Analysis of similarities and differences between transient symptomatic zinc deficiency and acrodermatitis enteropathica in children: a case report of a Chinese Yi-ethnic infant.

BACKGROUND: Transient symptomatic zinc deficiency (TSZD), an acquired type of zinc deficiency, is a rare, but probably underrecognized disease, extremely in breastfed premature with low birthweight infants. Its clinical manefestations are similar to Acrodermatitis enteropathica (AE), which is a genetic zinc absorption disorder caused by SLC39A4 gene mutations. This gene encodes a member of the zinc/iron-regulated transporter-like protein (ZIP) family. The encoded protein localizes to cell membranes and is required for zinc uptake in the intestine. TSZD is often misdiagnosed as AE because of their extremely similar manefestations, characterized by a typical rash. Therefore, the differention between them is still a clinical challenging. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we present a case of TSZD in a 4 month and 23 days female Chinese Yi-ethnic premature with AE-like skin lesions, mainly presenting periorificial, perianal and perineal crusted, eroded, erythemato-squamous eruption. Laboratory examination showed the patient's blood zinc level was significantly decreased. Further sequencing of the SLC39A4 gene showed no mutation in the infant and her parents. Skin lesions significantly improved after 6 days of initial zinc supplementation (3 mg/kg/d), and maintenance treatment with 1 mg/kg/day of zinc was discontinued after 8 months without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical manifestations of TSZD and AE are extremely similar, leading to a high rate of clinical misdiagnosis. While genetic analysis of the SLC39A4 gene is a reliable method for differentiating TSZD from AE. It is recommended that SLC39A4 gene test should be performed as far as possible in children with AE-like rash.

Blood immune cell profiling in adults with longstanding type 1 diabetes is associated with macrovascular complications.

Aims/hypothesis: There is increasing evidence for heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D): not only the age of onset and disease progression rate differ, but also the risk of complications varies markedly. Consequently, the presence of different disease endotypes has been suggested. Impaired T and B cell responses have been established in newly diagnosed diabetes patients. We hypothesized that deciphering the immune cell profile in peripheral blood of adults with longstanding T1D may help to understand disease heterogeneity. Methods: Adult patients with longstanding T1D and healthy controls (HC) were recruited, and their blood immune cell profile was determined using multicolour flow cytometry followed by a machine-learning based elastic-net (EN) classification model. Hierarchical clustering was performed to identify patient-specific immune cell profiles. Results were compared to those obtained in matched healthy control subjects. Results: Hierarchical clustering analysis of flow cytometry data revealed three immune cell composition-based distinct subgroups of individuals: HCs, T1D-group-A and T1D-group-B. In general, T1D patients, as compared to healthy controls, showed a more active immune profile as demonstrated by a higher percentage and absolute number of neutrophils, monocytes, total B cells and activated CD4+CD25+ T cells, while the abundance of regulatory T cells (Treg) was reduced. Patients belonging to T1D-group-A, as compared to T1D-group-B, revealed a more proinflammatory phenotype characterized by a lower percentage of FOXP3+ Treg, higher proportions of CCR4 expressing CD4 and CD8 T cell subsets, monocyte subsets, a lower Treg/conventional Tcell (Tconv) ratio, an increased proinflammatory cytokine (TNFα, IFNγ) and a decreased anti-inflammatory (IL-10) producing potential. Clinically, patients in T1D-group-A had more frequent diabetes-related macrovascular complications. Conclusions: Machine-learning based classification of multiparameter flow cytometry data revealed two distinct immunological profiles in adults with longstanding type 1 diabetes; T1D-group-A and T1D-group-B. T1D-group-A is characterized by a stronger pro-inflammatory profile and is associated with a higher rate of diabetes-related (macro)vascular complications.