Final 5-Year Outcomes of the Multicenter Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of a Water Vapor Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: We present final 5-year outcomes of the multicenter randomized sham-controlled trial of a water vapor therapy (Rezum™) for treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 197 subjects >50 years of age with International Prostate Symptom Score ≥13, maximum flow rate ≤15 ml/second and prostate volume 30 to 80 cc were randomized and followed for 5 years. From the control arm of 61 subjects, a subset of 53 subjects requalified and after 3 months received treatment as part of the crossover group and were also followed for 5 years. The total number of vapor treatments to each lobe of the prostate was determined by length of prostatic urethra and included middle lobe treatment per physician discretion. RESULTS: Significant improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms was observed at <3 months post-thermal therapy, remaining durable through 5 years in the treatment group (International Prostate Symptom Score reduced 48%, quality of life increased 45%, maximum flow rate improved 44%, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index decreased 48%). Surgical re-treatment rate was 4.4% with no reports of device or procedure related sexual dysfunction or sustained de novo erectile dysfunction. Results within the crossover group were similar through 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive treatment with water vapor thermal therapy provides significant and durable symptom relief as well as flow rate improvements through 5 years, with low surgical re-treatment rates and without impacting sexual function. It is a versatile therapy, providing successful treatment to obstructive lateral and middle lobes.

Convective Thermal Therapy: Durable 2-Year Results of Randomized Controlled and Prospective Crossover Studies for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: We report 2-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial plus 1-year results of a crossover trial after treatment with convective radiofrequency water vapor thermal energy for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 197 men at least 50 years old with I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) 13 or greater, maximum flow rate 15 ml per second or less and prostate size 30 to 80 cc were randomized 2:1 to thermal therapy with the Rezum® System or a control group. Rigid cystoscopy with simulated active treatment sounds served as the control procedure. After unblinding at 3 months control subjects could requalify for crossover study. Convectively delivered radiofrequency thermal energy was delivered into obstructive prostate tissue, including the median lobe as needed. The primary efficacy end point was a change in severity of symptom scores. RESULTS: Convective radiofrequency thermal therapy improved urinary symptoms significantly over controls at 3 months and provided a sustained 51% reduction from baseline at 24 months (p <0.0001). This produced a 5 and 8-point or greater score decrease in 84% and 74% of subjects, respectively, at 24 months. Crossover subject symptoms, flow rate and quality of life measures were markedly improved after thermal therapy compared to after the control procedure (p = 0.024 to <0.0001). No de novo erectile dysfunction was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Convective radiofrequency water vapor thermal therapy is a minimally invasive office or outpatient procedure that provides early effective symptom relief that remains durable for 2 years and is applicable to the median lobe.

Minimally Invasive Prostate Convective Water Vapor Energy Ablation: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: This report reveals the results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled study using transurethral prostate convective water vapor thermal energy to treat lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men 50 years old or older with an International Prostate Symptom Score of 13 or greater, maximum flow rate of 15 ml per second or less and prostate size 30 to 80 cc were randomized 2:1 between thermal therapy with the Rezum® System and control. Thermal water vapor was injected into the transition zone and median lobe as needed. The control procedure was rigid cystoscopy with simulated active treatment sounds. The primary end point compared International Prostate Symptom Score reduction at 3 months. Treatment subjects were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: There were 197 men randomized (active 136, control 61). Thermal therapy and control International Prostate Symptom Score was reduced by 11.2 ± 7.6 and 4.3 ± 6.9 respectively (p <0.0001). Treatment subject baseline International Prostate Symptom Score of 22 decreased at 2 weeks (18.6, p=0.0006) and by 50% or greater at 3, 6 and 12 months, p <0.0001. The peak flow rate increased by 6.2 ml per second at 3 months and was sustained throughout 12 months (p <0.0001). No de novo erectile dysfunction was reported. Adverse events were mild to moderate and resolved quickly. CONCLUSIONS: Convective water vapor thermal therapy provides rapid and durable improvements in benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms and preserves erectile and ejaculatory function. Treatment can be delivered in an office or hospital setting using oral pain medication and is applicable to all prostate zones including the median lobe.

