Lenvatinib rechallenge after failure of lenvatinib and sorafenib in metastatic thyroid cancer.

The oral multikinase inhibitors sorafenib and lenvatinib are currently available as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable or metastatic thyroid cancer. However, treatment options for patients who are refractory to these multikinase inhibitors are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rechallenged lenvatinib after failure of both lenvatinib and sorafenib in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer in the real-world clinical practice. We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive 16 patients with metastatic thyroid cancer who received lenvatinib as a rechallenge after failure of initial lenvatinib and sorafenib treatment at Shizuoka Cancer Center between 2016 and 2023. Of these, the initial lenvatinib was discontinued in 12 patients owing to progressive disease, in 3 patients owing to adverse events, and in 1 patient owing to both. The overall response rate was 6.7%, and disease control was achieved by rechallenge with lenvatinib in all patients with the target lesions. The median progression free survival after rechallenging with lenvatinib was 15.0 months. No new signs of toxicity were observed after rechallenging with lenvatinib. Our findings suggest that rechallenge with lenvatinib after failure of both lenvatinib and sorafenib showed manageable safety and modest efficacy in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer in clinical practice. The strategy of lenvatinib rechallenge may provide an alternative option for patients with no targetable driver genes or when selective kinase inhibitors are not indicated.

The efficacy and safety of anamorelin among patients with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Anamorelin is a selective ghrelin receptor agonist approved for cancer cachexia in Japan. Little is known about predictors of anamorelin efficacy. This study aimed to assess the effect of diabetes on the efficacy and safety of anamorelin in patients with cancer cachexia. METHODS: Medical records of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung, gastric, pancreatic, or colorectal cancer who received anamorelin between January 2021 and March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The diabetic (DM) group included patients with a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, random plasma glucose of ≥ 200 mg/dL, or hemoglobin A1c of ≥ 6.5%. The maximum body weight gain and adverse events during anamorelin administration were compared between the DM and non-DM groups. Patients with a maximum body weight gain ≥ 0 kg were classified as the responders. RESULTS: Of 103 eligible patients, 31 (30.1%) were assigned to the DM group. The DM group gained less weight (median of -0.53% vs. + 3.00%, p < 0.01) and had fewer responders (45.2% vs. 81.9%, p < 0.01) than the non-DM group. The odds ratio for non-response in the DM group was 6.55 (95% confidential interval 2.37-18.06, p < 0.01), adjusted by age and performance status. The DM group had a higher cumulative incidence of hyperglycaemic adverse events (72.2% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.01) and more discontinuations due to hyperglycaemic adverse events (25.8% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.01) than the non-DM group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes and cancer cachexia are less likely to gain weight with anamorelin despite a high risk of hyperglycaemic adverse events.

Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, and Biweekly Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: MODURATE, a Phase Ib Study.

BACKGROUND: In this phase Ib study MODURATE, we optimized the dosing schedule and tested the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin treatment failure. METHODS: We included a dose escalation (3 + 3 design) and an expansion cohort. Patients were administered trifluridine/tipiracil (25-35 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-5), irinotecan (150-180 mg/m2, day 1), and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, day 1) every 2 weeks. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in the dose escalation cohort was administered to at least 15 patients in both cohorts combined. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Five dose-limiting toxicities were observed. RP2D was defined as trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg. Of 16 patients who received RP2D, 86% (14/16) experienced grade ≥3 neutropenia without febrile neutropenia. Dose reduction, delay, and discontinuation occurred in 94%, 94%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Three patients (19%) showed partial response and 5 had stable disease for >4 months, with a median progression-free and overall survival of 7.1 and 21.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab administration may have moderate antitumor activity with high risk of severe myelotoxicity in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000019828) and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs041180028)].

Genetic medicine in companion diagnostics of germline BRCA testing of Japanese pancreatic cancer patients.

In 2021, Japan's national health insurance made germline BRCA (g.BRCA) testing available to unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC) patients as a companion diagnostic (CD) of the PARP inhibitor. This study investigated the incidence of the g.BRCA variant (g.BRCAv.) and the status of the genetic medicine associated with its testing. A total of 110 PC patients underwent the testing, five of whom (4.5%) had a deleterious g.BRCA2v. (all truncations) but no g.BRCA1v. The turnaround time (TAT) to the doctors was 13 days, and to the patients, 17 days. A higher incidence of a BRCA-related family history and a shorter TAT were seen in the g.BRCAv. patients, but they were insignificant (p = 0.085 and p = 0.059, respectively). Genetic counseling was not performed for three g.BRCA2v. patients because two of them had no accessible relatives and one died of the cancer before the genetic report was completed. Two families underwent generic counseling and testing based on the patient's genetic data. g.BRCAv. is recognized in a small fraction of PC cases, and the following genetic counseling is done more for the relatives than for the patients. TAT was constant and did not affect much on the genetic counseling, but the earlier testing is expected for patients with a deadly cancer.

Biomarker analysis for patients with pancreatic cancer treated with nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.

BACKGROUND: Nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is a standard second-line therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer. Identification of biomarkers is important to determine appropriate treatment strategies. We investigated the clinical practice outcomes and biomarkers associated with the nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV regimen. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients treated with nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV as a second or subsequent treatment after gemcitabine-based therapy between June 2020 and March 2021 at Shizuoka Cancer Center. RESULTS: We analyzed 55 consecutive patients who met the selection criteria. At a median of 9.4 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 6.6 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) was significantly associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-4.30; P = 0.028) and OS (0 vs. 1 or 2: HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.15-5.25; P = 0.029). The OS was significantly longer in patients with CA19-9 response than in those without CA19-9 response (12.6 vs. 5.6 months; HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.08-0.75; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Nanoliposomal irinotecan was efficacious and tolerable in clinical practice. GPS and CA19-9 response were good candidates as predictive biomarkers, whereas GPS was a good candidate prognostic biomarker for the nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV regimen.

Effectiveness and safety of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in patients aged ≥ 75 years with advanced pancreatic cancer and compare it with monotherapy (GEM or S-1). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer aged ≥ 75 years who received either GnP or monotherapy (GEM or S-1) between January 2014 and May 2020. The primary efficacy outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were included in this study; 51 were treated with GnP and 45 with monotherapy (31 with GEM and 14 with S-1). The median OS and progression-free survival were 10.8 and 6.7 months in the GnP group and 10.7 and 4.3 months in the monotherapy group, respectively. The treatment effect on OS was consistently favorable in the GnP group across most subgroups, particularly in patients with locally advanced cancer, modified Glasgow prognostic score of 0 or 1, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio < 3.1. The disease control rates were 76% and 48% in the GnP and monotherapy groups, respectively, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 23 (45%) and 11 (24%) patients of the GnP and monotherapy groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that GnP was not superior to monotherapy with regard to OS. However, multivariate analysis showed that GnP treatment positively affected the OS and could be considered as a treatment option, even for elderly patients.

Prognostic impact of the number of metastatic lymph nodes after surgery in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a standard therapy for patients with high-risk factors for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, including positive margin and extra-nodal extension (ENE). However, the prognostic impact of the number of pathological metastatic lymph nodes (pLNs) in hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPC) is unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigate postoperative prognostic factors for locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HPSCC) with a focus on the number of pLNs. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of 99 consecutive patients with LA-HPSCC who underwent total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE) and bilateral neck dissection (ND) between December 2002 and May 2019. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for all censored patients was 63.2 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 101.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 48.1-134.9). patients had pLNs ≥ 3. Forty-six (45.5%) patients were diagnosed with ENE. Twenty (20.2%) patients received postoperative CRT. The multivariate analysis revealed that pLNs ≥ 3 (median OS: 163.2 vs. 31.8 months, hazard ratio [HR] 2.39, 95% CI 1.16-4.94, p < 0.01) and ENE (median OS: 161.0 vs. 26.3 months, HR 4.60, 95% CI 2.26-9.36, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with poor prognosis and that postoperative CRT (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.72, p < 0.01) was significantly associated with better prognosis. The cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was higher in patients with pLNs ≥ 3 than in those with pLNs < 3 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: pLNs ≥ 3 and ENE were significant poor prognostic factors for patients with LA-HPSCC who underwent TPLE and bilateral ND.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 following gemcitabine with cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer.

Background Combination therapy of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC) is a standard first-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). S-1 is often used as a second-line therapy in clinical practice, based on the results of some clinical studies investigating its efficacy and safety following gemcitabine monotherapy. However, few studies have reported on the clinical outcomes of S-1 following GC. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC for unresectable and recurrent BTC. Methods We retrospectively collected the data of 116 patients (pts) who were treated with S-1 as a second-line therapy following GC for unresectable or recurrent BTC at Shizuoka Cancer Center (November 2009 to July 2019). Results Of these 116 pts., 84 were assessable. Patient characteristics were as follows: intrahepatic bile duct/extrahepatic bile duct/gallbladder cancer, 30/23/31 pts.; metastatic/recurrent/locally advanced, 57/17/10 pts. The median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 2.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Among 65 pts. with measurable lesions, the overall response rate was 3.1% (2/65 pts) and the disease control rate was 24.6% (19/65 pts). The common grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (12%), neutropenia (4%), infections (16%), fatigue (6%), and diarrhea (4%). Dose reduction or treatment schedule modification of S-1 was required in 29 pts. (34.5%), and 17 pts. (20%) terminated S-1 due to adverse events. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC were almost the same as those of S-1 following GEM monotherapy for unresectable or recurrent BTC.

A retrospective cohort study to investigate the incidence of cancer-related weight loss during chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate cancer-related weight loss (WL) after the start of first-line chemotherapy as a surrogate marker for cancer cachexia in patients with advanced gastric cancer. We investigated the incidence of WL and the relationship between WL and overall survival (OS) or adverse events. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 131 patients with advanced gastric cancer who received first-line systemic chemotherapy between September 1, 2010, and August 31, 2016, at Kurume University Hospital and Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital. WL was defined in this study as weight loss of > 5% or weight loss of > 2% with a body mass index of < 20 kg/m2 within the last 6 months after the start of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Median age and median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of the patients participating in this study were 68 years old and 0, respectively. Incidence of WL was 53% at the first 12 weeks after starting first-line chemotherapy, and increased to 88% after 48 weeks. Overall survival rates were significantly associated with WL at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Appetite loss and fatigue were more frequent and more severe in patients with WL. CONCLUSION: WL was especially observed in more than half the patients within 12 weeks after starting chemotherapy. WL appeared to relate to adverse events or reduced survival. These results suggest the importance of monitoring WL or providing nutritional support at the beginning of chemotherapy.

Incurable locoregional disease is a strong poor prognostic factor in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Distant metastasis is a poor prognostic factor in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. However, limited information on the prognostic impact of locoregional disease is available, despite its life-threatening features. We investigated the prognostic impact of incurable locoregional disease and distant metastasis in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 156 patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who received palliative chemotherapy between August 2006 and December 2019. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for all censored patients was 12.1 (range 1.9-63.5) months. The median overall survival was 12.4 (95% confidence interval 10.1-15.1) months. Incurable locoregional disease (hazard ratio: 2.31, P = 0.007), liver metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.84, P = 0.006), disease-free interval > 13 months (hazard ratio: 0.51, P = 0.041), cetuximab use (hazard ratio: 0.59, P = 0.007), and immune checkpoint inhibitor use (hazard ratio: 0.56, P = 0.006) were associated with prognosis. The number of distant metastatic sites was not associated with overall survival (1-2: hazard ratio: 0.60, P = 0.16; 3-4: hazard ratio: 1.34, P = 0.50). Patients with incurable locoregional disease had more life-threatening events than those with curable locoregional disease. CONCLUSION: The presence of incurable locoregional disease had a significant prognostic impact, whereas the number of distant metastatic sites had no prognostic impact. Liver metastasis was a poor prognostic factor for recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Triplet induction chemotherapy followed by less invasive surgery without reconstruction for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancers: Why is it successful or unsuccessful?

BACKGROUND: De-escalating treatments have been focused on for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). We assessed the efficacy of a triplet induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by surgery with or without neck dissection (ND) for locally advanced OPSCC, aiming at less invasive surgery without free-flap reconstruction and avoiding postoperative irradiation. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 41 patients with advanced resectable HPV-positive OPSCC who underwent ICT followed by surgery of primary resection with or without ND. Patients underwent triplet ICT, including docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil, or carboplatin, paclitaxel, and cetuximab. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had tonsillar cancer, 15 patients were current smokers, and 18 and 12 patients had T2N1M0 and T1N1M0 status (UICC 8th), respectively. After ICT, a surgical procedure without free-flap reconstruction and tracheostomy was possible in 90.2%. Pathological complete response at both the primary site and lymph nodes was achieved in 73.2%. Of the patients who underwent surgery, no adjuvant radiotherapy was required in 85.0%. Two patients (4.9%) experienced recurrence at regional lymph nodes, but were cured by salvage ND followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront ICT using highly responsive triplet chemotherapeutic regimens may enable us to perform less invasive surgery without free-flap reconstruction and to avoid postoperative irradiation to the locoregional field through excellent postoperative pathological features.

Risk factors for aspiration pneumonia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy or bio-radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Aspiration pneumonia is one of the most important side effects of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and bio-radiotherapy (BRT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Aspiration pneumonia can lead to cancer-related mortality in HNC patients. However, the relationship between aspiration pneumonia occurring during CRT or BRT for HNC and treatment outcomes in HNC patients is not well characterized. In this study, we assessed the influence of aspiration pneumonia on treatment outcomes and sought to identify the clinical risk factors for aspiration pneumonia during definitive CRT and BRT in HNC patients. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the data pertaining to patients with locally advanced HNC who received definitive CRT or BRT at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between August 2006 and December 2016. RESULTS: Among the 374 HNC patients who received CRT or BRT, 95 (25.4%) developed aspiration pneumonia during treatment. Aspiration pneumonia was significantly associated with therapeutic response to CRT or BRT (multivariate adjusted odds ratio for complete response, 0.52, p = 0.020) and poor overall survival (multivariate adjusted hazard ratio for overall survival, 1.58, p = 0.024). The multivariate analyses identified four independent factors for aspiration pneumonia: poor oral hygiene, high N-classification, hypoalbuminemia before treatment, and inpatient treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Aspiration pneumonia occurring during CRT or BRT has a detrimental effect on the therapeutic response and survival of HNC patients. Careful attention should be paid to these risk factors for aspiration pneumonia in HNC patients undergoing CRT or BRT.

How Should We Approach Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck Cancer Patients Ineligible for Standard Non-surgical Treatment?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cisplatin has been established as one of the most important agents in multidisciplinary treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). However, since HNC patients are often elderly and typically have several comorbidities, a limited number of patients can tolerate high-dose cisplatin in real-world HNC populations. We will provide a review of therapeutic alternatives to high-dose cisplatin-based treatment in the setting of definitive and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or induction chemotherapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical criteria for CDDP ineligibility have been discussed in HNC. When considering cisplatin-based chemotherapy as part of a non-surgical approach, precise evaluation of the patient's physical condition, nutritional status, and comorbidities is needed. Upfront surgery is an important option with high curability, if a de-intensified non-surgical approach is estimated to be unavoidable. Although no prospective data are available regarding alternatives to definitive cisplatin-based combination therapy for patients undergoing a non-surgical approach, cetuximab, carboplatin, or split-dose cisplatin-based regimens may be employed for cisplatin-ineligible patients in clinical practice. The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy may be a promising novel approach, and some trials are currently targeting the specific cohort of patients ineligible for high-dose cisplatin. There are no standard treatments for patients ineligible for high-dose cisplatin. A personalized treatment strategy should be proposed based on the individual benefit-to-risk ratio of each treatment option in patients ineligible for the standard of care. Prospective clinical trials for cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced HNC still need to be performed.

Efficacy and feasibility of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab for locally advanced unresectable head and neck cancer patients ineligible for combination treatment with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy (ICT) is a treatment option for locally advanced unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). However, patients with advanced age, or renal, cardiac or neurogenic dysfunction are ineligible for ICT-TPF. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 24 unresectable LA-HNSCC patients who received paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE) as ICT at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between April 2013 and October 2018. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were as follows: median age, 72 years (range 60-81); 0, 1, and 2 performance status (PS), 1, 15, and 8 patients, respectively, and creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min or < 60 mL/min, 8 and 16 patients, respectively. The main reasons for PCE selection were renal impairment, older age, cardiac dysfunction, poor PS, and cerebral infarction. Twenty-two patients (92%) completed two or three cycles of ICT-PCE. After ICT-PCE, one patient (4%) and 20 patients (83%) achieved a complete response and partial response, respectively. Twenty-one patients (87%) advanced to definitive locoregional treatment. Median observation period was 25.2 months. The 12-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 75 and 92%, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 29.4 and 34.8 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia (58%), oral mucositis (8%), and febrile neutropenia (4%). CONCLUSIONS: ICT-PCE may be a tolerable and potential option for unresectable LA-HNSCC patients ineligible for TPF.

