RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a difference in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage at time of presentation after lifting coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown restrictions, as compared to before the lockdown. Enhancing our understanding of how healthcare utilization for pelvic floor disorders may be affected by limited accessibility, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, could prove invaluable for similar future circumstances. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of women with POP at their initial visit. Patients were grouped into two cohorts based on their initial presentation time: pre-COVID-19 lockdown (before March 2020) and post-COVID-19 lockdown (after December 2020). The cohorts were compared using demographic, clinical, and surgical variables. A logistic regression controlling for confounders was used to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 lockdown on prolapse stage. RESULTS: There were 656 (50.3%) patients in the pre-COVID-19 lockdown cohort and 648 (49.7%) in the post-COVID-19 lockdown cohort. All baseline characteristics were similar between both cohorts except for race (p = 0.015). Treatment choices differed with the post-COVID-19 lockdown cohort having a lower proportion (26.5%) opting for surgery and a higher proportion (50.5%) of patients opting for nonsurgical interventions compared to the pre-COVID-19 lockdown cohort (p = 0.0005). A higher proportion of women presented with stages I and II prolapse in the post-COVID-19 lockdown (70.4%) cohort as compared to the pre-COVID-19 lockdown (62.5%) cohort (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Women in the post-COVID-19 lockdown cohort presented with early stage prolapse with preference for more conservative treatment options.