Unnecessary Abdominal Surgeries in Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema with Normal C1 Inhibitor.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant disease mostly due to the deficiency of C1 inhibitor (C1-INH). HAE with normal C1-INH was first described in 2000 and associated with mutations in the coagulation factor XII in 2006. Both diseases are associated with high bradykinin production, resulting in increased vascular permeability. Gastrointestinal edema due to HAE can be misdiagnosed as acute abdomen and unnecessary surgical procedures may be performed. The present study evaluates the prevalence of surgical procedures and/or acute abdomen in HAE patients with the coagulation factor XII mutation. It is a retrospective study where patients were diagnosed with recurrent angioedema without urticaria, normal C1-INH levels, and positive family history of angioedema. All patients were evaluated for the known mutations located at exon 9 of the F12 gene. Medical records were evaluated and questionnaires were applied to 52 patients with normal C1-INH levels (age range 13-76 years; 47/52, 90.38% women; 5/52, 9.61% men). F12 mutation was present in 32/52 patients (61.5%). Acute abdominal pain was diagnosed in 16/52 (30.76%) patients, appendicitis in 9/16 (56.2%), and undetermined diagnosis in 7/16 (43.7%). Among patients diagnosed with acute abdominal pain, 13/16 (81.2%) underwent surgery and 3/16 (18.7%) improved without surgical intervention. We conclude that many HAE patients with coagulation factor XII mutation were misdiagnosed with acute abdomen and subjected to unnecessary invasive procedures. It is critical to disseminate information about this rare mutation in patients with otherwise normal C1-INH activity, in order to speed up diagnosis and avoid misconduct.

Appendectomy: prognostic factors in the brazilian unified health system.

INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common cause of surgical acute abdomen. Postoperative complications in emergency care are reflections of the surgical procedure and pre- and postoperative factors. OBJECTIVE: Define prognostic factors for patients who underwent appendectomy, comparing them with the literature. METHODS: Descriptive observational study with a cross-sectional design based on data from the emergency/urgency appendectomy records between September 2018 and April 2019. Variables of interest were considered based on intrinsic patient data, clinical status, and perioperative management factors. Primary outcomes considered: postoperative complications from hospital admission discharge and prolonged hospital stay for > 2 days. Secondary outcome: death. The results were evaluated by Fisher's exact test (p <0.05). RESULTS: We identified 48 patients undergoing an appendectomy. Young adults accounted for 68.7%. From the total, 58.3% were males, 6 (12.5%) had hospitalization> 2 days, 4 (8.3%) had complications and no deaths. Among the variables, the stage of AA, the time of complaint up until seeking care, and advanced age were correlated with worse prognosis during hospitalization (p <0.05). The emergence of immediate postoperative complications was correlated with longer hospital stay (p <0.05). DISCUSSION: The descriptive data of the sample converge with the epidemiological profile of patients with AA in the literature, corroborating the applicability of conventional guidelines. The results strengthen the hypothesis that the patient's flow with abdominal manifestations is complicated from the first contact with SUS to the resolution of the condition. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the epidemiological profile and perioperative predictors that are most related to complications favor the appropriate management of patients.

Perception of risk factors for cancer in the ABC population.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the knowledge about risk factors for cancer in patients treated at the ABC Medical School (FMABC). METHODS Cross-sectional observational study conducted in 2019. The American Cancer Institute's Cancer Risk Awareness Survey questionnaire was used with 29 cancer risk factors, 14 of which were proven to cause cancer and 15 without consensus or scientific evidence of causality with cancer but that are often reminded by most of the population. Qualitative variables were described by frequency and percentage, and quantitative variables by mean and standard deviation or median and range depending on normality, assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration for Research and approved by the Research Ethics Committee. RESULTS 191 patients were included. Median age 54 (20 to 90), 64% female. 35.6% reported current or previous smoking. 3.1% consumed alcohol more than 5 drinks/week. 56% reported sedentary lifestyle. 44% had at least 1 case of cancer in relatives up to 2nd degree. The average of correct answers in the analyzed population was 12.83 ± 3.06. A weak positive correlation was observed between income and number of cases (rho = 0.177, p = 0.02). No relationship was observed between the number of correct answers and level of education, age, sex, marital status, race or patients with a positive family history for cancer. CONCLUSION The knowledge about risk factors for cancer in the ABC population is low, which may contribute to the adoption of risk behaviors for the disease.