Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 65
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 8: CD009679, 2024 08 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39171616

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures, which are intra-articular injuries of the knee joint, are often difficult to treat and have a high complication rate, including early-onset osteoarthritis. The most common treatment for complex tibial plateau fractures is surgical fixation. Additionally, orthopaedic surgeons often use bone defect fillers to address bone defects caused by the injury. Currently, there is no consensus on the best method of fixation and on whether bone defect fillers are necessary. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of different surgical interventions and bone defect fillers for treating tibial plateau fractures. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trial registries up to March 2023. We also searched conference proceedings and the grey literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing surgical interventions for treating tibial plateau fractures and different types of filler for bone defects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened search results, selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our primary outcomes (and the specific measures we considered most relevant) were generic quality of life (general health score in the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)), patient-reported lower limb function (Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score), and adverse events (frequency of unplanned reoperation). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 15 trials in the review, with a total of 948 adult participants. Nine trials compared different types of fixation, and six trials evaluated different types of bone graft substitutes. All 15 trials were small and at high risk of bias. We considered most available evidence to be of very low certainty, meaning we have very little confidence in the results. Only limited pooling was possible. One trial compared circular fixation combined with insertion of percutaneous screws (hybrid fixation) versus standard open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 82 people with open or closed Schatzker types V or VI tibial plateau fractures. At 24 months' follow-up, hybrid fixation compared with ORIF may have little or no effect on SF-36 general health score (MD 6 points higher, 95% CI 7.7 points lower to 19.7 points higher; 66 participants), patient-reported lower limb function according to the HSS score (MD 7 points higher, 95% CI 2.4 points lower to 16.4 points higher; 66 participants), or frequency of unplanned reoperation (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.32; 83 fractures (82 participants)). However, the evidence for all three outcomes is very uncertain. Three trials (with 242 participants) compared single-plating ORIF versus double-plating ORIF. There may be little to know difference in patient-reported lower limb function (HSS score) at 24 months' follow-up in people who undergo single-plating ORIF compared with those who undergo double-plating ORIF (MD 0.2 points higher, 95% CI 2.12 points lower to 2.52 points higher; 1 study, 84 participants), but the evidence is very uncertain. There were no data for quality of life or unplanned reoperation at 24 months' follow-up. Six trials (including 368 participants) compared bone substitute versus autologous bone graft (autograft) for managing bone defects. No trials reported SF-36 general health score, HSS score, or frequency of unplanned reoperation at 24 months' follow-up. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to ascertain the best method of fixation or the best method of addressing bone defects during surgery in people with tibial plateau fractures. Further well-designed RCTs with larger sample sizes are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Calidad de Vida , Fracturas de la Meseta Tibial , Adulto , Humanos , Sesgo , Sustitutos de Huesos/uso terapéutico , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Intraarticulares/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Fracturas de la Meseta Tibial/cirugía
2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 1: CD008106, 2023 01 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36692346

