Ibrexafungerp Versus Placebo for Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Treatment: A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Superiority Trial (VANISH 303).

BACKGROUND: Current treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is largely limited to azole therapy. Ibrexafungerp is a first-in-class triterpenoid antifungal with broad-spectrum anti-Candida fungicidal activity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibrexafungerp compared with placebo in patients with acute VVC. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive ibrexafungerp (300 mg twice for 1 day) or placebo. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a clinical cure (complete resolution of vulvovaginal signs and symptoms [VSS] = 0) at test-of-cure (day 11 ± 3). Secondary endpoints included the percentage of patients with mycological eradication, overall success (clinical cure and mycological eradication), clinical improvement (VSS ≤ 1) at test-of-cure, and symptom resolution at follow-up (day 25 ± 4). RESULTS: Patients receiving ibrexafungerp had significantly higher rates of clinical cure (50.5% [95/188] vs 28.6% [28/98]; P = .001), mycological eradication (49.5% [93/188] vs 19.4% [19/98]; P < .001), and overall success (36.0% [64/178] vs 12.6% [12/95]; P < .001) compared with placebo. Symptom resolution was sustained and further increased with ibrexafungerp compared with placebo (59.6% [112/188] vs 44.9% [44/98]; P = .009) at follow-up. Post hoc analysis showed similar rates of clinical cure and clinical improvement at test-of-cure for Black patients (54.8% [40/73] and 63.4% [47/73], respectively) and patients with a body mass index >35 (54.5% [24/44] and 68.2% [30/44], respectively) compared with overall rates. Ibrexafungerp was well tolerated. Adverse events were primarily gastrointestinal and mild in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrexafungerp provides a promising safe and efficacious oral treatment that mechanistically differs from current azole treatment options for acute VVC.

A dose-response study of a novel, oral tranexamic formulation for heavy menstrual bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of a novel, oral tranexamic acid formulation (Lysteda; Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc, Parsippany, NJ) in women with cyclic heavy menstrual bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group trial for 3 menstrual cycles (n = 304). Women with mean menstrual blood loss (MBL) of ≥ 80 mL/cycle were randomized to receive either 1.95 g/d or 3.9 g/d of tranexamic acid or placebo for up to 5 days of menstrual bleeding. Primary efficacy endpoints were mean MBL reduction from baseline, mean MBL reductions that were considered "meaningful" by subjects, and mean MBL reductions from baseline > 50 mL/cycle. Adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. RESULTS: Only the 3.9 g/d group met all 3 primary efficacy endpoints. AEs did not significantly differ among the 3 groups. There were no serious study-related AEs. CONCLUSION: The 3.9-g/d dose met all 3 primary efficacy endpoints, whereas the 1.95 g/d dose met 2 primary efficacy endpoints. Both doses were well tolerated.

A rapid, high-volume cervical screening project using self-sampling and isothermal PCR HPV testing.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid, high-volume screening programs are needed as part of cervical cancer prevention in China. METHODS: In a 5-day screening project in Inner Mongolia, 3345 women volunteered following a community awareness campaign, and self-swabbed to permit rapid HPV testing. Two AmpFire™ HPV detection systems (Atila Biosystems) were sufficient to provide pooled 15-HPV type data within an hour. HPV+ patients had same-day digital colposcopy (DC) performed by 1 of 6 physicians, using the EVA™ system (MobileODT). Digital images were obtained and, after biopsy of suspected lesions for later confirmatory diagnosis, women were treated immediately based on colposcopic impression. Suspected low- grade lesions were offered treatment with thermal ablation (Wisap), and suspected high-grade lesions were treated with LLETZ. RESULTS: Of 3345 women screened, 624 (18.7%) were HPV+. Of these, 88.5% HPV+ women underwent same-day colposcopy and 78 were treated. Later consensus histology results obtained on 197 women indicated 20 CIN2+, of whom 15 were detected and treated/referred at screening (10 by thermal ablation, 4 by LLETZ, 1 by referral). CONCLUSIONS: Global control of cervical cancer will require both vaccination and screening of a huge number of women. This study illustrates a cervical screening strategy that can be used to screen-and-treat large numbers of women. HPV self-sampling facilitates high-volume screening. Specimens can be tested rapidly, promoting minimal loss-to-follow-up. Specifically, the AmpFire™ system used in this study is highly portable, simple, rapid (92 specimens per 65 min per unit), and economical. Visual triage can be performed on HPV+ women with a portable digital colposcope that provides magnification, lighting, and a recorded image. Diagnosis and appropriate treatment remain the most subjective elements. The digital image is under study for deep-learning based automated evaluation that could assist the management decision, either by itself or combined with HPV typing.

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Prospective, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety of a Single Dose of Secnidazole 2 g for the Treatment of Women and Postmenarchal Adolescent Girls with Bacterial Vaginosis.

BACKGROUND: A novel formulation of secnidazole is under development in the United States for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV). Efficacy and safety of other formulations of secnidazole have been reported. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of a single-dose oral granule formulation of secnidazole in a U.S. population of women with BV. METHODS: In this open-label study, patients were enrolled based on the following criteria: off-white, thin, homogeneous vaginal discharge; vaginal pH ≥4.7; presence of ≥20% clue cells; and positive potassium hydroxide whiff test. Eligible patients received a single dose of secnidazole 2 g at baseline. Patients were contacted on days 8-10 and were assessed for safety at an end-of-study visit (days 21-30). Additional endpoints included investigator assessment of the need for additional treatment and a post hoc analysis of clinical response to treatment. RESULTS: Of 321 patients, 283 (88.2%) completed the study. The mean age was 32 ± 8.5 years; most patients were white (51.4%) or black/African American (46.1%). Most (79.1%) reported ≤3 episodes of BV in the past year. The overall number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 95 (29.6%), of which 53 (16.5%) were treatment related. Common treatment-related TEAEs were vulvovaginal mycotic infection (5.3%), nausea (4.4%), and dysgeusia (3.1%). The proportion of patients not requiring additional BV treatment, as assessed by investigators, was 72.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose secnidazole 2 g was well tolerated, with a low overall number of TEAEs, most of which were mild to moderate.

Effect of Extended 30 µg Ethinyl Estradiol with Continuous Low-Dose Ethinyl Estradiol and Cyclic 20 µg Ethinyl Estradiol Oral Contraception on Adolescent Bone Density: A Randomized Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in lumbar spine bone mineral density after 12 months of a 91-day extended regimen or 28-day combined oral contraceptive with those in a healthy reference group not using hormonal contraceptives. DESIGN: Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Forty-five academic centers, clinical research centers, and community practices in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred twenty-nine postmenarcheal adolescent girls aged 12-18 years. INTERVENTIONS: Adolescents were randomly assigned to 91-day levonorgestrel (LNG)/ethinyl estradiol (EE) extended regimen (84 days of LNG 150 µg/EE 30 µg with 7 days of EE 10 µg [LNG/EE extended regimen]) or 28 days of LNG/EE (21 days of LNG 100 µg/EE 20 µg with 7 days of placebo [LNG/EE 21/7]) for 12 months. A reference group not seeking hormonal contraception was also evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was mean percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Of 1361 adolescents randomized/enrolled, 829 were included in the primary analysis. Mean changes in lumbar spine bone mineral density were +2.26% with LNG/EE extended regimen, +1.45% with LNG/EE 21/7, and +2.50% in the reference group. Noninferiority of the LNG/EE extended regimen compared with the reference group was shown. A statistically significant treatment difference was found between LNG/EE 21/7 and the reference group (1.05%; 95% confidence interval, 0.61%-1.49%) but not between LNG/EE extended regimen and the reference group (0.23%; 95% confidence interval, -0.20% to 0.67%). No new safety signals were noted. CONCLUSION: Compared with the reference group, bone accrual was statistically significantly lower among LNG/EE 21/7 users but not among LNG/EE 30-µg extended regimen users. Additional research is needed to clarify the clinical relevance of these findings.

Efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid in women with heavy menstrual bleeding and fibroids.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral, modified-release tranexamic acid in women with heavy menstrual bleeding and fibroids. MATERIALS & METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of two pivotal Phase III studies. Fibroids were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography. Menstrual blood loss (MBL) was measured via a validated alkaline hematin method. RESULTS: In women with and without fibroids, mean MBL was reduced compared with placebo across all treatment cycles (p < 0.001). Within the tranexamic acid group, more statistically significant (p < 0.001) reductions in MBL compared with placebo occurred in women with fibroids than in those without fibroids. Adverse events were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Tranexamic acid was well tolerated and reduced MBL in women with and without fibroids.

Tranexamic acid increases hemoglobin and ferritin levels in women with heavy menstrual bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is the most common cause of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in women. A novel, modified-release oral formulation of tranexamic acid (TA) designed to reduce gastrointestinal side effects was approved recently for treatment of HMB. We assessed improvements in objective laboratory measures of IDA in women with self-reported HMB who received long-term TA therapy. METHODS: Women enrolled in a long-term, open-label, multicenter study self-medicated with TA 3.9 g/day administered as 1.3 g orally up to three times daily for 5 days/menstrual cycle for 27 cycles. Oral iron therapy was required if serum hemoglobin (Hgb) levels decreased to <11 g/dL. RESULTS: A total of 723 women (mean age 38.3 years) were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Significant increases in mean serum Hgb and ferritin were observed throughout the study (p<0.01). Among 191 patients with low Hgb (<12 g/dL) at baseline, mean serum Hgb increased by ≥0.71 g/dL after the third cycle and all subsequent assessments (p<0.001). After 3 and 27 cycles, 34.1% and 45.7%, respectively, of patients with low Hgb at baseline shifted to within normal range, respectively. Among 233 patients with low ferritin (<10 ng/mL) at baseline, mean serum ferritin increased by >5.38 ng/mL after cycles 15 and 27. After 6 and 27 cycles, 35.2% and 58% of patients, respectively, with low ferritin levels at baseline shifted to within normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term self-medication with this novel TA formulation improved Hgb and ferritin levels in women with self-reported HMB.

Long-term evaluation of safety and health-related quality of life in women with heavy menstrual bleeding treated with oral tranexamic acid.

AIMS: A multicenter, long-term, open-label study was conducted to assess the safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of an oral tranexamic acid (TA) formulation in women with cyclic heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). MATERIALS & METHODS: Following a screening menstrual cycle, women with a history of cyclic HMB initiated 27 cycles of treatment with TA 1.3 g administered three-times daily for up to 5 days per menstrual cycle (maximum of 15 doses). Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) monitoring, physical examinations, laboratory results, ophthalmologic examinations and electrocardiography. HRQoL was evaluated using both generic and HMB-specific instruments. RESULTS: Most of the TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity and were largely considered unrelated to study treatment. The most commonly reported TEAEs among women in the intent-to-treat population (n = 723) were headache, menstrual discomfort and back pain. Improvements in generic and disease-specific HRQoL measures were evident during the first treatment cycle and were maintained throughout the 15 cycles of measurement for most domains. CONCLUSION: Long-term TA treatment was well tolerated and improved measures of HRQoL in women with cyclic HMB.

Tranexamic acid treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of an oral formulation of tranexamic acid for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. METHODS: Adult women with heavy menstrual bleeding (mean menstrual blood loss 80 mL or more per cycle) were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After two pretreatment menstrual cycles, women were randomized to receive tranexamic acid 3.9 g/d or placebo for up to 5 days per menstrual cycle through six cycles. To meet the prespecified three-component primary efficacy end point, mean reduction in menstrual blood loss from baseline with tranexamic acid treatment needed to be 1) significantly greater than placebo, 2) greater than 50 mL, and 3) greater than a predetermined meaningful threshold (36 mL or higher). Health-related quality of life was measured using a validated patient-reported outcome instrument. RESULTS: Women who received tranexamic acid (n=115) met all three primary efficacy end points: first, a significantly greater reduction in menstrual blood loss of -69.6 mL (40.4%) compared with -12.6 mL (8.2%) in the 72 women who received placebo (P<.001); reduction of menstrual blood loss exceeding a prespecified 50 mL; and last, reduction of menstrual blood loss considered meaningful to women. Compared with women receiving placebo, women treated with tranexamic acid experienced significant improvements in limitations in social or leisure and physical activities, work inside and outside the home, and self-perceived menstrual blood loss (P<.01). The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, and the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was comparable with placebo. CONCLUSION: In this study, a new oral tranexamic acid treatment was well tolerated and significantly improved both menstrual blood loss and health-related quality of life in women with heavy menstrual bleeding. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00386308. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.