Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia secondary to tumor: a single-institution retrospective series.

OBJECTIVE: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) secondary to tumor represents a rare and diverse entity, and treatment for secondary TN remains controversial. This report reviews a single institution's experience in treating secondary TN with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and focuses on the durability of pain relief with respect to various treatment targets, i.e., the trigeminal nerve, offending tumor, or both. METHODS: Between the years 2009 and 2021, 21 patients with TN secondary to benign (n = 13) or malignant (n = 8) tumors underwent SRS. Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scale scores were collected from patient electronic medical records at baseline, initial follow-up, and 1 and 3 years post-SRS. The interval change in BNI scale score (ΔBNI) at the various follow-up time points was also calculated to assess the durability of pain relief following SRS. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 24 (range 0.5-155) months. Five patients (24%) received treatment to the trigeminal nerve only, 10 (48%) received treatment to the tumor only, and 6 (29%) had treatment to both the nerve and tumor. The overall radiation dosage ranged from 14 to 60 Gy delivered in 1-5 fractions, with a median overall dose of 26 Gy. The median dose to the tumor was 22.5 (range 14-35) Gy, delivered in 1-5 fractions. Of the treatments targeting the tumor, 25% were delivered in a single fraction with doses ranging from 14 to 20 Gy, 60% were delivered in 3 fractions with doses ranging from 18 to 27 Gy, and 15% were delivered in 5 fractions with doses ranging from 25 to 35 Gy. The most common dose regimen for tumor treatment was 24 Gy in 3 fractions. The median biologically effective dose (with an assumed alpha/beta ratio of 10 [BED10]) for tumor treatments was 43.1 (range 13.3-60.0) Gy. There was a significant difference in the proportion of patients with recurrent pain (ΔBNI score ≥ 0) at the time of last follow-up across the differing SRS treatment targets: trigeminal nerve only, tumor only, or both (p = 0.04). At the time of last follow-up, the median ΔBNI score after SRS to the nerve only was -1, 0 after SRS to tumor only, and -2 after SRS to both targets. CONCLUSIONS: SRS offers clinical symptomatic benefit to patients with TN secondary to tumor. For optimal pain relief and response durability, treatment targeting both the tumor and the trigeminal nerve appears to be most advantageous.

Safety of pelvic and abdominal radiation therapy for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a dosimetric analysis of acute bowel toxicity.

OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been considered a relative contraindication to radiation therapy (RT) due to the potential greater risk of RT-induced toxicities. This study aims to assess acute toxicity outcomes in patients with IBD treated with abdominal/pelvic RT. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, patients with IBD who received RT to the abdomen/pelvis were identified from an institutional research repository and their electronic medical records were reviewed. The IBD cohort was matched 1:1 with controls according to all of the following: radiotherapy, gender, disease site, age, and year of RT. Acute toxicity was defined as toxicity occurring within 3 months of RT. Primary outcomes were assessed via univariable logistic regression models and predicted probability of acute toxicity and acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were plotted for the most significant covariates. IBD and control control cohorts were compared on demographic and toxicity variables using chi-square/Fisher's exact tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests where appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 62 patients with median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR] 54-70) who received RT from 2006-2022. Patients were treated with intensity-modulated RT (38; 61.3%), 3-dimensional conformal RT (12; 19.4%), and stereotactic body RT/brachytherapy (12; 19.4%). After RT, 28 (45.2%) and 23 (37.1%) patients experienced grade ≥2 acute (any) and acute GI toxicity, respectively. Higher overall RT dose and RT dose to small bowel were found to be signicantly associated with increased risk of grade ≥2 acute toxicities (OR=1.041 per unit Gy, 95% CI 1.005-1.084, p=0.034 and OR=1.046, 95% CI 1.018-1.082, p=0.003, respectively). Between IBD and control cohorts, there were no significant differences in grade ≥2 acute (any) and acute GI toxicities (p=0.710 and p=0.704, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with IBD treated with abdominal/pelvic RT for malignancy, RT was effective and well-tolerated. RT treatment planning should carefully consider the location(s) of IBD inflammation and dose to bowel structures, in particular, dose to small bowel.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases in Patients With a Heterozygous Germline Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Gene.

Germline mutations in the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene are associated with increased radiation sensitivity. Present literature lacks consensus on whether patients with heterozygous germline ATM mutations may be at greater risk of radiation-associated toxicities when treated with radiation therapy (RT), and there is little data considering more modern and conformal RT techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Our report presents two cases of patients with heterozygous germline ATM mutations treated with SRS for brain metastases. One patient developed grade 3 radiation necrosis (RN) of an irradiated 16.3 cm3 resection cavity, but did not develop RN at other sites of punctate brain metastases treated with SRS. Similarly, the second report describes a patient who did not develop RN at any of the 31 irradiated sites of sub-centimeter (all ≤5 mm) brain metastases. The described cases demonstrate that some patients with germline ATM variants can safely undergo SRS for smaller brain metastases; however, clinical caution should be considered for patients with larger targets or a history of prior radiation toxicity. Given these findings and the lingering uncertainty surrounding the degree of radiosensitivity across ATM variants, future research is needed to determine whether more conservative dose-volume limits would potentially mitigate the risk of RN when treating larger brain metastases in this radiosensitive population.

Post-operative Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Malignant Melanotic Schwannoma.

Melanotic schwannoma is an extremely rare schwannoma variant with malignant potential, demonstrating high local and distant recurrence. Given the paucity of data, recommended treatment with localized disease is radical resection, with the unclear benefit of adjuvant therapy. We present a case of an 18-year-old female with no past medical history or genetic syndromes who underwent margin-positive resection of an S1 nerve root melanotic schwannoma followed by adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). SRS was delivered without acute or late toxicity by 2.5 years post-treatment. She remains without evidence of recurrent disease, although longer follow-up is needed given the risk of late recurrence. Our case adds to the limited literature documenting the efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy in melanotic schwannoma and is the first to describe the successful use of SRS for this rare disease.