Stress ulcer prophylaxis for non-critically ill patients on a teaching service.

RATIONALE: Doctors frequently give non-critically ill patients unjustified stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP). It is unknown if this practice also occurs during residency training. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pattern of SUP given to non-critically ill medical patients on the teaching service of an internal medicine residency programme. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of non-critically ill adults admitted to the internal medicine teaching service of a community hospital from August 2003 to July 2004. We assessed receipt of SUP, association of SUP with risk factors for stress ulcer bleeding; appropriateness of SUP according to evidence-based criteria; and incidence of stress ulcer bleeding. RESULTS: Of the 774 patient records reviewed, 545 were included in the study. The average age was 55.4 years. Patients were more likely to receive SUP if they had more risk factors for stress ulcer bleeding (P < 0.001). Overall, 54.9% (299 of 545) of patients received SUP. Of these 299 patients, at least 58.5% did not warrant SUP, depending on the criteria used. Of the entire cohort of 545 non-critically ill patients, 32.1% to 54.9% received unjustified SUP, depending on the criteria applied. There were no cases of stress ulcer bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Many non-critically ill patients on the teaching service received unjustified SUP, suggesting the need for institutional protocols and educational interventions to promote evidence-based practice during residency training.

Improving the physical diagnosis skills of third-year medical students: a controlled trial of a literature-based curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a literature-based physical diagnosis curriculum could improve student knowledge, skill, and self-confidence in physical diagnosis. DESIGN: Prospective controlled trial of an educational intervention. SETTING: Required internal medicine clerkship for third-year medical students at Brown Medical School. PARTICIPANTS: Third-year medical students who completed the internal medicine clerkship during the academic year 1999-2000: 32 students at 1 clerkship site received the intervention; a total of 50 students at 3 other clerkship sites served as controls. INTERVENTION: Physical diagnosis curriculum based on 8 articles from the Journal of the American Medical Association's Rational Clinical Examination series. Intervention students met weekly for 1 hour with a preceptor to review each article, discuss the sensitivity and specificity of the maneuvers and findings, and practice the techniques with an inpatient who agreed to be visited and examined. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physical diagnosis knowledge for the 8 topics was evaluated using a 22-item multiple choice question quiz, skill was evaluated using trained evaluators, and self-confidence was assessed using an end-of-clerkship survey. Intervention students scored significantly higher than the control group on the knowledge quiz (mean correct score 70% vs 63%, P =.002), skills assessment (mean correct score 90% vs 54%, P <.001), and self-confidence score (mean total score 40 vs 35, P =.003), and they expressed greater satisfaction with the physical diagnosis teaching they received in the clerkship. CONCLUSION: This physical diagnosis curriculum was successful in improving students' knowledge, skill, and self-confidence in physical diagnosis.

Patients' use of the Internet for medical information.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the percentage of patients enrolled in a primary care practice who use the Internet for health information, to describe the types of information sought, to evaluate patients' perceptions of the quality of this information, and to determine if patients who use the Internet for health information discuss this with their doctors. DESIGN: Self-administered mailed survey. SETTING: Patients from a primary care internal medicine private practice. PARTICIPANTS: Randomly selected patients ( N=1,000) were mailed a confidential survey between December 1999 and March 2000. The response rate was 56.2%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 512 patients who returned the survey, 53.5% (274) stated that they used the Internet for medical information. Those using the Internet for medical information were more educated ( P <.001) and had higher incomes ( P <.001). Respondents used the Internet for information on a broad range of medical topics. Sixty percent felt that the information on the Internet was the "same as" or "better than" information from their doctors. Of those using the Internet for health information, 59% did not discuss this information with their doctor. Neither gender, education level, nor age less than 60 years was associated with patients sharing their Web searches with their physicians. However, patients who discussed this information with their doctors rated the quality of information higher than those who did not share this information with their providers. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care providers should recognize that patients are using the World Wide Web as a source of medical and health information and should be prepared to offer suggestions for Web-based health resources and to assist patients in evaluating the quality of medical information available on the Internet.