RESUMEN
Diaphyseal malunion poses a great challenge for the orthopedic surgeon, and an inundation of morbidity for the patient. Diaphyseal malunion can cause altered gait, adjacent joint osteoarthritis and body dissatisfaction. This problem is fraught with complications without surgical intervention. There is a myriad of options for the management of a diaphyseal malunion. The clamshell osteotomy was engendered to ameliorate the difficulty in managing this issue. This technique is a viable option to correct diaphyseal malunion about the femur and tibia. Recently, the indications of a clamshell osteotomy have been expanded to function as a derotational or shortening osteotomy.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Mal Unidas , Osteoartritis , Fracturas de la Tibia , Fracturas Mal Unidas/cirugía , Humanos , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Osteotomía , Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Modifier 22 in the American Medical Association's Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) book is a billing code for professional fees used to reflect an increased amount of skill, time, and work required to complete a procedure. There is little disagreement that using this code in the setting of surgery for acetabulum fractures in the obese patient is appropriate; however, to our knowledge, the degree to which payers value this additional level of complexity has not been determined. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) the use of Modifier 22 increased reimbursements in morbidly obese patients and (2) there was any difference between private insurance and governmental payer sources in treatment of Modifier 22. METHODS: Over a 4-year period, we requested immediate adjudication with payers when using Modifier 22 for morbidly obese patients with acetabular fractures. We provided payers with evidence of the increased time and effort required in treating this population. Reimbursements were calculated for morbidly obese and nonmorbidly obese patients. Of the 346 patients we reviewed, 57 had additional CPT® codes or modifiers appended to their charges and were excluded, leaving 289 patients. Thirty (10%) were morbidly obese and were billed with Modifier 22. Fifty-three (18%) were insured by our largest private insurer and 69 (24%) by governmental programs (Medicare/Medicaid). Eight privately insured patients (15%) and seven governmentally insured patients (10%) were morbidly obese and were billed with Modifier 22. For our primary question, we compared reimbursement rates between patients with and without Modifier 22 for obesity within the 289 patients. We then performed the same comparison for the 53 privately insured patients and the 69 governmentally insured patients. RESULTS: Overall, there was no change in mean reimbursement when using Modifier 22 in morbidly obese patients, compared to nonmorbidly obese patients (USD 2126 versus USD 2149, p < 0.94). There was also no difference in mean reimbursements with Modifier 22 in either the privately insured patients (USD 3445 versus USD 2929, p = 0.16) or the governmentally insured patients (USD 1367 versus USD 1224, p=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Despite educating payers on the increased complexity and time needed to deal with morbidly obese patients with acetabular fractures, we have not seen an increased reimbursement in this challenging patient population. This could be a disincentive for many centers to treat these challenging injuries. Further efforts are needed to convince government payer sources to increase compensation in these situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, economic and decision analyses. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/lesiones , Fracturas Óseas/economía , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Asistencia Médica/economía , Asistencia Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Geriatric trauma continues to rise, corresponding with the continuing growth of the older population. These fractures continue to expand, demonstrated by the incidence of hip fractures having grown to 1.5 million adults worldwide per year. This patient population and their associated fracture patterns present unique challenges to the surgeon, as well as having a profound economic impact on the health care system. Pharmacologic treatment has focused on prevention, with aging adults having impaired fracture healing in addition to diminished bone mineral density. Intraoperatively, novel ideas to assess fracture reduction to facilitate decreased fracture collapse have recently been explored. Postoperatively, pharmacologic avenues have focused on future fracture prevention, while shared care models between geriatrics and orthopaedics have shown promise regarding decreasing mortality and length of stay. As geriatric trauma continues to grow, it is imperative that we look to optimize all phases of care, from preoperative to postoperative.