Excellent local control with preoperative radiation therapy, surgical resection, and intra-operative electron radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma.

PURPOSE: To examine the value of surgical resection combined with preoperative external beam radiation therapy and intraoperative radiation therapy (Surg-RT) for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). METHODS: Review of 63 consecutive patients with RPS from 1996 to 2011. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (59%) underwent Surg-RT and 26 (41%) had surgery alone. 51% of tumors were high grade and 36% of patients had locally recurrent disease. Final margin status was: R0 73%, R1 16%, R2 6%, and unknown 5%. Of those with R0 resections, 67% received Surg-RT. Median follow-up was 45 months. The 5-year local control rate was 89% for Surg-RT patients and 46% for surgery alone patients (P = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, Surg-RT was the only variable associated with a lower risk of LR (HR 0.19; CI 0.05-0.69, P = 0.003). The actuarial 5-year OS was 60% for patients receiving either Surg-RT or surgery alone. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pre-operative radiation, surgical resection, and intraoperative radiation produces excellent local disease control for RPS. Combination therapy was associated with improved local control but not with overall survival.

'Evidence-based medicine: the time has come to set standards for staging'. Is a radical overhaul really needed?

This Invited Response addresses concerns and opinions expressed in an Invited Commentary, 'Evidence-based medicine: the time has come to set standards for staging', by Quirke et al., published in this issue of The Journal of Pathology.

Adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the Johns Hopkins Hospital-Mayo Clinic collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: Survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is low, the role of adjuvant therapy remains controversial, and recent data suggest adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) may decrease survival compared with surgery alone. Our goal was to examine efficacy of adjuvant CRT in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared with surgery alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma at Johns Hopkins Hospital (n = 794, 1993-2005) and Mayo Clinic (n = 478, 1985-2005) following resection who were observed (n = 509) or received adjuvant 5-FU based CRT (median dose 50.4 Gy; n = 583) were included. Cox survival and propensity score analyses assessed associations with overall survival. Matched-pair analysis by treatment group (1:1) based on institution, age, sex, tumor size/stage, differentiation, margin, and node positivity with N = 496 (n = 248 per treatment arm) was performed. RESULTS: Median survival was 18.8 months. Overall survival (OS) was longer among recipients of CRT versus surgery alone (median survival 21.1 vs. 15.5 months, P < .001; 2- and 5-year OS 44.7 vs. 34.6%; 22.3 vs. 16.1%, P < .001). Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant CRT improved survival in propensity score analysis for all patients by 33% (P < .001), with improved survival when stratified by age, margin, node, and T-stage (RR = 0.57-0.75, P < .05). Matched-pair analysis demonstrated OS was longer with CRT (21.9 vs. 14.3 months median survival; 2- and 5-year OS 45.5 vs. 31.4%; 25.4 vs. 12.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant CRT is associated with improved survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Adjuvant CRT was not associated with decreased survival in any risk group, even in propensity score and matched-pair analyses. Further studies evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy compared with adjuvant chemoradiation are needed to determine the most effective combination of systemic and local-regional therapy to achieve optimal survival results.

