RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient engagement attrition in mobile health (mHealth) remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs decreases program benefits. Systemic disparities lead to inequities in RPM adoption and use. There is an urgent need to understand patients' experiences with RPM in the real world, especially for patients who have stopped using the programs, as addressing issues faced by patients can increase the value of mHealth for patients and subsequently decrease attrition. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to understand patient engagement and experiences in an RPM mHealth intervention in lung transplant recipients. METHODS: Between May 4, 2020, and November 1, 2022, a total of 601 lung transplant recipients were enrolled in an mHealth RPM intervention to monitor lung function. The predictors of patient engagement were evaluated using multivariable logistic and linear regression. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 6 of 39 patients who had engaged in the first month but stopped using the program, and common themes were identified. RESULTS: Patients who underwent transplant more than 1 year before enrollment in the program had 84% lower odds of engaging (odds ratio [OR] 0.16, 95% CI 0.07-0.35), 82% lower odds of submitting pulmonary function measurements (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.33), and 78% lower odds of completing symptom checklists (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.43). Patients whose primary language was not English had 78% lower odds of engaging compared to English speakers (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.67). Interviews revealed 4 prominent themes: challenges with devices, communication breakdowns, a desire for more personal interactions and specific feedback with the care team about their results, understanding the purpose of the chat, and understanding how their data are used. CONCLUSIONS: Care delivery and patient experiences with RPM in lung transplant mHealth can be improved and made more equitable by tailoring outreach and enhancements toward non-English speakers and patients with a longer time between transplant and enrollment. Attention to designing programs to provide personalization through supplementary provider contact, education, and information transparency may decrease attrition rates.
Asunto(s)
Participación del Paciente , Telemedicina , Humanos , Comunicación , Modelos Lineales , Oportunidad RelativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD) is an imprecise syndrome denoting concern for the onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Mechanistic biomarkers are needed that stratify risk of ALAD progression to CLAD. We hypothesized that single cell investigation of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells at the time of ALAD would identify immune cells linked to progressive graft dysfunction. METHODS: We prospectively collected BAL from consenting lung transplant recipients for single cell RNA sequencing. ALAD was defined by a ≥10% decrease in FEV1 not caused by infection or acute rejection and samples were matched to BAL from recipients with stable lung function. We examined cell compositional and transcriptional differences across control, ALAD with decline, and ALAD with recovery groups. We also assessed cell-cell communication. RESULTS: BAL was assessed for 17 ALAD cases with subsequent decline (ALAD declined), 13 ALAD cases that resolved (ALAD recovered), and 15 cases with stable lung function. We observed broad differences in frequencies of the 26 unique cell populations across groups (p = 0.02). A CD8 T cell (p = 0.04) and a macrophage cluster (p = 0.01) best identified ALAD declined from the ALAD recovered and stable groups. This macrophage cluster was distinguished by an anti-inflammatory signature and the CD8 T cell cluster resembled a Tissue Resident Memory subset. Anti-inflammatory macrophages signaled to activated CD8 T cells via class I HLA, fibronectin, and galectin pathways (p < 0.05 for each). Recipients with discordance between these cells had a nearly 5-fold increased risk of severe graft dysfunction or death (HR 4.6, 95% CI 1.1-19.2, adjusted p = 0.03). We validated these key findings in 2 public lung transplant genomic datasets. CONCLUSIONS: BAL anti-inflammatory macrophages may protect against CLAD by suppressing CD8 T cells. These populations merit functional and longitudinal assessment in additional cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Trasplante de Pulmón , Macrófagos , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Macrófagos/inmunología , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/citología , Aloinjertos , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Adulto , Enfermedad Aguda , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) limits survival following lung transplant, but substantial lung damage occurs before diagnosis by traditional methods. We hypothesized that small airway gene expression patterns could identify CLAD risk before spirometric diagnosis and predict subsequent graft failure. METHODS: Candidate genes from 4 rejection-associated transcript sets were assessed for associations with CLAD or graft failure in a derivation cohort of 156 small airway brushes from 45 CLAD cases and 37 time-matched controls with >1-year stable lung function. Candidate genes not associated with CLAD and time to graft failure were excluded, yielding the Airway Inflammation 2 (AI2) gene set. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for CLAD and competing risks of death or graft failure were assessed in an independent validation cohort of 37 CLAD cases and 37 controls. RESULTS: Thirty-two candidate genes were associated with CLAD and graft failure, comprising the AI2 score, which clustered into 3 subcomponents. The AI2 score identified CLAD before its onset, in early and late post-CLAD brushes, as well as in the validation cohort (AUC 0.69-0.88). The AI2 score association with CLAD was independent of positive microbiology, CLAD stage, or CLAD subtype. However, transcripts most associated with CLAD evolved over time from CLAD onset. The AI2 score predicted time to graft failure and retransplant-free survival in both cohorts (p ≤ 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This airway inflammation gene score is associated with CLAD development, graft failure, and death. Future studies defining the molecular heterogeneity of airway inflammation could lead to endotype-targeted therapies.