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Skin dimpling, also known as skin puckering, is a rare occurrence after closed proximal humerus fractures. This finding is suggestive of incarceration of the skin at the fracture site and may lead to necrosis and conversion to an open fracture. OBJECTIVES: Our goal is to describe our experience with skin dimpling after a proximal humerus fracture to increase awareness and recognition of this clinical presentation in the Emergency Department (ED). CASE REPORT: We report a case of a 46-year-old woman who presented to the ED with left shoulder pain and swelling after a fall. She was found to have skin dimpling over the anterior aspect of the shoulder on further examination and was diagnosed with a proximal humerus fracture after imaging. CONCLUSION: Skin dimpling is an uncommon sign associated with proximal humerus fractures that can help in diagnosis and determining course of treatment. Devastating soft tissue injury can occur if the fracture is not immediately reduced. Therefore, it is imperative that physicians be able to promptly identify the clinical presentation to prevent unwanted sequelae.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Cerradas/complicaciones , Fracturas Cerradas/terapia , Fracturas del Hombro/complicaciones , Fracturas del Hombro/terapia , Piel/patología , Femenino , Fracturas Cerradas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas del Hombro/diagnósticoRESUMEN
A displaced medial tibial plateau fracture with central and lateral impaction, but an intact anterolateral cortical rim, is an uncommon variant of bicondylar tibial plateau fracture that presents a number of challenges. Without a lateral metaphyseal fracture line to work through, it is challenging to address central and lateral impaction. Previously published techniques for addressing this fracture pattern describe an intra-articular osteotomy of the lateral plateau to aid visualization and reduction, or use a posterolateral approach to the proximal tibia with or without an osteotomy of the proximal fibula. This study presents a technique which utilizes standard dual incision approaches and does not involve an intra-articular osteotomy of the lateral tibial plateau or a posterolateral approach. A case series was conducted evaluating radiographic and functional outcomes of 8 patients.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de la Tibia , Fracturas de la Meseta Tibial , Humanos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Tibia/cirugía , Peroné/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of perioperative complications between morbidly obese (body mass index greater than 40 kg/m2) and nonmorbidly obese patients undergoing operative treatment of acetabular fractures across 2 periods (2000-2005 and 2012-2019). DESIGN: Retrospective, case-control study. SETTING: Level I academic trauma center. PATIENTS: Four hundred thirty-five consecutive patients from 2000 to 2005 and 216 consecutive patients from 2012 to 2019 with acetabular fractures treated by a single surgeon. INTERVENTION: Operative fixation of acetabular fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Outcome variables include positioning time, operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, wound complications, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: Twenty-eight morbidly obese and 188 nonmorbidly obese patients from 2012 to 2019, as well as 41 morbidly obese patients and 394 nonmorbidly obese patients from 2000 to 2005 were included in the study. The relative risk (RR) of wound complications between 2012 and 2019 groups was significantly higher for morbidly obese patients (RR = 5.31, P = 0.009) but has decreased significantly for morbidly obese patients between 2000-2005 and 2012-2019 (RR = 0.31, P = 0.017). The rate of total perioperative complications was similar between morbidly obese and nonmorbidly obese groups from 2012 to 2019 (21% vs. 8%, P = 0.230). For morbidly obese patients, the rate of total perioperative complications decreased significantly between 2000-2005 and 2012-2019 (63% vs. 21% P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Acetabular fracture surgery can be safely performed in morbidly obese patients. Although obesity remains a significant risk factor for wound complications, the risk for morbidly obese patients has decreased significantly since our initial investigation because of adaptations to surgical techniques and surgeon's experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera , Obesidad Mórbida , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Effective fracture surgery requires contouring orthopaedic implants in multiple planes. The amount of force required for contouring is dependent on the amount and type of material contained within the plane to be altered. The type of contouring used depends on the desired plate function; for example, buttress mode often requires some degree of undercontouring, whereas compression plating may require prebending. Other reasons to contour a plate include matching patient anatomy either to maximize fixation options or to reduce implant prominence. Precontoured plates can be convenient and help to facilitate soft-tissue friendly techniques but have the potential to introduce malreduction if the plate position and fit are not carefully monitored.