Intraperitoneal treatment for peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin after operative management: long-term follow-up of the Mayo Clinic experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors and the impact of intraperitoneal (IP) treatment after surgical resection of peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMC) of appendiceal origin. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PMC is a rare, malignant, intra-abdominal neoplasm that produces large amounts of mucin. Patients typically present with diffuse peritoneal disease. After surgical treatment, multiple locoregional recurrences are common; recurrences outside the abdomen are infrequent. Treatment regimens include debulking, radiotherapy with IP radioisotopes, and chemotherapies (IP, systemic, or both). Because reported data are variable and heterogeneous, treatment evaluations are challenging. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 115 consecutive patients with PMC who underwent maximal surgical resection with or without postoperative therapy between 1985 and 2000 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. After maximal resection, 37 patients received IP 5-fluorouracil, 35 of whom also received IP chromic phosphate P 32. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival. RESULTS: All gross disease was removed in 61% of patients. With a median follow-up of 6.1 years, the median OS was 8.1 years. Median OS for patients receiving versus not receiving IP therapy was 23.5 years versus 7.5 years, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year OS for those receiving and not receiving IP therapy was 82%, 65%, and 52% versus 60%, 27%, and 15%, respectively. Adverse prognostic factors for OS identified by univariate analysis included partial mucin debulking, adenocarcinoma histology, systemic chemotherapy, diffuse IP disease at presentation, and no IP therapy. On multivariate analysis, diffuse IP disease at presentation and no IP therapy remained significant. A separate analysis was performed for the 70 patients who underwent gross total resection, 51% of whom received IP therapy. Adverse prognostic factors for OS included adenocarcinoma histology, systemic chemotherapy, and no IP therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This large, single-institution, retrospective series with long-term follow-up suggests that IP chromic phosphate P 32 and 5-fluorouracil after maximal surgical resection of PMC of appendiceal origin is associated with improved OS and disease-free survival.

Unresectable colorectal cancer can be cured with multimodality therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine in what manner aggressive external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), chemotherapy, surgical resection, and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) impact relapse and survival in patients with locally unresectable primary colorectal cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with colorectal cancer fixed to critical structures (eg, IVC and pelvic sidewall) are considered locally "unresectable" for cure and treated with palliative therapy. METHODS: One hundred forty-six patients (65% males) with locally unresectable colon (40) and rectal (106) cancer were treated with EBRT, chemotherapy, surgical resection, and IORT. Final surgical margins were close, but negative in 100 patients (68%), microscopically positive in 28 (19%), and grossly positive in 18 (13%). Kaplan-Meier method was used to visualize survival and relapse curves; groups were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 3.7 years. Median overall survival (years) favored patients with age <58 (7.6 vs. 3.6; P = 0.0012), those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (9.4 versus 3.9; P = 0.0019), and those with negative or microscopic margins (6.3 vs. 1.9; P = 0.0006). There were no perioperative deaths. Fifteen complications occurred in 12 patients (8%) within 30 days of surgery/IORT. One hundred nineteen long-term complications occurred in 77 patients (53%), most commonly peripheral neuropathy (19%), bowel obstruction (14%), and ureteral obstruction (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive multimodality therapy for locally unresectable primary colorectal cancer results in excellent local disease control and a 5-year disease-free and overall survival rate of 43% and 52% respectively with no operative mortality and acceptable perioperative morbidities.

Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Chemoradiation as definitive therapy is the preferred primary therapy for patients with anal canal carcinoma; however, the 5-year disease-free survival rate from concurrent fluorouracil/mitomycin and radiation is only approximately 65%. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of cisplatin-based (experimental) therapy vs mitomycin-based (standard) therapy in treatment of anal canal carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: US Gastrointestinal Intergroup trial RTOG 98-11, a multicenter, phase 3, randomized controlled trial comparing treatment with fluorouracil plus mitomycin and radiotherapy vs treatment with fluorouracil plus cisplatin and radiotherapy in 682 patients with anal canal carcinoma enrolled between October 31, 1998, and June 27, 2005. Stratifications included sex, clinical nodal status, and tumor diameter. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 intervention groups: (1) the mitomycin-based group (n = 341), who received fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 on days 1-4 and 29-32) plus mitomycin (10 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29) and radiotherapy (45-59 Gy) or (2) the cisplatin-based group (n = 341), who received fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 on days 1-4, 29-32, 57-60, and 85-88) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on days 1, 29, 57, and 85) and radiotherapy (45-59 Gy; start day = day 57). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was 5-year disease-free survival; secondary end points were overall survival and time to relapse. RESULTS: A total of 644 patients were assessable. The median follow-up for all patients was 2.51 years. Median age was 55 years, 69% were women, 27% had a tumor diameter greater than 5 cm, and 26% had clinically positive nodes. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53%-67%) in the mitomycin-based group and 54% (95% CI, 46%-60%) in the cisplatin-based group (P = .17). The 5-year overall survival rate was 75% (95% CI, 67%-81%) in the mitomycin-based group and 70% (95% CI, 63%-76%) in the cisplatin-based group (P = .10). The 5-year local-regional recurrence and distant metastasis rates were 25% (95% CI, 20%-30%) and 15% (95% CI, 10%-20%), respectively, for mitomycin-based treatment and 33% (95% CI, 27%-40%) and 19% (95% CI, 14%-24%), respectively, for cisplatin-based treatment. The cumulative rate of colostomy was significantly better for mitomycin-based than cisplatin-based treatment (10% vs 19%; P = .02). Severe hematologic toxicity was worse with mitomycin-based treatment (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this population of patients with anal canal carcinoma, cisplatin-based therapy failed to improve disease-free-survival compared with mitomycin-based therapy, but cisplatin-based therapy resulted in a significantly worse colostomy rate. These findings do not support the use of cisplatin in place of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy in the treatment of anal canal carcinoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003596.

Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Compared With Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin After Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer: Results From CALGB 80101 (Alliance).

Purpose After curative resection of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, Intergroup Trial 0116 (Phase III trial of postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy for high risk gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Demonstrated superior survival for patients who received postoperative chemoradiotherapy with bolus fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) compared with surgery alone. CALGB 80101 (Alliance; Phase III Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Chemoradiation After Resection of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma) assessed whether a postoperative chemoradiotherapy regimen that replaced FU plus LV with a potentially more active systemic therapy could further improve overall survival. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and May 2009, 546 patients who had undergone a curative resection of stage IB through IV (M0) gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative FU plus LV before and after combined FU and radiotherapy (FU plus LV arm) or postoperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and infusional FU (ECF) before and after combined FU and radiotherapy (ECF arm). Results With a median follow-up duration of 6.5 years, 5-year overall survival rates were 44% in the FU plus LV arm and 44% in the ECF arm ( Plogrank = .69; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.24 comparing ECF with FU plus LV). Five-year disease-free survival rates were 39% in the FU plus LV arm and 37% in the ECF arm ( Plogrank = .94; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20). In post hoc analyses, the effect of treatment seemed to be similar across all examined patient subgroups. Conclusion After a curative resection of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, postoperative chemoradiotherapy using a multiagent regimen of ECF before and after radiotherapy does not improve survival compared with standard FU and LV before and after radiotherapy.

Intraoperative electron-beam radiotherapy and ureteral obstruction.

PURPOSE: To quantify the risk of ureteral obstruction (UO) after intraoperative electron-beam radiotherapy (IOERT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred forty-six patients received IOERT of 7.5 to 30 Gy to 168 ureters; 132 patients received external radiotherapy. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 0.01 to 19.1 years (median, 2.1 years). The rates of clinically apparent type 1 UO (UO from any cause) after IOERT at 2, 5, and 10 years were 47%, 63%, and 79%, respectively. The rates of clinically apparent type 2 UO (UO occurring at least 1 month after IOERT, excluding UO caused by tumor or abscess and patients with stents) at 2, 5, and 10 years were 27%, 47%, and 70%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of UO before IOERT (p < 0.001) was associated with an increased risk of clinically apparent type 1 UO. Increasing IOERT dose (p < 0.04) was associated with an increased risk of clinically apparent type 2 UO. UO rates in ureters not receiving IOERT at 2, 5, and 10 years were 19%, 19%, and 51%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of UO after IOERT increases with dose. However, UO risk for ureters not receiving IOERT was also high, which suggests an underlying risk of ureteral injury from other causes.

