The influence of TMS of the rTPJ on attentional control and mentalizing.

Mentalizing is the powerful cognitive ability to understand others. By attributing mental states to others, we become able to explain and predict their behavior. The right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) plays a key role in processing models of mental states. Yet, a different line of research suggests that the rTPJ is crucially involved in attentional control, prompting debates on its cognitive function. In this pre-registered neuro-navigated event-related TMS study, we tested for the rTPJ's specificity in mentalizing and attentional control. We interfered with its activity in a recently developed spatial cueing paradigm in which another's mental states were apparently task-relevant, allowing direct comparison of TMS effects on attention and mentalizing. We contrasted effects with a nearby control TMS site. Our confirmatory analysis showed no evidence for an involvement of the rTPJ in mentalizing or attentional control, presumably due to an observed large inter-individual variability of TMS effects on context and validity. To follow up this finding, we conducted exploratory analyses which revealed that rTPJ TMS had an influence on both attentional control and mentalizing. TMS effects on attention and mentalizing co-varied across participants: participants responding most to rTPJ TMS on mentalizing were also those for whom rTPJ TMS increased the attentional effect the most. This provides further evidence against total absolute segregation between mentalizing and attention within the rTPJ. Rather, our results suggest a common cognitive mechanism in both domains for which the rTPJ is necessary, paving the way for future research to cross-validate and extend these findings.

Algorithm-Based Liquid Formulation Development Including a DoE Concept Predicts Long-Term Viral Vector Stability.

Specifically tailored amino acid-based formulations were previously shown to have a high potential to avoid stress-mediated degradation of complex molecules such as monoclonal antibodies and viral vectors. By using adenovirus 5 (Ad5) as a model, we studied whether such formulations may also efficiently protect viral vectors in thermal stress experiments and during long-term liquid storage. Algorithm-based amino acid preselection using an excipient database and subsequent application of design of experiments (DoE) in combination with a 37°C challenging model enabled the prediction of long-term storage stability of Ad5. By statistical analysis of the Ad5 infectivity, amino acids with significant influence on Ad5 stability were detected after 2 and 3 weeks of liquid storage at 37°C. Ad5 formulations comprising positively selected amino acids did not reveal any loss of infectivity after 24 months in liquid storage at 5°C. By contrast, a 2 log reduction after 3 months and complete loss of infectivity after 18 months was observed with a standard viral vector formulation. By an optimization round, we designed a simple and well-balanced formulation avoiding MgCl2, previously considered essential in Ad5 formulations. This work demonstrates the efficacy of an algorithm-based development approach in the formulation development for viral vectors.

33-month-old children succeed in a false belief task with reduced processing demands: A replication of Setoh et al. (2016).

A recent low-inhibition false belief task showed a high success rate with 33-month-old children when response-generation demands were reduced [Setoh, Scott, & Baillargeon (2016). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(47), 13360-13365]. We found correct responding in 74% of N = 58 33-month-old children, replicating the original findings. Within the same sample, we compared this performance with performance in a concurrent measure of false belief understanding which has previously produced competence in children below the age of 3 years [Hughes & Ensor (2007). Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1447-1459]. Contrasting sharply with findings from the low-inhibition false belief task, we found partial competence in 15%, and full competence in only 5% of the same sample. These results show that the paradigm by Setoh and colleagues generates reliable findings in a different lab and a different language. We discuss this pattern of results in relation to theoretical considerations of early false belief understanding.