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Prótesis e Implantes , Diseño de Prótesis/métodos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk factors for deep infection in OTA/AO 43C pilon fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective, case-control study. SETTING: Single institution, Level 1 trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with 43C pilon fractures treated over a 5-year period with follow-up to bony union. One hundred fifty of 169 of identified patients met inclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: Operative treatment of tibial pilon fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Deep infection; patient demographics, Gustilo-Anderson classification, location of open fracture wounds, surgical approaches. RESULTS: The overall rate of deep infection was 16.7%. Body mass index, tobacco use, and diabetes were not associated with deep infection. The rate of Gustilo-Anderson type 3A and 3B fractures was significantly higher in those with infection, but the overall open fracture rate was not significantly different between the groups. Medial and anterior open fracture wound location was significantly associated with deep infection, whereas lateral open fracture wound location was not. In closed fractures, anteromedial and anterolateral approaches were not significantly associated with infection, but posterolateral approach was associated with deep infection. Segmental bone loss and the need for soft tissue coverage were the only independent risk factors for deep infection. CONCLUSIONS: High-grade open pilon fractures are at risk of deep infection, and medial/anterior open fracture wounds are particularly vulnerable to developing deep infection. The anteromedial/anterolateral surgical approaches should be selected based on a complete understanding of the fracture pattern and soft tissue injury; however, the posterolateral approach to the tibia should be used with some caution. Ultimately injury factors (segmental bone loss and need for soft tissue coverage) seem to be the most important variables in driving deep infection, and a complete understanding of the bone and soft tissue injury is needed to manage these injuries effectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas , Fracturas de la Tibia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas Abiertas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Humanos , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are little data to explain why the surgical subspecialty of orthopaedic surgery struggles with improving the racial/ethnic composition of its workforce. The current work sought to determine what orthopaedic residency program directors and coordinators believe are the barriers to improving diversity at their own programs. METHODS: Between November 17, 2018, and April 1, 2019, a 17-question survey was electronically distributed to the program directors and coordinators of 155 allopathic orthopaedic surgery residency programs. Seventy-five of 155 programs (48.4%) responded to the survey. A p-value of < 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: The most commonly stated barriers to increasing diversity within the orthopaedic surgery programs were the following: "We do not have enough minority faculty, which may deter the applicants" (69.3%), "We consistently rank minority applicants high but can never seem to match them" (56%), and "Not enough minorities are applying to our program" (54.7%). Programs with higher percentages of underrepresented minority (URM) faculty had higher percentages of URM residents (p = 0.001). Programs participating in the Nth Dimensions and/or Perry Initiative programs had a higher percentage of URM faculty as compared to the residency programs that did not participate in these programs (p = 0.004). URM residents represented 17.5% of all residents who resigned and/or were dismissed in the 10 years preceding the survey while also only representing 6% of all orthopaedic residents during the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: From the orthopaedic residency program perspective, the greatest perceived barrier to increasing the racial/ethnic diversity of residents in their program is their lack of URM faculty. Surveyed programs with more URM faculty had more URM residents, and programs participating in Nth Dimensions and/or Perry Initiative programs had a higher percentage of URM faculty.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the failure rate of the DePuy-Synthes variable angle locking compression curved condylar plate (VA-LCP) and quantify failure modes. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirteen patients with 118 OTA/AO classification 33A and 33C distal femoral fractures were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Internal fixation using only the DePuy-Synthes VA-LCP plate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes included mechanical failure rate of the DePuy-Synthes VA-LCP plate in open and closed fractures. Secondary outcomes included overall failure rate of treatment, risk factors for mechanical failure, and the specific location of failure: loss of fixation in the proximal segment, implant failure over the working length, or failure of locking screw fixation distally. RESULTS: There were 11 total failures (9.3%) in 118 fractures. Failure rates for the closed and open fracture groups were 5.4% and 15.9%, respectively. Twenty patients (16.9%) required reoperation to promote union. Open fractures (P = 0.00475), the presence of medial metaphyseal comminution (P = 0.037), the length of the zone of comminution (P = 0.037), and plate length (P = 0.0096) were significantly higher in those with implant failure. Most failures (63.6%) were in the working length of the implant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Synthes VA-LCP is a viable option in distal femoral fractures and has an acceptable failure rate and reoperation to promote union rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity and segmental fracture/bone loss are challenging problems in the treatment of fractures and nonunions of the distal femur. The use of an intramedullary rod as an endosteal substitute for a deficient medial cortex along with a lateral locked plate is 1-tool to combat these problems. This article describes the technique used and its results at a single Level 1 trauma center. METHODS: Retrospective chart and radiographic review of all patients treated for acute fractures and nonunions of the distal femur using endosteal substitution with an intramedullary nail and a lateral locked plate. Fixation construct was determined at the surgeon's discretion and was strongly influenced by bone loss and patient body habitus. RESULTS: Seven of 8 acute fractures and 8 of 8 nonunions healed without an unplanned reoperation. There were no cases of secondary displacement after fixation, and only 1 unplanned reoperation in the study group. CONCLUSION: Endosteal substitution with an intramedullary rod and the use of a lateral locked plate provides the stability needed to allow bone healing under prolonged or supraphysiologic loads seen in morbid obesity or segmental bone loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Fracturas no Consolidadas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Tornillos Óseos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fracturas no Consolidadas/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The rates of obesity continue to increase in the United States and the overall impact of obesity on health care spending and patient outcomes after trauma is considerable. The unique physiology of the obese places them at higher risk for complications, including infection, failure of fixation, nonunion, multiorgan failure, and death. These physiologic differences and overall patient size can make orthopedic care in obese patients with trauma more difficult, but appropriate initial resuscitation, careful preoperative planning, meticulous surgical technique, diligent postoperative medical management, and specialized rehabilitation give these patients their best opportunity for a good outcome.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismo Múltiple/complicaciones , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Obesidad/complicaciones , Humanos , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Acetabular and pelvic ring injuries in obese patients are difficult to treat. Obese patients require great attention to detail during the trauma evaluation to prevent medical and anesthetic complications in the perioperative period. Radiographic evaluation is often compromised by modalities available and loss of resolution with plain film imaging. Patient positioning must be meticulous to ensure stability on the bed while allowing access to the operative site, preventing pressure necrosis, and minimizing ventilation pressure. Complications after surgical treatment are common and often due to infection and loss of fixation. Careful technique can mitigate but not prevent these complications.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/lesiones , Fijación de Fractura/efectos adversos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Obesidad/complicaciones , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Humanos , Posicionamiento del PacienteRESUMEN
The management of fractures with segmental bone loss or abundant comminution on the far cortex is often complicated by deformity or frank hardware failure. Using plate constructs that rely on off-axis loading may not be sufficient to support the limb until healing occurs. There are a number of techniques to mitigate this problem, notably the use of intramedullary nails and bicolumnar plating of the fracture. These techniques are not always possible and do come with the biologic cost of additional surgery. In this article, the authors present a technique along with 2 case examples of using plates in an intraosseous location that was described by Dr Mast in his classic orthopaedic text. By placing these plates in the intramedullary space and then interdigitating fixation from the standard cortical plate, a rigid "I-beam" of fixation can be created to mitigate the eccentric loading placed on extraosseous plates. This technique is especially useful in situations in which intramedullary nails are precluded (comminuted intraarticular and some periprosthetic fractures).
