Targeting safety: Exploring trends and risk factors in pediatric head and neck BB gun injuries and hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: To examine head and neck injuries caused by BB (Ball Bearing) guns treated in US emergency departments among children under 18 to identify trends in injury frequency over time and risk factors associated with severe injuries leading to hospital admission. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), a single database, to analyze head and neck injuries caused by BB guns between 1993 and 2019. The analysis explored demographic characteristics and injury patterns, including sex, age, incidence, injury location, hospital type, and disposition. Linear regression was employed to assess trends in the yearly frequency of injuries, while univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios associated with hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 4041 cases of pediatric head and neck injuries caused by BB guns and treated in US emergency departments were identified. Most patients were male (84 %), with the highest proportion of injuries occurring in the 10-14 age group (49.7 %). The face (35.8 %) and eye (27.4 %) were the most affected injury sites, and 7.5 % of patients required hospital admission. No significant linear trend was observed in injury frequency over the study period. However, children aged four and under had higher odds of hospitalization (OR 2.77, 95 % CI 1.61-4.75) despite a lower incidence of injuries. Injuries to the eye (OR 12.37, 95 % CI 8.31-18.43) and neck (OR 7.58, 95 % CI 4.76-12.06) were strong predictors of hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Pediatric BB gun-related head and neck injuries remain a source of emergency room visits nationally. Younger children are at increased risk of admission to the hospital. Eye and neck injuries were the strongest predictors of hospital admission. Implementing safety precautions for younger children is crucial, as injuries might be more severe in this age group.

Conductive Hearing Loss Associates With Dementia, and Middle Ear Reconstruction Mitigates This Association: A Multinational Database Study.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that conductive hearing loss (CHL) is associated with dementia, and that middle ear reconstruction (MER) associates with improved outcomes for these measures in a multinational electronic health records database. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with propensity-score matching (PSM). SETTING: TriNetX is a research database representing about 110 million patients from the United States, Taiwan, Brazil, and India. PATIENTS: Subjects older than 50 years with no HL and any CHL (ICD-10: H90.0-2). Subjects of any age with and without any MER (CPT: 1010174). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for incident dementia (ICD-10: F01, F03, G30). RESULTS: Of 103,609 patients older than 50 years experiencing any CHL, 2.74% developed dementia compared with 1.22% of 38,216,019 patients with no HL (OR, 95% CI: 2.29, 2.20-2.37). Of patients experiencing CHL, there were 39,850 who received MER. The average age was 31.3 years, with 51% female patients. A total of 343,876 control patients with CHL were identified; 39,900 patients remained in each cohort after 1:1 PSM for HL- and dementia-related risk factors. Matched risk for developing dementia among MER recipients was 0.33% compared with 0.58% in controls (OR: 0.58, 0.46-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: CHL increases the odds for dementia, and MER improves the odds for incident dementia. This study represents the first population study on the topic of CHL, MER, and dementia.

Associations Between Race and Survival Outcomes Among Veterans With Head and Neck Cancer in a Racially Diverse Setting.

Objective: There is limited data on the impact of clinical-demographic factors on survival outcomes among veterans with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of race and other factors on overall survival (OS) in a population of veterans with HNSCC treated with curative intent. Methods: Demographic and clinical data were collected on veterans with HNSCC treated with curative intent at our institution between 1999 and 2021. The primary outcome was 3-year OS. Secondary outcomes included treatment delay intervals, including time to treatment initiation (TTI), total package time, and duration of chemoradiation (DCRT). Results: Of 260 veterans with HNSCC, black veterans had significantly lower 3-year OS (49.4%) compared to white veterans (65%, P = .019). Black veterans were also more likely to experience delays in treatment initiation (median TTI 46 vs 41 days; P = .047). Black patients were more likely to receive radiation alone (25.8% [black] vs 8.4% [white]; P < .001) and less likely to receive adjuvant therapy if treated surgically (11.1% [black] vs 22.4% [white]; P = .004), despite any statistically significant difference in stage of their tumor at presentation (Stage I: 21.2% [black] vs 19.6% [white]; P = .372); (Stage IV: 44.4% [black] vs 48.6% [white]; P = .487). Other factors associated with worse 3-year OS included older age (P = .023), lower body mass index (P = .026), neurocognitive disorder/dementia (P = .037), mental health disorders (P = .020), hypopharyngeal primary (P = .001), higher stage disease (P = .002), treatment type (P = .001), need for prophylactic gastrostomy tube (P = .048) or tracheotomy (P = .005), recurrent disease (P = .036), persistent disease (P < .001), distant metastases (P = .002), longer TTI (P = .0362), and longer DCRT (P = .004). Discussion: Black race appears to be an independent predictor of 3-year OS in veterans with HNSCC. Further studies are warranted to determine the factors responsible for disparities in survival. Implications for Practice: This study evaluated the ways in which race affects survival for US veterans with head and neck cancer. The authors found that black veterans had an increased risk of death compared to white patients, and also experienced delays when receiving treatment. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Quantitative Ergonomic Comparison of Traditional Versus Endoscopic-Assisted Tonsillectomies: A Prospective Case-Control Study.

Objective: Quantitatively compare the ergonomics of traditional tonsillectomy versus an endoscopic-assisted tonsillectomy. Methods: The physical positioning of the senior author was studied during a simulation of two different operative approaches to tonsillectomy: one using an endoscope and one using direct visualization without the aid of an endoscope. Whole-body postural data was collected and analyzed using the validated Rapid Upper Limb Assessments (RULA) tool to calculate the risk of musculoskeletal injuries. Results: Severe neck and trunk flexion are high-risk postures unique to the traditional approach. The RULA score for the traditional, non-endoscopic approach was 5, with a Neck, Trunk, and Leg Score of 6 and a Wrist/Arm score of 1. The RULA score for the endoscopic-assisted approach was 3, with a Neck, Trunk, and Leg score of 4 and a Wrist/Arm score of 1. The difference between the two approaches narrowed down to the effect on neck positioning (angle decreased from > 20 degrees with traditional to nearly 0 degrees with endoscopic) and trunk positioning (angle decreased from 20 to 60 degrees with traditional to 0 degrees with endoscopic). Conclusion: An endoscopic-assisted approach to tonsillectomy allowed for a lower RULA score compared to the traditional tonsillectomy. This study suggests that an endoscopic approach may decrease the potential for musculoskeletal strain and reduce occupational-related pain and injury seen in practicing otolaryngologists.

A Novel Endoscopic Approach for Distally Calcified Ureteral Stents.

Double-J ureteral stents are an invaluable tool in urology and are one of the most widely used stents in the world. However, when left in situ for prolonged periods, so-called "retained" ureteral stents can lead to numerous complications such as migration, hematuria, encrustation, or stent occlusion. These complications present severe challenges in urologic management. Notably, encrustation of ureteral stents may increase the risk of renal impairment and other potentially life-threatening complications. Here, we present the case of a 34-year-old female with a left double-J ureteral stent who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with a one-day history of left flank pain and febrile urinary tract infection.