Results of intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy containing multimodality treatment for locally unresectable T4 rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of the Mayo Clinic Rochester and Catharina Hospital Eindhoven.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to analyse the pooled results of intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) containing multimodality treatment of locally advanced T4 rectal cancer, initially unresectable for cure, from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA (MCR) and Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (CHE), both major referral centers for locally advanced rectal cancer. A rectal tumor is called locally unresectable for cure if after full clinical work-up infiltration into the surrounding structures or organs has been demonstrated, which would result in positive surgical margins if resection was the initial component of treatment. This was the reason to refer these patients to the IOERT program of one of the centers. METHODS: In the period from 1981 to 2010, 417 patients with locally unresectable T4 rectal carcinomas at initial presentation were treated with multimodality treatment including IOERT at either one of the two centres. The preferred treatment approach was preoperative (chemo) radiation and intended radical surgery combined with IOERT. Risk factors for local recurrence (LR), cancer specific survival, disease free survival and distant metastases (DM) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 306 patients (73%) underwent a R0 resection. LRs and metastases occurred more frequently after an R1-2 resection (P<0.001 and P<0.001 respectively). Preoperative chemoradiation (preop CRT) was associated with a higher probability of having a R0 resection. Waiting time after preoperative treatment was inversely related with the chance of developing a LR, especially after R+ resection. In 16% of all cases a LR developed. Five-year disease free survival and overall survival (OS) were 55% and 56% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An acceptable survival can be achieved in treatment of patients with initially unresectable T4 rectal cancer with combined modality therapy that includes preop CRT and IOERT. Completeness of the resection is the most important predictive and prognostic factor in the treatment of T4 rectal cancer for all outcome parameters. IOERT can reduce the LR rate effectively, especially in R+ resected patients.

Phase III study of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy compared with chemotherapy alone in the surgical adjuvant treatment of colon cancer: results of intergroup protocol 0130.

PURPOSE: Some patients with colon cancer have a high risk of local recurrence postoperatively. This trial was undertaken to determine whether radiation therapy added to an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen improves outcome in high-risk patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resected colon cancer with tumor adherence or invasion of surrounding structures, or with T3N1 or T3N2 tumors of the ascending or descending colon were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil and levamisole therapy with or without radiation therapy. Patients who received chemotherapy and radiation therapy (chemoRT) received 45 to 50.4 Gy in 25 to 28 fractions beginning 28 days after starting chemotherapy. Patient enrollment was terminated because of slow accrual after 222 patients enrolled (original goal was 700 patients); 187 patients were assessable. RESULTS: Overall 5-year survival was 62% for chemotherapy patients and 58% for chemoRT patients (P >.50); 5-year disease-free survival was 51% for both groups (P >.50). Toxicity (>/= grade 3) occurred in 42% of chemotherapy patients and 54% of chemoRT patients (P =.04). Leukopenia (>/= grade 3) occurred in 10% of chemotherapy patients and 22% of chemoRT patients (P =.02). No significant difference in nonhematologic toxicity (>/= grade 3) was observed between chemoRT and chemotherapy patients (35% v 44%; P =.26). CONCLUSION: Patients who received chemotherapy or chemoRT had similar overall survival and disease-free survival. Toxicity was higher among chemoRT patients. These results must be interpreted with caution because of the high number of ineligible patients and the limited power of the study to detect potentially meaningful differences.