Asunto(s)
Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Fracturas Intraarticulares/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Placas Óseas , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Fracturas Conminutas/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Fracturas Intraarticulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Preoperative evaluation of the contralateral anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) at our institution is used to judge coronal plane alignment. In our study, we investigated 4 different techniques for obtaining an anteroposterior intraoperative fluoroscopic image of the distal femur to determine which technique provides (1) the greatest interobserver reliability; (2) the lowest variability from the previously published population mean; and (3) the lowest side-to-side variability. METHODS: Inclusion criteria included lower extremity injuries needing fixation that required intraoperative fluoroscopy with an intact femur and an intact extensor mechanism (N = 100). Fluoroscopic images were obtained of the distal femur in 4 positions differentiated by the position of the limb and the orientation of the C-arm beam to the femoral shaft. RESULTS: All measurement techniques resulted in mean measurements within one degree of 81 degrees. Variance between measurements was small among patients with all views, but images that involved a true anteroposterior with the beam perpendicular to the femur had the lowest rate of measurements that were <78 or >84 degrees. CONCLUSION: Side-to-side differences in patients were <2 degrees on average with every image used. With the best-performing images, 20% of patients had an aLDFA > 3 degrees different from the population mean of 81 degrees and 3% of patients were >5 degrees different. Although restoring aLDFA to 81 degrees will be within 3 degrees of the contralateral side the vast majority of the time, matching the aLDFA to the injured side will be the most accurate reconstruction.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fémur/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate all patients who received gentamicin for open fracture treatment and determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, kidney injury in this population. DESIGN: Retrospective, case control. SETTING: Single institution; Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective chart review identified patients who received gentamicin for open fracture antibiotic treatment from January 2008 to December 2012. Overall, 371 patients met the inclusion criteria and were categorized into 2 groups using risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, and end-stage kidney disease criteria: normal kidney function (74.9%) versus abnormal kidney function (25.1%). INTERVENTION: Use of gentamicin in open fracture antibiotic treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Kidney function; injury and treatment characteristics (eg, mechanism of injury; Gustilo-Anderson classification; number of surgical debridements, timing of definitive wound coverage, and type of wound coverage); and patient information (eg, age, height, weight, and body mass index, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis, and current chemotherapy treatment). RESULTS: Those with abnormal kidney function had lower baseline creatinine (P < 0.001) and higher injury severity scores (16.5 vs. 11.8, P < 0.001) and were more likely to require intensive care unit admission (P < 0.001) than the normal group. Female sex (P = 0.015), and higher weight (P = 0.004), ICU admission (P < 0.001), and use of CT contrasted imaging (P < 0.001) were independently associated with abnormal kidney function. Abnormal kidney function incidence also sharply increased with age. CONCLUSIONS: Females and heavier individuals are at-risk of kidney injury while receiving gentamicin. ICU admission and concurent CT contrasted imaging are strongly associated with kidney injury in patients receiving gentamicin for open fracture treatment, and gentamicin should be avoided in those >60 years of age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Profilaxis Antibiótica/efectos adversos , Fracturas Abiertas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Gentamicinas/efectos adversos , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Incidencia , Pruebas de Función Renal , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Centros TraumatológicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We sought to define the rate of syndesmotic instability after anatomic reduction of the posterior malleolus when posterior stabilization of a trimalleolar or trimalleolar equivalent ankle fracture was chosen vs when a supine position and initially conservative management of the posterior elements was chosen. METHODS: The types of syndesmotic and posterior malleolar fixation used to treat adult patients with ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus at our level I trauma center were retrospectively assessed (N = 198). Specifically, both bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures were included. Exclusion criteria included pilon fractures, trimalleolar fractures with Chaput fragments, and neurologic injury. Demographics, fracture classification, initial operative position, medial clear space, and posterior malleolar fragment size were recorded for each fracture. RESULTS: In total, 151 patients (76.3%) were initially positioned supine, 27.2% of whom had syndesmotic instability requiring operative stabilization. Almost 25% of supine patients also underwent posterior malleolar stabilization for posterior instability. Overall, 73 (48.3%) patients who were initially treated in the supine position needed some form of additional stabilization. Forty-seven patients (23.7%) were initially positioned prone. Syndesmotic stability was restored in 97.9% of these patients. This 2.1% rate of instability vastly differs from the 13-fold higher syndesmotic instability rate observed in the supine group ( P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the rate of syndesmotic instability was reduced in trimalleolar and trimalleolar equivalent fractures when prone positioning and direct fixation of the posterior malleolus were first performed. Using traditional preoperative estimates of posterior stability to determine the need for posterior malleolar fixation may be inadequate since almost a quarter of patients treated supine received posterior stabilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo/cirugía , Traumatismos del Tobillo/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Articulaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Huesos TarsianosRESUMEN
The mission of any academic orthopaedic training program can be divided into 3 general areas of focus: clinical care, academic performance, and research. Clinical care is evaluated on clinical volume, patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and becoming increasingly focused on data-driven quality metrics. Academic performance of a department can be used to motivate individual surgeons, but objective measures are used to define a residency program. Annual in-service examinations serve as a marker of resident knowledge base, and board pass rates are clearly scrutinized. Research productivity, however, has proven harder to objectively quantify. In an effort to improve transparency and better account for conflicts of interest, bias, and self-citation, multiple bibliometric measures have been developed. Rather than using individuals' research productivity as a surrogate for departmental research, we sought to establish an objective methodology to better assess a residency program's ability to conduct meaningful research. In this study, we describe a process to assess the number and quality of publications produced by an orthopaedic residency department. This would allow chairmen and program directors to benchmark their current production and make measurable goals for future research investment. The main goal of the benchmarking system is to create an "h-index" for residency programs. To do this, we needed to create a list of relevant articles in the orthopaedic literature. We used the Journal Citation Reports. This publication lists all orthopaedic journals that are given an impact factor rating every year. When we accessed the Journal Citation Reports database, there were 72 journals included in the orthopaedic literature section. To ensure only relevant, impactful journals were included, we selected journals with an impact factor greater than 0.95 and an Eigenfactor Score greater than 0.00095. After excluding journals not meeting these criteria, we were left with 45 journals. We performed a Scopus search over a 10-year period of these journals and created a database of articles and their affiliated institutions. We performed several iterations of this to maximize the capture of articles attributed to institutions with multiple names. Based off of this extensive database, we were able to analyze all allopathic US residency programs based on their quality research productivity. We believe this as a novel methodology to create a system by which residency program chairmen and directors can assess progress over time and accurate comparison with other programs.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Eficiencia , Internado y Residencia , Ortopedia/educación , Bibliometría , Humanos , Ortopedia/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
CASE: A 40-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a comminuted fracture of the patella with separation of the bone fragments. The patient underwent an open reduction and osteosynthesis using medial and lateral 2.0-mm nonlocking plates, which subsequently led to pain in the anterior and posterior aspects of the knee. CONCLUSION: In this patient, bicolumnar nonlocking plating was unable to adequately resist the tensile forces of the extensor mechanism. We believe that the probable cause of failure was an insufficient neutralization of the tensile forces exerted by the extensor mechanism. Because of the substantial forces acting on the patella, a method of converting these tensile forces into compressive forces is very beneficial, as seen with anterior tension-band wiring. Although we used nonlocking plates in our patient, we believe that locking-plate fixation placed along the medial and lateral columns also would have had a biomechanical disadvantage in dispersing the tensile forces exerted by the extensor mechanism.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas/efectos adversos , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Rótula/lesiones , Falla de Prótesis/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Fuerza Muscular , Reducción Abierta/métodosRESUMEN
This study examined the incidence and risk factors associated with lateral helical blade migration and trochanteric pain with the trochanteric fixation nail. A retrospective review was performed of 141 cases of pertrochanteric femur fracture treated with a trochanteric fixation nail at a level I trauma center over a period of 42 months. Exclusion criteria included follow-up of less than 60 days, preexisting osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and prophylactic trochanteric fixation nail treatment. Patient demographics, operative findings, and radiographic findings were recorded. Medical records were reviewed to identify symptomatic hardware. Overall, 27 patients (19.1%) were symptomatic, and 3 (2.1%) required revision surgery for blade prominence. Of the patients, 42 (30%) had lateralization of greater than 1 cm, and 16 of these (38.1%) were symptomatic (P<.02). A risk factor for lateralization was AO classification, with 46.1% of type A2 fractures showing lateralization of greater than 1 cm. The quality of calcar reduction nearly reached statistical significance, and 44.8% of patients who had inadequate reduction had lateralization of greater than 1 cm compared with 26.4% of patients who had adequate reduction (P=.054). Lateralization of greater than 1 cm was directly associated with the presence of symptoms (P<.001) and removal of hardware because of trochanteric pain (P=.007). Multivariate analysis showed that increasing tip-apex distance, inadequate calcar reduction, and greater fracture severity were predictive of excessive lateralization of greater than 1 cm. Nearly 20% of patients had lateral hip pain associated with cephalomedullary fixation. Final lateralization of the helical blade of greater than 1 cm was a very strong predictor of symptoms. During preoperative counseling, surgeons should caution patients about this relatively frequent and likely underreported complication. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):e886-e891.].