Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Tebipenem following Oral Administration of Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide to Healthy Adult Subjects.

Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) is an oral carbapenem prodrug being developed for the treatment of serious bacterial infections. The active moiety, tebipenem, has broad-spectrum activity against common Enterobacterales pathogens, including extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing multidrug-resistant strains. This study evaluated the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations of tebipenem relative to plasma levels in nonsmoking, healthy adult subjects. Thirty subjects received oral TBP-PI-HBr at 600 mg every 8 h for five doses. Serial blood samples were collected following the last dose. Each subject underwent one standardized bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 h after the fifth dose of TBP-PI-HBr. The tebipenem area under the concentration-time curve for the 8-h dosing interval (AUC0-8) values in plasma, ELF, and AMs were calculated using the mean concentration at each BAL sampling time. Ratios of AUC0-8 values for total ELF and AMs to those for unbound plasma were determined, using a plasma protein binding value of 42%. Mean values ± standard deviations (SD) of tebipenem maximum (Cmax) and minimum (Cmin) total plasma concentrations were 11.37 ± 3.87 mg/L and 0.043 ± 0.039 mg/L, respectively. Peak tebipenem concentrations in plasma, ELF, and AMs occurred at 1 h and then decreased over 8 h. Ratios of tebipenem AUC0-8 values for ELF and AMs to those for unbound plasma were 0.191 and 0.047, respectively. Four (13.3%) subjects experienced adverse events (diarrhea, fatigue, papule, and coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]); all resolved, and none were severe or serious. Tebipenem is distributed into the lungs of healthy adults, which supports the further evaluation of TBP-PI-HBr for the treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections caused by susceptible pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT04710407.).

Solriamfetol for Excessive Sleepiness in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (TONES 3). A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rationale: Primary treatment of obstructive sleep apnea can be accompanied by a persistence of excessive sleepiness despite adherence. Furthermore, effectiveness of sleep apnea treatment is limited by poor adherence. Currently available pharmacologic options for the treatment of sleepiness in this population are limited. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of solriamfetol (JZP-110), a selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with robust wake-promoting effects, for the treatment of excessive sleepiness in participants with obstructive sleep apnea with current or prior sleep apnea treatment. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week trial comparing solriamfetol, 37.5, 75, 150, and 300 mg, with placebo. Measurements and Main Results: Of 476 randomized participants, 459 were included in the prespecified efficacy analyses. Coprimary endpoints (Maintenance of Wakefulness Test sleep latency and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score) were met at all solriamfetol doses (P < 0.05), with dose-dependent effects observed at Week 1 maintained over the study duration. All doses except 37.5 mg resulted in higher percentages of participants reporting improvement on Patient Global Impression of Change (key secondary endpoint; P < 0.05). Adverse events were reported in 47.9% of placebo- and 67.9% of solriamfetol-treated participants; five participants experienced serious adverse events (two [1.7%] placebo, three [0.8%] solriamfetol); none were deemed related to study drug. The most common adverse events with solriamfetol were headache (10.1%), nausea (7.9%), decreased appetite (7.6%), anxiety (7.0%), and nasopharyngitis (5.1%). Conclusions: Solriamfetol significantly increased wakefulness and reduced sleepiness in participants with obstructive sleep apnea and excessive sleepiness; most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02348606) and www.eudract.ema.europa.eu (EudraCT 2014-005514-31).

A randomized, controlled, repeat-dose study of batefenterol/fluticasone furoate compared with placebo in the treatment of COPD.

