Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
1.
J Intensive Care Med ; 38(7): 643-650, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36802976

RESUMEN

Acutely elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) may have devastating effects on patient mortality and neurologic outcomes, yet its initial detection remains difficult because of the variety of manifestations that it can cause disease states it is associated with. Several treatment guidelines exist for specific disease processes such as trauma or ischemic stroke, but their recommendations may not apply to other causes. In the acute setting, management decisions must often be made before the underlying cause is known. In this review, we present an organized, evidence-based approach to the recognition and management of patients with suspected or confirmed elevated ICP in the first minutes to hours of resuscitation. We explore the utility of invasive and noninvasive methods of diagnosis, including history, physical examination, imaging, and ICP monitors. We synthesize various guidelines and expert recommendations and identify core management principles including noninvasive maneuvers, neuroprotective intubation and ventilation strategies, and pharmacologic therapies such as ketamine, lidocaine, corticosteroids, and the hyperosmolar agents mannitol and hypertonic saline. Although an in-depth discussion of the definitive management of each etiology is beyond the scope of this review, our goal is to provide an empirical approach to these time-sensitive, critical presentations in their initial stages.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Lesiones Encefálicas , Hipertensión Intracraneal , Humanos , Manitol/farmacología , Manitol/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión Intracraneal/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Intracraneal/etiología , Hipertensión Intracraneal/terapia , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Solución Salina Hipertónica/farmacología , Presión Intracraneal
2.
J Intensive Care Med ; 36(12): 1385-1391, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33375916

RESUMEN

Sepsis is a common disease process encountered by physicians. Sepsis can lead to septic shock, which carries a hospital mortality rate in excess of 40%. Although the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines recommend targeting a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg and normalization of lactate, these endpoints do not necessarily result in tissue perfusion in states of shock. While MAP and lactate are commonly used markers in resuscitation, clinicians may be able to improve their resuscitation by broadening their assessment of the microcirculation, which more adequately reflects tissue perfusion. As such, in order to achieve a successful resuscitation, clinicians must optimize both macrocirculatory (MAP, cardiac output) and microcirculatory (proportion of perfused vessels, lactate, mottling, capillary refill time) endpoints. This review will summarize various macrocirculatory and microcirculatory markers of perfusion that can be used to guide the initial resuscitation of patients with sepsis.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Ácido Láctico , Microcirculación , Resucitación , Sepsis/terapia , Choque Séptico/terapia
3.
J Intensive Care Med ; 36(8): 937-944, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32666869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frailty is characterized by vulnerability to stressors due to an accumulation of multiple functional deficits. Frailty is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for accelerated functional decline, increasing dependency, and risk of mortality. The objective of this study was to examine the association of frailty, at the time of critical care admission, with days alive at home and health care costs post-discharge. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used linked administrative data (2010-2016) in Ontario, Canada. We identified all patients admitted at the intensive care unit (ICU), aged 19 years and above, assessed using the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC), within 6 months prior to index hospitalization including an ICU stay. Patients were stratified as robust, pre-frail, or frail based on a validated Frailty Index. The primary outcome was days alive at home in the year after admission. Secondary outcomes included mortality, health care-associated costs, ICU interventions, long-term care admissions, and hospital readmissions. RESULTS: Frail patients spent significantly fewer days at home within 1 year of index hospitalization (mean 159 days vs 223 days in robust cohort, P < .001). Mortality was higher among frail patients at 1 year (59.6% in the frail cohort vs 45.9% in robust patients; odds ratio for death 1.59 [1.49-1.69]). Frail patients also had higher rates of long-term care admission within 1 year (30.1% vs 10.6% in robust patients). Total health care-associated costs per person alive were $30 450 higher the year after admission in the frail cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty prior to ICU admission among patients who were eligible for RAI-HC assessment was associated with higher mortality and fewer days spent at home following admission. Frail patients had markedly higher rates of long-term care admission and increased costs per life saved following critical illness. These findings add to the discussion of risk-benefit trade-offs for ICU admission.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Cuidados Posteriores , Anciano , Enfermedad Crítica , Anciano Frágil , Humanos , Ontario/epidemiología , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Intensive Care Med ; 35(12): 1556-1563, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31512559

RESUMEN

Resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest can be one of the most challenging scenarios in acute-care medicine. The devastating effects of postcardiac arrest syndrome carry a substantial morbidity and mortality that persist long after return of spontaneous circulation. Management of these patients requires the clinician to simultaneously address multiple emergent priorities including the resuscitation of the patient and the efficient diagnosis and management of the underlying etiology. This review provides a concise evidence-based overview of the core concepts involved in the early postcardiac arrest resuscitation. It will highlight the components of an effective management strategy including addressing hemodynamic, oxygenation, and ventilation goals as well as carefully considering cardiac catheterization and targeted temperature management. An organized approach is paramount to providing effective care to patients in this vulnerable time period.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Hipotermia Inducida , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Cuidados Críticos , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia
5.
Can J Anaesth ; 67(10): 1417-1423, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32394338

RESUMEN

Symptom management and end-of-life care are core skills for all physicians, although in ordinary times many anesthesiologists have fewer occasions to use these skills. The current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant mortality over a short time and has necessitated an increase in provision of both critical care and palliative care. For anesthesiologists deployed to units caring for patients with COVID-19, this narrative review provides guidance on conducting goals of care discussions, withdrawing life-sustaining measures, and managing distressing symptoms.


RéSUMé: La prise en charge des symptômes et les soins de fin de vie sont des compétences de base pour tous les médecins, bien qu'en temps ordinaire, de nombreux anesthésiologistes n'ont que peu d'occasions de mettre en pratique ces compétences. La pandémie actuelle de coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) a provoqué un taux de mortalité significatif dans un court intervalle et a nécessité une augmentation des besoins en soins intensifs et en soins palliatifs. Destiné aux anesthésiologistes déployés dans les unités prenant soin de patients atteints de la COVID-19, ce compte rendu narratif offre des recommandations quant à la façon de mener les discussions à propos des objectifs de soins, du retrait des thérapies de soutien vital, et de la prise en charge de symptômes de détresse.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Cuidado Terminal/organización & administración , Anestesiólogos/organización & administración , Anestesiólogos/normas , COVID-19 , Competencia Clínica , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Pandemias , Médicos/organización & administración , Médicos/normas , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Privación de Tratamiento
6.
J Intensive Care Med ; 34(8): 603-608, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30068253

RESUMEN

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease process encountered in the acute care setting. It presents on a spectrum of severity with the most severe presentations carrying a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, a wide range of competing treatment strategies have been proposed for the high-risk PE including new catheter-based and extracorporeal techniques, and management has become more challenging. There is currently no consensus as to the optimal approach to treatment. Contemporary management decisions are informed by the balance between the risk of deterioration and the risk of harm from intervention, within the available resources. This review will summarize the current evidence to better inform clinical decision-making in high-risk PE and highlight future directions in management.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Enfermedad Crítica , Embolectomía/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Resucitación/métodos , Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos
7.
J Intensive Care Med ; 34(2): 109-114, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28443389

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION:: With an aging population and increasing numbers of intensive care unit admissions, novel ways of providing quality care at reduced cost are required. Closed neurointensive care units improve outcomes for patients with critical neurological conditions, including decreased mortality and length of stay (LOS). Small studies have demonstrated the safety of intermediate-level units for selected patient populations. However, few studies analyze both cost and safety outcomes of these units. This retrospective study assessed clinical and cost-related outcomes in an intermediate-level neurosciences acute care unit (NACU) before and after the addition of an intensivist to the unit's care team. METHODS:: Starting in October 2011, an intensivist-led model was adopted in a 16-bed NACU unit, including daytime coverage by a dedicated intensivist. Data were obtained from all patients admitted 1 year prior to and 2 years after this intervention. Primary outcomes were LOS and hospital costs. Safety outcomes included mortality and readmissions. Descriptive and analytic statistics were calculated. Individual and total patient costs were calculated based on per-day NACU and ward cost estimates and significance measured using bootstrapping. RESULTS:: A total of 2931 patients were included over the study period. Patients were on average 59.5 years and 53% male. The most common reasons for admission were central nervous system (CNS) tumor (27.6%), ischemic stroke (27%), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (11%). Following the introduction of an intensivist, there was a significant reduction in NACU and hospital LOS, by 1 day and 3 days, respectively. There were no differences in readmissions or mortality. Adding an intensivist produced an individual cost savings of US$963 in NACU and US$2687 per patient total hospital stay. CONCLUSION:: An intensivist-led model of intermediate-level neurointensive care staffed by intensivists is safe, decreases LOS, and produces cost savings in a system increasingly strained to provide quality neurocritical care.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/terapia , Ahorro de Costo , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Costos de Hospital , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Personal de Hospital , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
J Intensive Care Med ; : 885066618803883, 2018 Oct 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30336712
9.
Crit Care Res Pract ; 2022: 4815734, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36466715

RESUMEN

Background: Nighttime and weekends in hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) contexts are thought to present a greater risk for adverse events than daytime admissions. Although some studies exist comparing admission time with patient outcomes, the results are contradictory. No studies currently exist comparing costs with the time of admission. We investigated the differences in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality, and cost between daytime and nighttime admissions. Methods: All adult patients (≥18 years of age) admitted to a large academic medical-surgical ICU between 2011 and 2015 were included. Admission cohorts were defined as daytime (8:00-16:59) or nighttime (17:00-07:59). Student's t-tests and chi-squared tests were used to test for associations between days spent in the ICU, days on mechanical ventilation, comorbidities, diagnoses, and cohort membership. Regression analysis was used to test for associations between patient and hospitalization characteristics and in-hospital mortality and total ICU costs. Results: The majority of admissions occurred during nighttime hours (69.5%) with no difference in the overall Elixhauser comorbidity score between groups (p=0.22). Overall ICU length of stay was 7.96 days for daytime admissions compared to 7.07 days (p=0.001) for patients admitted during nighttime hours. Overall mortality was significantly higher in daytime admissions (22.5% vs 20.6, p=0.012); however, ICU mortality was not different. The average MODS was 2.9 with those admitted during the daytime having a significantly higher MODS (3.0, p=0.046). Total ICU cost was significantly higher for daytime admissions (p=0.003). Adjusted ICU mortality was similar in both groups despite an increased rate of adverse events for nighttime admissions. Daytime admissions were associated with increased cost. There was no difference in all hospital total cost or all hospital direct cost between groups. These findings are likely due to the higher severity of illness in daytime admissions. Conclusion: Daytime admissions were associated with a higher severity of illness, mortality rate, and ICU cost. To further account for the effect of staffing differences during off-hours, it may be beneficial to compare weekday and weeknight admission times with associated mortality rates.

10.
CJEM ; 22(6): 764-767, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33028458

RESUMEN

A 67-year-old male presents to the emergency department (ED) in respiratory distress secondary to pneumonia. His oxygen saturation is 86% on a nonrebreather, respiratory rate is 32 respirations/minute, blood pressure 147/72 mmHg, heart rate 121 beats/minute, and temperature is 38.7° Celsius. The decision is made to intubate the patient. Fentanyl and propofol are used for analgesia and sedation, and rocuronium is used for paralysis. Using video laryngoscopy, the patient is successfully intubated, and now the ED team is awaiting your orders for the postintubation sedation care of this patient.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Propofol , Anciano , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fentanilo , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Masculino , Propofol/efectos adversos
11.
Chest ; 158(5): 2082-2089, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32422131

RESUMEN

Ultrasound examination of the thorax is superior to chest radiograph or physical examination for diagnosing common conditions such as pneumonia, pulmonary edema, pleural effusion, and pneumothorax. The basic skill set is straightforward to learn, quick to perform, repeatable, and does not involve patient transport, harmful ionizing radiation, or waiting time. This paper outlines the basic building blocks that makeup a thoracic ultrasound examination, regardless of which specific scanning protocol is performed. Narrative videos and illustrative figures demonstrating these techniques are included.


Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas , Enfermedades Torácicas/diagnóstico , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
12.
Chest ; 157(2): 369-375, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31654617

RESUMEN

Peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter insertion is the most commonly performed procedure in hospitals. Multiple patient factors can make PIV insertion challenging, and ultrasound guidance has been demonstrated to improve the rate of success in these difficult patients. This article outlines the suggested techniques for the ultrasound-guided insertion of PIV catheters, midline catheters, and peripherally inserted central catheters. Illustrative figures and narrative videos demonstrating these techniques are included.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Humanos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular
13.
Chest ; 157(3): 574-579, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31634448

RESUMEN

Arterial catheterization is frequently performed in ICUs to facilitate hemodynamic monitoring and frequent blood sampling. Overall, arterial catheterization has high success and low complication rates, but in patients who are critically ill, the incidence of failure is higher because of hypotension, peripheral edema, and obesity. Ultrasound guidance significantly increases the likelihood of successful cannulation and decreases complications compared with traditional landmark-based techniques. Multiple ultrasound techniques for radial and femoral arterial catheter insertion have been described; this paper presents an approach for incorporating these tools into bedside practice, including illustrative figures and narrated video presentations to demonstrate the techniques described.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Aneurisma Falso/epidemiología , Embolia por Colesterol/epidemiología , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Espacio Retroperitoneal , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos
20.
CJEM ; 20(5): 762-769, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29502553

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although older patients are a high-risk population in the emergency department (ED), little is known about those identified as "less acute" at triage. We aimed to describe the outcomes of patients ages 65 years and older who receive low acuity triage scores. METHODS: This health records review assessed ED patients who were ages 65 years and above or ages 40 to 55 years (controls) who received a Canadian Triage Acuity Scale score of 4 or 5. Data collected included patient demographics, ED management, disposition, and a return visit or hospital admission at 14 days. Data were analysed descriptively and chi-square testing performed. A pre-planned stratified analysis of patients ages 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85 and older was conducted. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty older patients with a mean age of 76.5 years and 150 control patients were included. Most patients presented with musculoskeletal or skin complaints and were triaged to the ambulatory care area. Older patients were significantly more likely than controls to be admitted on the index visit (5.0% v. 0.3%, p=0.016) and on re-presentation (4.0% v. 0.7%, p=0.045). In a subgroup analysis, patients ages 85 years and above were most likely to be admitted (8.9%, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients who present to the ED with issues labelled as "less acute" at triage are 16 times more likely to be admitted than younger controls. Patients ages 85 years and up are the primary drivers of this higher admission rate. Our study indicates that even "low acuity" elders presenting to the ED are at risk for re-presentation and admission within 14 days.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación Geriátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA