Does early activation within hours after cochlear implant surgery influence electrode impedances?

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine if early device activation can influence cochlear implant electrode impedances by providing electrical stimulation within hours after cochlear implant surgery. DESIGN: Electrode impedances were measured intraoperatively, at device activation, and one-month after device activation in three groups: users whose devices were activated (1) on the same day (Same Day), (2) the next day (Next Day), and (3) 10-14 days (Standard), after cochlear implant surgery. STUDY SAMPLE: Electrode impedances are reported in fifty-one patients implanted with a Cochlear™ Nucleus® Cochlear Implant. RESULTS: Compared to intraoperative levels, impedances dropped within hours for the Same Day activation group (p < 0.001) and continued dropping on the next day after surgery (p < 0.001). Similarly, electrode impedances were significantly (p < 0.001) lower at device activation for the Next Day group as compared to their intraoperative measurements. For Standard activation, impedances increased significantly from intraoperative levels, prior to device activation (p < 0.001). One-month after initial activation, impedances were not statistically different between the Same Day, Next Day, and Standard activation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early device activation does not influence long-term impedances in a clinically meaningful manner.

Pathophysiology of Facial Nerve Stimulation and Its Implications for Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.

OBJECTIVES: A small number of cochlear implant (CI) users experience facial nerve stimulation (FNS), which can manifest as facial twitching. In some patients, this can be resolved by adjusting the electrical stimulation parameters. However, for others, facial stimulation can significantly impair CI outcomes or even prevent its use. The exact mechanisms underlying FNS are unclear and may vary among patients. DESIGN: Transimpedance measurements were used to assess lateral and longitudinal spread of current within 15 cochlea of nucleus CI recipients with FNS (13 unilateral recipients and 1 bilateral recipient). We compared the transimpedance measurements with programming parameters from clinical visits and pre- and postoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) scans to identify factors that may contribute to FNS in each CI ear. RESULTS: In nine ears, transimpedance curves showed inflection, which suggests a localized current sink within the cochlea. This indicates a low-impedance pathway through which current exits the cochlea and stimulates the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve canal. Electrodes near this current sink were disabled or underfit to minimize facial stimulation. In the other seven ears, current flow peaked toward the basal end of the cochlea, suggesting that current exits through the round window or other structures near the basal end of the cochlea, stimulating the tympanic segment of the facial nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Objective transimpedance measurements can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of FNS and to develop strategies for optimizing electrical stimulation parameters and speech coding to minimize or eliminate FNS in a small subset of CI users.

Multi-Frequency Electrocochleography and Electrode Scan to Identify Electrode Insertion Trauma during Cochlear Implantation.

Intraoperative electrocochleography (ECOG) is performed using a single low-frequency acoustic stimulus (e.g., 500 Hz) to monitor cochlear microphonics (CM) during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion. A decrease in CM amplitude is commonly associated with cochlear trauma and is used to guide electrode placement. However, advancement of the recording electrode beyond the sites of CM generation can also lead to a decrease in CM amplitude and is sometimes interpreted as cochlear trauma, resulting in unnecessary electrode manipulation and increased risk of cochlear trauma during CI electrode placement. In the present study, multi-frequency ECOG was used to monitor CM during CI electrode placement. The intraoperative CM tracings were compared with electrode scan measurements, where CM was measured for each of the intracochlear electrodes. Comparison between the peak CM amplitude measured during electrode placement and electrode scan measurements was used to differentiate between different mechanisms for decrease in CM amplitude during CI electrode insertion. Analysis of the data shows that both multi-frequency electrocochleography and electrode scan could potentially be used to differentiate between different mechanisms for decreasing CM amplitude and providing appropriate feedback to the surgeon during CI electrode placement.

Relationship Between Intraoperative Electrocochleography Responses and Immediate Postoperative Bone Conduction Thresholds in Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG) measurements and residual hearing preservation after cochlear implant (CI) surgery by comparing differences between preoperative and immediate postoperative bone conduction thresholds. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients with preoperative residual hearing and measurable (no-vibrotactile) bone conduction thresholds at 250 and/or 500 Hz who underwent cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Intraoperative ECochG and air and bone conduction thresholds. RESULTS: Nine patients showed no significant drop (<30%) in ECochG amplitude during CI surgery with an average preoperative and immediate postoperative BC threshold of 46 and 39 dB HL, respectively, at 500 Hz. Seven patients with a decrease in ECochG amplitude of 30% or greater showed an average preoperative 500 Hz BC threshold of 32 dB HL and immediate postoperative threshold of 55 dB HL. Air and bone conduction thresholds measured approximately 1 month after CI surgery show delayed-onset of hearing loss across our study patients. CONCLUSIONS: A small decrease (<30%) in difference response or cochlear microphonics amplitude correlates with no significant changes in immediate postoperative residual hearing, whereas patients who show larger changes (≥30%) in difference response or cochlear microphonics amplitude during intraoperative ECochG measurements show significant deterioration in BC thresholds. This study reveals the necessity of prompt postoperative bone conduction measurement to isolate the intraoperative cochlear trauma that may be detected during intraoperative ECochG measurements. Although delayed postoperative audiometrics represent longer-term functional hearing, it includes the sum of all postoperative changes during the recovery period, including subacute changes after implantation that may occur days or weeks later. Measuring air and bone conduction thresholds immediately postoperatively will better isolate factors influencing intraoperative, early postoperative, and delayed postoperative hearing loss. This will ultimately help refine surgical technique, device design, and highlight the use of intraoperative ECochG in monitoring cochlear trauma during CI surgery.

A Comparison of Dizziness Handicap Inventory Scores by Categories of Vestibular Diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) is a 25-item self-report quantifying dizziness-related physical and emotional symptoms and restrictions in daily activities. DHI scores do not correlate with severity of structural vestibular deficits; thus, high DHI scores may reflect other causes of morbidity. This study investigated the relationship between total DHI scores and the presence of structural, functional, and psychiatric disorders in tertiary neurotology patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary center. PATIENTS: Eighty-five patients who underwent multidisciplinary neurotologic evaluations. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Active illnesses identified by a multidisciplinary neurotology team were abstracted from medical records, cataloged as structural, functional, or psychiatric disorders, and used to group patients into diagnostic categories: structural (structural disorders only), functional (functional disorders with/without structural disorders), and psychiatric (psychiatric disorders with/without other conditions). DHI scores were compared across diagnostic categories. Sensitivities and specificities of DHI scores for identifying structural versus functional or psychiatric disorders were calculated. RESULTS: Mean DHI scores differed significantly by diagnostic category (structural 35 ±â€Š18, functional 64 ±â€Š15, and psychiatric 65 ±â€Š19), before and after adjusting for age and sex (p < 0.001, Hedges' g>1.62 for structural versus functional and psychiatric categories). DHI≤30 (mild handicap) had specificity = 0.98 for structural disorders alone, whereas DHI>60 (severe handicap) had specificity = 0.88 for functional or psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In this tertiary cohort, categories of illnesses had large effects on total DHI scores. Patients with scores ≤30 were likely to have structural disorders alone, whereas those with scores >60 were likely to have functional or psychiatric disorders, with or without coexisting structural conditions.