The impact of an enhanced recovery perioperative pathway for pediatric pectus deformity repair.

PURPOSE: Pediatric repair of chest wall deformities is associated with significant pain, morbidity, and resource utilization. We sought to determine outcomes of a perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing minimally invasive (Nuss) and traditional (Ravitch) corrective procedures. METHODS: Our ERAS protocol was implemented in 2015. We performed a retrospective review of patients for Nuss or Ravitch procedures before and after ERAS implementation. Combined and procedure segregated bivariate analyses were conducted on postoperative outcomes and resource utilization. RESULTS: There are 17 patients in the pre-intervention group (Nuss = 13 and Ravitch = 4) compared to 38 patients in the post-intervention group (Nuss = 28 and Ravitch = 10). Protocol implementation increased utilization of pre-operative non-narcotic medication. The combined and Nuss post-intervention groups had a significant decrease in epidural duration and time to enteral medications, but had increased total postoperative opioid usage. The Ravitch post-intervention group had a significant decrease in intra-operative narcotics and discharge pain scores. There were no differences in length of stay or complications. CONCLUSION: Implementation of our ERAS protocol standardized pectus perioperative care, but did not improve postoperative opioid usage, complications, or resource utilization. Alterations in the protocol may lead to achieving desired goals of better pain management and decreased resource utilization.

Predictors of Admission After the Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in gynecologic surgery have been shown to decrease length of stay with no impact on readmission, but no study has assessed predictors of admission in this population. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of admission after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) performed under an ERAS pathway. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of women undergoing LH/RAH for benign indications within an ERAS pathway. Data collected included same-day discharge, reason for admission, incidences of urgent clinic and emergency room (ER) visits, readmissions, reoperations, and 9 postulated predictors of admission listed below. Patient demographics, markers of baseline health, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups (ERAS patients discharged on the day of surgery versus admitted) using Fisher exact and Student t tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the potential risk factors for being admitted, adjusting for age, race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, preoperative diagnosis indicative of hysterectomy, preoperative chronic pain, completion of a preprocedure pain-coping skills counseling session, procedure time, and compliance to the ERAS pathway. RESULTS: There were 165 patients undergoing LH/RAH within an ERAS pathway; 93 (56%) were discharged on the day of surgery and 72 were admitted. There were no significant differences in ER visits, readmissions, and reoperations between groups (ER visits: discharged 13% versus admitted 13%, P = .99; 90-day readmission: discharged 4% versus admitted 7%, P = .51; and 90-day reoperation: discharged 4% versus admitted 3%, P = .70). The most common reasons for admission were postoperative urinary retention (n = 21, 30%), inadequate pain control (n = 21, 30%), postoperative nausea and vomiting (n = 7, 10%), and planned admissions (n = 7, 10%). Increased ASA physical status, being African American, and increased length of procedure were significantly associated with an increased risk of admission (ASA physical status III versus ASA physical status I or II: odds ratio [OR], 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-7.16; P = .007; African American: OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.02-5.96; P = .04; and length of procedure, assessed in 30-minute increments: OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.50; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: We were able to define predictors of admission for patients having LH/RAH managed with an ERAS pathway. Increased ASA physical status, being African American, and increased length of procedure were significantly associated with admission after LH/RAH performed under an ERAS pathway. In addition, the incidences of urgent clinic and ER visits, readmissions, and reoperations within 90 days of surgery were similar for patients who were discharged on the day of surgery compared to those admitted.

Thoracic Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Single Academic Center Observations After Implementation.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based, multidisciplinary perioperative care model shown to reduce complications and hospital length of stay (LOS). While some thoracic ERAS studies were inconclusive, others demonstrated that ERAS improves patient outcomes after lung resections and provides more cost-effective care. We aimed to investigate the effects of preliminary implementation of an ERAS protocol, in comparison with conventional care, on lung resection outcomes at a single academic institution. METHODS: In this observational study, adult patients undergoing lung resections during the pre-ERAS (April 2014 to September 2015) and post-ERAS (January 2016 to May 2017) periods were identified. Relevant demographic, preoperative, anesthesia, and surgical variables were collected. Pre-ERAS and post-ERAS cohorts were compared in terms of hospital LOS, postoperative complications, and 30-day outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 264 patients, half in each cohort. Pre-ERAS and post-ERAS groups were similar with respect to age, race, and comorbidities. There were no significant differences in LOS, complications, 30-day readmission and mortality rates, or patient-reported outcomes. Of the patients with prolonged LOS, 31% had pulmonary complications, almost half of which were prolonged air leaks. ERAS adherence rate was approximately 60%. CONCLUSIONS: In the first year of implementation, median LOS, complications, and 30-day outcomes did not differ significantly between the pre-ERAS and post-ERAS groups. Prolonged air leaks commonly led to prolonged LOS; therefore, thoracic ERAS protocols could include interventions to reduce air leak and consideration for discharging patients with chest tubes placed to Heimlich valves. Buy-in and adherence to a new protocol are necessary for implementation to be effective.

