Tick-borne Encephalitis Vaccine Failures: A 10-year Retrospective Study Supporting the Rationale for Adding an Extra Priming Dose in Individuals Starting at Age 50 Years.

BACKGROUND: Southern Sweden is endemic for tick-borne encephalitis (TBE), with Stockholm County as one of the high-risk areas. Our aim in this study was to describe cases of vaccine failures and to optimize future vaccination recommendations. METHODS: Patients with TBE were identified in the notification database at the Department of Communicable Disease Control and Prevention in Stockholm County during 2006-2015. Vaccine failure was defined as TBE despite adherence to the recommended vaccination schedule with at least 2 doses. Clinical data were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 1004 TBE cases were identified, 53 (5%) were defined as vaccine failures. In this latter group, the median age was 62 years (6-83). Forty-three (81%) patients were aged >50 years and 2 were children. Approximately half of the patients had comorbidities, with diseases affecting the immune system accounting for 26% of all cases. Vaccine failures following the third or fourth vaccine dose accounted for 36 (68%) of the patients. Severe and moderate TBE disease affected 81% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest documented cohort of TBE vaccine failures. Vaccine failure after 5 TBE vaccine doses is rare. Our data provide rationale for adding an extra priming dose to those aged ≥50 years.

Outbreak of enterovirus D68 of the new B3 lineage in Stockholm, Sweden, August to September 2016.

We report an enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) outbreak in Stockholm Sweden in 2016. Between 22 August and 25 September EV-D68 was detected in 74/495 respiratory samples analysed at the Karolinska University Hospital. During the peak week, 30/91 (33%) samples were EV-D68 positive. Viral protein (VP)P4/VP2 sequencing revealed that cases were caused by B3 lineage strains. Forty-four (59%) EV-D68-positive patients were children aged ≤ 5 years. Ten patients had severe respiratory or neurological symptoms and one died.

Severe sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome in emergency department patients with suspected severe infection.

BACKGROUND: Severe sepsis is a common condition with a reported high mortality, but most studies have been confined to intensive care unit (ICU) populations. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) has been used to define sepsis, however its usefulness has been questioned. Our aim was to describe the prevalence and clinical impact of severe sepsis and SIRS in patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) with a suspected serious infection. METHODS: Four hundred and four adult patients were enrolled prospectively from the ED. Variables defining severe sepsis and SIRS were measured and the relationship between severe sepsis, SIRS, and the clinical course was analyzed. RESULTS: Infections were diagnosed in 344 patients (85%). The overall mortality rate at 28 days was 2.7%, and 4.5% of patients were treated in the ICU. Patients with severe sepsis within 24 h of admission (42%) were more likely to suffer a critical course (ICU admission 9.0%, death 5.1%; p < 0.001). While SIRS was observed in 72% of the subjects at presentation, it was not associated with severe sepsis within 24 h or a subsequent critical course. Furthermore, 23% of patients with severe sepsis within 24 h did not present with SIRS. CONCLUSIONS: Severe sepsis was a common condition among ED patients with a clinically suspected serious infection. Mortality was low compared with results from the ICU setting, suggesting that severe sepsis is a more benign disease than earlier reported. As a tool for the definition of sepsis and for the selection of patients for clinical sepsis trials, SIRS lacks acceptable discriminative ability in an ED population with a high prevalence of serious infections.

Clinical and laboratory variables identifying bacterial infection and bacteraemia in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: While early antimicrobial treatment is of critical importance to patients with severe infections, excessive use of antibiotics has caused escalating bacterial resistance. Better diagnostic tools are needed to secure antibiotic stewardship. METHODS: The diagnostic value of clinical and laboratory variables in predicting infections that require antibiotic treatment was evaluated in a prospective observational study of 404 adult patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) with suspected severe infections. We also investigated the association of these variables with bacteraemia and severe sepsis. RESULTS: In a univariate analysis, increased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin 6 (IL-6), lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP), white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophils, respiratory rate (RR) (p ≤ 0.001), and a decreased haemoglobin (Hb) level (p = 0.005) were associated with an indicated demand for antibiotics (n = 286). In a multivariate analysis, only WBC, Hb, RR, and CRP remained independent predictors. When compared to the clinician's ability to make accurate antibiotic decisions, all variables tested had inferior diagnostic accuracy except CRP. Increased levels of PCT, IL-6, LBP, CRP, bilirubin, and RR were significantly associated with bacteraemia (n = 68) (p ≤ 0.001). Of these, PCT and IL-6 were also associated with severe sepsis (n = 156) (p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, CRP, RR, PCT, and bilirubin remained associated with bacteraemia. CONCLUSIONS: Special attention should be directed to CRP, WBC, RR, and Hb when selecting patients for antibiotic treatment in the emergency department. PCT, IL-6, and LBP did not provide additional guidance on antibiotic decisions and better tests are required in order to improve antibiotic stewardship.