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patellar (knee cap) dislocation occurs when the patella disengages completely from the trochlear (femoral) groove. It affects up to 42/100,000 people, and is most prevalent in those aged 20 to 30 years old. It is uncertain whether surgical or non-surgical treatment is the best approach. This is important as recurrent dislocation occurs in up to 40% of people who experience a first time (primary) dislocation. This can reduce quality of life and as a result people have to modify their lifestyle. This review is needed to determine whether surgical or non-surgical treatment should be offered to people after patellar dislocation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating people with primary or recurrent patellar dislocation. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database and trial registries in December 2021. We contacted corresponding authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating primary or recurrent lateral patellar dislocation in adults or children. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were recurrent patellar dislocation, and patient-rated knee and physical function scores. Our secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, return to former activities, knee pain during activity or at rest, adverse events, patient-reported satisfaction, patient-reported knee instability symptoms and subsequent requirement for knee surgery. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 studies (eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and two quasi-RCTs) of 519 participants with patellar dislocation. The mean ages in the individual studies ranged from 13.0 to 27.2 years. Four studies included children, mainly adolescents, as well as adults; two only recruited children. Study follow-up ranged from one to 14 years. We are unsure of the evidence for all outcomes in this review because we judged the certainty of the evidence to be very low. We downgraded each outcome by three levels. Reasons included imprecision (when fewer than 100 events were reported or the confidence interval (CI) indicated appreciable benefits as well as harms), risk of bias (when studies were at high risk of performance, detection and attrition bias), and inconsistency (in the event that pooled analysis included high levels of statistical heterogeneity). We are uncertain whether surgery lowers the risk of recurrent dislocation following primary patellar dislocation compared with non-surgical management at two to nine year follow-up. Based on an illustrative risk of recurrent dislocation in 348 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, we found that 157 fewer people per 1000 (95% CI 209 fewer to 87 fewer) had recurrent dislocation between two and nine years after surgery (8 studies, 438 participants). We are uncertain whether surgery improves patient-rated knee and function scores. Studies measured this outcome using different scales (the Tegner activity scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm, Kujala Patellofemoral Disorders score and Hughston visual analogue scale). The most frequently reported score was the Kujala Patellofemoral Disorders score. This indicated people in the surgical group had a mean score of 5.73 points higher at two to nine year follow-up (95% CI 2.91 lower to 14.37 higher; 7 studies, 401 participants). On this 100-point scale, higher scores indicate better function, and a change score of 10 points is considered to be clinically meaningful; therefore, this CI includes a possible meaningful improvement. We are uncertain whether surgery increases the risk of adverse events. Based on an assumed risk of overall incidence of complications during the first two years in 277 people out of 1000 in the non-surgical group, 335 more people per 1000 (95% CI 75 fewer to 723 more) had an adverse event in the surgery group (2 studies, 144 participants). Three studies (176 participants) assessed participant satisfaction at two to nine year follow-up, reporting little difference between groups. Based on an assumed risk of 763 per 1000 non-surgical participants reporting excellent or good outcomes, seven more participants per 1000 (95% CI 199 fewer to 237 more) reported excellent or good satisfaction. Four studies (256 participants) assessed recurrent patellar subluxation at two to nine year follow-up. Based on an assumed risk of patellar subluxation in 292 out of 1000 in the non-surgical group, 73 fewer people per 1000 (95% CI 146 fewer to 35 more) had patellar subluxation as a result of surgery. Slightly more people had subsequent surgery in the non-surgical group. Pooled two to nine year follow-up data from three trials (195 participants) indicated that, based on an assumed risk of subsequent surgery in 215 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, 118 fewer people per 1000 (95% CI 200 fewer to 372 more) had subsequent surgery after primary surgery. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain whether surgery improves outcome compared to non-surgical management as the certainty of the evidence was very low. No sufficiently powered trial has examined people with recurrent patellar dislocation. Adequately powered, multicentre, randomised trials are needed. To inform the design and conduct of these trials, expert consensus should be achieved on the minimal description of both surgical and non-surgical interventions, and the pathological variations that may be relevant to both choice of these interventions.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Luxación de la Rótula , Adulto , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Luxación de la Rótula/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla , Rótula , Calidad de Vida
3.
Chin J Traumatol ; 26(5): 276-283, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36804261

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Scar assessment tools can be utilized during the post-operative period to monitor scar progress. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current subjective scar assessment scales utilized in orthopaedic surgery. The secondary aim was to identify determinants of patients' satisfaction with their scars and evaluate current measurement scales. METHODS: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses checklist was followed. Electronic databases, currently registered studies, conference proceedings and the reference lists of included studies were searched. There were no constraints based on language or publication status. A narrative synthesis provided a description and evaluation of scales utilized in orthopaedic surgery. Determinants of patient satisfaction were identified along with the scales used to measure satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 6059 records were screened in the initial search. Twenty-six articles satisfied the inclusion criteria, assessing 7130 patients. In the literature, six validated subjective scar scales were identified, including the Vancouver scar scale, patient and observer scar assessment scale, Manchester scar scale, Stony Brook scar evaluation scale, visual analogue scale, and Hollander wound evaluation scale. Studies utilizing these scales to evaluate scars following orthopaedic procedures did so successfully. These were total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, and limb reconstruction. The scales demonstrated satisfactory validity. Functional outcomes such as restoration of movement ranked among patients' highest concerns. Scar cosmesis was found to be amongst patients' lowest priorities. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective scar assessment scales identified in the literature were not designed specifically for orthopaedic surgery. However, these were able to appropriately assess scars in the studies identified in this review. Current evidence suggests the effect of scar cosmesis on patient satisfaction with orthopaedic procedures is limited.


