 235, 2020 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32321482

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Providing information about prenatal tests is a clinical challenge and the public frequently accesses the Web to read pregnancy-related information. The overarching aim of this study was to investigate the quality of consumer-oriented websites addressing obstetric ultrasound examination in the second trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: Swedish websites were identified with Google, using 20 search strings and screening 400 hits (n = 71 included websites). Reliability and information about the examination were assessed with the DISCERN instrument, completeness was assessed according to national guidelines, and readability analyzed with the Readability Index. Popularity was determined with the ALEXA tool and search rank was determined according to Google hit lists. RESULTS: The mean total DISCERN score was 29.7/80 (SD 11.4), with > 50% having low quality for 15 of the 16 questions. The mean completeness score was 6.8/24 (SD 4.5). The Readability Index ranged between 22 and 63, with a mean of 42.7 (SD 6.8), indicating difficult readability. Weak and non-significant correlations were observed between ALEXA/search rank and the investigated quality variables, except for search rank and reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of consumer-oriented websites addressing the second trimester ultrasound examination is low. Health professionals need to discuss this with expectant parents considering undergoing the examination. There is a need for efforts that aim to improve the poor quality of online sources in the field of prenatal examinations.


Asunto(s)
Información de Salud al Consumidor/normas , Internet , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Comprensión , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Suecia
8.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 20(1): 102, 2020 06 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32503524

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High-quality information is essential if clients who request an abortion are to reach informed decisions and feel prepared for the procedure, but little is known concerning the readability of web-based sources containing such material. The aim was to investigate the readability of web-based information about induced abortion. METHODS: The search engine Google was used to identify web pages about induced abortion, written in the English language. A total of 240 hits were screened and 236 web pages fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After correcting for duplicate hits, 185 web pages were included. The readability of the text-based content of each web page was determined with Flesch Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Flesch Reading Ease. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient and Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's test as post hoc analysis. RESULTS: Across all grade level measures, a small minority of the web pages had a readability corresponding to elementary school (n < 3, 1%), while the majority had readability corresponding to senior high school or above (n > 153, 65%). The means of the grade level measures ranged between 10.5 and 13.1, and the mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 45.3 (SD 13.6). Only weak correlations (rho < 0.2) were found between the readability measures and search rank in the hit lists. Consistently, web pages affiliated with health care had the least difficult readability and those affiliated with scientific sources had the most difficult readability. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, web-based information about induced abortions has difficult readability. Incentives are needed to improve the readability of these texts and ensure that clients encounter understandable information so that they may reach informed decisions and feel adequately prepared when requesting an abortion.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Información de Salud al Consumidor , Alfabetización en Salud , Internet , Comprensión , Información de Salud al Consumidor/normas , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo
9.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 131, 2019 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30991967

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many countries offer screening programmes to unborn and newborn babies (antenatal and newborn screening) to identify those at risk of certain conditions to aid earlier diagnosis and treatment. Technological advances have stimulated the development of screening programmes to include more conditions, subsequently changing the information required and potential benefit-risk trade-offs driving participation. Quantifying preferences for screening programmes can provide programme commissioners with data to understand potential demand, the drivers of this demand, information provision required to support the programmes and the extent to which preferences differ in a population. This study aimed to identify published studies eliciting preferences for antenatal and newborn screening programmes and provide an overview of key methods and findings. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases for key terms identified eligible studies (discrete choice experiments (DCEs) or best-worst scaling (BWS) studies related to antenatal/newborn testing/screening published between 1990 and October 2018). Data were systematically extracted, tabulated and summarised in a narrative review. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies using a DCE or BWS to elicit preferences for antenatal (n = 15; 79%) and newborn screening (n = 4; 21%) programmes were identified. Most of the studies were conducted in Europe (n = 12; 63%) but there were some examples from North America (n = 2; 11%) and Australia (n = 2; 11%). Attributes most commonly included were accuracy of screening (n = 15; 79%) and when screening occurred (n = 13; 68%). Other commonly occurring attributes included information content (n = 11; 58%) and risk of miscarriage (n = 10; 53%). Pregnant women (n = 11; 58%) and healthcare professionals (n = 11; 58%) were the most common study samples. Ten studies (53%) compared preferences across different respondents. Two studies (11%) made comparisons between countries. The most popular analytical model was a standard conditional logit model (n = 11; 58%) and one study investigated preference heterogeneity with latent class analysis. CONCLUSION: There is an existing literature identifying stated preferences for antenatal and newborn screening but the incorporation of more sophisticated design and analytical methods to investigate preference heterogeneity could extend the relevance of the findings to inform commissioning of new screening programmes.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/psicología , Tamizaje Neonatal/psicología , Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Diagnóstico Prenatal/psicología , Adulto , Australia , Conducta de Elección , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , América del Norte , Embarazo , Proyectos de Investigación , Medición de Riesgo
10.
Reprod Health ; 16(1): 172, 2019 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31775765

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Today, there are various short- and long-acting contraceptive alternatives available for those who wish to prevent unintended pregnancy. Long-acting reversible contraception are considered effective methods with a high user satisfaction. High-quality information about contraception is essential in order to empower individuals to reach informed decisions based on sufficient knowledge. Use of the Web for information about contraception is widespread, and there is a risk that those who use it for this purpose could come in contact with sources of low quality. OBJECTIVE: The overarching aim was to investigate the quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception. METHODS: Swedish client-oriented websites were identified through searches in Google (n = 46 included websites). Reliability and information about long-acting reversible contraceptive choices were assessed by two assessors with the DISCERN instrument, transparency was analyzed with the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmarks, completeness was assessed with inductive content analysis and readability was analyzed with Readability Index. RESULTS: The mean DISCERN was 44.1/80 (SD 7.7) for total score, 19.7/40 (SD 3.7) for reliability, 22.1/35 (SD 4.1) for information about long-acting reversible contraceptive choices, and 2.3/5 (SD 1.1) for overall quality. A majority of the included websites had low quality with regard to what sources were used to compile the information (n = 41/46, 89%), when the information was produced (n = 40/46, 87%), and if it provided additional sources of support and information (n = 30/46, 65%). Less than half of the websites adhered to any of the JAMA benchmarks. We identified 23 categories of comprehensiveness. The most frequent was contraceptive mechanism (n = 39/46, 85%) and the least frequent was when contraception may be initiated following an abortion (n = 3/46, 7%). The mean Readability Index was 42.5 (SD 6.3, Range 29-55) indicating moderate to difficult readability levels, corresponding to a grade level of 9. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of client-oriented websites about long-acting reversible contraception is poor. There is an undeniable need to support and guide laypersons that intend to use web-based sources about contraceptive alternatives, so that they may reach informed decisions based on sufficient knowledge.


Asunto(s)
Información de Salud al Consumidor/normas , Anticoncepción/métodos , Internet/normas , Anticoncepción Reversible de Larga Duración/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo no Planeado , Adulto , Comprensión , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo
11.
J Adv Nurs ; 75(11): 3006-3017, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31237008

RESUMEN

AIMS: To explore recollections of pain and pain management during induced abortions. DESIGN: Mixed-methods exploratory study in Sweden. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed between October 2017 - July 2018 via Swedish discussion boards and social media. Open-ended questions were asked about recollection of pain and pain management, followed by self-reported ratings. The survey was answered by 185 participants, responses were analysed with qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS: Recollections of pain intensity illustrated considerable pain and a traumatic event, described in temporal aspects and likened to other painful conditions such as dysmenorrhoea and childbirth. Recollections of pain management illustrated experiences of insufficient treatment of pain and dissatisfaction with pain management, including inefficient treatment and lack of professional attendance. Psychological aspects and consequences illustrated that participants related psychological distress to physical pain, felt unprepared for the physical pain and emphasized the importance of psychological support. Those who experienced intense pain described long-term psychological consequences, including fear of childbirth. CONCLUSION: Physical pain and psychological distress can manifest as considerable challenges during induced abortion. Abortion-related pain is a multidimensional phenomenon involving physical and psychological components that needs to be rigorously treated. When physical pain is unsuccessfully treated, women may experience long-term psychological consequences after an abortion. IMPACT: The results illustrate the importance of holistic abortion care where the multidimensional components of abortion-related pain are considered. Patients need to be offered sufficient preparatory information about potential physical pain and psychological distress. This study indicates that there is room for improvement in pain management. Larger studies are needed.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Salud Holística , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Estrés Fisiológico/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia
12.
J Adv Nurs ; 75(11): 2683-2691, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31206760

RESUMEN

AIMS: To investigate the readability, comprehensiveness and transparency of web pages about medical abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy. DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive study of Swedish web pages. METHODS: Six systematic searches were performed in Google during January 2017. The first 10 hits of each search were screened, resulting in 46 included Swedish web pages. The web pages were analyzed with readability index (LIX) to investigate readability, inductive manifest content analysis to investigate comprehensiveness, and Journal of the Medical Association benchmarks to investigate transparency. RESULTS: Median LIX was 29.0 and the largest proportion had LIX 31-40 (N = 17), indicating moderate readability. Visual components were observed in 13 websites. Content analysis resulted in 12 categories illustrating comprehensiveness, but eight of these were only included in ≤50% web pages. With regard to transparency, 29 (63%) adhered to no benchmark, 15 (33%) adhered to one benchmark, and 2 (4%) adhered to two benchmarks. Most web pages were written or reviewed by laypersons (N = 25) and health professionals (N = 11). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that web pages about medical abortion have moderate readability, varied comprehensiveness and poor transparency. IMPACT: Health professionals need to acknowledge the risk of contact with web-based information about poor quality. There is a need for research that aims to increase the chances that patients encounter high-quality web-based information about medical abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Comprensión , Difusión de la Información , Internet/normas , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Escritura
13.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 24(5): 380-389, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31368829

RESUMEN

Objective: A survey was conducted to explore worries, fears and preparedness relating to the recollected experience of having an induced abortion. Methods: The Web-based survey was carried out in Sweden among 185 women. Respondents answered open-ended questions and gave retrospective self-reported ratings about their abortion-related worries, fears, preparedness and satisfaction with information obtained from health professionals and the Web. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics. Results: Worries and fears included the abortion process, physical reactions and psychosocial aspects. The abortion was associated with unexpected events, including the abortion process, poor health professional treatment and support, and side effects and complications. Respondents described a lack of preparatory information, leading to uncertainties due to insufficient information. Many searched for Web-based information, but respondents experienced difficulties finding high-quality sources. Respondents also recounted that the preparatory information received did not reflect the actual abortion experience. Conclusion: There is room for improvement with regard to informing, preparing and supporting women who seek an abortion. The results emphasise the importance of health professionals' giving sufficient preparatory information to enable preparedness and lessen the impact of possible unexpected events. There is a need for the development of a trustworthy Web-based service that contains honest and high-quality information.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/psicología , Ansiedad/psicología , Miedo/psicología , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia , Adulto Joven
14.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 97(3): 341-348, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29288489

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The literature describes advantages for mothers giving birth in water, but waterbirth is controversial in Sweden and has not been offered at hospitals until recently. This study aimed to describe and compare the characteristics and outcome of waterbirths with those of spontaneous vaginal births at the same clinics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all waterbirths at two maternity units in Sweden from March 2014 to November 2015 (n = 306), and a consecutively selected comparison group of 306 women having conventional spontaneous vaginal births. Logistic regression was used to analyze the primary outcome; second-degree perineal tears. RESULTS: Women giving birth in water had a lower risk of second-degree perineal tears [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-0.9]). Their labor was shorter (6 h 3 min vs. 7 h 52 min) and there were significantly fewer interventions than in the comparison group; amniotomy (13.7 vs. 35.3%), internal cardiotocography (11.1 vs. 56.8%), and augmentation with oxytocin (5.2 vs. 31.3%). There were no differences in Apgar scores or admissions to neonatal intensive care unit. The experience of childbirth, measured with a numeric rating scale, was higher in the waterbirth group indicating a more positive birth experience. Three newborns born in water had an umbilical cord avulsion. CONCLUSIONS: In this low-risk population, waterbirth is associated with positive effects on perineal tears, the frequency of interventions, the duration of labor and women's birth experience. Midwives handling waterbirth should be aware of the risk of umbilical cord avulsion.