Impact of T and N stage and treatment on survival and relapse in adjuvant rectal cancer: a pooled analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine survival and relapse rates by T and N stage and treatment method in five randomized phase III North American rectal adjuvant studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were pooled from 3,791 eligible patients enrolled onto North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) 79-47-51, NCCTG 86-47-51, US Gastrointestinal Intergroup 0114, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) R01, and NSABP R02. Surgery alone (S) was the treatment arm in 179 patients. The remaining patients received adjuvant treatment as follows: irradiation (RT) alone (n = 281), RT + fluorouracil (FU) +/- semustine bolus chemotherapy (CT; n = 779), RT + protracted venous infusion CT (n = 325), RT + FU +/- leucovorin or levamisole bolus CT (n = 1,695), or CT alone (n = 532). Five-year follow-up was available in 94% of surviving patients, and 8-year follow-up, in 62%. RESULTS: Overall (OS) and disease-free survival were dependent on TN stage, NT stage, and treatment method. Even among N2 patients, T substage influenced 5-year OS (T1-2, 67%; T3, 44%; T4, 37%; P <.001). Three risk groups of patients were defined: (1) intermediate (T1-2/N1, T3/N0), (2) moderately high (T1-2/N2, T3/N1, T4/N0), and (3) high (T3/N2, T4/N1, T4/N2). For intermediate-risk patients, those receiving S plus CT had 5-year OS rates of 85% (T1-2/N1) and 84% (T3/N0), which was similar to results with S plus RT plus CT (T1-2/N1, 78% to 83%; T3/N0, 74% to 80%). For moderately high-risk lesions, 5-year OS ranged from 43% to 70% with S plus CT, and 44% to 80% with S plus RT plus CT. For high-risk lesions, 5-year OS ranged from 25% to 45% with S plus CT, and 29% to 57% with S plus RT plus CT. CONCLUSION: Different treatment strategies may be indicated for intermediate-risk versus moderately high- or high-risk patients based on differential survival rates and rates of relapse. Use of trimodality treatment for all patients with intermediate-risk lesions may be excessive, since S plus CT resulted in 5-year OS of approximately 85%; however, 5-year disease-free survival rates with S plus CT were 78% (T1-2/N1) and 69%(T3/N0), indicating room for improvement.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Every year in the United States, breast cancer is diagnosed in more than 200,000 women. Because of the prevalence of breast cancer, treatment-related sequelae are of Importance to many survivors of the disease. One such sequela is upper extremity lymphedema, which occurs when fluid accumulates in the Interstitial space and causes enlargement and usually a feeling of heaviness in the limb. Axillary surgery contributes considerably to the incidence of lymphedema, with the incidence and severity of swelling related to the number of lymph nodes removed. Lymphedema after standard axillary lymph node dissection can occur in up to approximately 50% of patients. However, the risk of lymphedema is decreased substantially with newer sentinel lymph node sampling procedures. Adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast or lymph nodes increases the risk of lymphedema, which has been reported in 9% to 40% of these patients. Management of lymphedema requires a multidisciplinary approach to minimize the effect on the patient's quality of life. This review presents an overview of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Gastric cancer--patterns of relapse after surgical resection.

A knowledge of patterns of relapse after initial treatment with surgery alone is essential to determining the relative importance of both local (irradiation) and systemic adjuvants (chemotherapy, other) to surgery. A presentation of anatomic factors and pathways of tumor spread provides a basis for understanding the subsequent patterns of relapse data found in clinical, autopsy, and reoperative series. Implications for adjuvant therapy are summarized.

Radiation treatment parameters in the adjuvant postoperative therapy of gastric cancer.

Radiation therapy will be used much more commonly in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the stomach because of the results of the Intergroup Trial demonstrating an advantage to adjuvant postoperative chemoradiation therapy. Previous descriptions of radiation fields have not emphasized the variation in local spread patterns between tumors located in different portions of the stomach and the varying extent of the primary tumor and lymph node spread. Based on data obtained from surgical and pathologic series, we have recommended a variation in the radiation fields from those routinely applied at the present time. Tumors located primarily in the region of the gastric cardia have the highest risk of nodal involvement in the pericardial region and along the lesser and greater curvature, as well as risk of spread into the periesophageal tissue. However, there is a lower risk of involvement in the distally located nodes, especially in the gastric antrum, periduodenal, and porta hepatis regions. For a patient who has been well evaluated both surgically and pathologically, and found to be node negative, it may not be necessary to treat the nodes in these lower risk sites. Similarly, tumors that originate in the distal stomach, in the region of the gastric antrum, have a high likelihood of spread to the periduodenal, peripancreatic, and porta hepatis nodes, and a lower likelihood of spread to the nodes near the cardia of the stomach, the periesophageal and mediastinal nodes, or to the splenic hilar nodes. Any tumor originating in the stomach has a high propensity of spread to nodes along the greater and lesser curvature, although they are most likely to spread to those sites in close anatomic proximity to the primary tumor mass. Based on such information, we have described the nodal and primary sites that should be treated for different T- and N-stage tumors located in the cardia, body, or antrum of the stomach. These should be used as guides for defining appropriate field arrangements for the adjuvant postoperative therapy of gastric cancer.