Asunto(s)
Cicatriz , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Humanos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Dimensión del Dolor
4.
Chin J Traumatol ; 25(5): 277-282, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35039216

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Alcohol has been associated with 10%-35% trauma admissions and 40% trauma-related deaths globally. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United Kingdom entered a state of "lockdown" on March 23, 2020. Restrictions were most significantly eased on June 1, 2020, when shops and schools re-opened. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of lockdown on alcohol-related trauma admissions. METHODS: All adult patients admitted as "trauma calls" to a London major trauma centre during April 2018 and April 2019 (pre-lockdown, n = 316), and 1st April-31st May 2020 (lockdown, n = 191) had electronic patient records analysed retrospectively. Patients' blood alcohol level and records of intoxication were used to identify alcohol-related trauma. Trauma admissions from pre-lockdown and lockdown cohorts were compared using multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Alcohol-related trauma was present in a significantly higher proportion of adult trauma calls during lockdown (lockdown 60/191 (31.4%), vs. pre-lockdown 62/316 (19.6%); (odds ratio (OR): 0.83, 95% CI: 0.38-1.28, p < 0.001). Lockdown was also associated with increased weekend admissions of trauma (lockdown 125/191 weekend (65.5%) vs. pre-lockdown 179/316 (56.7%); OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.79 to -0.02, p = 0.041). No significant difference existed in the age, gender, or mechanism between pre-lockdown and lockdown cohorts (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The United Kingdom lockdown was independently associated with an increased proportion of alcohol-related trauma. Trauma admissions were increased during the weekend when staffing levels are reduced. With the possibility of further global "waves" of COVID-19, the long-term repercussions of dangerous alcohol-related behaviour to public health must be addressed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Centros Traumatológicos , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Humanos , Londres/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 30(3): 473-477, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31705403

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Management of major trauma patients with evidence of polytrauma involves the use of immediate whole-body CT (WBCT). Identification of patients appropriate for immediate WBCT remains challenging. Our study aimed to assess for improvement in patient selection for WBCT over time as a major trauma centre (MTC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who presented to our MTC during distinct two-month periods, one in 2013 and the other in 2017. Patients over 18 years of age who presented primarily following blunt trauma and activated a major trauma call were included. All patients underwent either immediate WBCT or standard ATLS workup. Those undergoing WBCT had the results of their scan recorded as positive or negative. RESULTS: A total of 516 patients were included, 232 from 2 months in 2013 and 284 from 2 months in 2017. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients undergoing WBCT (61.6% vs 59.5%), selective CT (31.9% vs 32.4%) or no CT (6.5% vs 8.1%) between the cohorts. There was no improvement in the rate of negative WBCT observed between 2013 and 2017 (47.6% vs 39.6%, p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: There was no improvement in patient selection for WBCT following trauma at our institution over a three-year period. Optimal patient selection presents an ongoing clinical challenge, with 39-47% of patients undergoing a scan demonstrating no injuries.


