Contribution of syphilis to adverse pregnancy outcomes in people living with and without HIV in south Brazil: 2008-2018.

BACKGROUND: Syphilis co-infection among pregnant people living with HIV (PLH) may worsen pregnancy outcomes. We evaluated the impact of syphilis co-infection on pregnancies in south Brazil. METHODS: Data was extracted from hospital records between 1/1/2008 -12/31/2018. Preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW < 2500 g), and a composite adverse infant outcome [AIO: HIV vertical transmission, loss to follow-up before HIV diagnosis (LTFU), stillbirth, congenital syphilis] were evaluated among pregnancies without HIV and syphilis (PWOH+S), PLH mono-infection, syphilis mono-infection (PLS), and PLH with syphilis (PLH + S). RESULTS: Among 48,685 deliveries where patients were tested for HIV and syphilis, 1,353 (2.8%) occurred in PLH; of these, 181 (13.4%) were HIV/syphilis co-infected (PLH + S). Among PLH, 2.4% of infants acquired HIV and 13.1% were LTFU. Among all PLS, 70.5% of infants acquired congenital syphilis. Across the cohort, 1.2% stillbirths/neonatal deaths occurred. 37.0% of PLH + S did not initiate ART versus 15.4% of PLH mono-infection (p < 0.001). 37.6% of PLH + S had VDRL titers > 1:16 compared to 21.7% of PLS only (p < 0.001). Among PLH, syphilis co-infection and unknown/high VDRL titers ( > 1:16) increased AIO risk more (aRR:3.96, 95%CI:3.33-4.70) compared to low VDRL titers ( < 1:8) (aRR:3.51, 95%CI:2.90-4.25). Unsuppressed viremia ( > 50 copies/mL) was associated with risk of PTB (aRR:1.43, 95%CI:1.07-1.92) and AIO (aRR:1.38, 95%CI:1.11-1.70) but not LBW. Lack of prenatal care was significant in predicting PTB and LBW in all PLH and PLS mono-infection. CONCLUSION: Syphilis co-infection worsens adverse infant outcomes in all women and compounds negative effects of HIV infection during pregnancy. Effective syphilis treatment and HIV VL suppression are paramount for optimal obstetric care.

Risk-taking behavior for HIV acquisition during pregnancy in Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Recent studies suggest that acquisition of HIV-1 infection during pregnancy and breastfeeding is associated with a high risk of HIV mother-to-child transmission. This study evaluates risk factors associated with HIV acquisition during pregnancy in women delivering at a large metropolitan medical facility located in the south of Brazil. From February to August 2009, our group conducted a cross-sectional study assessing women's risk for HIV acquisition by administering an oral survey to peripartum women. Of 2465 participants, 42% (n = 1046) knew that partner had been tested for HIV. During pregnancy, 82% (n = 2022) of participants never used condoms; yet 97% (n = 2399) practiced vaginal sex. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with more years of education, in a relationship for more than 1 year, and who knew their own HIV status were more likely to know their partners' HIV status (P < 0.05). Those who were in relationship for more than 1 year and were married/living together were more likely to be comfortable discussing HIV testing with partners (P < 0.05). In conclusion, women in Brazil are at risk of HIV-infection during pregnancy as they remain sexually active, often do not know their sexual partner's HIV status, and have minimal condom use.

Comparison of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Participants Enrolled in a Multinational Clinical Trial: HPTN 052.

OBJECTIVE: Data comparing hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in HIV-infected [HIV(+)], and HIV-uninfected [HIV(-)] individuals recruited into the same study are limited. HBV infection status and chronic hepatitis B (cHB) were characterized in a multinational clinical trial: HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN 052). METHOD: HBV infection status at enrollment was compared between HIV(+) (N = 1241) and HIV(-) (N = 1232) from 7 HBV-endemic countries. Hepatitis B e antigen and plasma HBV DNA were determined in cHB. Median CD4, median plasma HIV RNA, and prevalence of transaminase elevation were compared in HIV(+) with and without cHB. Significance was assessed with χ, Fisher exact, and median tests. RESULTS: Among all participants, 33.6% had HBV exposure without cHB (8.9% isolated HBV core antibody, "HBcAb"; 24.7% HBcAb and anti-HB surface antibody positive, "recovered"), 4.3% had cHB, 8.9% were vaccinated, and 53.5% were uninfected. Data were similar among HIV(+) and HIV(-) except for isolated HBcAb, which was more prevalent in HIV(+) than HIV(-) [10.1% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.046]. Median HBV DNA trended higher in HIV(+) than in HIV(-). In HIV(+) with cHB versus those without cHB, transaminase elevations were more prevalent (alanine aminotransferase ≤ grade 2, 12% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.037; aspartate aminotransferase ≤ grade 2, 26% vs. 6.0%, P < 0.001), CD4 trended lower, and HIV RNA was similar. CONCLUSIONS: HBV infection status did not differ by HIV infection status. HIV co-infection was associated with isolated HBcAb and a trend of increased HBV DNA. In HIV, cHB was associated with mild transaminase elevations and a trend toward lower CD4.