First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy for Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer: LIGHT-NING study.

OBJECTIVE: As first-line treatment for stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, with or without chemotherapy, had demonstrated survival benefits over chemotherapy; however, data on Japanese patients are limited. METHODS: LIGHT-NING was a multicenter, observational study and retrospectively collected data. In this interim analysis, we analyzed patients who received combination immunotherapy between 27 November 2020 and 31 August 2021 for the treatment status, safety objectives (treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events incidences), and effectiveness objectives (objective response rate and progression-free survival) to determine the characteristics and early safety information. RESULTS: We analyzed 353 patients, with a median follow-up of 7.1 (interquartile range, 5.0-9.7) months. Overall, 60.1 and 39.9% received nivolumab plus ipilimumab with and without chemotherapy, respectively. In these cohorts, the median age was 67 and 72 years; 10.8 and 35.5% were aged ≥75 years; 80.2 and 79.4% were male; 5.2 and 13.5% had a performance score ≥ 2; 32.1 and 27.0% developed grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events; treatment-related deaths were observed in 6 (2.8%) and 5 (3.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse event incidence was the highest within the first month of treatment in both cohorts, although the immune-related adverse event risk persisted throughout. No new safety signals were observed at this interim analysis. The median progression-free survival was 6.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.2-7.6) and 5.8 (4.3-7.0) months in nivolumab plus ipilimumab with and without chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LIGHT-NING offers valuable insights into combination immunotherapy for untreated patients with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in Japanese real-world settings.

A case of tracheal stenosis due to anaplastic thyroid carcinoma treated using the stent-in-stent method.

Tracheal AERO stent collapse is a rare complication compared to bronchial AERO stent collapse due to differences in the nitinol framework thickness. A 58-year-old man with a bulky anaplastic thyroid carcinoma was referred to our hospital due to exacerbation of tracheal stenosis despite the administration of lenvatinib. His tracheal stenosis exhibited a severe extrinsic compression pattern with a length of 8 cm. Because tracheotomy was inappropriate, we placed an 18 × 80 mm AERO stent. Five months later, he was readmitted with severe dyspnea due to collapse of the distal portion of the stent caused by tumor growth. Because stent removal was difficult, we placed an additional AERO stent (18 × 60 mm) to cover the collapsed portion. The additional stent successfully expanded the collapse and improved his dyspnea. To our knowledge, this is the first case where a tracheal AERO stent collapse due to a poor prognosis tumor was treated with the stent-in-stent method.

Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels at admission predicts exercise-induced hypoxemia before and after discharge in patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: There are no reports of exercise-induced hypoxemia in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Additionally, the predictive factors and prevalence of exercise-induced hypoxemia are unknown. This study investigated the incidence and predictive factors of exercise-induced hypoxemia before and after discharge in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We enrolled 77 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who were hospitalized between November 2020 and October 2021 and who underwent a 6-min walk test before and after discharge. Based on the test results, we classified patients into exercise-induced and non-exercise-induced hypoxemia groups and investigated the predictive factors of exercise-induced hypoxemia using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The incidences of exercise-induced hypoxemia in patients with COVID-19 were 37.7% and 19.5% before and after discharge, respectively. At admission, the Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels was the associated factor for exercise-induced hypoxemia in patients with COVID-19 before and after discharge, with cut-off values of 314 U/mL and 367 U/mL, respectively. Age and lactate dehydrogenase levels were the associated factors for exercise-induced hypoxemia in patients with COVID-19 before discharge, with cut-off values of 61 years and 492 U/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with COVID-19 may continue to experience exercise-induced hypoxemia after discharge. Age, lactate dehydrogenase, and Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels at admission could serve as predictive markers of exercise-induced hypoxemia before and after discharge in these patients.

Physical Activity Using a Wearable Device as an Alternative to Performance Status in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer.

Importance: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) is extensively used to guide treatment decisions in patients with advanced lung cancer. However, its assessment is subjective, potentially leading to discordance among observers. Objective: To investigate the association between measured physical activity and ECOG PS, as well as the potential prognostic value of physical activity measurements in patients with advanced lung cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-institution, prospective observational study enrolled 119 patients with advanced lung cancer scheduled to receive systemic therapy as outpatients at Matsusaka Municipal Hospital in Mie, Japan. Participants wore the wearable device amuelink (Sony) for up to 14 days to measure physical activity, including metabolic equivalent tasks, distance walked, and number of steps taken. ECOG PS was assessed at enrollment, which took place from December 2021 to August 2022. Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary end point was estimating the area under the curve (AUC) for classification into ECOG PS of 2 or higher using physical activity measurements. An analysis of the association with survival was also conducted. Results: Among the 119 patients (median [range] age, 72 (32-88) years; 71 [59.7%] male), mean distance walked (MDW) had the highest diagnostic value for classifying an ECOG PS of 2 or greater, with an AUC of 0.818 (95% CI, 0.703-0.934). Moreover, MDW was also associated with 6-month survival, with an AUC of 0.806 (95% CI, 0.694-0.918). Survival curves significantly diverged based on the MDW threshold, indicating a potential association with survival outcome (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.57). Conclusions and Relevance: The cohort study suggests that MDW, as measured by a wearable device, was associated with ECOG PS and may serve as a predictor of health status alongside ECOG PS categories. It demonstrates the potential of objectively measured physical activity in complementing subjective ECOG PS assessments in patients with advanced lung cancer. Further research is needed to confirm the prognostic value of physical activity measurements.

Health Status Progression Measured Using Weekly Telemonitoring of COPD Assessment Test Scores Over 1 Year and Its Association With COPD Exacerbations.

Background: A previous longitudinal study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) score changes suggested patients fall into 3 patterns: stable, improving, and worsening. This study assessed the evolution of CAT scores over time and its relationship to exacerbations. Methods: In total, 84 participants used a telemedicine platform to complete CAT weekly for 52 weeks. Completion rates, annualized change in CAT scores, and learning effects were measured, as well as CAT changes of >4 units during look-back periods of 4 and 8 weeks. In a subgroup of participants with at least a 25% completion rate (adherent group, n=68 [81%]), the relationship between change in CAT score and exacerbations at any time during the study was examined post hoc. Results: Linear regression showed that 50%, 22%, and 28% of the adherent subgroup had CAT scores indicating worsening, stable, and improving health status, respectively. In the adherent subgroup, 70% (n=7/10) of participants who had an exacerbation during the study had worsening CAT scores, versus 47% (n=27/58) without an exacerbation. The hazard ratio association between CAT score increase and moderate exacerbation was 1.13 (95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.24). Most participants experienced at least one CAT score change of >4 units, and 7% showed an initial learning effect with a median of 2 weeks. Conclusion: Measuring trends in CAT scores may allow future studies to group patients into 3 defined categories of change over time and quantify CAT change trajectories to assess treatment response and potentially predict medium-term outcomes within individual patients.

The Current Achievements of Multi-Gene Panel Tests in Clinical Settings for Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Some multi-gene panel tests have been implemented in clinical settings to guide targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. The current performance of multi-gene panel tests under the condition that the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT) and Amoy Dx® Pan Lung Cancer PCR panel (AmoyDx-multi) are available remains relatively unknown. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with NSCLC, whose FFPE samples were considered for genetic testing. We assessed the submission rates, the success rates, and the driver oncogene detection rates of multi-gene panel tests. A total of 225 patients were histologically newly diagnosed with NSCLC or diagnosed with a recurrence of NSCLC without a previous multi-gene panel test at our institution. Among the 225 patients, the FFPE samples of 212 patients (94.2%) were submitted for multi-gene panel testing, including 191 samples (84.9%) for the ODxTT and 21 samples (9.3%) for the AmoyDx-multi. Among the 212 samples submitted to multi-gene panel tests, the success rate was 99.5% (211/212). The detection rate of driver oncogene alterations for all histologies was 52.4% (111/212), and that for adenocarcinoma was 69.7% (106/152). A favorable submission rate and success rate of multi-gene panel tests were shown, along with a favorable detection rate in recent clinical settings.

Impact of immune-related adverse events on survival outcomes in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently become the standard of care in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Although immune-related adverse events have been reported to influence prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients, few studies have investigated the prognostic value of immune-related adverse events in small cell lung cancer patients. In this study, we evaluated the prognosis of patients who developed immune-related adverse events after first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. METHODS: We enrolled 90 patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer who received immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment from September 2019 to December 2022 in six hospitals in Japan. The patients were categorized into groups with and without immune-related adverse events. RESULTS: There were 23 patients with and 67 without immune-related adverse events. Seventeen patients had grade 1-2 immune-related adverse events, and nine (including overlapping cases) had grade ≥3. The most frequent immune-related adverse event was a skin rash. The median survival time was 22 months in patients with immune-related adverse events and 9.3 months in patients without immune-related adverse events. The hazard ratio was 0.40 (95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.83, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that immune-related adverse events are associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Atezolizumab and Platinum Plus Pemetrexed With or Without Bevacizumab for Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The combination of an antibody to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or to its ligand (PD-L1) with chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bevacizumab is expected to enhance the efficacy not only of chemotherapy but also of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies through blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated immunosuppression, but further data are needed to support this. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab administered with platinum combination therapy and atezolizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: An open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 37 hospitals in Japan. Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without genetic driver alterations or those with genetic driver alterations who had received treatment with at least 1 approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor were enrolled between January 20, 2019, and August 12, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either atezolizumab plus carboplatin with pemetrexed (APP) or atezolizumab, carboplatin plus pemetrexed, and bevacizumab (APPB). After 4 cycles of induction therapy, maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or with atezolizumab, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab was administered until evidence of disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or the elapse of 2 years from the initiation of protocol treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Results: A total of 412 patients were enrolled (273 men [66%]; median age, 67.0 [range, 24-89] years) and randomly assigned, with 205 in the APPB group and 206 in the APP group of the ITT population after exclusion of 1 patient for good clinical practice violation. The median BICR-assessed PFS was 9.6 months with APPB vs 7.7 months with APP (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07; 1-sided stratified log-rank test; P = .92). According to prespecified subgroup analysis of BICR-assessed PFS, an improved PFS with APPB vs APP was apparent specifically in driver oncogene-positive patients (median, 9.7 vs 5.8 months; stratified HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98). Toxic effects related to bevacizumab were increased in the APPB group. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this trial did not show superiority of APPB over APP for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC; however, this regimen showed a similar tolerability and improved survival relative to APP in patients with driver oncogenes. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2080224500.