Design, Implementation, and Outcomes of a Volunteer-Staffed Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Initiative at an Urban Academic Medical Center.

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has claimed nearly 6 million lives globally as of February 2022. While pandemic control efforts, including contact tracing, have traditionally been the purview of state and local health departments, the COVID-19 pandemic outpaced health department capacity, necessitating actions by private health systems to investigate and control outbreaks, mitigate transmission, and support patients and communities. Objective: To investigate the process of designing and implementing a volunteer-staffed contact tracing program at a large academic health system from April 2020 to May 2021, including program structure, lessons learned through implementation, results of case investigation and contact tracing efforts, and reflections on how constrained resources may be best allocated in the current pandemic or future public health emergencies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series study was conducted among patients at the University of Pennsylvania Health System and in partnership with the Philadelphia Department of Public Health. Patients who tested positive for COVID-19 were contacted to counsel them regarding safe isolation practices, identify and support quarantine of their close contacts, and provide resources, such as food and medicine, needed during isolation or quarantine. Results: Of 5470 individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 and received calls from a volunteer, 2982 individuals (54.5%; median [range] age, 42 [18-97] years; 1628 [59.4%] women among 2741 cases with sex data) were interviewed; among 2683 cases with race data, there were 110 Asian individuals (3.9%), 1476 Black individuals (52.7%), and 817 White individuals (29.2%), and among 2667 cases with ethnicity data, there were 366 Hispanic individuals (13.1%) and 2301 individuals who were not Hispanic (82.6%). Most individuals lived in a household with 2 to 5 people (2125 of 2904 individuals with household data [71.6%]). Of 3222 unique contacts, 1780 close contacts (55.2%; median [range] age, 40 [18-97] years; 866 [55.3%] women among 1565 contacts with sex data) were interviewed; among 1523 contacts with race data, there were 69 Asian individuals (4.2%), 705 Black individuals (43.2%), and 573 White individuals (35.1%), and among 1514 contacts with ethnicity data, there were 202 Hispanic individuals (12.8%) and 1312 individuals (83.4%) who were not Hispanic. Most contacts lived in a household with 2 to 5 people (1123 of 1418 individuals with household data [79.2%]). Of 3324 cases and contacts who completed a questionnaire on unmet social needs, 907 (27.3%) experienced material hardships that would make it difficult for them to isolate or quarantine safely. Such hardship was significantly less common among White compared with Black participants (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.16-0.25). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings demonstrate the feasibility and challenges of implementing a case investigation and contact tracing program at an academic health system. In addition to successfully engaging most assigned COVID-19 cases and close contacts, contact tracers shared health information and material resources to support isolation and quarantine, thus filling local public health system gaps and supporting local pandemic control.

Perspectives on Breastfeeding from Mothers with Postpartum Depression Symptoms: A Qualitative Assessment of Antecedents, Barriers, Facilitators, and Intervention Suggestions.

Background: Postpartum depression (PPD) is one of the most common birthing complications, and studies negatively associate PPD with breastfeeding initiation and continuation. However, little is known about either the breastfeeding experience of mothers with PPD or what resources mothers need for sustained breastfeeding from their perspectives. This study aimed to identify the antecedents, barriers, and facilitators to breastfeeding for mothers with PPD, understand the relationship between self-efficacy and emergent themes, and generate suggestions to inform supportive interventions. Materials and Methods: Birth mothers who screened positive for PPD and reported breastfeeding were recruited to participate in semistructured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inter-coder discrepancies from double coding were resolved through consensus. Thematic analysis was facilitated using immersion-crystallization methods. Results: Participants identified five antecedent themes that encourage initiation (professional support, infant health, mother's health, cost-effectiveness, and faith), four facilitator themes for sustained breastfeeding (infant connection, decreased stress, personal attributes, and logistical strategies), and seven barrier themes (physical pain, infant nutrition, negative feelings, latching difficulties, medical conditions, public breastfeeding, and sleep). Participants' suggestions fell into three primary themes: supportive services, managing expectations, and respecting self-determination. Conclusion: Antecedent and facilitator themes did not overlap, indicating that factors encouraging breastfeeding initiation differ from sustaining factors. Participant suggestions, barriers, and facilitators did not largely differ from mothers without PPD in other qualitative studies. Therefore, interventions should tailor support to specific breastfeeding phase and may not need to be markedly different for mothers with PPD, in addition to depression management.