BACKGROUND: Batefenterol (BAT) is a bi-functional molecule with both muscarinic antagonist and ß2-adrenoceptor agonist pharmacology. This Phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluated the safety and tolerability of BAT 300 µg with fluticasone furoate (FF) 100 µg administered via the ELLIPTA inhaler (BAT/FF 300/100). METHODS: Subjects with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were randomized 2:1 to receive BAT/FF 300/100 or placebo once daily for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 0-4-h weighted mean (WM) heart rate (HR, measured by electrocardiogram [ECG]) on Day 42. Other endpoints included WM and maximum 0-4-h corrected QT interval (ECG on Days 1, 28, and 42), HR measured by Holter monitoring (Day 42), and standard safety assessments. Study protocol was approved by an Investigational Review Board. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study medication (BAT/FF 300/100 n = 42; placebo n = 20). Mean age was 62.5 years (standard deviation [SD] 8.17). Study completion rates were 83% (BAT/FF 300/100) and 100% (placebo). Screening mean (SD) post-bronchodilator percentage-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 57.57 (11.42) in the BAT/FF 300/100 group and 55.68 (14.03) in the placebo group. BAT/FF 300/100 was non-inferior to placebo for the primary endpoint, treatment difference: - 2.2 beats per minute (bpm), 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 6.2, 1.7). There were no clinically relevant differences between treatment groups in WM or maximum 0-4-h corrected QT interval, or mean HR based on Holter monitoring on Day 42 (BAT/FF 300/100: 76.3 bpm [SD 11.38]; placebo: 84.8 bpm [SD 9.87]). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38% (BAT/FF 300/100) and 35% (placebo) of patients. AEs in ≥2 subjects with BAT/FF 300/100 were dysgeusia (10%), diarrhea (7%), nasopharyngitis (7%), and cough (5%). AEs leading to discontinuation occurred in two subjects who received BAT/FF 300/100: post-treatment severe pneumonia (serious AE) and non-serious AEs of moderate vomiting and severe gastroenteritis; both were not considered drug-related. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of BAT/FF 300/100 treatment was non-inferior to placebo for change from baseline in HR, with no new clinically relevant general or cardiovascular safety signals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02573870 (submitted October 12, 2015).

Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of ETX2514 and Sulbactam following Intravenous Administration of ETX2514SUL to Healthy Adult Subjects.

ETX2514 is a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor that broadly inhibits Ambler class A, C, and D ß-lactamases. ETX2514 combined with sulbactam (SUL) in vitro restores sulbactam activity against Acinetobacter baumannii ETX2514-sulbactam (ETX2514SUL) is under development for the treatment of A. baumannii infections. The objective of this study was to determine and compare plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations following intravenous (i.v.) ETX2514 and sulbactam. Plasma, ELF, and AM concentrations of ETX2514 and sulbactam were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in 30 healthy adult subjects following repeated dosing (ETX2514 [1 g] and sulbactam [1 g] every 6 h [q6h], as a 3-h i.v. infusion, for a total of 3 doses). A bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed once in each subject at either 1, 2.5, 3.25, 4, or 6 h after the start of the last infusion. Penetration ratios were calculated from area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 6 h (AUC0-6) values for total plasma and ELF using mean and median concentrations at the BAL fluid sampling times. Respective ELF AUC0-6 values, based on mean and median concentrations, were 40.1 and 39.4 mg · h/liter for ETX2514 and 34.7 and 34.5 mg · h/liter for sulbactam. Respective penetration ratios of ELF to total/unbound plasma concentrations, based on mean and median AUC0-6 values, of ETX2514 were 0.37/0.41 and 0.36/0.40, whereas these same ratio values were 0.50/0.81 and 0.50/0.80 for sulbactam. ETX2514 and sulbactam concentrations in AM were measurable and fairly constant throughout the dosing interval (median values of 1.31 and 1.01 mg/liter, respectively). These data support further study of ETX2514SUL for the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03303924.).

Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Levonadifloxacin following Oral Administration of Alalevonadifloxacin to Healthy Adult Subjects.

Alalevonadifloxacin (WCK 2349) is a novel l-alanine ester prodrug of levonadifloxacin that is being developed as an oral fluoroquinolone antibiotic. The primary objective of this study was to determine and compare plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations of levonadifloxacin following oral administration of alalevonadifloxacin to healthy adult subjects. Levonadifloxacin concentrations in plasma, ELF, and AM samples from 30 healthy subjects were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) following oral dosing of alalevonadifloxacin (1,000 mg twice daily for 5 days). Six subjects were assigned to each bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid sampling time, i.e., 2, 4, 6, 8, or 12 h after the ninth oral dose. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined from serial total plasma concentrations collected over a 12-h interval following the first and ninth oral doses. Penetration ratios were calculated from the areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12) for plasma, ELF, and AM by using mean (and median) concentrations at each BAL sampling time. Unbound plasma concentrations (∼85% plasma protein binding) were used to determine site-to-plasma penetration ratios. Plasma PK parameter values for levonadifloxacin were similar after the first and ninth doses. The respective AUC0-12 values based on mean ELF and AM concentrations were 172.6 and 35.3 mg · h/liter, respectively. The penetration ratios for ELF and AM levonadifloxacin concentrations to unbound plasma levonadifloxacin concentrations were 7.66 and 1.58, respectively. Similar penetration ratios were observed with median concentrations. The observed plasma, ELF, and AM concentrations of levonadifloxacin support further studies of alalevonadifloxacin for treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections caused by susceptible pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02253342.).

Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Relebactam, a Novel ß-Lactamase Inhibitor, Dosed in Combination with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Healthy Subjects.

This phase I study assessed the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profiles of relebactam (MK-7655), a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor, and imipenem. Sixteen healthy subjects received 250 mg relebactam with 500 mg imipenem-cilastatin, given intravenously every 6 h for 5 doses, and were randomized to bronchoscopy/bronchoalveolar lavage at 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 3 h after the last dose (4 subjects per time point). Both drugs penetrated the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) to a similar degree, with the profiles being similar in shape to the corresponding plasma profiles and with the apparent terminal half-lives in plasma and ELF being 1.2 and 1.3 h, respectively, for relebactam and 1.0 h in both compartments for imipenem. The exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) in ELF relative to that in plasma was 54% for relebactam and 55% for imipenem, after adjusting for protein binding. ELF penetration for relebactam was further analyzed by fitting the data to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model to capture its behavior in plasma, with a partitioning coefficient capturing its behavior in the lung compartment. In this model, the time-invariant partition coefficient for relebactam was found to be 55%, based on free drug levels. These results support the clinical evaluation of relebactam with imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of bacterial pneumonia.

Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Cefepime and Zidebactam following Intravenous Administration of WCK 5222 to Healthy Adult Subjects.

WCK 5222 is a combination of cefepime and the novel ß-lactam enhancer zidebactam being developed for the treatment of serious Gram-negative bacterial infections. The objective of this study was to compare plasma (total), epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations of cefepime and zidebactam in healthy adult subjects. The WCK 5222 dosing regimen was 2 g cefepime/1 g zidebactam administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 8 h for a total of 7 doses. Subjects were assigned to one bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) sampling time at 0.5, 1.25, 3, 6, 8, or 10 h after the seventh dose. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from serial plasma concentrations collected over 8-hour and 10-hour intervals following the first and seventh doses, respectively. Penetration ratios were calculated from the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8) for plasma, ELF, and AM using mean and median concentrations at each BAL sampling time. The plasma maximum concentration of drug (Cmax) and AUC values of cefepime and zidebactam increased by 8% to 9% after the seventh versus the first dose of WCK 5222. The respective AUC0-8 values based on mean concentrations of cefepime and zidebactam in ELF were 127.9 and 52.0 mg · h/liter, and 87.9 and 13.2 mg · h/liter in AM. The ELF to total plasma penetration ratios of cefepime and zidebactam based on mean AUC0-8 values were 0.39 and 0.38, respectively. The AM to total plasma ratios were 0.27 and 0.10, respectively. The observed plasma, ELF, and AM concentrations of cefepime and zidebactam support studies of WCK 5222 for treatment of pneumonia caused by susceptible pathogens.

Comparison of Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Nafithromycin (WCK 4873) in Healthy Adult Subjects.