Erectile and Ejaculatory Function Preserved With Convective Water Vapor Energy Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Most surgical treatments for male lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia affect erectile and ejaculatory functions negatively, leading to patient dissatisfaction. AIM: To determine whether water vapor thermal therapy, when conducted in a randomized controlled trial, would significantly improve lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and urinary flow rate while preserving erectile and ejaculatory functions. METHODS: Men at least 50 years old with International Prostate Symptom Scores of at least 13, a peak flow rate of at least 5 to no higher than 15 mL/s, and prostate volume of 30 to 80 cm(3) were randomized 2:1 between Rezum System thermal therapy and control. Thermal water vapor (103°C) was injected into lateral and median lobes as required for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The control procedure entailed rigid cystoscopy with simulated active treatment sounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blinded group (active = 136, control = 61) comparison occurred at 3 months and the active arm was followed to 12 months for International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and sexual function using the International Index of Erectile Function and the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Function. The minimal clinically important difference in erectile function perceived by subjects as beneficial was determined for each erectile function severity category. Subjects not sexually active were censored from sexual function analysis. RESULTS: No treatment- or device-related de novo erectile dysfunction occurred after thermal therapy. International Index of Erectile Function and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Function scores were not different from the control group at 3 months or from baseline at 1 year. Ejaculatory bother score improved 31% over baseline (P = .0011). Also, 32% of subjects achieved minimal clinically important differences in erectile function scores at 3 months, and 27% at 1 year, including those with moderate to severe erectile dysfunction. International Prostate Symptom Score and peak flow rate were significantly superior to controls at 3 months and throughout 1 year (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Convective water vapor thermal therapy provides sustainable improvements for 12 months to lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary flow while preserving erectile and ejaculatory functions.

Rapid efficacy of the highly selective α(1A)-adrenoceptor antagonist silodosin in men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia: pooled results of 2 phase 3 studies.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of silodosin for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms in 2 randomized, placebo controlled, phase 3 studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men 50 years or older with an International Prostate Symptom Score of 13 or greater and peak urinary flow rate of 4 to 15 ml per second received placebo or 8 mg silodosin daily with breakfast for 12 weeks. The primary end point was International Prostate Symptom Score change from baseline to last observation. Change in peak urinary flow rate was a secondary end point. Differences in treatment efficacy were assessed by ANCOVA. RESULTS: Of 923 patients (mean age 65 years) 466 received silodosin and 457 placebo. After 0.5 week (range 3 to 4 days) of treatment patients receiving silodosin vs placebo achieved significant improvement in total International Prostate Symptom Score (difference -1.9, p <0.0001) and irritative (-0.5, p = 0.0002) and obstructive (-1.4, p <0.0001) subscores. The mean ± SD change from baseline in total International Prostate Symptom Score was -4.2 ± 5.3 for silodosin vs -2.3 ± 4.4 for placebo. Differences (silodosin vs placebo) in International Prostate Symptom Score and subscores increased by week 12 (p <0.0001). Mean change from baseline in peak urinary flow rate (ml per second) 2 to 6 hours after initial dose was greater (p <0.0001) with silodosin (2.8 ± 3.4) than placebo (1.5 ± 3.8). Differences remained significant (p <0.001) through week 12. The most common treatment emergent adverse event was (mostly mild) retrograde ejaculation (silodosin 28.1% of patients, placebo 0.9%). Few patients receiving silodosin (2.8%) discontinued because of retrograde ejaculation. Proportions of patients with treatment emergent orthostatic hypotension were similar for silodosin (2.6%) and placebo (1.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with silodosin produced rapid improvement in urinary symptoms that was sustained for 12 weeks. Silodosin was well tolerated with a low incidence of orthostatic hypotension.

PCA3 molecular urine test as a predictor of repeat prostate biopsy outcome in men with previous negative biopsies: a prospective multicenter clinical study.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical usefulness of the PROGENSA® PCA3 Assay for predicting repeat prostate biopsy outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with at least 1 prior negative prostate biopsy who were scheduled for repeat prostate biopsy based on best clinical judgment were enrolled at 14 centers. Whole blood and post-digital rectal examination urine samples were collected before extended template transrectal biopsy with 12 or more cores. Urinary PCA3 scores and biopsy outcomes were assessed by logistic regression analysis, which also included age, race, serum prostate specific antigen, clinical stage, family history of prostate cancer and the number of previous negative biopsy sessions. RESULTS: A total of 466 men were included in study and prostate cancer was identified in 21.9%. A PCA3 score cutoff of 25 yielded 77.5% sensitivity, 57.1% specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of 90% and 33.6%, respectively. On multivariable logistic regression men with a PCA3 score of less than 25 were 4.56 times as likely to have a negative repeat biopsy as men with a score of 25 or greater. PCA3 score significantly increased the predictive accuracy of the logistic regression model. At 90% sensitivity adding the PCA3 score to the model increased specificity, and positive and negative predictive values by 22.6%, 6.4% and 7.1%, respectively, relative to the model without the PCA3 score. CONCLUSIONS: The PCA3 score supplements serum prostate specific antigen and other clinical information to provide more accurate prediction of repeat biopsy outcome. Thus, it provides clinicians and patients with independent, clinically useful information to make more informed repeat biopsy decisions.

Long-term efficacy and tolerability of once-yearly histrelin acetate subcutaneous implant in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a once-yearly histrelin implant during an open-label extension of a pivotal study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with advanced prostate cancer and a clinical response to 52 weeks of treatment with the histrelin implant. Implants were placed annually. The primary efficacy variable was achievement of serum testosterone levels of ≤50 ng/dL. Secondary efficacy variables were disease progression, analgesia use, performance status and tolerability of therapy. RESULTS: Of 104 patients enrolled, over 70% received three consecutive histrelin implants, and the longest, single treatment period was greater than 4 years. Serum testosterone was consistently suppressed below 50 ng/dL in all patients and mean testosterone levels were 13.1, 14.8 and 10.8 ng/dL after 104 weeks (year 2), 156 weeks (year 3) and 208 weeks (year 4) of treatment, respectively. Most patients showed no clinical worsening of their disease, were able to continue normal daily activities, and did not require analgesic medication during the extension period. Mean (SD) time to place the histrelin implant was 4.5 (6.2) min, with only three patients having insertions that were considered difficult. Adverse events were reported in 100 (96.2%) patients. The eight deaths and 28 (26.9%) serious adverse events were judged as unrelated to the study drug. The most commonly reported drug-related adverse events was hot flashes in 67 (64.4%) patients. Most of these cases was judged as mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The once-yearly histrelin implant maintained testosterone suppression for repeated treatment cycles and was generally well tolerated. The histrelin implant provides a clinically attractive option for long-term androgen deprivation therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer seeking fewer office visits and repeated injections.

A New Oral Testosterone Undecanoate Formulation Restores Testosterone to Normal Concentrations in Hypogonadal Men.

CONTEXT: A novel formulation of oral testosterone (T) undecanoate (TU) was evaluated in a phase 3 clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: Determine efficacy, short-term safety, and alignment of new oral TU formulation with current US approval standards for T replacement therapy. DESIGN: Randomized, active-controlled, open-label study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Academic and private clinical practice sites; enrolled patients were clinically hypogonadal men 18 to 65 years old. METHODS: Patients were randomized 3:1 to oral TU, as prescribed (JATENZO®; n = 166) or a topical T product once daily (Axiron®; n = 56) for 3 to 4 months. Dose titration was based on average T levels (Cavg) calculated from serial pharmacokinetic (PK) samples. T was assayed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Patients had 2 dose adjustment opportunities prior to final PK visit. Safety was assessed by standard clinical measures, including ambulatory blood pressure (BP). RESULTS: 87% of patients in both groups achieved mean T Cavg in the eugonadal range. Sodium fluoride-ethylenediamine tetra-acetate plasma T Cavg (mean ± standard deviation) for the oral TU group was 403 ± 128 ng/dL (~14 ± 4 nmol/L); serum T equivalent, ~489 ± 155 ng/dL (17 ± 5 nmol/L); and topical T, 391 ± 140 ng/dL (~14 ± 5 nmol/L). Modeling/simulation of T PK data demonstrated that dose titration based on a single blood sample 4 to 6 h after oral TU dose yielded efficacy (93%) equivalent to Cavg-based titration (87%). Safety profiles were similar in both groups, but oral TU was associated with a mean increase in systolic BP of 3 to 5 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: A new oral TU formulation effectively restored T to mid-eugonadal levels in hypogonadal patients.

Rapid efficacy of the highly selective alpha1A-adrenoceptor antagonist silodosin in men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia: pooled results of 2 phase 3 studies.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of silodosin for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms in 2 randomized, placebo controlled, phase 3 studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men 50 years or older with an International Prostate Symptom Score of 13 or greater and peak urinary flow rate of 4 to 15 ml per second received placebo or 8 mg silodosin daily with breakfast for 12 weeks. The primary end point was International Prostate Symptom Score change from baseline to last observation. Change in peak urinary flow rate was a secondary end point. Differences in treatment efficacy were assessed by ANCOVA. RESULTS: Of 923 patients (mean age 65 years) 466 received silodosin and 457 placebo. After 0.5 week (range 3 to 4 days) of treatment patients receiving silodosin vs placebo achieved significant improvement in total International Prostate Symptom Score (difference -1.9, p <0.0001) and irritative (-0.5, p = 0.0002) and obstructive (-1.4, p <0.0001) subscores. The mean +/- SD change from baseline in total International Prostate Symptom Score was -4.2 +/- 5.3 for silodosin vs -2.3 +/- 4.4 for placebo. Differences (silodosin vs placebo) in International Prostate Symptom Score and subscores increased by week 12 (p <0.0001). Mean change from baseline in peak urinary flow rate (ml per second) 2 to 6 hours after initial dose was greater (p <0.0001) with silodosin (2.8 +/- 3.4) than placebo (1.5 +/- 3.8). Differences remained significant (p <0.001) through week 12. The most common treatment emergent adverse event was (mostly mild) retrograde ejaculation (silodosin 28.1% of patients, placebo 0.9%). Few patients receiving silodosin (2.8%) discontinued because of retrograde ejaculation. Proportions of patients with treatment emergent orthostatic hypotension were similar for silodosin (2.6%) and placebo (1.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with silodosin produced rapid improvement in urinary symptoms that was sustained for 12 weeks. Silodosin was well tolerated with a low incidence of orthostatic hypotension.

Are Over-the-Counter Alpha Blockers in the Best Interest of Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms?

INTRODUCTION: Lower urinary tract symptoms have a multifactorial etiology, are common in men and increase with age. In view of the unprecedented growth of the aging population worldwide and in the United States, an increase in the number of men with lower urinary tract symptoms is expected in the near future. In contrast, a decline in the number of practicing urologists is projected. Many men do not discuss their lower urinary tract symptoms with health care practitioners or seek treatment. Thus, they remain undiagnosed, untreated or both. For such men, self-treatment with over-the-counter alpha blockers with proven efficacy and safety is an unsubstantiated option. However, use of over-the-counter alpha blockers for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms is controversial owing to the multifactorial nature of these symptoms and concerns associated with over-the-counter use of alpha blockers. METHODS: This review summarizes a debate held at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association (May 15-19, 2015, New Orleans, Louisiana) on whether over-the-counter alpha blockers are in the best interest of patients. RESULTS: Concerns about over-the-counter use of alpha blockers for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms, including inappropriate self-diagnosis and/or self-treatment by patients; potential for missing an important disease; and failure to adhere with guidelines on the assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms are reviewed, as are corresponding rebuttals supporting use of over-the-counter alpha blockers for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Over-the-counter alpha blockers are not yet available. Ongoing studies will determine whether appropriate safety and usage criteria can be achieved.

Natural history of rising serum prostate-specific antigen in men with castrate nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To describe the natural history of nonmetastatic prostate cancer and rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) despite androgen deprivation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 201 patients in this report were the placebo control group from an aborted randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of zoledronic acid on time to first bone metastasis in men with prostate cancer, no bone metastases, and rising PSA despite androgen deprivation therapy. Relationships between baseline covariates and clinical outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazard analyses. Covariates in the model were baseline PSA, Gleason sum, history of bilateral orchiectomies, regional lymph node metastases at diagnosis, prior prostatectomy, time from androgen deprivation therapy to random assignment, time from diagnosis to random assignment, and PSA velocity. RESULTS: At 2 years, 33% of patients had developed bone metastases. Median bone metastasis-free survival was 30 months. Median time to first bone metastases and overall survival were not reached. Baseline PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL (relative risk, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.74 to 5.80; P < .001) and PSA velocity (4.34 for each 0.01 increase in PSA velocity; 95% CI, 2.30 to 8.21; P < .001) independently predicted shorter time to first bone metastasis. Baseline PSA and PSA velocity also independently predicted overall survival and metastasis-free survival. Other covariates did not consistently predict clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer and rising PSA despite androgen deprivation therapy have a relatively indolent natural history. Baseline PSA and PSA velocity independently predict time to first bone metastasis and survival.

Effect of silodosin on specific urinary symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: analysis of international prostate symptom scores in 2 phase III clinical studies.

PURPOSE: Pooled results from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, US phase III studies (NCT00224107, NCT00224120) showed that silodosin, a uroselective α-blocker, significantly improved International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This analysis evaluated the effect of silodosin on each symptom assessed by IPSS questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study participants (N = 923) were men aged ≥50 years with IPSS ≥13 and Qmax 4-15 mL/s. They received silodosin 8 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Patient responses to 7 IPSS questions were collected at weeks 0 (baseline), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 12 and scored on a 6-point scale. Efficacy of silodosin versus placebo was assessed by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: For each symptom, the 2 treatment groups had similar mean baseline scores. Decrease in score from baseline (mean ± standard deviation) to last observation was significantly greater with silodosin than with placebo for all symptoms (P < 0.005); symptom improvement with silodosin (versus placebo) was greatest for weak stream (silodosin, -1.1 ± 1.4 versus placebo, -0.5 ± 1.2; P < 0.0001) and smallest for nocturia (silodosin, -0.6 ± 1.1 versus placebo, -0.4 ± 1.2; P = 0.0037). Compared with placebo, silodosin significantly improved nocturia within 1 week (silodosin, -0.5 ± 1.07 versus placebo, -0.3 ± 1.05; P = 0.009) and all other symptoms within 3 to 4 days (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Silodosin significantly improved all BPH-associated symptoms assessed by IPSS questionnaire within the first week of treatment. All improvements were maintained over the 12-week study period.

Silodosin in the treatment of the signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 9-month, open-label extension study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term safety of the highly selective alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor antagonist silodosin in men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Patients enrolled in this open-label extension study had completed 1 of 2 identical double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-week studies of silodosin treatment for symptomatic BPH. For 40 weeks, patients received silodosin 8 mg once daily with breakfast. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate safety. Change in International Prostate Symptom Score was a secondary variable. RESULTS: Of the 661 participants, 435 (65.8%) completed the study; 431 patients (65.2%) experienced 924 AEs. No serious AEs that were considered drug-related by investigators occurred. AEs reported most often (percentage of patients) were retrograde ejaculation (20.9%), diarrhea (4.1%), and nasopharyngitis (3.6%). Orthostatic hypotension and dizziness occurred in 2.6% and 2.9% of patients, respectively. The percentage of patients with treatment-emergent AEs, stratified by preceding double-blind treatment (placebo or silodosin), was higher for de novo (previous treatment with placebo, 71.5%) than for continuing silodosin treatment (58.3%). More patients receiving de novo (7.5%) vs continuing treatment (1.9%) discontinued study participation because of retrograde ejaculation. Mean International Prostate Symptom Score change (standard deviation) from baseline to week 40 (observed cases) was -4.5 (6.7) for de novo treatment (P <.0001) and -1.6 (6.0) for continuing treatment (P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Silodosin was well tolerated by men with BPH-related symptoms and was associated with low incidences of dizziness and orthostatic hypotension. Discontinuation because of retrograde ejaculation was more common among patients receiving silodosin de novo than in those who continued silodosin treatment.

