RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Endocrine therapy (ET) in combination with CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i) is the standard treatment modality for hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). There is uncertainty about the prognostic and predictive value of HER2-low status and whether HER2-low BC is an individual biologic subtype. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of HER2 expression status on survival in mBC patients treated with first-line ET plus CDK 4/6i. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with HR + /HER2-negative mBC cancer who were treated with first-line CDK 4/6i in combination with ET from January 2016 to March 2023. Patients were divided into two groups (HER2-low and zero), and survival and safety analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were included in this study; of these, 73 (36.3%) had HER2-low disease and 128 (63.7%) had HER2-zero. There were 135 patients (67.2%) treated with ribociclib and 66 (32.8%) with palbociclib. Most of the patients (75.1%) received aromatase inhibitors as combination-endocrine therapy. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The median follow-up was 19.1 months (range: 2.5-78.4). The most common side effect was neutropenia (22.4%). The frequency of grade 3-4 toxicity was similar between the HER2-zero and low patients (32% vs 31.5%; p = 0.939). Visceral metastases were present in 44.8% of patients. Between the HER2-low and zero groups, median PFS (25.2 vs 22.6 months, p = 0.972) and OS (not reached vs 37.5 months, p = 0.707) showed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: The prognostic value of HER2-low status remains controversial. Our study showed no significant effect of HER2 low expression on survival in patients receiving CDK 4/6i plus ET.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Receptor ErbB-2 , Humanos , Femenino , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Pronóstico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Purinas/uso terapéutico , Purinas/administración & dosificación , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Aminopiridinas/uso terapéutico , Aminopiridinas/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) represent a significant global health concern due to high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite therapeutic advances, the prognosis for advanced or recurrent cases remains challenging. Nivolumab obtained approval for recurrent or metastatic HNC based on the Phase III CheckMate 141 trial. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world outcomes of nivolumab in patients with non-nasopharyngeal HNC. DESIGN: In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed 124 patients with recurrent or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal HNC who received nivolumab in the second-line setting and beyond. Data were collected from 20 different cancer centers across Turkey. The effectiveness and safety of the treatment and survival outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Nivolumab exhibited favorable clinical responses, yielding an objective response rate of 29.9% and a disease control rate of 55.7%. Safety assessments revealed a generally well-tolerated profile, with no instances of treatment discontinuation or mortality due to side effects. Survival analysis disclosed a median overall survival (OS) of 11.8 (95% CI 8.4-15.2) months. Multivariate analysis revealed that ECOG-PS ≥ 1 (HR: 1.64, p = 0.045), laryngeal location (HR: 0.531, p = 0.024), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 3.5 (HR: 1.97, p = 0.007) were independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal HNC in real-world settings. Further studies are needed on factors affecting response to treatment and survival outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a new phenomenon developing in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. HPD is characterized by an unexpected and fast progression in tumor volume and poor survival. There is no standardized definition for HPD and clinicopathological variables associated with HPD are unclear. Herein, we assessed incidence, treatment outcomes and factors predictive of HPD in patients treated with ICIs. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI at one academic center between 2014 and 2021. We used the Lo Russo's adopted criteria combined with clinical and radiologic parameters for the definition of HPD. All patients who underwent their first tumor evaluation according to RECIST1.1 were included. RESULTS: Of 155 patients, 147 were eligible for analysis. The median age was 61 and 83% were male. The cancer types were; lung 67.3%, bladder 12.9%, gastric 9.5%, 5, colon 5.4% and renal cell carcinoma 4.8%. 59.9% of patients were treatment-naive and others had one or more lines of chemotherapy. 19 (12.9%) patients had HPD. In patients who had HPD, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter (1.5 vs 9.8 months, (HR 9.56; 95% CI (5.51-16.57), p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) was also shorter for HPD patients than non-HPD (3.0 vs 23.1 months, respectively, HR 12.03, 95% CI (6.64-21.81), p < 0.001). Gastric cancer, larger sum of target lesion diameters at baseline, liver metastases, higher LDH level and higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significantly associated with HPD. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that HPD was a rapid phenomenon with significantly poor survival rates. Several clinicopathological factors and tumor characteristics might indicate HPD.
RESUMEN
The only phase 3 study on the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in first-line treatment in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer is the MONALEESA-7 study, and data on the effectiveness of palbociclib is limited. Data are also limited regarding the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia, the most common side effect of CDK 4-6 inhibitors. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib and ribociclib in first-line treatment in patients with premenopausal metastatic breast cancer and the effect of dose reduction due to neutropenia on progression-free survival. Our study is a multicenter, retrospective study, and factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) were examined in patients diagnosed with metastatic premenopausal breast cancer from 29 different centers and receiving combination therapy containing palbociclib or ribociclib in the metastatic stage. 319 patients were included in the study. The mPFS for patients treated with palbociclib was 26.83 months, and for those receiving ribociclib, the mPFS was 29.86 months (p = 0.924). mPFS was 32.00 months in patients who received a reduced dose, and mPFS was 25.96 months in patients who could take the initial dose, and there was no statistical difference (p = 0.238). Liver metastasis, using a fulvestrant together with a CDK 4-6 inhibitor, ECOG PS 1 was found to be a negative prognostic factor. No new adverse events were observed. In our study, we found PFS over 27 months in patients diagnosed with premenopausal breast cancer with CDK 4-6 inhibitors used in first-line treatment, similar to post-menopausal patients. We did not detect any difference between the effectiveness of the two CDK 4-6 inhibitors, and we showed that there was no decrease in the effectiveness of the CDK 4-6 inhibitor in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia.