A Randomized Crossover Trial Evaluating the Impact of Cultural Dexterity Training on Surgical Residents' Knowledge, Cross-Cultural Care, Skills, and Beliefs: The Provider Awareness and Cultural dexterity Training for Surgeons (PACTS) Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This trial examines the impact of the Provider Awareness and Cultural dexterity Toolkit for Surgeons (PACTS) curriculum on surgical residents' knowledge, cross-cultural care, skills, and beliefs. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Cross-cultural training of providers may reduce healthcare outcome disparities, but its effectiveness in surgical trainees is unknown. METHODS: PACTS focuses on developing skills needed for building trust, working with patients with limited English proficiency, optimizing informed consent, and managing pain. The PACTS trial was a randomized crossover trial of 8 academic general surgery programs in the United States: The Early group ("Early") received PACTS between Periods 1 and 2, while the Delayed group ("Delayed") received PACTS between Periods 2 and 3. Residents were assessed pre- and post-intervention on Knowledge, Cross-Cultural Care, Self-Assessed Skills, and Beliefs. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were conducted to evaluate within- and between-intervention group differences. RESULTS: Of 406 residents enrolled, 315 were exposed to the complete PACTS curriculum. Early residents' Cross-Cultural Care (79.6% to 88.2%, P<0.0001), Self-Assessed Skills (74.5% to 85.0%, P<0.0001), and Beliefs (89.6% to 92.4%, P=0.0028) improved after PACTS; Knowledge scores (71.3% to 74.3%, P=0.0661) were unchanged. Delayed resident scores pre- to post-PACTS showed minimal improvements in all domains. When comparing the two groups at Period 2, Early residents had modest improvement in all 4 assessment areas, with statistically significant increase in Beliefs (92.4% vs 89.9%, P=0.0199). CONCLUSION: The PACTS curriculum is a comprehensive tool that improved surgical residents' knowledge, preparedness, skills, and beliefs, which will help with caring for diverse patient populations.

Strategies and Challenges of a Safe Fireplace Program in Rural Kenya: A Qualitative Study.

There is a lack of information on effective burn prevention strategies. The objective of this study was to examine a safe fireplace program, as a method of burn prevention, in a resource-limited setting. We conducted a qualitative, phenomenological study at a community health and development program for a rural population in Kenya. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of community health workers involved with the safe fireplace program. Data were reviewed iteratively and coded independently by two researchers using NVivo 12. The study included five participants. Reflections from participants fell into three main domains: (1) effective methods of education, (2) strategies to incorporate stakeholders, and (3) implementation challenges. The results of this study emphasize the importance of community engagement in implementing a successful burn injury prevention program in a resource-limited setting. The participants involved in this study reported that rather than focusing on resources outside the community, effective methods of education and strategies for incorporating stakeholders depended on involving peers and community leaders. The challenges to the program were similarly specific to community concerns about resources and maintenance. These findings provide information to guide future community health programs in creating successful models for burn prevention strategies in resource-limited areas.

Changing Surgical Culture Through Surgical Education: Introduction to the PACTS Trial.

The Provider Awareness and Cultural dexterity Toolkit for Surgeons (PACTS) curriculum was developed to improve surgical resident cultural dexterity, with the goal of promoting health equity by developing cognitive skills to adapt to individual patients' needs to ensure personal, patient-centered surgical care through structured educational interventions for surgical residents. Funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH)'s National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, PACTS addresses surgical disparities in patient care by incorporating varied educational interventions, with investigation of both traditional and nontraditional educational outcomes such as patient-reported and clinical outcomes, across multiple hospitals and regions. The unique attributes of this multicenter, multiphased research trial will not only impact future surgical education research, but hopefully improve how surgeons learn nontechnical skills that modernize surgical culture and surgical care. The present perspective piece serves as an introduction to this multifaceted surgical education trial, highlighting the rationale for the study and critical curricular components such as key stakeholders from multiple institutions, multimodal learning and feedback, and diverse educational outcomes.

Assessment of surgical residents in a vascular anastomosis laboratory.

BACKGROUND: We designed a simple, low-cost workshop to teach surgical residents the basic skills of vascular anastomosis. We studied our ability to identify objective procedural and end-product metrics that could be used to measure improvement in vascular anastomotic skill before and after training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten postgraduate year 2 residents without previous vascular surgery experience and four attending surgeons (expert) performed end-to-side anastomosis using a synthetic graft. The residents were taught the basic skills of vascular anastomosis during three didactic workshops. The objective metrics included volume leakage after saline perfusion (leak) and the time needed to complete the anastomosis. Penalty points were assigned for broken sutures, air knots, locking sutures, and failure to maintain an outside-in to inside-out technique. The leak, time, and penalties before and after training were compared. RESULTS: The mean leak was 70.4 ± 13.7 mL and the mean completion time was 18.7 ± 3 min for the pretraining group versus 45.3 ± 10.6 mL (P < 0.01) and 8.5 ± 1 min (P < 0.001), respectively, for the attending group. After training, significant improvement was seen in resident leak (46.7 ± 6.8 mL; P < 0.001) and completion time (14.4 ± 3 min; P < 0.01). Leak was similar between the post-training and expert groups (46.7 ± 6.8 mL and 45.3 ± 10.6 mL, respectively; P = 0.77); however, a significant difference for the completion time remained (14.4 ± 3.0 min and 8.5 ± 1 min, respectively; P < 0.01). The mean number of technical errors improved from 2.7 in the pretraining group to zero for the post-training group after completing the workshop. CONCLUSIONS: We have reported an easy to implement workshop for teaching surgical residents the basic skills of performing vascular anastomosis.

The reflective statement: a new tool to assess resident learning.

PURPOSE: Continued assessment and redesign of the curriculum is essential for optimal surgical education. For the last 3 y, we have asked the residents to reflect on the previous week and describe "the best thing" they learned. We hypothesize that this statement could be used to assess the weaknesses or strengths of our curriculum. METHODS: Starting in 2007, residents filled out surveys approximately 4 times/y at the start of a mandatory conference. They were asked to describe the "best thing" they learned that week, where it was learned, and who taught it. Residents were not asked to classify the item learned by core competency (communication, knowledge, patient care, practice-based learning, professionalism, and systems-based practice). This categorization into core competencies was done as part of our study design. Attending, fellow, resident, or other were used as groups designating who taught each item. Where the item was learned was fit into either clinic, conference, operating room (OR), wards, or self. The impact of postgraduate year (PGY) level on learning was also assessed. χ(2) analysis was used to compare groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 304 surveys were completed and returned by 65 residents. The majority of responses came from PGY 1 residents (134, 43%). Patient care and knowledge were the most common core competencies learned. As PGY level increased, learning of professionalism (P = 0.035) increased. A majority of learning was experiential (wards and OR, P < 0.0125). Self-learning and learning in clinic was a minor component of learning (P < 0.0125). Learning on wards (P < 0.001) decreased as residents progressed and learning from the OR (P = 0.002) had the opposite trend. CONCLUSIONS: Patient care and knowledge are the most frequently cited competencies learned by the residents. Self-learning is not a significant source of learning, and the majority of the learning is experiential. It is not known if this was a sign that there was a lack of self-directed learning or that self-directed learning was not an efficient method of learning. In addition, each PGY level learns differently (teacher and location of learning), perhaps reflecting the different needs and/or structure of each PGY. We believe the reflective statement has been and will be a useful tool to assess our curriculum.

The APDS General Surgery Education Quality Improvement Program (EQIP).

BACKGROUND: Although the ACGME has called for outcomes-based evaluation of residency programs, few metrics or benchmarks exist connecting educational processes with resident educational outcomes. To address this deficiency, a national Education Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) for General Surgery training is proposed. METHODS: We describe the initial efforts to create this platform. In addition, a national survey was administered to 330 Program Directors to assess their interest in and concerns about a continuous educational quality improvement project. RESULTS: We demonstrate that through a collaborative process and the support of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), we were able to develop the groundwork for a national surgical educational improvement project, now called EQIP. The survey response rate was 45.8% (152 of 332 programs) representing a mix of university (55.3%), university-affiliated (18.4%), independent (24.3%), and military (2.0%) programs. Most respondents (66.2%) had not previously heard of EQIP. Most respondents (69.7%) believe that educational outcomes can be measured. The majority of respondents indicated they believed EQIP could be successful (57%). Only 2.3% thought EQIP would not be successful. Almost all programs (98.7%) expressed a willingness to participate, although 19.1% did not believe that they had adequate resources to participate. CONCLUSION: The APDS EQIP platform holds promise as a useful and achievable method to obtain educational outcomes data. These data can be used as a basis for continuous surgical educational quality improvement. General Surgery Program Directors have expressed enthusiasm for EQIP and are willing to participate in the program examining outcomes of General Surgery training programs, with an ultimate goal of improving overall residency training.

EQIP's First Year: A Step Closer to Higher Quality in Surgical Education.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the first year of the Educational Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) DESIGN: The Educational Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) was formed by the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) in 2018 as a continuous educational quality improvement program. Over 18 months, thirteen discrete goals for the establishment of EQIP were refined and executed through a collaborative effort involving leaders in surgical education. Alpha and beta pilots were conducted to refine the data queries and collection processes. A highly-secure, doubly-deidentified database was created for the ingestion of resident and program data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 36 surgical training programs with 1264 trainees and 1500 faculty members were included in the dataset. 51,516 ERAS applications to programs were also included. Uni- and multi-variable analysis was then conducted. RESULTS: EQIP was successfully deployed within the timeline described in 2020. Data from the ACGME, ABS, and ERAS were merged with manually entered data by programs and successfully ingested into the EQIP database. Interactive dashboards have been constructed for use by programs to compare to the national cohort. Risk-adjusted multivariable analysis suggests that increased time in a technical skills lab was associated with increased success on the ABS's Qualifying Examination, alone. Increased time in a technical skills lab and the presence of a formal teaching curriculum were associated with increased success on both the ABS's Qualifying and Certifying Examination. Program type may be of some consequence in predicting success on the Qualifying Examination. CONCLUSIONS: The APDS has proved the concept that a highly secure database for the purpose of continuous risk-adjusted quality improvement in surgical education can be successfully deployed. EQIP will continue to improve and hopes to include an increasing number of programs as the barriers to participation are overcome.

Stress-only or stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging in patients undergoing evaluation for bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery for management of obesity is being used with increasing frequency. Stress testing with myocardial perfusion imaging is often employed as part of the workup prior to anticipated bariatric surgery. The incidence of clinically significant abnormalities on stress MPI performed for this indication, however, has not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 383 consecutive stress MPI studies performed on patients undergoing workup prior to planned bariatric surgery. The study population had a mean age 42 ± 10 years, and was 83% female, with a body mass index of 49 ± 8. The majority of patients (81%) were able to exercise using either the Bruce or Modified Bruce protocol, and 67% underwent stress-only imaging. Overall SPECT MPI findings were normal in 89% and equivocal in 6% of patients. The incidence of abnormal findings on MPI was 5% (3% mild and 2% moderate-to-severe abnormalities). At 1 year, overall survival was 99.5%, with no difference between those with and without MPI abnormalities. Similarly, the incidence of post-operative cardiac events was very low (2%), and mostly due to atrial arrhythmias or borderline elevations of troponin. CONCLUSION: In a typical pre-bariatric surgery population, the incidence of abnormal stress MPI is low. The majority of patients were able to use a stress-only strategy for assessment of perfusion. At 1 year the incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes is very low. Additional studies should be focused on determining whether any subgroup of such patients may benefit more from pre-operative stress testing.

Impact of socioethnic factors on outcomes following traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Ethnic minorities and low income families tend to be in poorer health and have worse outcomes for a spectrum of diseases. Health care provider bias has been reported to potentially affect the distribution of care away from poorer communities, minorities, and patients with a history of substance abuse. Trauma is perceived as a disease of the poor and medically underserved. Minorities are overrepresented in low income populations and are also less likely to possess health insurance leading to a potential overlapping effect. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a predominant cause of mortality and long-term morbidity, which imposes a considerable social and financial burden. We therefore sought to determine the independent effect on outcome after TBI from race, insurance status, intoxication on presentation, and median income. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective chart review of admitted trauma patients aged 18 years and older to a Level I trauma center. Zip code of residency was a surrogate marker for socioeconomic status, because median income for each zip code is available from the US Census. Charts review included race, insurance status, mechanisms of trauma, and injuries sustained. Outcomes were placement of tracheostomy, hospital length of stay (HLOS), leaving Against Medical Advice (AMA), and discharge to home versus rehabilitation and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3,101 TBI patients were included in the analyses. Multivariable logistic and proportional hazard regression analyses were undertaken adjusting for age, gender, Injury Severity Score, and mechanism. Rates of tracheostomy placement were unaffected by race, median income, or insurance status. Race and median income did not affect HLOS, but private insurance was associated with shorter HLOS and intoxication was associated with longer HLOS. Neither race nor intoxication affected rates of AMA, but higher income and private insurance was associated with lower rates of AMA. Non-Caucasian race and lack of insurance had significantly lower likelihood of placement in a rehabilitation center. Mortality was unaffected by race, increased in intoxicated patients, was variably affected by median income, and was lowest in patients with private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: An extremely complex interplay exists between socioethnic factors and outcomes after TBI. Few physicians would claim overt discrimination. Tracheostomy, the factor most directed by the surgeon, was unbiased by race, income, or insurance status. The likelihood of placement in a rehabilitation center was significantly impacted by both race and insurance status. Future prospective studies are needed to better address causation.

Neighborhood risk: Socioeconomic status and hospital admission for pediatric burn patients.

BACKGROUND: Burn injury continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality in the US pediatric population. Many studies using inpatient samples have found a relationship between low socioeconomic status (SES) and burn injury. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the association between SES and the likelihood of admission for Emergency Department (ED) visits for pediatric burn injury. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database review of pediatric ED visits for burn injury from a statewide hospital system, from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2014. SES was assigned using an eight factor Neighborhood Risk Index (NRI) created from census block group data, with a higher score indicative of lower SES. The outcome measure was ED visits admitted to inpatient care. RESULTS: We analyzed a sample of 1845 pediatric ED visits for burn injuries. Most visits were discharged from the ED (88.4%) while 10.5% were admitted to inpatient care and 1.0% were transferred to another hospital. In a multivariable logistic regression model, patients from high risk areas (>75th percentile NRI) had 1.58 higher odds of inpatient admission compared to patients from low risk areas (<75th percentile NRI; 95% CI: 1.08-2.30), after adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, distance to the hospital, and previous ED visit for burn injury in the past 30 days. In addition, for every 1-mile increase in distance, a child's likelihood of admission increased by 6% (95% CI: 4-9%). CONCLUSIONS: Children with a burn injury from the highest risk socioeconomic areas in Rhode Island had a higher likelihood of inpatient admission. Further research is needed to determine what factors associated with socioeconomic status impact this finding.

Referral Patterns of Burn Injury in Rural Kenya.

Burn injury represents a substantial burden of disease in resource-limited settings. Kenya has no formal trauma system and referral practices for burn injuries are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors associated with burn injury referrals in rural Kenya. A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients with burn injury from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017 at a 300-bed faith-based, teaching hospital in southwest Kenya. Bivariate analysis compared referred and non-referred patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between burn severity and odds of referral adjusting for age, sex, insurance, time from injury to arrival, and estimated travel time from home to hospital. The study included 171 patients with burn injury; 11 patients were excluded due to missing referral data. Of the 160 patients, 31.9% (n = 51) were referred. Referral patients had higher average total body surface area burn (23.1 ± 2.4% vs 11.1 ± 1.2%, P < .001), were more likely to have full-thickness burns (41.3% vs 25.5%, P = .05), and less likely to present to the referral hospital within 24 hours after injury (47.8% vs 73.0%, P = .005). Referral patients had longer travel time to hospital (90+ min: 52.9% vs 22.0%, P < .001). Odds of referral increased 1.62 times (95% confidence interval: 1.19-2.22) for every 10% increase in total body surface area burn. Without a coordinated trauma system, referrals represent a substantial portion of burn injury patients at a hospital in rural Kenya. Referred patients present with more severe burns and experience delays to presentation.

The multiply injured trauma patient: resuscitation, rehabilitation, recovery.

The care of the acutely injured patient requires a multidisciplinary approach from the moment of injury through rehabilitation and reintegration into society. In addition to the doctors and nurses providing many aspects of the acute and chronic medical care, the rehabilitation component is delivered by several skilled specialists focused on maximizing functional outcomes.

Beyond the Surgical Time-Out: A National Needs Assessment of Preoperative Communication in US General Surgery Residency Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative communication is critical for procedural learning. In order to develop a periprocedural faculty development tool, we aimed to characterize the current status of preoperative communication in US General Surgery residency programs. DESIGN: After Association of Program Directors in Surgery approval, a survey was distributed to general surgery programs. Participants were asked about perioperative communication, including the frequency of preoperative briefings, defined as dedicated educational discussions prior to a procedure. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. SETTING: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to interested programs in early 2019. PARTICIPANTS: US General Surgery trainees and attending surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 348 responses were recorded from 27 programs: 199 (57%) attending surgeons and 149 (43%) surgical trainees. Most respondents (83%) were from a university-affiliated program. Attending surgeons indicated a higher frequency of performing preoperative briefings compared to trainees (p < 0.001). Both trainees and attending surgeons were more likely to select their own group when asked who initiates a preoperative briefing. The majority of respondents (58%) agreed that discussing autonomy preoperatively improves resident autonomy for the case. In regards to the timing of preoperative briefings, most took place in/adjacent to the operating room, with only 60 participants (17%) participating in preoperative briefings the day/night prior to the operation. The most frequent topic discussed during preoperative briefings was "procedural content." Most participants selected "time constraints" as the greatest barrier to preoperative briefings and indicated that attending surgeon engagement was necessary to facilitate their use. Trainees were less likely to report engaging in immediate postoperative feedback, but more likely to report postoperative self-reflection. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative briefings are not necessarily routine and attendings and trainees differ on their perceptions related to their content and frequency. Efforts to address timing and scheduling and encourage dual-party engagement in perioperative communication are key to the development of tools to enhance this important aspect of procedural learning.

Concordance of Resident and Patient Perceptions of Culturally Dexterous Patient Care Skills.

PURPOSE: Disparities in surgical care persist. To mitigate these disparities, we are implementing and testing the Provider Awareness and Cultural dexterity Toolkit for Surgeons (PACTS), a curriculum to improve surgical residents' cultural dexterity during clinical encounters. We analyzed baseline data to look for concordance between residents' self-perceived cultural dexterity skills and patients' perceptions of their skills. We hypothesized that residents would rate their skills in cultural dexterity higher than patients would perceive those skills. METHODS: Prior to the implementation of the curriculum, surgical residents at 5 academic medical centers completed a self-assessment of their skills in culturally dexterous patient care using a modified version of the Cross-Cultural Care Survey. Randomly selected surgical inpatients at these centers completed a similar survey about the quality of culturally dexterous care provided by a surgery resident on their service. Likert scale responses for both assessments were classified as high (agree/strongly agree) or low (neutral/disagree/strongly disagree) competency. Resident and patient ratings of cultural dexterity were compared. Assessments were considered dexterous if 75% of responses were in the high category. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted using STATA 16. RESULTS: A total of 179 residents from 5 surgical residency programs completed self-assessments prior to receiving the PACTS curriculum, including 88 (49.2%) women and 97 (54.2%) junior residents (PGY 1-2s), of whom 54.7% were White, 19% were Asian, and 8.9% were Black/African American. A total of 494 patients with an average age of 55.1 years were surveyed, of whom 238 (48.2%) were female and 320 (64.8%) were White. Fifty percent of residents viewed themselves as culturally dexterous, while 57% of patients reported receiving culturally dexterous care; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Residents who perceived themselves to be culturally dexterous were more likely to self-identify as non-White as compared to White (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, White patients were more likely to report highly dexterous care, whereas Black patients were more likely to report poorly dexterous care (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At baseline, half of patients reported receiving culturally dexterous care from surgical residents at 5 academic medical centers in the United States. This was consistent with residents' self-assessment of their cultural dexterity skills. White patients were more likely to report receiving culturally dexterous care as compared to non-White patients. Non-White residents were more likely to feel confident in their cultural dexterity skills. A novel curriculum has been designed to improve these interactions between patients and surgical residents.

Ad astra per aspera (Through Hardships to the Stars): Lessons Learned from the First National Virtual APDS Meeting, 2020.

OBJECTIVE: After COVID-19 rendered in-person meetings for national societies impossible in the spring of 2020, the leadership of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) innovated via a virtual format in order to hold its national meeting. DESIGN: APDS leadership pre-emptively considered factors that would be important to attendees including cost, value, time, professional commitments, education, sharing of relevant and current information, and networking. SETTING: The meeting was conducted using a variety of virtual formats including a web portal for entry, pre-ecorded poster and oral presentations on the APDS website, interactive panels via a web conferencing platform, and livestreaming. PARTICIPANTS: There were 298 registrants for the national meeting of the APDS, and 59 participants in the New Program Directors Workshop. The registrants and participants comprised medical students, residents, associate program directors, program directors, and others involved in surgical education nationally. RESULTS: There was no significant difference detected for high levels of participant satisfaction between 2019 and 2020 for the following items: overall program rating, topics and content meeting stated objectives, relevant content to educational needs, educational format conducive to learning, and agreement that the program will improve competence, performance, communication skills, patient outcomes, or processes of care/healthcare system performance. CONCLUSIONS: A virtual format for a national society meeting can provide education, engagement, and community, and the lessons learned by the APDS in the process can be used by other societies for utilization and further improvement.

The evolution of the Rhode Island trauma system: where do we stand?

The Rhode Island Trauma System today has been shown to demonstrate several positive attributes in the delivery of patient care; however, ongoing efforts need to continue in the realms of field and inter-facility communication, efficiency in inter-hospital transfer, and rehabilitation services. Through ongoing dialogue and the fundamental desire to improve, it remains our goal to provide patients the best care possible during one of the most stressful times of their lives.

A Full-Thickness Burn in a Teenager Resulting from Prolonged Contact with a Mobile Phone Charging Cube: A Case Report.

We present a case of a teenager who suffered a full-thickness burn following prolonged contact with a mobile phone charging cube. The patient required primary surgical excision and closure of the wound resulting in a good clinical outcome. There have been multiple reports in the literature of burns resulting from lithium batteries; however, this appears to be the first case report of a full thickness burn resulting from a mobile phone charging cube. Given the ubiquity of mobile phone use among teenagers, primary care providers should warn patients about the risks of sleeping with an electronic device while it is connected to a charger.

The Resident Outcome Project: Increased Academic Productivity Associated with a Formal Clinical Research Curriculum.

PURPOSE: A formal 2-year clinical research project in conjunction with a system-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement curriculum was initiated for all residents in our program. Within the structure of this formal clinical research curriculum, residents are required to develop a research hypothesis, develop an appropriate study design, collect and analyze data, and present a completed project. METHODS: At the end of the PGY1 year, residents select a project with an emphasis on quality improvement or clinical outcomes. The first 6 months of the 2-year program are dedicated to the identification of a faculty mentor and submission of a formal proposal to both the departmental education committee and to the institutional IRB. Over the following 12 months, residents meet monthly for required group research meetings. The final 6 months are focused on data analysis and project completion. RESULTS: Seventy-five residents have successfully completed the clinical research program since it was initiated in 2002. Completed projects led to abstracts accepted at 33 national or regional meetings and 11 peer reviewed publications to date. In addition, 3 major hospital wide quality improvement measures were initiated based on project findings. Following the first peer reviewed publication associated with these research projects in 2006, there have been significant increases in not only the number of accepted abstracts from these resident projects (3/18 [17%] vs 30/57 [53%], p = 0.008) but also the total number of all accepted resident clinical research (mean accepted abstracts per year 7.9 vs 1.0, p = 0.009 and mean peer reviewed publications per year 6.8 vs 2.0, p = 0.003.) DISCUSSION: Increased academic productivity was observed after a formal resident clinical research program was initiated in our program. Resident research efforts extended beyond the specific initial outcome projects as skills gained allowed for future independent clinical research.

Intoxication and Flame Burn Injuries in Young Adults in the United States.

Flame injuries are the primary cause of burns in young adults. Although drug and alcohol intoxication has been associated with other types of trauma, its role in burn injury has not been well described in this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of intoxication and flame burn injuries in young adults in the United States. The 2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample was queried for burn injury visits of young adult patients, 13-25 years old. This data is weighted to allow for national estimates. Burn mechanism and intoxication status were determined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association of intoxication and emergency department (ED) visits due to flame burns, adjusting for patient age, gender, zip code median income, zip code rural-urban designation, timing of visit, and hospital region. Further analyses assessed the odds of admission or transfer, as a possible proxy of injury severity, in patients with flame or other burns, with and without intoxication adjusting for patient age, gender, primary insurance, and hospital trauma designation. There were 20,787 visits for patients 13-25 years old with burn injuries and 12.9% (n = 2678) had a codiagnosis of intoxication. There was an increasing proportion of intoxication by age (5.8% 13-17 years old, 25% 18-20 years old, 69% 21-25 years old, P < .001). ED visits for burns with a codiagnosis of intoxication had 1.34 times ([95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18, 1.52], P < .01) higher odds of having flame burns compared to other burn mechanisms. Those with flame burns and intoxication were most likely to be admitted or transferred when compared to nonflame, nonintoxication visits in the adjusted model (odds ratio [OR] 5.49, [95% CI: 4.29, 7.02], P < .01). Furthermore, the odds of admission or transfer in visits with the combined exposure of intoxication and flame mechanism were significantly higher than visits due to nonflame burns and intoxication (OR 2.75, [2.25, 3.36], P < .01) or flame burns without intoxication (OR 3.00, [95% CI: 2.61, 3.42], P < .01). This study identified a significant association between flame-burn-related ED visits and intoxication in the young adult population in the United States. In addition, the combination of flame mechanism and intoxication appears to result in more substantial injury compared with either exposure alone. The relationship seen between intoxication and flame burn injury underscores a major target for burn prevention efforts in the young adult population.