Rectal cancer: Preoperative versus postoperative irradiation as a component of adjuvant treatment.

The search for improved disease control and survival for resectable but high-risk rectal cancers has led to studies that combine all 3 modalities. For surgically resected, high-risk rectal cancers, postoperative chemoradiation has been shown to improve both disease control (local and distant) and survival (disease free and overall) and was recommended as standard adjuvant treatment at the 1990 National Institute of Health Colorectal Cancer Consensus Conference. Three randomized studies showed improved overall survival (OS) and local control for patients treated with postoperative irradiation and chemotherapy when compared with surgery alone or surgery plus irradiation control arms. These include 2 US trials, Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group and Mayo/North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) and a Norway trial. Although most preoperative external beam radiation trials show reductions in local relapse with the addition of preoperative EBRT to resection, only the large Swedish trial of approximately 1,100 patients showed a survival improvement when compared with a surgery alone control arm for resectable primary rectal cancers. In a recent pooled analysis of 3 postoperative adjuvant rectal cancer trials (NCCTG 794751, NCCTG 864751, and GI Intergroup 0114) survival and disease relapse were dependent on both TN and NT stage of disease (N substage within T stage and T substage within N stage). Even among N2 patients (4 or more positive nodes), T substage influenced 5-year OS (T1-2, 69%; T3, 48%; and T4, 38%; P <.001). Ongoing randomized trials are being conducted for patients with high-risk, resectable primary rectal cancers. The intent is to help define optimal combinations of postoperative chemoradiation (US GI Intergroup), to test sequencing issues of preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiation (Germany trial), and to determine if concurrent and maintenance 5-FU and leucovorin add to the benefits found with preoperative irradiation (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer). For subsequent trials, it may be preferable to perform separate studies, or a planned statistical analysis, for different risk groups of patients (low, intermediate, moderately high, and high), as defined in the rectal cancer pooled analysis.

Recursive partitioning analysis of pretreatment variables of 416 patients with locoregional esophageal cancer treated with definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy on Intergroup and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials.

PURPOSE: To analyze the relative contributions of uniformly collected pretreatment patient- and tumor-related variables to survival and to identify the terminal nodes via recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) that could be used as a stratification variable for future Phase III trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From two Intergroup trials (85-01, n = 130; and 94-05, n = 218) and one Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial (92-07, n = 68), we identified 416 patients who were treated with definitive concomitant cisplatin and 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy and analyzed their data for survival by RPA to define prognostic classes. The following pretreatment factors were evaluated: histologic type, age, weight loss, Karnofsky performance status, gender, race, T stage, tumor location, tumor size, N stage, and degree of dysphagia. The entire data set was considered as the initial node. The criterion for split points was the smallest p value less than unadjusted 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 416 patients, 336 (81%) were dead at the time of the analysis. The RPA identified only one significant split: pretreatment weight loss in the prior 6 months of <10% vs. > or =10%. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, no other split approached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Unlike our experience with malignant glioma, brain metastases, and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, RPA failed to identify novel prognostic information that could be incorporated into the stratification scheme of future chemoradiotherapy trials for esophageal cancer. Furthermore, our analysis validated the percentage of weight loss as a stratification variable for esophageal cancer.

Use of intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy in the management of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the disease control, survival results, and tolerance of intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) as a component of treatment for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 1981 and September 1995, 87 patients with primary (n = 43) or recurrent (n = 44) retroperitoneal or intrapelvic sarcomas received IOERT as a component of treatment at the Mayo Clinic. The tumors were high grade in 54 patients (62%) and low grade in 33 (38%). The median tumor size was 10 cm (range 2-36). All patients underwent maximal surgical resection with IOERT; in 72 patients, only microscopic or no residual tumor remained. The IOERT doses ranged from 8.75 to 30 Gy (median 15). All primary tumors received external beam irradiation (EBRT) with a median dose of 48.6 Gy. Thirty-four of the 44 recurrent tumors received EBRT to a median dose of 45 Gy. All patients were followed prospectively for outcome and toxicity evaluation. RESULTS: The median follow-up, based on 46 patients (53%) currently alive, was 3.5 years. The overall estimated 5-year survival was 47%. For patients with tumors > or = 10 cm, the 5-year overall survival was significantly poorer (28%) than for those with smaller lesions (60%) (p = 0.01). Neither primary vs. recurrent status nor tumor grade had a significant impact on survival. Patients with gross residual tumor had a marginally significantly poorer survival compared with patients with microscopic or no residual tumor, with a 5-year survival rate of 37% and 52%, respectively (p = 0.08). A total of 49 patients (56%) experienced failure, including 20 local recurrences (23%). The median time to failure was 2.3 years. Four recurrences were within the IOERT field, 3 within the IOERT and EBRT field, and 13 within the EBRT field alone. The 3- and 5-year estimated local control rate was 77% and 59%, respectively. Local control was marginally significantly affected by the amount of residual tumor, with a 5-year local control rate of 41% for those with gross residual tumor, 60% for those with microscopic residual tumor, and 100% for those with no residual tumor (p = 0.09). Gastrointestinal complications were recorded in 12 incidences (Grade 3 or higher toxicity). These complications were believed to be secondary to surgery and/or EBRT in 10 of the 12 cases. Seven patients had fistula formation, and 3 experienced severe proctitis. Grade 3 peripheral neurologic toxicities occurred in 9 patients (10%), but none had pain as a component of their neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas can be treated with an aggressive combined approach of EBRT, surgery, and IOERT, with acceptable toxicity. Local control in primary disease appears to be improved in this retrospective series with this approach. Distant disease control and options for recurrent disease needs further definition.

Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy in the management of gallbladder carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the outcome of patients with gallbladder cancer who received postoperative concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Curative resection followed by adjuvant combined modality therapy with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and chemotherapy was attempted in 21 consecutive gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) patients at the Mayo Clinic from 1985 through 1997. All patients received concurrent 5-fluorouracil during EBRT. EBRT fields encompassed the tumor bed and regional lymph nodes (median dose of 54 Gy in 1.8-2.0-Gy fractions). One patient received 15 Gy intraoperatively after EBRT. A retrospective analysis was performed for the end points of local control, distant failure, and overall survival. RESULTS: After maximal resection, 12 patients had no residual disease on pathologic evaluation, 5 had microscopic residual disease, and 4 had gross residual disease. One patient had Stage I disease, and 20 had Stage III-IV disease. With median follow-up of 5 years (range: 2.6-11.5 years), 5-year survival for the entire cohort was 33%. The 5-year survival rate of patients with Stage I-III disease was 65% vs. 0% for those with Stage IV disease (p < 0.02). For patients with no residual disease, 5-year survival was 64% vs. 0% for those with residual disease (p = 0.002). The median survival was 0.6, 1.4, and 5.1 years for patients with gross residual, microscopic residual, and no residual disease, respectively (p = 0.02). The 5-year local control rate for the entire cohort was 73%. Two-year local control rates were 0%, 80%, and 88% for patients with gross residual, microscopic residual, or no residual disease, respectively (p < 0.01). Five-year local control rates were 100% for the 6 patients who received total EBRT doses >54 Gy (microscopic residual, 3 patients; gross residual, 1 patient; negative but narrow margins, 2 patients) vs. 65% for the 15 who received a lower dose (3, gross residual; 2, microresidual; 10, negative margins). CONCLUSION: Patients with completely resected (negative margins) GBC followed by adjuvant EBRT plus 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy had a relatively favorable prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 64%. These results seem to be superior to historical surgical controls from the Mayo Clinic and other institutions, which report 5-year survival rates of approximately 33% with complete resection alone. Both tumor stage and extent of resection seemed to influence survival and local control. More aggressive measures using current cancer therapies and integration of new cancer treatment modalities will be required to favorably impact on the poor prognosis of patients with Stage IV or subtotally resected GBC. Additional investigation leading to earlier diagnosis is warranted, because most patients with GBC present with advanced disease.