Asunto(s)
Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Imagen de Cuerpo Entero , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Imagen de Cuerpo Entero/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
6.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 29(8): 1795-1799, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31312954

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tibial fractures represent approximately 3-4% of reported fractures. Locked, intramedullary nails are commonly used to restore length and alignment and provide rotational stability. Few studies have assessed the complication rate of locking screws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of all patients who underwent tibial nailing at our institution between the 01/01/15 and 30/06/17. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year post-operatively. For inclusion, patients had to be over 16 years of age and had undergone tibial nail fixation following a traumatic fracture. Post-operative radiographs were used to assess the configuration and features of locking screws. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six individuals underwent tibial nailing over the 30-month period, with 95 followed up at least 1 year. Twenty-seven per cent of individuals reported pain attributed to locking screws at follow-up. Upon radiographic assessment, no significant difference was seen between symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts in terms of proud screw heads proximally (7% vs 5%, p > 0.99) or distally (14% vs 17%, p > 0.99), long screw tips proximally (52% vs 48%, p = 0.81) or distally (51% vs 50%, p > 0.99), or tibiofibular joint penetration proximally (31% vs 23%, p = 0.60). However, there was a higher incidence of distal tibiofibular joint penetration in symptomatic versus asymptomatic individuals (4% vs 25%, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Twenty-seven per cent of patients with a tibial nail report painful locking screws. Patients with symptomatic distal locking screws had a higher incidence of radiographic distal tibiofibular joint penetration.


Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Clavos Ortopédicos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven
8.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 24(9): 2798-2805, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25564195

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the most effective method for the treatment of the symptomatic bipartite patella. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was completed, and all studies assessing the management of a bipartite patella were included. Owing to the paucity of randomised controlled trials, a narrative review of 22 studies was completed. A range of treatments were assessed: conservative measures, open and arthroscopic fixation or excision and soft tissue release and excision. RESULTS: All of the methods provided results ranging from good to excellent, with acceptable complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: This is a poorly answered treatment question. No firm guidance can be given as to the most appropriate method of treating the symptomatic bipartite patella. This study suggests that there are a number of effective treatments with acceptable complication rates and it may be that treatments that conserve the patella are more appropriate for larger fragments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Asunto(s)
Artralgia/etiología , Enfermedades del Desarrollo Óseo/terapia , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades Inferiores/terapia , Rótula/anomalías , Artralgia/terapia , Enfermedades del Desarrollo Óseo/complicaciones , Humanos , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades Inferiores/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (2): CD008106, 2015 Feb 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25716704

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patellar dislocation occurs when the patella disengages completely from the trochlear (femoral) groove. Following reduction of the dislocation, conservative (non-surgical) rehabilitation with physiotherapy may be used. Since recurrence of dislocation is common, some surgeons have advocated surgical intervention rather than non-surgical interventions. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2011. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating people with primary or recurrent patellar dislocation. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, ZETOC, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and a variety of other literature databases and trial registries. Corresponding authors were contacted to identify additional studies. The last search was carried out in October 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating lateral patellar dislocation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently examined titles and abstracts of each identified study to assess study eligibility, extract data and assess risk of bias. The primary outcomes we assessed were the frequency of recurrent dislocation, and validated patient-rated knee or physical function scores. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences MD) for continuous outcomes. When appropriate, we pooled data. MAIN RESULTS: We included five randomised studies and one quasi-randomised study. These recruited a total of 344 people with primary (first-time) patellar dislocation. The mean ages in the individual studies ranged from 19.3 to 25.7 years, with four studies including children, mainly adolescents, as well as adults. Follow-up for the full study populations ranged from two to nine years across the six studies. The quality of the evidence is very low as assessed by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) criteria, with all studies being at high risk of performance and detection biases, relating to the lack of blinding.There was very low quality but consistent evidence that participants managed surgically had a significantly lower risk of recurrent dislocation following primary patellar dislocation at two to five years follow-up (21/162 versus 32/136; RR 0.53 favouring surgery, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.87; five studies, 294 participants). Based on an illustrative risk of recurrent dislocation in 222 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, these data equate to 104 fewer (95% CI 149 fewer to 28 fewer) people per 1000 having recurrent dislocation after surgery. Similarly, there is evidence of a lower risk of recurrent dislocation after surgery at six to nine years (RR 0.67 favouring surgery, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.08; two studies, 165 participants), but a small increase cannot be ruled out. Based on an illustrative risk of recurrent dislocation in 336 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, these data equate to 110 fewer (95% CI 195 fewer to 27 more) people per 1000 having recurrent dislocation after surgery.The very low quality evidence available from single trials only for four validated patient-rated knee and physical function scores (the Tegner activity scale, KOOS, Lysholm and Hughston VAS (visual analogue scale) score) did not show significant differences between the two treatment groups.The results for the Kujala patellofemoral disorders score (0 to 100: best outcome) differed in direction of effect at two to five years follow-up, which favoured the surgery group (MD 13.93 points higher, 95% CI 5.33 points higher to 22.53 points higher; four studies, 171 participants) and the six to nine years follow-up, which favoured the non-surgical treatment group (MD 3.25 points lower, 95% CI 10.61 points lower to 4.11 points higher; two studies, 167 participants). However, only the two to five years follow-up included the clear possibility of a clinically important effect (putative minimal clinically important difference for this outcome is 10 points).Adverse effects of treatment were reported in one trial only; all four major complications were attributed to the surgical treatment group. Slightly more people in the surgery group had subsequent surgery six to nine years after their primary dislocation (20/87 versus 16/78; RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.89, two studies, 165 participants). Based on an illustrative risk of subsequent surgery in 186 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, these data equate to 11 more (95% CI 76 fewer to 171 more) people per 1000 having subsequent surgery after primary surgery. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there is some evidence to support surgical over non-surgical management of primary patellar dislocation in the short term, the quality of this evidence is very low because of the high risk of bias and the imprecision in the effect estimates. We are therefore very uncertain about the estimate of effect. No trials examined people with recurrent patellar dislocation. Adequately powered, multi-centre, randomised controlled trials, conducted and reported to contemporary standards, are needed. To inform the design and conduct of these trials, expert consensus should be achieved on the minimal description of both surgical and non-surgical interventions, and the anatomical or pathological variations that may be relevant to both choice of these interventions and the natural history of patellar instability. Furthermore, well-designed studies recording adverse events and long-term outcomes are needed.