Postoperative Urinary Retention in Patients Undergoing Lung Resection: Incidence and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the incidence of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in patients undergoing lung resection at our institution, (2) identify differences in potential risk factors between patients with and without POUR, and (3) describe patient outcomes across POUR status. METHODS: The medical records of 225 patients between 2016 and 2017 were reviewed, and 191 met criteria for inclusion. The institution's catheterization removal protocol was followed in all patients. Recatheterization was defined as requiring in-and-out catheterization or Foley catheter placement. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: POUR developed in 35 patients (18%). Patients with POUR were older (P = .01), had increased baseline creatinine (P = .04), and a higher prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (P = .007). POUR patients were also less likely to get a Foley catheter intraoperatively (P = .0002). Other intraoperative factors, such as surgical approach and extent of resection, were not significantly different between patients with and without POUR. Postoperative factors (epidural use or days with chest tube) were similar. Although patients with POUR were more likely to be discharged with a Foley catheter (13% vs 0%, P = .002), no difference in length of stay, incidences of urinary tract infections, or 30-day readmission were observed. CONCLUSIONS: POUR develops in approximately 1 in 5 patients undergoing lung resection. Patients with POUR were more likely to not have a Foley catheter placed intraoperatively. However, patients who had POUR did not have worsened patient outcomes (urinary tract infections, length of stay, or 30-day readmission).

Implementation of a pediatric enhanced recovery pathway decreases opioid utilization and shortens time to full feeding.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for pediatric patients undergoing surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) would be beneficial. METHODS: This is a single institution retrospective comparative study comparing patients treated with an ERAS pathway to consecutive patients in a Preimplementation Cohort (PIC) with similar open and laparoscopic surgeries for IBD. The pathway emphasized minimal preoperative fasting, multimodal and regional analgesia, and early enteral nutrition after surgery. Primary endpoints were time to 120 mL of PO intake (POI), length of stay (LOS), opioid utilization, and 30-day surgical outcomes. Continuous and categorical variables were compared (p < 0.05). RESULTS: There were 23 PIC and 28 ERAS patients with similar demographic data and surgical and anesthetic approaches. ERAS patients experienced a significant increase in the use of regional anesthesia, faster time to POI, and a nonsignificant decrease in mean LOS. ERAS patients had decreased total and daily opioid use with similar complication rates. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a pediatric ERAS pathway for IBD patients requiring laparoscopic and (unique to this study) open surgery. The study demonstrates that opioid utilization and time to feeding can be positively impacted using ERAS pathways without negatively impacting outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Increased Intraoperative Vasopressor Use as Part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Pancreatectomy Does Not Increase Risk of Pancreatic Fistula.

Purpose: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are increasingly implemented. Goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a core component of ERAS pathways that limit excessive volume administration and is associated with increased use of intraoperative vasopressors. Vasopressor effects on anastomotic healing and pancreatic fistula are inconclusive. We hypothesized that intraoperative vasopressor use in an ERAS GDFT algorithm would not increase risk of pancreatic fistulas. Methods: We reviewed all adult patients undergoing pancreatectomy at an academic institution from January 2013 to February 2016, before and after implementation of an ERAS pathway in July 2014. Retrospective chart review was performed. Log-binomial regression, weighted by stabilized inverse probability-of-treatment weights, estimated effect of ERAS and intraoperative vasopressors on fistula risk. Results: One hundred thirty two patients met inclusion criteria: 74 (56.1%) in the ERAS cohort. No significant differences in overall leak risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-2.09) were observed between the ERAS and pre-ERAS cohorts. Similarly, vasopressor infusions, independent of ERAS pathway, did not significantly increase the risk of anastomotic leaks (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.52-2.72). Conclusions: Increased use of vasopressor infusions as part of an ERAS pathway for pancreatic surgery is not associated with an increase in the risk of clinically significant pancreatic fistulas.