Asunto(s)
Inmersión , Parto Normal/métodos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/prevención & control , Perineo/lesiones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Parto Normal/psicología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suecia
15.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 17(1): 359, 2017 Oct 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29037234

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maternal perception of decreased fetal movements and low awareness of fetal movements are associated with a negative birth outcome. Mindfetalness is a method developed for women to facilitate systematic observations of the intensity, character and frequency of fetal movements in late pregnancy. We sought to explore women's attitudes, experiences and compliance in using Mindfetalness. METHODS: We enrolled 104 pregnant women treated at three maternity clinics in Stockholm, Sweden, from February to July of 2016. We educated 104 women in gestational week 28-32 by providing information about fetal movements and how to practice Mindfetalness. Each was instructed to perform the assessment daily for 15 min. At each subsequent follow-up, the midwife collected information regarding their perceptions of Mindfetalness, and their compliance. Content analyses, descriptive and analytic statistics were used in the analysis of data. RESULTS: Of the women, 93 (89%) were positive towards Mindfetalness and compliance was high 78 (75%). Subjective responses could be binned into one of five categories: Decreased worry, relaxing, creating a relationship, more knowledge about the unborn baby and awareness of the unborn baby. Eleven (11%) women had negative perceptions of Mindfetalness, citing time, and the lack of need for a method to observe fetal movements as the most common reasons. CONCLUSION: Women in late pregnancy are generally positive about Mindfetalness and their compliance with daily use is high. The technique helped them to be more aware of, and create a relationship with, their unborn baby. Mindfetalness can be a useful tool in antenatal care. However, further study is necessary in order to determine whether the technique is able to reduce the incidence of negative birth outcome.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Fetal/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Atención Plena/métodos , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo/psicología , Atención Prenatal/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Monitoreo Fetal/métodos , Movimiento Fetal , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Percepción , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Suecia , Adulto Joven
16.
BMC Womens Health ; 17(1): 96, 2017 Oct 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28969621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most women who choose to terminate a pregnancy cope well following an abortion, although some women experience severe psychological distress. The general interpretation in the field is that the most consistent predictor of mental disorders after induced abortion is the mental health issues that women present with prior to the abortion. We have previously demonstrated that few women develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) after induced abortion. Neuroticism is one predictor of importance for PTSD, and may thus be relevant as a risk factor for the development of PTSD or PTSS after abortion. We therefore compared Neuroticism-related personality trait scores of women who developed PTSD or PTSS after abortion to those of women with no evidence of PTSD or PTSS before or after the abortion. METHODS: A Swedish multi-center cohort study including six Obstetrics and Gynecology Departments, where 1294 abortion-seeking women were included. The Screen Questionnaire-Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (SQ-PTSD) was used to evaluate PTSD and PTSS. Measurements were made at the first visit and at three and six month after the abortion. The Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP) was used for assessment of Neuroticism-related personality traits. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors for development of PTSD or PTSS post abortion. RESULTS: Women who developed PTSD or PTSS after the abortion had higher scores than the comparison group on several of the personality traits associated with Neuroticism, specifically Somatic Trait Anxiety, Psychic Trait Anxiety, Stress Susceptibility and Embitterment. Women who reported high, or very high, scores on Neuroticism had adjusted odds ratios for PTSD/PTSS development of 2.6 (CI 95% 1.2-5.6) and 2.9 (CI 95% 1.3-6.6), respectively. CONCLUSION: High scores on Neuroticism-related personality traits influence the risk of PTSD or PTSS post abortion. This finding supports the argument that the most consistent predictor of mental disorders after abortion is pre-existing mental health status.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Aborto Espontáneo/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Trastornos Neuróticos/psicología , Neuroticismo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Neuróticos/etiología , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia , Adulto Joven
17.
J Genet Couns ; 26(3): 447-454, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27480089

RESUMEN

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was recently introduced for prenatal testing of genetic disorders. Cell-free fetal DNA is present in maternal blood during pregnancy and enables detection of fetal chromosome aberrations in a maternal blood sample. The public perspective to this new, simple method has not been illuminated. The views of young people (i.e. future parents) are important to develop suitable counseling strategies regarding prenatal testing. The aim was to explore Swedish high school students' attitudes, knowledge and preferences regarding NIPT. A questionnaire was completed by 305 students recruited from one high school in Stockholm, November and December 2014. Most students (80 %) considered prenatal testing as good. The majority (65 %) was positive or very positive towards NIPT and 62 % stated that they potentially would like to undergo the test if they or their partner was pregnant. The vast majority (94 %) requested further information about NIPT. Most students (61 %) preferred verbal information, whereas 20 % preferred information via the Internet. The majority of the high school students was positive towards prenatal testing and most was positive towards NIPT. Further, information was requested by the vast majority before making a decision about NIPT. Most of the students preferred verbal information and to a lesser extent information via the Internet. The attitudes, knowledge and preferences for risk information concerning NIPT in young adults are important, in order to increase knowledge on how to educate and inform future parents.


