Potential competing risk of death in older high-risk endometrial carcinoma patients: Results from a multicentric retrospective cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant therapeutic decisions in older endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients are challenged by a balance between more frequent aggressive EC and comorbidities. We assessed whether EC and comorbidities are competing or cumulative risks in older EC patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated for FIGO stage I-IV EC in two University Hospitals in Paris between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively included. Patients were categorized as: <70 years (y), >70y without comorbidity (fit), and > 70y with a Charlson comorbidity index>3 (comorbid). Association between high-risk EC (2021-ESGO-ETRO-ESP) or comorbidity, and disease-specific-survival (DSS), was evaluated using Cox model (estimation of cause-specific hazard ratio (CSHR), and Fine-Gray model (subdistribution HR) to account for competing events (death unrelated with EC). RESULTS: Overall, 253 patients were included (median age = 67y, IQR[59-77], median follow-up = 61.5 months, [44.4-76.8]). Among them, 109 (43%) were categorized at high-risk (proportion independent of age), including 67 (26%) who had TP53-mutated tumors. Comorbidity and high-risk group were both associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 4.09, 95%CI[2.29; 7.32] and HR = 3.21, 95%CI [1.69; 6.09], respectively). By multivariate analysis, patients with high-risk EC exhibited poorer DSS, regardless of age/comorbidity (Adjusted-CSHR = 6.62, 95%CI[2.53;17.3]; adjusted-SHR = 6.62 95%CI[2.50;17.5]). Patients>70y-comorbid with high-risk EC had 5-years cumulative incidences of EC-related and EC-unrelated death of 29% and 19%, respectively. In patients <70y, 5-years cumulative incidence of EC-related and EC-unrelated death were 25% and < 1% (one event), respectively. CONCLUSION: High-risk EC patients are exposed to poorer DSS regardless of age/comorbidities, comorbidities and cancer being two cumulative rather than competing risks. Our results suggest that age/comorbidity alone should not lead to underestimate EC-specific survival.

Therapeutic sequencing in the era of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations, a novel challenge in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations have reshaped the treatment landscape of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. As four regimens are now approved in the first-line setting, including nivolumab plus ipilimumab in intermediate and poor-risk patients, and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus axitinib in all-comers, the choice of subsequent therapies is becoming a novel challenge for physicians. Such choices now rely on several compounds used as monotherapy which have demonstrated sustained activity after previous immune checkpoint or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Future strategies may lie in novel targets, including hypoxia-inducible factor inhibitors, as well as further exploration of combinations in more advanced settings. Here we review the current evidence regarding treatment activity after immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations, the underlying biological and clinical challenges that may impact patient selection and the optimal sequencing strategies for clinical practice.