The nafithromycin concentrations in the plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophages (AM) of 37 healthy adult subjects were measured following repeated dosing of oral nafithromycin at 800 mg once daily for 3 days. The values of noncompartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined from serial plasma samples collected over a 24-h interval following the first and third oral doses. Each subject underwent one standardized bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, or 48 h after the third dose of nafithromycin. The mean ± standard deviation values of the plasma PK parameters after the first and third doses included maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 1.02 ± 0.31 µg/ml and 1.39 ± 0.36 µg/ml, respectively; times to Cmax of 3.97 ± 1.30 h and 3.69 ± 1.28 h, respectively; clearances of 67.3 ± 21.3 liters/h and 52.4 ± 18.5 liters/h, respectively, and elimination half-lives of 7.7 ± 1.1 h and 9.1 ± 1.7 h, respectively. The values of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 h postdosing (AUC0-24) for nafithromycin based on the mean or median total plasma concentrations at BAL fluid sampling times were 16.2 µg · h/ml. For ELF, the respective AUC0-24 values based on the mean and median concentrations were 224.1 and 176.3 µg · h/ml, whereas for AM, the respective AUC0-24 values were 8,538 and 5,894 µg · h/ml. Penetration ratios based on ELF and total plasma AUC0-24 values based on the mean and median concentrations were 13.8 and 10.9, respectively, whereas the ratios of the AM to total plasma concentrations based on the mean and median concentrations were 527 and 364, respectively. The sustained ELF and AM concentrations for 48 h after the third dose suggest that nafithromycin has the potential to be a useful agent for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02453529.).

Comparison of Omadacycline and Tigecycline Pharmacokinetics in the Plasma, Epithelial Lining Fluid, and Alveolar Cells of Healthy Adult Subjects.

The steady-state concentrations of omadacycline and tigecycline in the plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar cells (AC) of 58 healthy adult subjects were obtained. Subjects were administered either omadacycline at 100 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h for two doses followed by 100 mg i.v. every 24 h for three doses or tigecycline at an initial dose of 100 mg i.v. followed by 50 mg i.v. every 12 h for six doses. A bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed once in each subject following the start of the fifth dose of omadacycline at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h and after the start of the seventh dose of tigecycline at 2, 4, 6, or 12 h. The value of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 h postdosing (AUC0-24) (based on mean concentrations) in ELF and the ratio of the ELF to total plasma omadacycline concentration based on AUC0-24 values were 17.23 mg · h/liter and 1.47, respectively. The AUC0-24 value in AC was 302.46 mg · h/liter, and the ratio of the AC to total plasma omadacycline concentration was 25.8. In comparison, the values of the AUC from time zero to 12 h postdosing (AUC0-12) based on the mean concentrations of tigecycline in ELF and AC were 3.16 and 38.50 mg · h/liter, respectively. The ratio of the ELF and AC to total plasma concentrations of tigecycline based on AUC0-12 values were 1.71 and 20.8, respectively. The pharmacokinetic advantages of higher and sustained concentrations of omadacycline compared to those of tigecycline in plasma, ELF, and AC suggest that omadacycline is a promising antibacterial agent for the treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections caused by susceptible pathogens.

Meropenem-RPX7009 Concentrations in Plasma, Epithelial Lining Fluid, and Alveolar Macrophages of Healthy Adult Subjects.

The steady-state concentrations of meropenem and the ß-lactamase inhibitor RPX7009 in plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations were obtained in 25 healthy, nonsmoking adult subjects. Subjects received a fixed combination of meropenem (2 g) and RPX7009 (2 g) administered every 8 h, as a 3-h intravenous infusion, for a total of three doses. A bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed once in each subject at 1.5, 3.25, 4, 6, or 8 h after the start of the last infusion. Meropenem and RPX7009 achieved a similar time course and magnitude of concentrations in plasma and ELF. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters ± the standard deviations of meropenem and RPX7009 determined from serial plasma concentrations were as follows: Cmax = 58.2 ± 10.8 and 59.0 ± 8.4 µg/ml, Vss = 16.3 ± 2.6 and 17.6 ± 2.6 liters; CL = 11.1 ± 2.1 and 10.1 ± 1.9 liters/h, and t1/2 = 1.03 ± 0.15 and 1.27 ± 0.21 h, respectively. The intrapulmonary penetrations of meropenem and RPX7009 were ca. 63 and 53%, respectively, based on the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8) values of ELF and total plasma concentrations. When unbound plasma concentrations were considered, ELF penetrations were 65 and 79% for meropenem and RPX7009, respectively. Meropenem concentrations in AMs were below the quantitative limit of detection, whereas median concentrations of RPX7009 in AMs ranged from 2.35 to 6.94 µg/ml. The results from the present study lend support to exploring a fixed combination of meropenem (2 g) and RPX7009 (2 g) for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by meropenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens susceptible to the combination of meropenem-RPX7009.