Asunto(s)
Actitud , Conocimiento , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudiantes/psicología , Adolescente , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia
18.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 16(1): 127, 2016 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27245990

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women sometimes worry about their unborn baby's health, often due to decreased fetal movements. The aim of this study was to examine how women, who consulted health care due to decreased fetal movements, describe how the baby had moved less or differently. METHODS: Women were recruited from all seven delivery wards in Stockholm, Sweden, during 1/1 - 31/12 2014. The women completed a questionnaire after it was verified that the pregnancy was viable. A modified content analysis was used to analyse 876 questionnaires with the women's responses to, "Try to describe how your baby has moved less or had changes in movement". RESULTS: Four categories and six subcategories were identified: "Frequency" (decreased frequency, absence of kicks and movement), "Intensity" (weaker fetal movements, indistinct fetal movements), "Character" (changed pattern of movements, slower movements) and "Duration". In addition to the responses categorised in accordance with the question, the women also mentioned how they had tried to stimulate the fetus to move and that they had difficulty in distinguishing fetal movements from contractions. Further, they described worry due to incidents related to changed pattern of fetal movements. CONCLUSION: Women reported changes in fetal movement concerning frequency, intensity, character and duration. The challenge from a clinical perspective is to inform pregnant women about fetal movements with the goal of minimizing unnecessary consultations whilst at the same time diminishing the length of pre-hospital delay if the fetus is at risk of fetal compromise. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.


Asunto(s)
Movimiento Fetal , Adulto , Ansiedad/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Percepción , Estimulación Física , Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia , Adulto Joven
19.
Sex Reprod Healthc ; 39: 100929, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38041928

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although the prevalence of pain persisting after pregnancy or labour decreases with time, up to 35 % of women report pain 8 months to 12 years after childbirth. To prevent the development and reduce the impact of chronic pain, researchers and clinicians emphasize the importance of early diagnosis as well as timely and appropriate treatment. Previous studies have shown that when women with post-childbirth morbidities consult healthcare professionals during the first year following birth, their problems are often neglected, and they do not receive adequate treatment. OBJECTIVE: To explore how women with pain persisting for eight months after childbirth experienced encounters with healthcare. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative design with 20 face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: "Pain ignored by healthcare" was identified as an essential theme and included four categories: "Questioned pain experience," "Inadequate pain management," "Lost in healthcare," and "Insufficient postpartum care " CONCLUSION: The women experienced that their pain was often not recognized or adequately treated, but instead ignored or trivialized. Recurring were descriptions of experienced knowledge gaps among the healthcare providers regarding pain and its management. There was an overall desire among women for a well-defined and well-functioning chain of care with better accessibility and scope.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor/etiología , Investigación Cualitativa , Atención a la Salud , Parto
20.
Midwifery ; 107: 103283, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35172265

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The management of the active second stage in labor and perineal protection varies between countries and is rarely described regarding waterbirths. The objective of this study was to describe how midwives manage the active second stage of labor in waterbirths compared to conventional births. A secondary aim was to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups. METHODS: A prospective cohort study, based on 323 women who gave birth at three clinics in Sweden, between Dec 2015-May 2019. The women were both primiparous and multiparous; 153 gave birth in water and 170 had a conventional uncomplicated birth. A protocol was completed by the attending midwife after birth, describing characteristics and management of the active second stage of labor as well as perineal protection. RESULTS: The active second stage of labor differed in several aspects between waterbirths and conventional births. Maternal pushing was spontaneous to a higher extent among women giving birth in water and the use of manual perineal protection was lower. The technique of manual perineal protection differed as well as birth positions. Giving birth in water was associated with less second-degree tears among primiparous women but with no differences among multiparas. CONCLUSIONS: In waterbirth, the midwife took the role of a more watchful attendee, making less interventions. Waterbirths were associated with less directed pushing and less manual perineal protection. However, there was still a widespread use of manual perineal protection, showing it is possible to use in the same way as in conventional births if needed.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Parto Normal , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Parto Normal/métodos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Perineo , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA