Tunnel osteolysis post-ACL reconstruction: a systematic review examining select diagnostic modalities, treatment options and rehabilitation protocols.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to (1) identify the optimal diagnostic modality for tunnel widening in skeletally mature patients; (2) identify potentially modifiable risk factors for tunnel widening, such as graft type, and (3) determine what elements of a post-operative rehabilitation program exert the most influence on TW. METHODS: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to January 2018. Studies that discussed tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) of skeletally mature patients and written in English were included. Descriptive statistics, such as means, ranges, and measures of variance (e.g. standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals (CI)) are presented where applicable. RESULTS: 103 studies (6,383 patients) were included. Plain radiographs were the most commonly used diagnostic modality, but radiographs on average required 10 months longer than CT and 2 months longer on average than MRI to diagnose tunnel widening after ACLR. Although CT was the least commonly used modality, it was the shortest time to diagnose tunnel widening at 9.5 months after ACLR. Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft had the largest average tunnel widening overall. BPTB autograft had the lowest average tunnel widening overall. Double-bundle hamstring graft configuration had a lower average tunnel widening than single-bundle configuration. Rehabilitation protocols after ACLR that used a full weight-bearing prescription in rehabilitation showed a greater average femoral tunnel widening than partial weight-bearing, and partial weight-bearing showed a greater average tibial tunnel widening than full weight-bearing. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this systematic review and the descriptive data evaluated, CT demonstrated a time of 9.5 months on average from ACLR to diagnosing tunnel osteolysis post-ACLR. With respect to graft types, double-bundle hamstring autografts reported lower average femoral and tibial TW than single-bundle hamstring autografts. BPTB autografts reported the lowest average TW and BPTB allograft the largest average TW of all the grafts. Furthermore, extension-locked bracing had the lowest TW of all the brace protocols. Lastly, several other surgical technical parameters influencing tunnel osteolysis remain to be determined. No definitive recommendations can be made at this time due to the high heterogeneity of data and the lack of comparative studies analysed in this systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedures for the treatment of shoulder instability: a systematic review of comparative studies.

BACKGROUND: The arthroscopic and open Latarjet procedures are both known to successfully treat shoulder instability with high success rates. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and positioning of the coracoid graft and screws between the arthroscopic and open Latarjet procedures. METHODS: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched for relevant studies between database creation and 2018. Only studies directly comparing open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures were included. RESULTS: There were 8 included studies, with a total of 580 patients treated arthroscopically and 362 patients treated with an open Latarjet procedure. Several papers found significantly better standardized outcome scores for either the open or arthroscopic procedure but these findings were not consistent across papers. Patients treated with arthroscopic Latarjet procedures had significantly lower initial post-operative pain, however pain scores became equivalent by one month post-operatively. Three of the five included studies found no significant difference in the coracoid graft positioning and two of three included studies found no significant difference in screw divergence angles between the two techniques. Arthroscopic procedures (112.2 min) appear to take, on average, longer than open procedures (93.3 min). However, operative times and complication rates decrease with surgeon experience with the arthroscopic procedure. Overall 3.8% of the patients treated arthroscopically and 6.4% of the patients treated with the open procedure went on to have post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures can be used to effectively treat shoulder instability with similarly low rates of complications, recurrent instability and need for revision surgery. Arthroscopic Latarjet procedures are associated with less early post-operative pain but require increased operative time. The evidence does not support there being any significant difference in graft or screw positioning between the two techniques. At this time neither procedure shows clear superiority over the other.

Pudendal nerve injury is a relatively common but transient complication of hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: Hip arthroscopy is emerging as the standard of care for conditions involving the hip, and has a unique set of complications. The purpose of this review was to identify (1) the crude rate of pudendal nerve injury following hip arthroscopy and (2) the specific factors leading to pudendal nerve injury. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched from database inception to October 2016. Patient demographics, indications, surgical technique, complication rates, treatment approaches, and rehabilitation strategies were extracted. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies (n = 3405) were included, with the majority (66%) of studies being level IV evidence. The mean age was 33.9 ± 9.7 years (range 12-78) and 48.2% were males. Average follow-up was 30.2 ± 19.1 months. 62 patients were reported to have sustained pudendal nerve injury (1.8%) post-operatively, and all resolved within 6 weeks to 3 months. Of the seven studies that reported using a perineal post, 20 patients were diagnosed with pudendal nerve injury (4.3%), in contrast to two studies (189 patients) reporting only 0.5% pudendal nerve injury without the use of perineal post. Two studies commented on time of traction during surgical intervention with mean times of 98 and 68 min with complication rates of 10% and 6.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pudendal nerve injury is not uncommon following hip arthroscopy, with a reported rate found in this review of 1.8%. Potential risk factors may include the use of a perineal post and long traction times. All reported cases resolved within 3 months. Patients should be informed of complications related to pudendal nerve injury, which include sexual and urinary dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level I-IV studies.

