RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare Uromonitor® (U-Monitor Lda, Porto, Portugal), a multitarget DNA assay that detects mutated proto-oncogenes (telomerase reverse transcriptase [TERT], fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 [FGFR-3], Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue [KRAS]), with urine cytology in the urine-based diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) within a multicentre real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicentre, prospective, double-blind study was conducted across four German urological centres from 2019 to 2024. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of Uromonitor compared to urine cytology in a cohort of patients with UCB and in healthy controls within a real-world setting. Sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value (PPV), negative-predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the tests were measured, in addition to multivariate analyses to assess the ability of individual proto-oncogene mutations in detecting UCB. The biometric sample size was designed to achieve a 10% difference in sensitivity. RESULTS: Patients with UCB comprised 63.7% (339/532) of the study group. Uromonitor showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and an area-under-the-curve of 49.3%, 93.3%, 92.8%, 51.1%, 65.2%, and 0.713%, respectively. These metrics did not demonstrate statistical superiority over urine cytology in terms of sensitivity (44.6%; P = 0.316). Moreover, the comparison of additional test parameters, as well as the comparison within various sensitivity analyses, yielded no significant disparity between the two urinary tests. Multivariate logistic regression underscored the significant predictive value of a positive Uromonitor for detecting UCB (odds ratio [OR] 9.03; P < 0.001). Furthermore, mutations in TERT and FGFR-3 were independently associated with high odds of UCB detection (OR 13.30 and 7.04, respectively), while KRAS mutations did not exhibit predictive capability. CONCLUSION: Despite its innovative approach, Uromonitor fell short of confirming the superior results anticipated from previous studies in this real-world setting. The search for an optimal urine-based biomarker for detecting and monitoring UCB remains ongoing. Results from this study highlight the complexity of developing non-invasive diagnostic tools and emphasise the importance of continued research efforts to refine these technologies.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) performed in several German centres with different laparoscopic experience, as LA has become the gold-standard approach for benign surgical adrenal disorders; however, for solitary metastasis or primary adrenal cancer its precise role is uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of 363 patients who underwent a LA were prospectively collected in 23 centres. All centres were stratified into three groups according to their experience: group A (<10 LAs/year), group B (10-20 LAs/year) and group C (>20 LAs/year). In all, 15 centres used a transperitoneal approach, four a retroperitoneal approach and four both approaches. Demographic data, perioperative and postoperative variables, including operating time, surgical approach, tumour size, estimated blood loss, complications, hospital stay and histological tumour staging, were collected and analysed. RESULTS: The transperitoneal approach was used in 281 cases (77.4%) and the retroperitoneal approach was used in 82 patients (22.6%). In all, 263 of 363 lesions (72.5%) were benign and 100 (27.5%) were malignant. The mean (sd) operating time was 127.22 (55.56) min and 130.16 (49.88) min after transperitoneal and retroperitoneal LA, respectively. The mean complication rates for transperitoneal and retroperitoneal LA were 5% and 10.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: LAs performed by urologists experienced in laparoscopy is safe for the removal of benign and malignant adrenal masses. LA for malignant adrenal tumours should be performed only in high-volume centres by a surgeon performing at least >10 LAs/year.