Comparative efficacy and safety of transdermal oxybutynin and oral tolterodine versus placebo in previously treated patients with urge and mixed urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of an oxybutynin transdermal delivery system (OXY-TDS) and oral, long-acting tolterodine (TOL-LA) with placebo in previously treated patients with urge or mixed urinary incontinence. METHODS: After withdrawal of their current antimuscarinic therapy, 361 adult patients were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind, double-dummy treatment with twice weekly OXY-TDS 3.9 mg/day, daily TOL-LA 4 mg, or placebo. Evaluations included change from baseline in patient urinary diary symptoms, incontinence-specific quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: OXY-TDS 3.9 mg/day and TOL-LA 4 mg/day significantly reduced the number of daily incontinence episodes (median change -3 OXY-TDS and -3 TOL-LA versus -2 placebo; P <0.05), increased the average void volume (median change 24 and 29 mL versus 5.5 mL, P <0.01), and improved quality of life (incontinence impact questionnaire [IIQ] total score, P <0.05; Urogenital Distress Inventory Irritative Symptom subscale, P <0.05) compared with placebo. The most common adverse event for OXY-TDS was localized application site pruritus (14% versus 4% placebo) accompanied by a low incidence of systemic side effects (eg, dry mouth 4.1%). Anticholinergic adverse events occurred with greatest frequency during TOL-LA treatment (dry mouth 7.3% versus 1.7% placebo, P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: OXY-TDS and TOL-LA are effective and comparable treatments for patients with urge and mixed incontinence. OXY-TDS improves systemic safety with regard to anticholinergic side effects. Local skin irritation occurs in some OXY-TDS patients.

Efficacy and safety of transdermal oxybutynin in patients with urge and mixed urinary incontinence.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of an oxybutynin transdermal delivery system (TDS) in a general population of patients with overactive bladder and urge or mixed urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following symptom stabilization or treatment withdrawal 520 adult patients were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind daily treatment with 1.3, 2.6 or 3.9 mg. oxybutynin TDS or placebo administered twice weekly, followed by a 12-week open-label, dose titration period to assess efficacy and safety further. Evaluations included patient urinary diaries, incontinence specific quality of life and safety. RESULTS: A dose of 3.9 mg. daily oxybutynin TDS significantly reduced the number of weekly incontinence episodes (median change -19.0 versus -14.5, p = 0.0165), reduced average daily urinary frequency (mean change -2.3 versus -1.7, p = 0.0457), increased average voided volume (median change 24 versus 6 ml., p = 0.0063) and significantly improved quality of life (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire total score, p = 0.0327) compared with placebo. Average voided volume increased in the daily 2.6 mg. group (19 ml., p = 0.0157) but there were no other significant differences between 1.3 and 2.6 mg. oxybutynin TDS and placebo. The most common adverse event was application site pruritus (oxybutynin TDS 10.8% to 16.8%, placebo 6.1%). Dry mouth incidence was similar in both groups (7.0% versus 8.3%, p not significant). In the open-label period a sustained reduction of nearly 3 incontinence episodes per day was reported for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 2.6 and 3.9 mg. oxybutynin TDS daily improve overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life, and are well tolerated. Transdermal oxybutynin is an innovative new treatment for overactive bladder.

Sustained decrease in incidence of acute urinary retention and surgery with finasteride for 6 years in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: We determined the effect of long-term treatment with finasteride on the incidence of acute urinary retention (AUR) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) related surgery in men with BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Proscar (Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey) Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study (PLESS) was comprised of 3040 men with enlarged prostates, moderate to severe symptomatic BPH and no clinical evidence of prostate cancer. Patients were randomized to placebo or 5 mg finasteride daily for 4 years. Of the 3016 randomized patients with available efficacy data 62% completed the original 4-year study (1006 on finasteride and 891 on placebo) and 89% of these (908 from the original finasteride arm and 785 from the placebo arm) continued in a 2-year open extension on finasteride. Followup was attempted in discontinued patients. Complete 6-year outcomes data, including 6-year followup in 770 men who had discontinued treatment during years 1 to 6, were available for 2463 (82%) of the 3016 originally randomized patients. RESULTS: For patients on continuous finasteride treatment the decrease in incidence of AUR and/or BPH related surgery in the 4-year base study was sustained during the open extension. In patients who were switched from placebo to finasteride in the extension, the incidence of AUR and/or BPH related surgery was similar to that in the continuous finasteride arm. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-year data from PLESS confirmed and further extended the findings from the original 4-year trial, demonstrating that finasteride treatment led to a sustained decrease in the incidence of AUR and/or BPH related surgery in men with BPH and enlarged prostates.