Arthroscopy Up to Date: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement.

PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive review and summary of the research published in Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery and The American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM) related to hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). METHODS: A comprehensive review was conducted in duplicate of Arthroscopy and AJSM from February 2012 to February 2015 for all articles related to FAI, and a quality assessment was completed for all included studies. Clinical outcomes were dichotomized into short-term (<6 months) and midterm (<24 months) outcomes, and values were pooled when possible. RESULTS: We identified 60 studies in Arthroscopy and 44 studies in AJSM, primarily from North America (78.8%), that predominantly assessed clinical outcomes after arthroscopic hip surgery (46.1%). Seventy-one percent of Arthroscopy studies and 20.5% of AJSM studies were Level IV evidence. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was used by 81.5% of included studies. Pooled weighted mean mHHS values after arthroscopic surgery for FAI showed improvements at the midterm from 60.5 points (range, 56.6 to 83.6 points) to 80.5 points (range, 72.1 to 98.0 points) out of a possible 100 points. Pooled weighted outcomes for labral repair showed mean mHHS improvements from 63.8 points (range, 62.5 to 69.0 points) preoperatively to 86.9 points (range, 85.5 to 89.9 points) up to 24 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive review of research published in Arthroscopy and AJSM over the past 3 years identified a number of key findings. Arthroscopic intervention results in improvements in functional outcomes at both the short-term and midterm for patients with symptomatic FAI in the absence of significant existing degenerative changes. Labral repair may result in improvements over labral debridement. The most commonly used outcome score was the mHHS for objective assessment of surgical success. There is a need for continued focus on improvement of methodologic quality and reporting of research pertaining to FAI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Non-invasive pulse arrival time is associated with cardiac index in pediatric heart transplant patients with normal ejection fraction.

Objective.Cardiac Index (CI) is a key physiologic parameter to ensure end organ perfusion in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Determination of CI requires invasive cardiac measurements and is not routinely done at the PICU bedside. To date, there is no gold standard non-invasive means to determine CI. This study aims to use a novel non-invasive methodology, based on routine continuous physiologic data, called Pulse Arrival Time (PAT) as a surrogate for CI in patients with normal Ejection Fraction (EF).Approach.Electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals were collected from beside monitors at a sampling frequency of 250 samples per second. Continuous PAT, derived from the ECG and PPG waveforms was averaged per patient. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated between PAT and CI, PAT and heart rate (HR), and PAT and EF.Main Results.Twenty patients underwent right heart cardiac catheterization. The mean age of patients was 11.7 ± 5.4 years old, ranging from 11 months old to 19 years old, the median age was 13.4 years old. HR in this cohort was 93.8 ± 17.0 beats per minute. The average EF was 54.4 ± 9.6%. The average CI was 3.51 ± 0.72 l min-1m-2, with ranging from 2.6 to 4.77 l min-1m-2. The average PAT was 0.31 ± 0.12 s. Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between PAT and CI (0.57,p< 0.01). Pearson correlation between HR and CI, and correlation between EF and CI was 0.22 (p= 0.35) and 0.03 (p= 0.23) respectively. The correlation between PAT, when indexed by HR (i.e. PAT × HR), and CI minimally improved to 0.58 (p< 0.01).Significance.This pilot study demonstrates that PAT may serve as a valuable surrogate marker for CI at the bedside, as a non-invasive and continuous modality in the PICU. The use of PAT in clinical practice remains to be thoroughly investigated.

Operative mortality after Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Mortality Category 1 to 3 procedures: Deficiencies and opportunities for quality improvement.