Asunto(s)
Luxación de la Rótula/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Luxación de la Rótula/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto Joven
10.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (9): CD009679, 2015 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26370268

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the tibial plateau, which are intra-articular injuries of the knee joint, are often difficult to treat and have a high complication rate, including early-onset osteoarthritis. Surgical fixation is usually used for more complex tibial plateau fractures. Additionally, bone void fillers are often used to address bone defects caused by the injury. Currently there is no consensus on either the best method of fixation or bone void filler. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of different surgical interventions, and the use of bone void fillers, for treating tibial plateau fractures. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (12 September 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2014 Issue 8), MEDLINE (1946 to September Week 1 2014), EMBASE (1974 to 2014 Week 36), trial registries (4 July 2014), conference proceedings and grey literature (4 July 2014). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials comparing surgical interventions for treating tibial plateau fractures and the different types of filler for filling bone defects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened search results, selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Only very limited pooling, using the fixed-effect model, was possible. Our primary outcomes were quality of life measures, patient-reported outcome measures of lower limb function and serious adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: We included six trials in the review, with a total of 429 adult participants, the majority of whom were male (63%). Three trials evaluated different types of fixation and three analysed different types of bone graft substitutes. All six trials were small and at substantial risk of bias. We judged the quality of most of the available evidence to be very low, meaning that we are very uncertain about these results.One trial compared the use of a circular fixator combined with insertion of percutaneous screws (hybrid fixation) versus standard open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in people with open or closed Schatzker types V or VI tibial plateau fractures. Results (66 participants) for quality of life scores using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function scores tended to favour hybrid fixation, but a benefit of ORIF could not be ruled out. Participants in the hybrid fixation group had a lower risk for an unplanned reoperation (351 per 1000 people compared with 450 in the ORIF group; 95% CI 197 fewer to 144 more) and were more likely to have returned to their pre-injury activity level (303 per 1000 people, compared with 121 in the ORIF group; 95% CI 15 fewer to 748 more). Results of the two groups were comparable for the WOMAC pain subscale and stiffness scores, but mean knee range of motion values were higher in the hybrid group.Another trial compared the use of a minimally invasive plate (LISS system) versus double-plating ORIF in 84 people who had open or closed bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Nearly twice as many participants (22 versus 12) in the ORIF group had a bone graft. Quality of life, pain, knee range of motion and return to pre-injury activity were not reported. The trial provided no evidence of differences in HSS knee scores, complications or reoperation entailing implant removal or revision fixation. A quasi-randomised trial comparing arthroscopically-assisted percutaneous reduction and internal fixation versus standard ORIF reported results at 14 months in 58 people with closed Schatzker types II or III tibial plateau fracture. Quality of life, pain and return to pre-injury activity were not reported. There was very low quality evidence of higher HSS knee scores and higher knee range of motion values in the arthroscopically assisted group. No reoperations were reported.Three trials compared different types of bone substitute versus autologous bone graft (autograft) for managing bone defects. Quality of life, pain and return to pre-injury activity were not reported. Only one trial (25 participants) reported on lower limb function, finding good or excellent results in both groups for walking, climbing stairs, squatting and jumping at 12 months. The incidences of individual complications were similar between groups in all three trials. One trial found no cases of inflammatory response in the 20 participants receiving bone substitute, and two found no complications associated with the donor site in the autograft group (58 participants). However, all 38 participants in the autologous iliac bone graft group of one trial reported prolonged pain from the harvest site. Two trials reported similar range of motion results in the two groups, whereas the third trial favoured the bone substitute group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is insufficient evidence to ascertain the best method of fixation or the best method of addressing bone defects during surgery. However, the evidence does not contradict approaches aiming to limit soft-tissue dissection and damage or to avoid autograft donor site complications through using bone substitutes. Further well-designed, larger randomised trials are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adulto , Sustitutos de Huesos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante Óseo , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
11.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 49: 102355, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38356689

