Bias of near-infrared light in evaluation of patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare visual quality between subjective tests and optical devices using near-infrared (NIR) light in patients implanted with monofocal, multifocal and enlarged depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: Cross-sectional study enrolling patients aged between 55 and 75 (axial length between 22 and 25 mm) bilaterally implanted with Tecnis IOLs (Johnson & Johnson) four months previously: 40 patients (80 eyes) with monofocal ZCB00, 41 patients (82 eyes) with bifocal diffractive ZMB00 and 48 patients (96 eyes) with EDoF Symfony. They were examined using subjective and objective tests. The subjective tests comprised visual acuity (VA) with ETDRS charts, contrast sensitivity (CS) with Pelli-Robson and CSV-1000E tests, and clear vision range (CVR). The objective tests using NIR light were performed with the KR-1 W wavefront analyzer and the OQAS. RESULTS: In the subjective tests, the monofocal group achieved the best outcomes in some of the VA and CS sections, while the bifocal group obtained the worst outcomes in some of the CS sections. In the objective tests, the bifocal group achieved the best results for VA and CS. Discrepancies between pseudoaccommodation range and CVR were found in the bifocal and EDoF groups. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of visual quality using NIR light implies greater bias for diffractive lenses than for EDoF lenses. This bias may be even greater with devices using longer light wavelengths or Hartmann-Shack technology. The difference in wavelength between NIR and visible light leads to dimming of near-vision focus and magnification of distance focus.

Efficacy of estimations of Hartmann-Shack sensors in small pupil sizes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of the estimations of wavefront analyzers using Hartmann-Shack technology to measure optical aberrations when the pupil size is smaller than the evaluated pupil area. METHODS: Patients implanted with the monofocal ZCB00 intraocular lens (Johnson and Johnson) were examined with the KR-1W Wavefront Analyzer (Topcon) without pharmacological mydriasis and with it afterward. Optical aberrations were analyzed considering a 4-mm pupil and a 6-mm pupil for both examinations. RESULTS: Sixty-six eyes of 33 patients with a mean axial length of 23.35 ± 0.91 mm were assessed. The mean pupil diameter at the baseline examination was 5.05 ± 0.88 mm and under pharmacological mydriasis, it was 6.29 ± 0.84 mm. Outcomes were similar with and without dilation in the 4-mm comparison. However, there was a great disparity in the 6-mm comparison. Most of the values obtained under mydriasis were statistically lower than at baseline (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The iris interferes with measurements of wavefront aberrations, and therefore, real pupil size should always be checked before evaluating optical aberrations with Hartman-Shack sensors. When pupil size is smaller than the analyzed diameter, ocular, and internal, and sometimes, corneal aberrations are estimated far more positive than real values.

Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform.

PURPOSE: To compare internal optical aberrations between three different intraocular lenses (IOL) of the same Tecnis platform: monofocal ZCB00, multifocal ZMB00, and enlarged depth-of-focus (EDoF) Symfony ZXR00. METHODS: We included in this study 236 eyes of 118 patients who had been bilaterally implanted either with the monofocal, the multifocal, or the EDoF IOL. They were examined with the K1-RW wavefront analyzer (Topcon Medical Systems) 2 months after surgery. Patients with any ocular pathology were excluded from the study. Only high-order aberrations (HOA) of the third and fourth orders of the Zernike polynomials were considered. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (86 eyes) were implanted with the monofocal IOL, 45 patients (90 eyes) with the ZMB00 IOL, and 30 patients (60 eyes) with the EDoF Symfony IOL. Mean age was 62.42 ± 7.38, 63.60 ± 6.01, and 64.74 ± 5.84 years, respectively. Mean axial length was 23.37 ± 1.00, 23.49 ± 1.00, and 23.54 ± 0.73 mm, respectively. For a 6-mm pupil, internal total HOA in the monofocal group was 1.01 ± 1.75 µm; in the bifocal group was 1.35 ± 2.12 µm; and in the Symfony group was 0.72 ± 0.63 µm. No optical aberration differences were found among the three groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There are no differences regarding internal optical aberrations between these three IOLs when analyzing them with optical aberrometry. Patients' pupil size should be considered for the selection of the most appropriate IOL to be implanted, because despite a same optical platform, every IOL implies a different increase of HOA with larger pupil sizes.

Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between Clareon CNA0T0 and Tecnis ZCB00 intraocular lenses.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose is to compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and its impact on vision between Clareon CNA0T0 (Alcon) and Tecnis ZCB00 intraocular lenses (IOLs) (Johnson&Johnson) 1, 6, and 12 months after implantation. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed at the Nuestra Señora de Gracia Hospital (Zaragoza, Spain). Fifty eyes (50 patients) with Tecnis IOL (group 1) and 60 eyes (60 patients) with Clareon IOL (group 2) were enrolled. One, 6, and 12 months after age-related cataract surgery by five different surgeons, the following tests were performed: mesopic corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), CSV1000-E test, KR-1W wavefront analyzer, OQAS II, Catquest-9SF questionnaire and mydriatic slit-lamp pictures. PCO intensity was quantified and the area of opacification was measured using ImageJ (NIH). RESULTS: Mean age was 71.20 ± 6.79 years in group 1, and 71.73 ± 8.17 years in group 2 (p = 0.72); mean axial length was 23.46 ± 1.14 and 23.53 ± 0.91 mm, respectively (p = 0.72); mean IOL power was 21.69 ± 2.26 D and 21.28 ± 2.44 D, respectively (p = 0.37). One month after surgery there were differences in intensity of PCO (0.73 ± 0.60 and 1.05 ± 0.71, respectively, p = 0.02). Six months after surgery statistical differences were found in VA with 20% CS in mydriatic conditions (0.26 ± 0.21 logMAR (20/36) and 0.18 ± 0.17 logMAR (20/30), respectively, p = 0.04). Twelve months after surgery, no differences were detected between groups. As for the evolution of PCO within the Clareon group, high order aberrations (p < 0.05) and the Strehl ratio (p = 0.02) decreased. CONCLUSION: There are no differences in slit-lamp pictures or visual function between both IOLs during the first 12 months after implantation.

Reading and quality of life differences between Tecnis ZCB00 monofocal and Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare the NEI-RQL-42 quality of life questionnaire and the Radner Vissum reading test outcomes after bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of Tecnis ZCB00 monofocal and Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Forty-two eyes of 21 patients who had phacoemulsification were implanted with Tecnis ZCB00 IOL and 82 eyes of 41 patients were implanted with Tecnis ZMB00 IOL. They answered the NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire before cataract surgery and 3 months after it. The Radner Vissum test was performed 3 months after the surgery with optical correction for near vision in patients with monofocal IOL, but without it in patients with multifocal IOL. RESULTS: Regarding the NEI-RQL-42 test, the multifocal group obtained better results in items 2, 7, 8, 11, 13, 31, and 40, and in the following categories: near vision, dependence on correction, and suboptimal correction (p<0.05). The monofocal group only showed better results in item 17. As for the Radner Vissum test, the multifocal group obtained significantly better results in phrases 1, 3, 4, and 5, and in the number of incorrect syllables (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal IOL report a higher quality of life regarding the lack of need for optical correction for near vision in their daily activities, but halos in vision at night. Additionally, patients with multifocal IOL achieve similar or better reading quality at near vision and under photopic lighting conditions than patients with monofocal IOL with near vision optical correction.

Retinal structure assessed by OCT as a biomarker of brain development in children born small for gestational age.

PURPOSE: To identify differences in neuronal tissue from retinal and brain structures in children born small for gestational age (SGA) with no abnormality in neonatal brain ultrasonography and no previous neurological impairment, and to evaluate the relationship between retinal structure and brain changes in school-age children born SGA. METHODS: Two cohorts of children were recruited: 25 children born SGA and 25 children born with an appropriate birth weight according to gestational age. All the children underwent an ophthalmic examination, which included retinal imaging using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and a brain MRI. MRI images were automatically segmented and global and regional brain volumes were obtained. RESULTS: Although visual function did not differ between both groups, the complex ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers (GCL-IPL) was thinner in SGA children. Total intracranial volume, and global grey and white matter volumes in brain and cerebellum were correlated with birthweight centile, as were certain regional volumes (temporal and parietal lobes, hippocampus and putamen). Abnormal GCL-IPL measurements accurately identified SGA children with the most severe grey and white matter changes in the brain. CONCLUSIONS: SGA children, both preterm and term born, showed evidence of structural abnormalities in the retina, which may be an accurate and non-invasive biomarker of neuronal damage in brain tissue.