Chemoradiotherapy for high-risk stage II laryngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for stage II laryngeal cancer is known to be less effective for locoregional control and survival (LRCS) in patients with high-risk factors (e.g., subglottic extension, impaired cord mobility, or bulky tumor size) than in low-risk patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage II laryngeal cancer patients with high-risk factors METHODS: Sixty-five consecutive patients with stage II laryngeal cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) alone or CRT were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified into three groups: RT, low risk (RT-low, n = 26); RT, high risk (RT-high, n = 25); and CRT, high risk (CRT-high, n = 14). RESULTS: The glottis was the most common primary tumor site in all groups. Most patients in the CRT-high group received platinum-based CRT. The 5-year locoregional control and survival (LRCS) rates were 88.3, 44.2, and 85.7% in the RT-low, RT-high, and CRT-high groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, high-risk disease and CRT were significantly associated with 5-year LRCS rates. CONCLUSION: CRT may provide better locoregional control than RT alone in high-risk stage II laryngeal cancer.

Pretreatment predictive factors for feasibility of oral intake in adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has been widely performed before concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN) because severe oral mucositis and dysphagia induced by CCRT lead to difficulty with oral intake. However, it is controversial whether all patients require prophylactic PEG for adjuvant CCRT. This study evaluated predictive factors for the feasibility of oral intake in adjuvant CCRT for patients with LASCCHN. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 117 LASCCHN patients who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant CCRT with cisplatin at Shizuoka Cancer Center between April 2008 and December 2018. To investigate predictive factors for the feasibility of oral intake, tumor factors, treatment factors and social factors were included in multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients, 25 received total laryngectomy and 92 received other surgery. In multivariate analysis, total laryngectomy [HR (hazard ratio) 0.09, P = 0.001] and oral cavity of primary tumor location (HR 0.21, P = 0.031) were significantly associated with the feasibility of oral intake. Difficulty obtaining adequate nutrition via oral intake from initiation of CCRT until 1 year after its completion was significantly rarer in the total laryngectomy group than in the other surgery group (16% vs. 57%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that majority of patients who underwent total laryngectomy are able to maintain oral intake during adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Adherence to a topical moisturizing preparation for regorafenib-related hand-foot skin reaction.

OBJECTIVE: Application of topical moisturizing preparations is important for the prevention and palliation of hand-foot skin reaction induced by multi-kinase inhibitor. Application adherence of topical moisturizing preparations in clinical practice has rarely been reported. This study investigated the factors affecting adherence to the application of topical moisturizing preparations in patients administered regorafenib. METHODS: The subjects were patients administered regorafenib (n = 118). Consumption of a urea-based moisturizing ointment, hand-foot skin reaction grade (CTC-AE ver 3.0), treatment duration, and dose of regorafenib, factors that might affect the onset of symptoms and adherence, including age, sex, presence of a key person, working status, performance status, past use of capecitabine or epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies, and relative dose intensity were retrospectively investigated. The adherence to the topical moisturizing ointment (<21 g per week) was judged as poor. The data were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Working status was associated with poor adherence, showing a positive correlation (odds ratio; 3.024, p = 0.023). In contrast, symptom grade of hand-foot skin reaction and regorafenib relative dose intensity showed negative correlation with poor adherence (odds ratio; 0.971, p = 0.012, and 0.485, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that adherence decreases in patients with working. The relative dose intensity of regorafenib decreased when adherence to topical moisturizing ointments decreased. Severe hand-foot skin reaction could be associated with adherence. Patients consciously might not apply the ointment when hand-foot skin reaction did not become severe. It will be problematic for medical personnel to motivate patients for improving adherence to the use of moisturizing ointments.

A multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of anamorelin (ONO-7643) in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients with cancer cachexia.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia is characterized by weight loss and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Anamorelin (ONO-7643; ANAM) is a novel and selective ghrelin receptor agonist that improves appetite, lean body mass (LBM), body weight, and anorexia. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study investigated the efficacy and safety of 100 mg anamorelin in 50 Japanese patients with advanced and unresectable gastrointestinal (colorectal, gastric, or pancreatic) cancer. ANAM was administered once daily over 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients that maintained or gained LBM over the course of the study. Secondary endpoints included changes in LBM, body weight, quality of life (QoL), and nutritional status biomarkers. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who responded to treatment was 63.3% (95% CI, 48.3%-76.6%), with a least square mean ± SE change in LBM and body weight from baseline of 1.89 ± 0.36 kg and 1.41 ± 0.61 kg, respectively. Appetite-related questions on the QoL questionnaire showed that ANAM improved appetite. Adverse events occurred in 79.6% of patients, and the most common treatment-related adverse events were increased γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (8.2%), diabetes mellitus (6.1%), hyperglycemia (6.1%), and prolonged QRS complex (6.1%). CONCLUSIONS: ANAM improved anorexia and patients' nutritional status, resulting in rapid increases in LBM and body weight in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who had cancer cachexia. ANAM treatment was well tolerated over 12 weeks. ANAM is a potential clinically beneficial pharmacotherapeutic option for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who have cancer cachexia.

Comparison of enteral nutrition with total parenteral nutrition for patients with locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer harboring dysphagia in definitive chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The nutritional status of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) harboring dysphagia is often poor. The efficacy and safety of enteral nutrition (EN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) have not been addressed in patients with ESCC requiring nutritional support during definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 51 locally advanced unresectable ESCC patients with dysphagia receiving EN (n = 28) or TPN (n = 23) during dCRT between 2009 and 2016. RESULTS: Patient characteristics in EN vs. TPN were as follows: median age (range), 67 (34 to 82) vs. 66 (57 to 83); ECOG performance status 0/1/2, 11/15/2 vs. 7/14/2; dysphagia score 2/3/4, 11/15/2 vs. 14/8/1; and primary tumor location Ce/Ut/Mt/Lt/Ae, 4/6/14/3/1 vs. 2/2/16/1/2. Median changes in serum albumin level one month after dCRT were +8.8% (-36 to 40) in EN and -12% (-64 to 29) in TPN (P = 0.00377). Weight, body mass index, and skeletal muscle area were not significantly different between the groups. Median durations of hospitalization were 50 days (18 to 72) in EN and 63 days (36 to 164) in TPN (P = 0.00302). Adverse events during dCRT in EN vs. TPN were as follows: catheter-related infection, 0 vs. 6 (27%); aspiration pneumonia, 3 (11%) vs. 2 (9%); mediastinitis, 3 (11%) vs. 1 (5%); grade ≥3 neutropenia, 6 (21%) vs. 14 (64%) (P = 0.00287); and febrile neutropenia, 0 vs. 6 (27%) (P = 0.00561). CONCLUSIONS: EN may be advantageous for improving serum albumin level, and reducing hematological toxicity and duration of hospitalization compared with TPN during dCRT in ESCC patients.

Safety and efficacy of concurrent carboplatin or cetuximab plus radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer patients ineligible for treatment with cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN) is usually treated with cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemoradiotherapy, except when patients are elderly or have renal, cardiac, or neurogenic dysfunction. This study compared the safety and efficacy of concurrent carboplatin (CBDCA) to cetuximab (Cmab) plus radiotherapy (RT) in patients ineligible for CDDP treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed LASCCHN patients who received CBDCA plus RT (n = 29) or Cmab plus RT (n = 18) due to ineligibility for CDDP treatment at two Japanese institutions between August 2006 and December 2015. RESULTS: Patients characteristics for CBDCA plus RT and Cmab plus RT were: median age, 74 and 75 years; 0-1 performance status, 90% and 100%; main primary tumor site, hypopharynx 52% (n = 15) and oropharynx 39% (n = 7); and stage IV, 90% (n = 26) and 50% (n = 9), respectively. With a median follow-up time of 60.0 months for CBDCA plus RT and 53.6 months for Cmab plus RT, 3-year locoregional control rates were 56% versus 58%, and median progression-free survival was 42.7 versus 11.6 months. CBDCA plus RT was associated with more grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas Cmab plus RT was associated with more grade 3/4 oral mucositis and radiation dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: CBDCA or Cmab as a concurrent systemic therapy with RT is a possible treatment option for LASCCHN patients ineligible for CDDP treatment, although attention to hematological toxicity should be paid.