RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An important focus of rehabilitation is thereturn to the meningful occupations which may include work and school activities. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate predictive factors for return to work/study in traumatic brachial plexus injury patients undergoing rehabilitation and to investigate the level of satisfaction with treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study with at least 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: One hundred and one individuals with traumatic brachial plexus injury enrolled in this study. Primary outcomes were return to work/study and satisfaction with treatment. A secondary outcome was the self-perception of what influenced return to work. Sociodemographic and related to injury data, rehabilitation interventions, muscle strength, and disability were analyzed as predictors. Associations were investigated using univariable and discriminant analysis and considered a level of significance of P < .05. RESULTS: Return to work/study occurred in 55% of the patients who participated in this study. Muscle strength discerned those who returned to work. Time interval between trauma and surgery and age were lower in those who returned to work. Thirty-one patients answered the question regarding self-perception of what influenced return to work. They indicated "necessity", "rehabilitation", "my desire" and "not become depressed". Satisfaction was graded between 8.9 and 9.5 in 95% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Return to work/study was related to muscle strength improvement and those who returned were younger and had less time elapsed from trauma. Individual factors and rehabilitation were pointed out as helpful in aiding return to work. Satisfaction with treatment was high. These findings can help to optimize goals in the rehabilitation environment.
Asunto(s)
Plexo Braquial , Reinserción al Trabajo , Humanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Plexo Braquial/lesiones , Satisfacción PersonalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and the need for social distancing created challenges for accessing and providing health services. Telemedicine enables prompt evaluation of patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury, even at a distance, without prejudice to the prognosis. The present study aimed to verify the validity of range of motion, muscle strength, sensitivity, and Tinel sign tele-assessment in adults with traumatic brachial plexus injury (TBPI). METHODS: A cross-sectional study of twenty-one men and women with TBPI admitted for treatment at a Rehabilitation Hospital Network was conducted. The participants were assessed for range of motion, muscle strength, sensitivity, and Tinel sign at two moments: in-person assessment (IPA) and tele-assessment (TA). RESULTS: The TA muscle strength tests presented significant and excellent correlations with the IPA (the intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC ranged between 0.79 and 1.00 depending on the muscle tested). The agreement between the TA and IPA range of motion tests ranged from substantial to moderate (weighted kappa coefficient of 0.47-0.76 (p < 0.05) depending on the joint), and the kappa coefficient did not indicate a statistically significant agreement in the range of motion tests of supination, wrist flexors, shoulder flexors, and shoulder external rotators. The agreement between the IPA andTA sensitivity tests of all innervations ranged from substantial to almost perfect (weighted kappa coefficient 0.61-0.83, p < 0.05) except for the C5 innervation, where the kappa coefficient did not indicate a statistically significant agreement. The IPA versus TA Tinel sign test showed a moderate agreement (weighted kappa coefficient of 0.57, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that muscle strength tele-assessment is valid in adults with TBPI and presented a strong agreement for many components of TA range of motion, sensitivity, and Tinel sign tests.