OBJECTIVES: We examined cases of operative mortality at a single quaternary academic center for patients undergoing relatively lower-risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Mortality Category 1-3) procedures, as a means of identifying systemic weaknesses and opportunities for quality improvement. METHODS: A retrospective review of all operative mortality events for patients who underwent a Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Mortality Category 1, 2, or 3 index procedure (2009-2020) at our institution was performed. After a detailed chart review was performed by 2 independent faculty for each case, factors and system deficiencies that contributed to mortality were identified. RESULTS: A total of 42 mortalities were identified. A total of 37 patients (88%) had at least 1 Society of Thoracic Surgeons-designated risk factor, including prior cardiac operations (48%), extracardiac malformations (43%), and preoperative ventilation (33%). Eight patients (19%) had non-Society of Thoracic Surgeons-designated preoperative patient-level variables considered as at potential risk, including severe ventricular dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, lung hypoplasia, and undiagnosed severe coronary abnormalities. Four patients (10%) had no identified preoperative risk factors. After detailed chart review, 5 broad categories were identified: patient-related factors (n = 33; 78%), postoperative infection (n = 13; 31%), postoperative residual lesions (n = 7; 17%), Fontan physiology failure (n = 4; 10%), and unexplained left ventricular failure after tetralogy of Fallot repair (n = 3; 7%). A total of 74% of patients had at least 1 preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative system deficiency. A total of 50% of surgeries were urgent or emergency. CONCLUSIONS: Operative mortality after Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Mortality Category 1 to 3 procedures is related to the presence of multifactorial risk patterns (Society of Thoracic Surgeons and non-Society of Thoracic Surgeons-designated patient-level risk factors and variables, broad risk categories, system deficiencies, emergency surgery). A multidisciplinary approach to care, with early recognition and treatment of modifiable additional burdens, could reduce this risk.

Adverse Events in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Suite: Does Having Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesiologists Make a Difference?

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that anesthesiologists with subspecialty expertise in pediatric cardiac anesthesia are best qualified to care for patients with complex congenital cardiac anomalies and manage the complex physiology frequently encountered in the pediatric cardiac catheterization lab. We evaluated the incidence of adverse events in our pediatric cardiac catheterization lab, comparing care provided by cardiac and noncardiac pediatric attending anesthesiologists. METHODS: Data were collected on each anesthetic in the pediatric cardiac catheterization lab from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019. A generalized linear mixed effect model was used to identify associations between pediatric cardiac and noncardiac anesthesiologists and the presence of adverse events adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, emergency status, and interventional versus diagnostic procedures. RESULTS: A total of 3,761 procedures involving 1,729 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference between noncardiac and cardiac anesthesia attendings for overall adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.75 P=0.349). Specific respiratory adverse events (OR, 1.22; 95%, CI 0.73 to 2.03 P=0.443) or cardiac adverse events (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.64 to 2.48 P=0.502) were also not significantly different with respect to noncardiac compared with cardiac attending anesthesiologists. CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis, the incidence of adverse events in the pediatric cardiac catheterization lab during the study period was not statistically different, whether anesthesia care was provided by a cardiac or a noncardiac anesthesiologist.

The influence of familiarity on life jacket donning performance: implications for participant selection.

Laboratories and test houses keep a "pool" of test subjects that volunteer to be participants in life jacket approval testing, which is believed to be an incorrect procedure. Fifty-six participants donned 8 child/infant life jackets onto 4 infant manikins in random order with time and accuracy of donning recorded. Average donning time for all 8 life jackets decreased significantly after the first donning experience. The findings show that the effect of familiarity occurs immediately after the first test, regardless of life jacket type, thus "contaminating" the subject and making them unsuitable for further tests. These observations are important for life jacket standards where the life jacket must be donned by a naïve participant. Currently, a poorly designed life jacket may receive a pass as a result of the learning effect as shown by participants with previous donning experiences.

Perioperative systemic glucocorticoids in total hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative systemic glucocorticoids are frequently included in multimodal analgesia and antiemetic regimens administered to patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effect of perioperative systemic glucocorticoids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pain, narcotic consumption, antiemetic consumption, length of stay in hospital, and major complications in patients undergoing elective THA or TKA. METHODS: A predefined protocol of eligibility and methodology was used for conduct of systematic reviews. Two reviewers screened citations for inclusion, assessed methodological quality, and verified the extracted data. RESULTS: Six RCTs were included for analysis. Across all outcomes analyzed, patients who received glucocorticoids experienced either a benefit or no difference compared to those patients who did not receive glucocorticoids. There were no instances in which perioperative glucocorticoids had a negative impact on any of the outcomes that were analyzed. Furthermore, perioperative glucocorticoids had no effect on the rates of superficial infection, deep infection, wound complications or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review support the use of perioperative systemic glucocorticoids in patients undergoing elective total hip and knee arthroplasty. Perioperative glucocorticoids have overall positive outcomes with the benefits being more robust in those patients undergoing TKA compared to THA. Glucocorticoids did not increase the occurrence of major complications. There is limited data to support the conclusion that they can reduce length of stay in hospital.

The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey.

BACKGROUND: High-quality, evidence-based orthopaedic care relies on the generation and translation of robust research evidence. The Fragility Index is a novel method for evaluating the robustness of statistically significant findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It is defined as the minimum number of patients in 1 arm of a trial that would have to change status from a nonevent to an event to alter the results of the trial from statistically significant to nonsignificant. PURPOSE: To calculate the Fragility Index of statistically significant results from clinical trials in sports medicine and arthroscopic surgery to characterize the robustness of the RCTs in these fields. METHODS: A search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed for RCTs related to sports medicine and arthroscopic surgery from January 1, 2005, to October 30, 2015. Two reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts for study eligibility, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias. The Fragility Index was calculated using the Fisher exact test for all statistically significant dichotomous outcomes from parallel-group RCTs. Bivariate correlation was performed to evaluate associations between the Fragility Index and trial characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 48 RCTs were included. The median sample size was 64 (interquartile range [IQR], 48.5-89.5), and the median total number of outcome events was 19 (IQR, 10-27). The median Fragility Index was 2 (IQR, 1-2.8), meaning that changing 2 patients from a nonevent to an event in the treatment arm changed the result to a statistically nonsignificant result, or P ≥ .05. CONCLUSION: Most statistically significant RCTs in sports medicine and arthroscopic surgery are not robust because their statistical significance can be reversed by changing the outcome status on only a few patients in 1 treatment group. Future work is required to determine whether routine reporting of the Fragility Index enhances clinicians' ability to detect trial results that should be viewed cautiously.

Humeral Avulsion of the Glenohumeral Ligament: Indications for Surgical Treatment and Outcomes-A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The inferior glenohumeral ligament, the most important static anterior stabilizer of the shoulder, becomes disrupted in humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions. Unfortunately, HAGL lesions commonly go unrecognized. A missed HAGL during an index operation to treat anterior shoulder instability may lead to persistent instability. Currently, there are no large studies describing the indications for surgical repair or the outcomes of patients with HAGL lesions. PURPOSE: To search the literature to identify surgical indications for the treatment of HAGL lesions and discuss reported outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Two reviewers completed a comprehensive literature search of 3 online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) from inception until May 25, 2016, using the keywords "humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament" or "HAGL" to generate a broad search. Systematic screening of eligible studies was undertaken in duplicate. Abstracted data were organized in table format, with descriptive statistics presented. RESULTS: After screening, 18 studies comprising 118 patients were found that described surgical intervention and outcomes for HAGL lesions. The mean patient was 22 years (range, 12-50 years), and 82% were male. Sports injuries represented 72% of all HAGL injuries. The main surgical indication was primary anterior instability, followed by pain and failed nonoperative management. Commonly associated injuries in patients with identified HAGL lesions included a Bankart lesion (15%), Hill-Sachs lesions (13%), and glenoid bone loss (7%). Reporting of outcome scores varied among the included studies. Meta-analysis was not possible, but all included studies reported significantly improved postoperative stability and function. There were no demonstrated differences in outcomes for patients treated with open versus arthroscopic surgical techniques. All but 2 patients undergoing operative management for HAGL lesions were able to return to sport at their previous levels; these included Olympians and professional athletes. CONCLUSION: HAGL lesions typically occur in younger male patients and are often associated with Bankart lesions and bone loss. Open and arthroscopic management techniques are both effective in preventing recurrent instability.