A randomised trial of lung sealant versus medical therapy for advanced emphysema.

Uncontrolled pilot studies demonstrated promising results of endoscopic lung volume reduction using emphysematous lung sealant (ELS) in patients with advanced, upper lobe predominant emphysema. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ELS in a randomised controlled setting.Patients were randomised to ELS plus medical treatment or medical treatment alone. Despite early termination for business reasons and inability to assess the primary 12-month end-point, 95 out of 300 patients were successfully randomised, providing sufficient data for 3- and 6-month analysis.57 patients (34 treatment and 23 control) had efficacy results at 3 months; 34 (21 treatment and 13 control) at 6 months. In the treatment group, 3-month lung function, dyspnoea, and quality of life improved significantly from baseline when compared to control. Improvements persisted at 6 months with >50% of treated patients experiencing clinically important improvements, including some whose lung function improved by >100%. 44% of treated patients experienced adverse events requiring hospitalisation (2.5-fold more than control, p=0.01), with two deaths in the treated cohort. Treatment responders tended to be those experiencing respiratory adverse events.Despite early termination, results show that minimally invasive ELS may be efficacious, yet significant risks (probably inflammatory) limit its current utility.

The localized inflammatory response to bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation.

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation (BTVA) reduces lung volumes in emphysema patients by inducing a localized inflammatory response (LIR) leading to a healing process of fibrosis, but may also increase symptoms. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether the clinical manifestation of LIR correlated with patient outcome. METHODS: Respiratory adverse events and inflammatory markers were analyzed from a multicenter trial of BTVA in patients with upper-lobe-predominant emphysema. End points including changes in forced expiratory flow (FEV1), lobar volume, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and 6-minute-walk distance (6-MWD) were analyzed according to the presence or absence of a respiratory adverse event requiring treatment with an antibiotic or steroid. RESULTS: Forty-four patients received BTVA. Increases of inflammatory markers were observed with a peak between the second and fourth week. Eighteen respiratory adverse events occurred in 16 patients within 30 days of BTVA, requiring antibiotics and/or steroids. These patients had significantly greater lobar volume reduction (65.3 vs. 33.4%, p = 0.007) and a change in residual volume at 12 months (-933 vs. 13 ml, p < 0.001) associated with a greater improvement of exercise capacity and health-related quality of life than patients without respiratory adverse events. CONCLUSION: Patients with more prominent respiratory symptoms in the first 30 days following BTVA experience greater efficacy. The clinical manifestations of the LIR are predictive of long-term clinical benefits.

Comparison of plasma, epithelial lining fluid, and alveolar macrophage concentrations of solithromycin (CEM-101) in healthy adult subjects.

The steady-state concentrations of solithromycin in plasma were compared with concomitant concentrations in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophages (AM) obtained from intrapulmonary samples during bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in 30 healthy adult subjects. Subjects received oral solithromycin at 400 mg once daily for five consecutive days. Bronchoscopy and BAL were carried out once in each subject at either 3, 6, 9, 12, or 24 h after the last administered dose of solithromycin. Drug concentrations in plasma, ELF, and AM were assayed by a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Solithromycin was concentrated extensively in ELF (range of mean [± standard deviation] concentrations, 1.02 ± 0.83 to 7.58 ± 6.69 mg/liter) and AM (25.9 ± 20.3 to 101.7 ± 52.6 mg/liter) in comparison with simultaneous plasma concentrations (0.086 ± 0.070 to 0.730 ± 0.692 mg/liter). The values for the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24) values) based on mean and median ELF concentrations were 80.3 and 63.2 mg · h/liter, respectively. The ratio of ELF to plasma concentrations based on the mean and median AUC(0-24) values were 10.3 and 10.0, respectively. The AUC(0-24) values based on mean and median concentrations in AM were 1,498 and 1,282 mg · h/L, respectively. The ratio of AM to plasma concentrations based on the mean and median AUC(0-24) values were 193 and 202, respectively. Once-daily oral dosing of solithromycin at 400 mg produced steady-state concentrations that were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in ELF (2.4 to 28.6 times) and AM (44 to 515 times) than simultaneous plasma concentrations throughout the 24-h period after 5 days of solithromycin administration.

Bronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation therapy in the management of heterogeneous emphysema.

The need for a less invasive procedure than surgical lung volume reduction that can produce consistent improvements with reduced morbidity remains a medical goal in patients with emphysema. We sought to determine the effect of bronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation (BTVA) on lung volumes and outcomes in patients with emphysema. 44 patients with upper lobe-predominant emphysema were treated unilaterally with BTVA. Entry criteria included: age 40-75 yrs, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 15-45% predicted, previous pulmonary rehabilitation and a heterogeneity index (tissue/air ratio of lower lobe/upper lobe) from high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) ≥ 1.2. Changes in FEV(1), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), 6-min walk distance (6 MWD), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea score, and hyperinflation were measured at baseline, and 3 and 6 months post-BTVA. At 6 months, mean ± SE FEV(1) improved by 141 ± 26 mL (p<0.001) and residual volume was reduced by 406 ± 113 mL (p<0.0001). SGRQ total score improved by 14.0 ± 2.4 points (p<0.001), with 73% improving by ≥ 4 points. Improvements were observed in 6 MWD (46.5 ± 10.6 m) and mMRC dyspnoea score (0.9 ± 0.2) (p<0.001 for both). Lower respiratory events (n=11) were the most common adverse event and occurred most often during the initial 30 days. BTVA therapy results in clinically relevant improvements in lung function, quality of life and exercise tolerance in upper lobe predominant emphysema.

Intrapulmonary penetration of ceftolozane/tazobactam and piperacillin/tazobactam in healthy adult subjects.

OBJECTIVES: Appropriate antibiotic exposure at the site of infection is important for clinically effective therapy. This study compared the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) penetration of ceftolozane/tazobactam, which has potent in vitro activity against many Gram-negative pathogens causing nosocomial pneumonia, with that of piperacillin/tazobactam in healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: In this Phase 1, open-label trial, 51 healthy adult subjects were randomized to receive three doses of either ceftolozane/tazobactam 1.5 g administered every 8 h via a 60 min infusion or piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g administered every 6 h via a 30 min infusion. Serial blood samples were obtained for determination of plasma drug concentrations. Bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed at pre-specified timepoints in five subjects per timepoint in each treatment group to determine the ELF drug concentration. The penetration of individual analytes into the ELF was determined from the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in ELF to that in plasma (AUC(ELF)/AUC(plasma)). RESULTS: Plasma and ELF concentrations of ceftolozane, piperacillin and tazobactam increased rapidly, reaching maximal concentrations at the end of the infusion. Mean maximum concentration and AUC from time 0 to the end of the dosing interval (AUC(0-τ)) for ceftolozane in ELF were 21.8 mg/L and 75.1 mg·h/L, respectively. Corresponding values for piperacillin were 58.8 mg/L and 94.5 mg·h/L. The ELF/plasma AUC ratio for ceftolozane was 0.48 compared with 0.26 for piperacillin. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that ceftolozane penetrated well into the ELF following parenteral administration of ceftolozane/tazobactam.

Efficacy of indacaterol 75 µg once-daily on dyspnea and health status: results of two double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-week studies.

Indacaterol is an inhaled, once-daily, long-acting ®(2)-agonist for the treatment of COPD. Most previous studies were conducted with doses of 150 and/or 300 µg once-daily, and data with the 75 µg dose are limited. Two identically designed studies were, therefore, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 75 µg once-daily dose. In two double-blind studies conducted in the USA, patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized to treatment with indacaterol 75 µg once-daily (n = 163 and 159) or matching placebo (n = 160 and 159) for 12 weeks. The primary variable was forced expiratory volume in 1 s measured 24 h post-dose after 12 weeks (reported elsewhere). This report describes secondary efficacy endpoints, including transition dyspnea index (TDI) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores, and the percentages of patients with improvements of or above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID; ≥1 in TDI score and ≥4 in SGRQ score). Differences between indacaterol and placebo for TDI total score at week 12 were 1.23 (p < 0.001) and 0.45 (p = 0.16), with odds ratios for achieving the MCID of 2.19 (p = 0.002) and 1.58 (p = 0.065). SGRQ total score decreased (improved) from baseline by 5.8 and 4.9 units with indacaterol at week 12 (2.0 and 0.9 with placebo), with odds ratios for achieving the MCID of 1.80 (p = 0.024) and 1.71 (p = 0.031). Patients receiving indacaterol had statistically significant or numerical improvements in diary-derived symptom variables compared with placebo. Treatment with indacaterol 75 µg may provide useful improvements in patient-reported outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.

Incidence and duration of common early-onset adverse events in randomized controlled trials of solriamfetol for treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea and narcolepsy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This post hoc analysis characterized the weekly incidence and overall duration of common early-onset, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during solriamfetol treatment. METHODS: Participants (obstructive sleep apnea [OSA], n = 474; narcolepsy, n = 236) were randomized to 12 weeks of placebo or solriamfetol 37.5 (OSA only), 75, 150, or 300 mg. For common early-onset TEAEs (those occurring in ≥ 5% of participants in any solriamfetol dose group and with a higher incidence than that observed in placebo-treated participants during week 1), the incidence of new occurrence or change in severity over time was calculated for each subsequent study week. Data were analyzed separately for each study and summarized by placebo and combined solriamfetol groups. RESULTS: Common early-onset TEAEs (at doses ≤ 150 mg; ie, approved doses) included headache (OSA, 5.1%; narcolepsy, 8.5%), nausea (OSA, 2.5%; narcolepsy, 4.2%), decreased appetite (OSA, 4.2%; narcolepsy, 5.9%), as well as anxiety (2.1%), insomnia (1.3%), and feeling jittery (3.0%) in OSA and dry mouth (4.2%) in narcolepsy. Incidence of common early-onset TEAEs was highest at week 1 and decreased over time. In OSA at doses ≤ 150 mg, headache, nausea, and feeling jittery had median durations ≤ 8 days, whereas decreased appetite, anxiety, and insomnia had longer durations. In narcolepsy at doses ≤ 150 mg, headache and nausea had median durations ≤ 8 days, whereas decreased appetite and dry mouth had longer durations. Most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Common early-onset TEAEs with solriamfetol are limited in duration, with the majority subsiding during the first week of treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Twelve-week Study of the Safety and Efficacy of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in Narcolepsy; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02348593; Identifier: NCT02348593; and Name: Twelve-week Study of the Safety and Efficacy of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in OSA; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02348606; Identifier: NCT02348606. CITATION: Rosenberg R, Thorpy MJ, Dauvilliers Y, et al. Incidence and duration of common early-onset adverse events in randomized controlled trials of solriamfetol for treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea and narcolepsy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(1):235-244.

Penetration of vancomycin into epithelial lining fluid in healthy volunteers.

Although vancomycin is often regarded as an agent that concentrates poorly in the lower respiratory tract, as determined from concentrations in epithelial lining fluid (ELF), few data are available. This study sought to determine the profile of vancomycin exposure in the ELF relative to plasma. Population modeling and Monte Carlo simulation were employed to estimate the penetration of vancomycin into ELF. Plasma and ELF pharmacokinetic (PK) data were obtained from 10 healthy volunteers. Concentration-time profiles in plasma and ELF were simultaneously modeled using a three-compartment model with zero-order infusion and first-order elimination and transfer using the big nonparametric adaptive grid (BigNPAG) program. Monte Carlo simulation with 9,999 subjects was performed to calculate the ELF/plasma penetration ratios by estimating the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in ELF (AUC(ELF)) and plasma (AUC(plasma)) after a single simulated 1,000-mg dose. The mean (standard deviation) AUC(ELF)/AUC(plasma) penetration ratio was 0.675 (0.677), and the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile penetration ratios were 0.265, 0.474, and 0.842, respectively. Our results indicate that vancomycin penetrates ELF at approximately 50% of plasma levels. To properly judge the adequacy of current doses and schedules employed in practice, future studies are needed to delineate the PK/PD (pharmacodynamics) target for vancomycin in ELF. If the PK/PD target in ELF is found to be consistent with the currently proposed target of an AUC/MIC of ≥400, suboptimal probability of target attainment would be expected when vancomycin is utilized for pneumonias due to MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) with MICs in excess of 1 mg/liter.

Insulin lung deposition and clearance following Technosphere® insulin inhalation powder administration.

PURPOSE: To determine distribution and deposition of Technosphere® Insulin (TI) inhalation powder and the rate of clearance of fumaryl diketopiperazine (FDKP; major component of Technosphere particles) and insulin from the lungs. METHODS: Deposition and distribution of (99m)pertechnetate adsorbed onto TI immediately after administration using the MedTone® inhaler was quantified by gamma-scintigraphy. Clearance from the lungs was studied in a second experiment by serial bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) after administration of TI inhalation powder and assay of the recovered fluid for FDKP and insulin. RESULTS: Following inhalation, ~60% of radioactivity (adsorbed on TI) emitted from the inhaler was delivered to the lungs; the remainder of the emitted dose was swallowed. Clearance from the lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of FDKP and insulin have a half-life of ~1 hour. CONCLUSION: TI inhalation powder administered via the MedTone inhaler was uniformly distributed throughout the lungs; ~40% of the initial cartridge load reached the lungs. Insulin and FDKP are quickly cleared from the lungs, mainly by absorption into the systemic circulation. The terminal clearance half-life from the lung ELF, estimated from sequential BAL fluid measurements for both components, was ~1 hour. Since there is an overnight washout period, the potential for accumulation on chronic administration is minimal.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Solriamfetol for Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in OSA: An Analysis of Subgroups Adherent or Nonadherent to OSA Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Solriamfetol, a dopamine-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved in the United States to improve wakefulness in adults with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with OSA (37.5-150 mg/d). RESEARCH QUESTION: Does solriamfetol have differential effects on EDS based on adherence to primary OSA therapy and does solriamfetol affect primary OSA therapy use? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were randomized to 12 weeks of placebo or solriamfetol 37.5, 75, 150, or 300 mg/d (stratified by primary OSA therapy adherence). Coprimary end points were week 12 change from baseline in 40-min Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in the modified intention-to-treat population. Primary OSA therapy use (hours per night, % nights) and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: At baseline, 324 participants (70.6%) adhered to OSA therapy (positive airway pressure use ≥ 4 h/night on ≥ 70% nights, surgical intervention, or oral appliance use on ≥ 70% nights) and 135 participants (29.4%) did not adhere. Least squares (LS) mean differences from placebo in MWT sleep latency (minutes) in the 37.5-, 75-, 150-, and 300-mg/d groups among adherent participants were 4.8 (95% CI, 0.6-9.0), 8.4 (95% CI, 4.3-12.5), 10.2 (95% CI, 6.8-13.6), and 12.5 (95% CI, 9.0-15.9) and among nonadherent participants were 3.7 (95% CI, -2.0 to 9.4), 9.9 (95% CI, 4.4-15.4), 11.9 (95% CI, 7.5-16.3), and 13.5 (95% CI, 8.8-18.3). On ESS, LS mean differences from placebo in the 37.5-, 75-, 150-, and 300-mg/d groups among adherent participants were -2.4 (95% CI, -4.2 to -0.5), -1.3 (95% CI, -3.1 to 0.5), -4.2 (95% CI, -5.7 to -2.7), and -4.7 (95% CI, -6.1 to -3.2) and among nonadherent participants were -0.7 (95% CI, -3.5 to 2.1), -2.6 (95% CI, -5.4 to 0.1), -5.0 (95% CI, -7.2 to -2.9), and -4.6 (95% CI, -7.0 to -2.3). Common adverse events included headache, nausea, anxiety, decreased appetite, nasopharyngitis, and diarrhea. No clinically meaningful changes were seen in primary OSA therapy use with solriamfetol. INTERPRETATION: Solriamfetol improved EDS in OSA regardless of primary OSA therapy adherence. Primary OSA therapy use was unaffected with solriamfetol. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02348606; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov; EU Clinical Trials Register; No.: EudraCT2014-005514-31; URL: www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu.