Effect of Abaloparatide vs Placebo on New Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Additional therapies are needed for prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Abaloparatide is a selective activator of the parathyroid hormone type 1 receptor. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of abaloparatide, 80 µg, vs placebo for prevention of new vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women at risk of osteoporotic fracture. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Abaloparatide Comparator Trial In Vertebral Endpoints (ACTIVE) was a phase 3, double-blind, RCT (March 2011-October 2014) at 28 sites in 10 countries. Postmenopausal women with bone mineral density (BMD) T score ≤-2.5 and >-5.0 at the lumbar spine or femoral neck and radiological evidence ≥2 mild or ≥1 moderate lumbar or thoracic vertebral fracture or history of low-trauma nonvertebral fracture within the past 5 years were eligible. Postmenopausal women (>65 y) with fracture criteria and a T score ≤-2.0 and >-5.0 or without fracture criteria and a T score ≤-3.0 and >-5.0 could enroll. INTERVENTIONS: Blinded, daily subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 821); abaloparatide, 80 µg (n = 824); or open-label teriparatide, 20 µg (n = 818) for 18 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end point was percentage of participants with new vertebral fracture in the abaloparatide vs placebo groups. Sample size was set to detect a 4% difference (57% risk reduction) between treatment groups. Secondary end points included change in BMD at total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine in abaloparatide-treated vs placebo participants and time to first incident nonvertebral fracture. Hypercalcemia was a prespecified safety end point in abaloparatide-treated vs teriparatide participants. RESULTS: Among 2463 women (mean age, 69 years [range, 49-86]), 1901 completed the study. New morphometric vertebral fractures occurred less frequently in the active treatment groups vs placebo. The Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate for nonvertebral fracture was lower with abaloparatide vs placebo. BMD increases were greater with abaloparatide than placebo (all P < .001). Incidence of hypercalcemia was lower with abaloparatide (3.4%) vs teriparatide (6.4%) (risk difference [RD], −2.96 [95%CI, −5.12 to −0.87]; P = .006). [table: see text]. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, the use of subcutaneous abaloparatide, compared with placebo, reduced the risk of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures over 18 months. Further research is needed to understand the clinical importance of RD, the risks and benefits of abaloparatide treatment, and the efficacy of abaloparatide vs other osteoporosis treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01343004.

Evolution of Neuroendocrine Tumor Therapy.

To better understand developments in treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system, and the pivotal roles of native somatostatin and its long-acting analogues play in normal peptide regulation and neuropeptide excess associated with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), this article delineates and defines distinct eras in the history and discovery of gastrointestinal endocrinology. We highlight the collaboration between academia and industry in basic science and the clinical research that advanced Lu-177-DOTATATE to approval as standard of care therapy for low-grade NETs. Examples of new radioisotopes and therapy compounds currently in development for diagnosis and therapy for high-grade NETs are also discussed.

Cellular effects of AP102, a somatostatin analog with balanced affinities for the hSSTR2 and hSSTR5 receptors.

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are first-line medical therapy for the treatment of acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumors that express somatostatin receptors (SSTR). Somatostatin suppresses secretion of a large number of hormones through the stimulation of the five SSTR. However, unbalanced inhibition of secretion as observed with the highly potent SSAs pasireotide causes hyperglycaemia mainly by inhibiting insulin secretion. In contrast, AP102 a new SSAs has neutral effect on blood glucose while suppressing GH secretion. Our objective was to establish the cellular effects of AP102 on SSTR2 and SSTR5 that may explain the differences observed between AP102 and other SSAs. METHODS: We compared the binding and agonist activity of AP102 with somatostatin-14, octreotide and pasireotide in HEK293 cells transfected with human SSTR2 and SSTR5 receptors. SSAs signal transduction effects (cAMP concentrations) were measured in forskolin-treated cells in the presence of SSAs. Proliferation and apoptotic effects were determined and binding assays were performed using 125I- somatostatin-14. RESULTS: AP102 has comparable affinity and agonist effect to octreotide at SSTR2 (IC50's of 112 pM and 244 pM, respectively; EC50's of 230 pM and 210 pM, respectively) in contrast to pasireotide that exhibits a 12-27 fold higher IC50 (3110 pM) and about 5-fold higher EC50 (1097 pM). At SSTR5, AP102 has much higher affinity and stimulating effect than octreotide (IC50's of 773 pM and 16,737 pM, respectively; EC50's of 8526 pM and 26,800 pM), and an intermediate affinity and agonist effect between octreotide and pasireotide. AP102, octreotide and pasireotide have variable anti-proliferative effects on HEK cells transfected with SSTR2 and SSTR5. CONCLUSION: AP102 is a new SSA that better reduces signaling at SSTR2 than SSTR5 and prevents cell proliferation at both receptors. The euglycaemic effect of AP102 observed in preclinical studies may be related to this intermediate agonistic potency between pasireotide and octreotide at SSTR2 and SSTR5.

Sensitive quantification of the somatostatin analog AP102 in plasma by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and application to a pharmacokinetic study in rats.

AP102 is a di-iodinated octapeptide somatostatin agonist (SSA) designed to treat acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumors. A sensitive and selective method was validated for the quantification of AP102 in plasma following the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines. Sample preparation was performed using solid-phase extraction microplates. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) C18 column in 6.0 minutes. The compounds were quantified using multiple reaction monitoring on a tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer with 13 C,15 N-labeled AP102 as internal standard. Calibration ranged from 50 to 10000 pg/mL. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was measured at 20 pg/mL, and robust analytical performances were obtained with trueness at 99.2%-100.0%, intra-assay imprecision at 2.5%-4.4%, and inter-assay imprecision at 8.9%-9.7%. The accuracy profiles (total error) built on the 3 concentrations levels showed accuracy within the 70%-130% range. AP102 is remarkably stable since no proteolytic fragments were detected on plasma samples analyzed by Orbitrap-MS. Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in rats, after single dose (1, 3, and 10 µg/kg, sc) and continuous subcutaneous administration (osmotic minipumps for 28 days, 3.0 or 10.0 µg/kg/h). AP102 showed a rapid absorption by the subcutaneous route (Tmax : 15-30 minutes) and a fast elimination (t1/2 : 33-86 minutes). The PK profile of AP102 exhibited a mean clearance of 1.67 L/h and a mean distribution volume at steady state of 7.16 L/kg, about 10-fold higher than those observed with other SSA or non- and mono-iodinated AP102. LogD7.4 determination confirmed the lipophilic properties of AP102 that might influence its distribution in tissues.

Effects of GH on cognitive function in elderly patients with adult-onset GH deficiency: a placebo-controlled 12-month study.

OBJECTIVE: Young adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency (GHD) have reduced memory and attention, which can be improved by treatment with GH. Little information is available on cognitive function in elderly GHD patients. DESIGN: Single center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 52-week duration. METHODS: Elderly GH therapy naïve GHD patients (n=34; age range 60-77 years) were enrolled and randomized to receive placebo or GH therapy which was titrated to achieve a target IGF-I level of +1 to +2 s.d. of the normal mean for age. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and after 24 and 52 weeks, using a computerized psychometric test package (Neurobehavioral Examination System-2). RESULTS: The mean GH dose was 0.16+/-0.06 mg/day; mean IGF-I increased from 135+/-59 ng/ml at baseline to 213+/-77 ng/ml during active treatment. The GH-treated group had better mean serial digit learning scores compared with placebo group (P<0.05). Assessment of effect sizes showed that improvements in memory occurred with GH after 24 weeks. The overall adverse event rates were similar in the GH and the placebo group. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that GH replacement may be accompanied by improvement in certain measures of cognitive function in elderly patients with GHD.

Clinical investigation of RAD1901, a novel estrogen receptor ligand, for the treatment of postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms: a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging, proof-of-concept trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of RAD1901, an oral estrogen receptor ligand, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms of menopause. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging, proof-of-concept trial. Postmenopausal women with a minimum of 7 moderate-to-severe, diary-reported hot flashes per day, or 50 per week, were randomized to one of five blinded dose groups (0 [placebo], 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg RAD1901 daily for 28 d). Efficacy endpoints included frequency and severity of hot flashes over 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: One hundred participants were randomized across the five treatment regimens. The frequency of moderate-to-severe hot flashes decreased in all groups over the treatment period (mean percent change from baseline at 4 wk, -54.1%, -77.2%, -51.8%, -53.8%, and -67.0% for placebo, 10, 25, 50, and 100 mg groups). The response in the 10 mg group was significantly different from placebo at 4 weeks (P = 0.024). No other dose group was significantly different from placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in severity of hot flashes between placebo and any dose group. Treatment was well tolerated; most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Daily treatment with 10 mg RAD1901 over 4 weeks resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the frequency of moderate-to-severe hot flashes compared with placebo, with an acceptable safety profile. Further clinical trials are warranted to investigate RAD1901's utility as a potential treatment for vasomotor symptoms.

Effect of AP102, a subtype 2 and 5 specific somatostatin analog, on glucose metabolism in rats.

PURPOSE: Somatostatin analogs are widely used to treat conditions associated with hormonal hypersecretion such as acromegaly and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. First generation somatostatin analogs, such as octreotide and lanreotide, have high affinity for somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2), but have incomplete efficacy in many patients. Pasireotide targets multiple SSTRs, having the highest affinity for SSTR5, but causes hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus in preclinical and clinical studies. AP102 is a new somatostatin analogs with high affinity at both SSTR2 and SSTR5. We aimed to characterize the effects of AP102 vs. pasireotide on random and dynamic glucose levels, glucoregulatory hormone concentrations and growth axis measures in healthy Sprague-Dawley rats. METHODS: Three doses of each compound were evaluated under acute conditions (1, 10, and 30 µg/kg s.c.), and two doses during a chronic (4-week) infusion (3 and 10 µg/kg/h s.c.). RESULTS: Neither acute nor chronic AP102 administration altered blood glucose concentrations or dynamic responses following an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test. In contrast, acute and chronic pasireotide dosing increased random and post-intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test blood glucose measures, compared to vehicle-treated controls. Both AP102 and pasireotide acutely suppressed growth hormone levels, although insulin-like growth factor-1 and somatic growth was suppressed to a greater extent with pasireotide. CONCLUSIONS: AP102 is a new dual SSTR2/SSTR5-specific somatostatin analog that acutely reduces growth hormone but does not cause hyperglycemia during acute or chronic administration in a healthy rat model. Further studies in diabetic animals and in humans are necessary to determine the potential utility of AP102 in the clinical setting.

Effects of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler and beclomethasone dipropionate hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in asthmatic subjects.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) [400 mug] is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) that is effective in the treatment of asthma. MF-DPI has a low potential for suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis at its clinical dose. The effect of MF-DPI, 400 microg qd, on the HPA axis was compared to that of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) using hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) and chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants via metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) twice daily. DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS: This randomized, third-party blind, parallel-group study compared the effects of MF-DPI 400 mug one puff qd in the morning (n = 18), HFA-BDP 200 microg two puffs MDI bid (n = 18), and CFC-BDP 400 microg two puffs MDI bid (n = 17) for 14 days on the area under the 24-h serum cortisol concentrations curve (AUC(0-24)) and on total 24-h urinary free cortisol excretion in mild asthmatic subjects. Effects on morning/evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) and on inhaled albuterol use were also assessed. Adverse events that occurred during or > or = 30 days after the study were recorded. RESULTS: The mean decrease from baseline in the serum cortisol concentrations AUC(0-24) in the MF-DPI group was significantly less than in either the HFA-BDP (p = 0.024) or the CFC-BDP (p = 0.011) groups. Decreases in serum cortisol concentrations AUC(0-24) in the two BDP groups did not differ from one another. The MF-DPI group trended toward higher morning and evening PEF than either BDP group. Treatment-associated adverse events were reported by seven subjects in the MF-DPI group, vs one subject in the HFA-BDP and three subjects in the CFC-BDP groups; these were mild, and no subject discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Fourteen days of treatment with MF-DPI 400 microg qd was associated with a significantly lesser decrease in the serum cortisol concentrations AUC(0-24) compared with HFA-BDP 200 microg MDI or CFC-BDP 400 microg MDI bid.

Intramuscular administration of ACTH1-24 vs. 24-hour blood sampling in the assessment of adrenocortical function.

The standard intravenous short Synacthen test (SSST) has long been accepted as one of the most reliable diagnostic tests of adrenocortical insufficiency. Intramuscular (i.m.) administration of ACTH obviates the need of venous cannulation and can be used as an alternative to the intravenous test. Nevertheless, reports of correlation between cortisol response to i.m. ACTH1-24 and 24-hr average cortisol concentration are scarce. We studied this relation in 64 nonobese healthy men. Blood samples for serial cortisol measurements were collected hourly over 24 hrs. The following day, blood samples were collected at baseline and at 30 and 60 min after intramuscular (i.m.) administration of 250 microg of ACTH1-24. All healthy men reached 24-hr serum cortisol peak values (Cmax) between 0600 h and 1000 h. Following i.m. ACTH1-24, cortisol levels significantly increased at both 30 (C30ACTH) and 60 (C60ACTH) minutes, when compared to baseline values. C30ACTH and C60ACTH significantly correlated with Cmax and with the 24-hr time-integrated cortisol concentration (AUC0-24). Morning mean cortisol was calculated as the average of serum concentrations measured between 0600 h and 1000 h (C(av)6-10) and correlated very well with AUC0-24. In conclusion, we confirmed that i.m. administration of ACTH1-24, followed by a single blood sampling at 60 min for cortisol measurement represents a valid, convenient and cost- effective screening test of adrenal function.

Potential for a pluripotent adult stem cell treatment for acute radiation sickness.

Accidental radiation exposure and the threat of deliberate radiation exposure have been in the news and are a public health concern. Experience with acute radiation sickness has been gathered from atomic blast survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and from civilian nuclear accidents as well as experience gained during the development of radiation therapy for cancer. This paper reviews the medical treatment reports relevant to acute radiation sickness among the survivors of atomic weapons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, among the victims of Chernobyl, and the two cases described so far from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi disaster. The data supporting the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the new efforts to expand stem cell populations ex vivo for infusion to treat bone marrow failure are reviewed. Hematopoietic stem cells derived from bone marrow or blood have a broad ability to repair and replace radiation induced damaged blood and immune cell production and may promote blood vessel formation and tissue repair. Additionally, a constituent of bone marrow-derived, adult pluripotent stem cells, very small embryonic like stem cells, are highly resistant to ionizing radiation and appear capable of regenerating radiation damaged tissue including skin, gut and lung.

A comparison of stem cells for therapeutic use.

A critical comparison of the attributes of several types of stem cells is presented, with particular emphasis on properties that are critical for the application of these cells for therapeutic purposes. The importance of an autologous source of pluripotent stem cells is stressed. It is apparent that two sources currently exist for non-embryonic pluripotent stem cells--very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS). The impact of the emerging iPS research on therapy is considered.

Effect of desloratadine therapy on symptom scores and measures of nasal patency in seasonal allergic rhinitis: results of a single-center, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Desloratadine reduces symptoms and maintains nasal airflow in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) during experimental allergen exposure. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of desloratadine and placebo on symptom scores, quality of life (QOL), and nasal airway patency in patients with SAR during the allergy season. METHODS: Adults with symptomatic SAR were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive desloratadine, 5 mg, or placebo for 14 days. Patient-rated SAR symptoms were recorded twice daily (morning and evening). On days 1 and 15, SAR symptoms were scored jointly (investigator and patient), nasal airflow was measured using 4-phase rhinomanometry, and QOL and the overall condition of SAR were rated. Overall treatment response was scored on day 15. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: At day 15, total symptom (P = .03) and total nasal symptom (P = .02) scores and patient morning-rated individual nasal symptom scores (except nasal stuffiness) (P < or = .04) decreased significantly from baseline with desloratadine vs placebo. Flow in the descending expiratory nasal airflow phase was significantly greater (P = .046) and the percentage increase in total inspiratory nasal airway resistance was less (P = .03) in the desloratadine group vs the placebo group. The overall condition of SAR was less severe (P = .045), the therapeutic response was greater (P = .004), and the nasal symptom domain of the QOL score was significantly better (P = .03) in the desloratadine group. Adverse event rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Desloratadine treatment for 14 days improved nasal airflow and resistance as well as symptom and QOL scores in patients with symptomatic SAR during the allergy season.

Cytokine dysregulation, inflammation and well-being.

Cytokines mediate and control immune and inflammatory responses. Complex interactions exist between cytokines, inflammation and the adaptive responses in maintaining homeostasis, health, and well-being. Like the stress response, the inflammatory reaction is crucial for survival and is meant to be tailored to the stimulus and time. A full-fledged systemic inflammatory reaction results in stimulation of four major programs: the acute-phase reaction, the sickness syndrome, the pain program, and the stress response, mediated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system. Common human diseases such as atopy/allergy, autoimmunity, chronic infections and sepsis are characterized by a dysregulation of the pro- versus anti-inflammatory and T helper (Th)1 versus Th2 cytokine balance. Recent evidence also indicates the involvement of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and major depression, and conditions such as visceral-type obesity, metabolic syndrome and sleep disturbances. During inflammation, the activation of the stress system, through induction of a Th2 shift, protects the organism from systemic 'overshooting' with Th1/pro-inflammatory cytokines. Under certain conditions, however, stress hormones may actually facilitate inflammation through induction of interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and C-reactive protein production and through activation of the corticotropin-releasing hormone/substance P-histamine axis. Thus, a dysfunctional neuroendocrine-immune interface associated with abnormalities of the 'systemic anti-inflammatory feedback' and/or 'hyperactivity' of the local pro-inflammatory factors may play a role in the pathogenesis of atopic/allergic and autoimmune diseases, obesity, depression, and atherosclerosis. These abnormalities and the failure of the adaptive systems to resolve inflammation affect the well-being of the individual, including behavioral parameters, quality of life and sleep, as well as indices of metabolic and cardiovascular health. These hypotheses require further investigation, but the answers should provide critical insights into mechanisms underlying a variety of common human immune-related diseases.

Effect of desloratadine versus placebo on nasal airflow and subjective measures of nasal obstruction in subjects with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in an allergen-exposure unit.

BACKGROUND: Unlike many antihistamines, desloratadine can reduce nasal congestion in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). OBJECTIVE: We compared the effects of 5 mg of desloratadine and placebo on nasal airflow and SAR symptoms, including nasal congestion, in response to grass pollen in an allergen-exposure unit. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, 47 subjects with histories of SAR received desloratadine or placebo every morning for 7 days and, after a 10-day washout period, were crossed over to the other treatment arm for 7 days. Subjects underwent a 6-hour allergen exposure on day 7 of each treatment period. Nasal airflow and nasal secretion weights were measured before and every 30 minutes during allergen exposure; SAR symptoms (including nasal congestion) were scored before exposure and every 15 minutes thereafter. RESULTS: Nasal obstruction, as measured by nasal airflow, was less severe with desloratadine than with placebo (P <.02). Individual and combined SAR symptom severity scores, including nasal congestion and sneezing, were significantly lower with desloratadine than with placebo (all P < or =.003). Within 30 minutes of allergen exposure, less severely decreased nasal airflow (P <.02), less nasal secretions (P <.001), and less severe symptoms, including nasal congestion (P <.002), rhinorrhea, and sneezing, occurred with desloratadine compared with placebo, and this continued throughout (0-6 hours) allergen exposure. Desloratadine was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSION: In subjects with allergen-induced SAR symptoms, desloratadine significantly reduced the severity of nasal obstruction and accompanying complaints of nasal congestion and other SAR symptoms compared with the effects of placebo.

Desloratadine inhibits constitutive and histamine-stimulated nuclear factor-kappaB activity consistent with inverse agonism at the histamine H1 Receptor.

BACKGROUND: The human histamine H1 receptor is constitutively active and exhibits basal activation of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB), an important modulator of allergic inflammation. Certain H1 antihistamines have recently been shown to inhibit basal NF-kappaB activity by stabilizing the H1 receptor in an inactive state, a phenomenon called 'inverse agonism'. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of the new H1 antihistamine, desloratadine, on basal and histamine-stimulated NF-kappaB activity and compared it with the activities of other H1 antihistamines. RESULTS: Transiently transfected COS-7 cells co-expressing NF-kappaB-luciferase and the H1 receptor exhibited constitutive NF-kappaB activity. H1 antihistamines reduced basal NF-kappaB activity (rank order of potency: desloratadine > pyrilamine > cetirizine > loratadine > fexofenadine). Histamine stimulated basal NF-kappaB activity 8-fold, which was blocked by H1 antihistamines (rank order of potency: desloratadine > cetirizine > pyrilamine > loratadine > fexofenadine). Neither histamine nor antihistamines had any effect on NF-kappaB activity in the absence of the H1 receptor. CONCLUSIONS: Desloratadine, acting through the histamine H1 receptor, inhibited basal NF-kappaB activity and can thus be classified as an inverse agonist. Inhibition of basal and histamine-stimulated NF-kappaB activity may help to explain previously reported inhibitory effects of desloratadine on allergic inflammatory mediators.

Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler vs fluticasone propionate metered-dose inhaler in asthma subjects previously using fluticasone propionate.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (DPI) administered once daily in the evening with fluticasone propionate metered-dose inhaler (MDI) administered twice daily. METHODS: An 8-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study compared mometasone furoate DPI, 400 microg every evening (1 puff daily), with fluticasone propionate MDI, two 125-microg puffs twice daily, in 167 adults and adolescents with moderate persistent asthma previously using fluticasone propionate. The primary efficacy variable was the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to the end point. Variables such as response to therapy and subject satisfaction with the inhaler devices were also analyzed. RESULTS: Improvement in FEV1 was noted at the week 2 visit with both treatments. This improvement was maintained at the 4- and 8-week visits and at the end point for both groups. The mean percent change in FEV1 from baseline to the end point was 4.58% with mometasone furoate DPI and 6.98% with fluticasone propionate MDI (P = .35). At the end point, physicians rated 62% of the mometasone furoate DPI group as "improved" or "much improved" compared with 47% of the fluticasone propionate MDI group (P = .007). A significantly greater proportion of subjects in the mometasone furoate DPI group "liked the inhaler a lot" vs subjects in the fluticasone propionate MDI group (46.8% vs 22.4%; P = .01). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Mometasone furoate DPI, 400 microg every evening, provided comparable efficacy as fluticasone propionate MDI, two 125-microg puffs twice daily, in subjects with moderate persistent asthma previously treated with fluticasone propionate.