Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Dis ; 225(8): 1317-1320, 2022 04 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34919700

RESUMEN

We assessed the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on treatment of latent tuberculosis, and of active tuberculosis, at 3 centers in Montreal and Toronto, using data from 10 833 patients (8685 with latent tuberculosis infection, 2148 with active tuberculosis). Observation periods prior to declarations of COVID-19 public health emergencies ranged from 219 to 744 weeks, and after declarations, from 28 to 33 weeks. In the latter period, reductions in latent tuberculosis infection treatment initiation rates ranged from 30% to 66%. At 2 centers, active tuberculosis treatment rates fell by 16% and 29%. In Canada, cornerstone measures for tuberculosis elimination weakened during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Tuberculosis Latente , Tuberculosis , Canadá/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/prevención & control
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(8): 1390-1400, 2022 04 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34286831

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Automated radiologic analysis using computer-aided detection software (CAD) could facilitate chest X-ray (CXR) use in tuberculosis diagnosis. There is little to no evidence on the accuracy of commercially available deep learning-based CAD in different populations, including patients with smear-negative tuberculosis and people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, PLWH). METHODS: We collected CXRs and individual patient data (IPD) from studies evaluating CAD in patients self-referring for tuberculosis symptoms with culture or nucleic acid amplification testing as the reference. We reanalyzed CXRs with three CAD programs (CAD4TB version (v) 6, Lunit v3.1.0.0, and qXR v2). We estimated sensitivity and specificity within each study and pooled using IPD meta-analysis. We used multivariable meta-regression to identify characteristics modifying accuracy. RESULTS: We included CXRs and IPD of 3727/3967 participants from 4/7 eligible studies. 17% (621/3727) were PLWH. 17% (645/3727) had microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis. Despite using the same threshold score for classifying CXR in every study, sensitivity and specificity varied from study to study. The software had similar unadjusted accuracy (at 90% pooled sensitivity, pooled specificities were: CAD4TBv6, 56.9% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 51.7-61.9]; Lunit, 54.1% [95% CI: 44.6-63.3]; qXRv2, 60.5% [95% CI: 51.7-68.6]). Adjusted absolute differences in pooled sensitivity between PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants were: CAD4TBv6, -13.4% [-21.1, -6.9]; Lunit, +2.2% [-3.6, +6.3]; qXRv2: -13.4% [-21.5, -6.6]; between smear-negative and smear-positive tuberculosis was: were CAD4TBv6, -12.3% [-19.5, -6.1]; Lunit, -17.2% [-24.6, -10.5]; qXRv2, -16.6% [-24.4, -9.9]. Accuracy was similar to human readers. CONCLUSIONS: For CAD CXR analysis to be implemented as a high-sensitivity tuberculosis rule-out test, users will need threshold scores identified from their own patient populations and stratified by HIV and smear status.


Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Infecciones por VIH , Tuberculosis Pulmonar , Tuberculosis , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Programas Informáticos , Triaje , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/microbiología , Rayos X
3.
Int J Infect Dis ; : 107221, 2024 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39233047

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Computer-aided detection (CAD) software packages quantify tuberculosis-compatible chest X-ray (CXR) abnormality as continuous scores. In practice, a threshold value is selected for binary CXR classification. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of an alternative approach to applying CAD for tuberculosis triage: incorporating CAD scores in multivariable modelling. METHODS: We pooled individual patient data from four studies. Separately for two commercial CAD, we used logistic regression to model microbiologically-confirmed tuberculosis. Models included CAD score, study site, age, sex, HIV status, and prior tuberculosis. We compared specificity at target sensitivities ≥90% between the multivariable model and the current threshold-based approach for CAD use. RESULTS: We included 4733/5640 (84%) participants with complete covariate data (median age 36 years; 45% female; 22% with prior tuberculosis; 22% people living with HIV). A total of 805 (17%) had tuberculosis. Multivariable models demonstrated excellent performance (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95%CI): software A, 0.91 (0.90-0.93); software B, 0.92 (0.91-0.93)). Compared to threshold scores, multivariable models increased specificity (e.g. at 90% sensitivity, threshold vs model specificity (95%CI): software A, 71% (68%-74%) vs. 75% (74%-77%); software B, 69% (63%-75%) vs. 75% (74%-77%)). CONCLUSIONS: Using CAD scores in multivariable models outperformed the current practice of CAD-threshold-based CXR classification for tuberculosis diagnosis.

4.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(2): ofae020, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38328498

RESUMEN

Background: Computer-aided detection (CAD) may be a useful screening tool for tuberculosis (TB). However, there are limited data about its utility in active case finding (ACF) in a community-based setting, and particularly in an HIV-endemic setting where performance may be compromised. Methods: We performed a systematic review and evaluated articles published between January 2012 and February 2023 that included CAD as a screening tool to detect pulmonary TB against a microbiological reference standard (sputum culture and/or nucleic acid amplification test [NAAT]). We collected and summarized data on study characteristics and diagnostic accuracy measures. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality against Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 criteria. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines were followed. Results: Of 1748 articles reviewed, 5 met with the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. A meta-analysis revealed pooled sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.96) and specificity of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.55-0.93), just below the World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended target product profile (TPP) for a screening test (sensitivity ≥0.90 and specificity ≥0.70). We found a high risk of bias and applicability concerns across all studies. Subgroup analyses, including the impact of HIV and previous TB, were not possible due to the nature of the reporting within the included studies. Conclusions: This review provides evidence, specifically in the context of ACF, for CAD as a potentially useful and cost-effective screening tool for TB in a resource-poor HIV-endemic African setting. However, given methodological concerns, caution is required with regards to applicability and generalizability.

5.
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis ; 31: 100365, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37095759

RESUMEN

Objectives: We applied computer-aided detection (CAD) software for chest X-ray (CXR) analysis to determine if diabetes affects the radiographic presentation of tuberculosis. Methods: From March 2017-July 2018, we consecutively enrolled adults being evaluated for pulmonary tuberculosis in Karachi, Pakistan. Participants had same-day CXR, two sputum mycobacterial cultures, and random blood glucose measurement. We identified diabetes through self-report or glucose >11.1mMol/L. We included participants with culture-confirmed tuberculosis for this analysis. We used linear regression to estimate associations between CAD-reported tuberculosis abnormality score (range 0.00 to 1.00) and diabetes, adjusting for age, body mass index, sputum smear-status, and prior tuberculosis. We also compared radiographic abnormalities between participants with and without diabetes. Results: 63/272 (23%) of included participants had diabetes. After adjustment, diabetes was associated with higher CAD tuberculosis abnormality scores (p < 0.001). Diabetes was not associated with frequency of CAD-reported radiographic abnormalities apart from cavitary disease; participants with diabetes were more likely to have cavitary disease (74.6% vs 61.2% p = 0.07), particularly non-upper zone cavitary disease (17% vs 7.8%, p = 0.09). Conclusions: CAD analysis of CXR suggests diabetes is associated with more extensive radiographic abnormalities and with greater likelihood of cavities outside upper lung zones.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA