Hematologic Abnormalities After COVID-19 Infection: A Case of Coombs-Negative Hemolytic Anemia and Thrombocytopenia.

The occurrence of hemolytic anemia in patients with active SARS-CoV-2 infection has been documented in medical literature. While relatively uncommon, there have been instances where this condition presents as a Coombs-negative hemolytic anemia. In this research study, we report a distinctive case of Coombs-negative hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia in a patient with a known history of COVID-19 infection. The patient demonstrated a favorable response to treatment involving the administration of steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. This case adds to the existing body of evidence regarding the hematological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighting the importance of considering and managing hematological complications in patients with COVID-19.

Breast Cancer Treatment: To tARget or Not? That Is the Question.

To assess AR's role in TNBC treatment, various existing and completed clinical trials targeting AR or co-targeting AR with other pertinent signaling molecules were analyzed. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6), cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17 lyase), and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) signaling pathway were some of the most prevalent biomarkers used in combination therapy with AR inhibitors in these trials. Studying how AR functions in tandem with these molecules can have increasing breakthroughs in the treatment options for TNBC. Previous studies have been largely unsuccessful in utilizing AR as the sole drug target for systemic targeted treatment in TNBC. However, there is a lack of other commonly used drug target biomarkers in the treatment of this disease, as well. Thus, analyzing the clinical benefit rate (CBR) within clinical trials that use combination therapy can prove to be imperative to the progression of improving treatment options and prognoses.

Metabolic syndrome is independently associated with improved overall survival to first-line therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Many co-existing medical conditions may affect the outcome in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced cancer. There is currently not any information on whether metabolic syndrome (MetS) impacts the clinical outcome in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced non-small cell line cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We carried out a single-center retrospective cohort study to determine the effects of MetS on first-line ICI therapy in patients with NSCLC. Results: One hundred and eighteen consecutive adult patients who received first-line therapy with ICIs and had adequate medical record information for the determination of MetS status and clinical outcomes were included in the study. Twenty-one patients had MetS and 97 did not. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, smoking history, ECOG performance status, tumor histologic types, pre-therapy use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, PD-L1 expression, pre-treatment neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, or proportions of patients who received ICI monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy. With a median follow-up of 9 months (range 0.5-67), MetS patients enjoyed significantly longer overall survival (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92) (p = 0.02) but not progression-free survival. The improved outcome was only observed in patients who received ICI monotherapy and not chemoimmunotherapy. MetS predicted for higher probability of survival at 6 months (p = 0.043) and 12 months (p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis indicated that, in addition to the known adverse effects of use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials and the beneficial effects of PD-L1 (Programmed cell death-ligand 1) expression, MetS was independently associated with improved overall survival but not progression-free survival. Conclusions: Our results suggest that MetS is an independent predictor of treatment outcome in patients who received first-line ICI monotherapy for NSCLC.

Radioimmunoconjugates in the age of modern immuno-oncology.

Immunotherapy was first investigated as a therapeutic option for treating cancer more than a century ago. During this period, it has gone through numerous disappointments when the successes obtained in the laboratory were not matched clinically. However, recent advances in immuno-oncology have provided the impetus to revisit this therapeutic option. Unlike previous efforts, modern immunotherapy is now a realistic and formidable therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory malignancies. Unfortunately, most of the successes obtained thus far have primarily been in patients with hematologic malignancies. While the results of immunotherapy with immune check-point inhibitors for solid tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma are encouraging, more effective treatment methods are desirable. Many intrinsic and extrinsic factors pose as obstacles to successful immunotherapy of solid tumors. They include heterogeneity of tumor antigens, limitation in the trafficking and accessibility of the effector mechanisms to the tumor sites, the adverse anti-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, and the on-target off tumor and off-target off-tumor effects of some of these approaches. In this review, we will discuss these obstacles and examine the evidence that support the notion that radioimmunotherapy, using radioimmunoconjugates, may be the answer to overcome these obstacles in patients with metastatic cancer. Finally, we will discuss how the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy using radioimmunoconjugates might further be harnessed to maximize successes in these patients.

Outcome of deceased donor renal transplantation - a single-center experience from developing country.

Renal transplantation (RTx) is considered as the best therapeutic modality for patient suffering from end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Dearth of donor kidneys is a major problem everywhere, and deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRTx) is seen as at least a partial solution. Even so, DDRTx accounts for only less than 4% of RTx in India. We report our 6-year single-center experience on DDRTx vis-à-vis patient/graft survival, graft function in terms of serum creatinine (SCr), rejection episodes, and delayed graft function (DGF). Between January 2005 and March 2011, 236 DDRTx were performed. Majority of the donors were those with brain death due to road traffic/cerebrovascular accidents. The commonest recipient diseases leading to ESRD were chronic glomerulonephritis (42.8%), diabetes (12.7%), and hypertension (10.6%). Mean recipient age was 36.2 ± 14.2 years; 162 were males and 74 were females. Mean donor age was 45.3 ± 17.13 years; 144 were males and 92 were females. Mean dialysis duration pre-transplantation was 18.5 ± 2.5 months. All recipients received single-dose rabbit-anti-thymocyte globulin induction and steroids, calcinueurin inhibitor, and mycophenolate mofetil/azathioprine for maintenance immunosuppression. Delayed graft function was observed in 29.6% patients and 22% had biopsy-proven acute rejection. Over the mean follow-up of 2.18 ± 1.75 years, patient and graft survival rates were 74.57% and 86.8%, respectively, with mean SCr of 1.42 ± 0.66 mg%. DDRTx achieves acceptable graft function with patient/graft survival, encouraging the use of this approach in view of organ shortage.