RESUMEN

Introduction: Fractures occur in children at an incidence only surpassed by women >85 years and account for 25 % of paediatric injuries. Over the last three decades, there has been a trend towards operative management of children's fractures including utilisation of flexible nails as popularised by the Nancy group in the 1980s. Between 5 and 11 % of paediatric forearm fractures are now fixed in this manner with complication rates of 12-42 %. This study shares the experience of a paediatric level one major trauma centre using this technique in managing long bone fractures in children. Methods and materials: This retrospective cohort study comprises a sequential series of 109 cases (71 children) of upper and lower limb fractures in children (aged 16 years and below) who underwent fracture fixation using flexible intramedullary nails between 1st April 2015 and 31st March 2019. Radiological and clinical outcomes and complications were assessed. Results: Ninety-three cases (10 in the lower limb, 83 in the upper limb) satisfied the inclusion criteria in 57 children with a mean age of 8.6 years. All cases were successfully reduced intra-operatively and 92 (98.9 %) achieved union. Taking into account all complications in the upper and lower limb, the overall complication rate is 30.1 % (28 cases) with the vast majority (13 cases, 46.4 %) occurring in the upper limb due to prominence of metalwork prompting early removal. Conclusions: This study has shown flexible intramedullary nailing to perform well with good stabilisation of a wide variety of paediatric long bone fractures with restoration of bone alignment, satisfactory outcomes with good union rates and a return to normal function. The technique is also safe and in the upper limb can be performed as day-case surgery by a generalist orthopaedic surgeon. Although the overall complication rate is not insignificant, major complications are rare.

12.
Bone Jt Open ; 5(8): 637-643, 2024 08 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39103162

RESUMEN

Aims: Our primary aim was to establish the proportion of female orthopaedic consultants who perform arthroplasty via cases submitted to the National Joint Registry (NJR), which covers England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man, and Guernsey. Secondary aims included comparing time since specialist registration, private practice participation, and number of hospitals worked in between male and female surgeons. Methods: Publicly available data from the NJR was extracted on the types of arthroplasty performed by each surgeon, and the number of procedures of each type undertaken. Each surgeon was cross-referenced with the General Medical Council (GMC) website, using GMC number to extract surgeon demographic data. These included sex, region of practice, and dates of full and specialist registration. Results: Of 2,895 surgeons contributing to the NJR in 2023, 102 (4%) were female. The highest proportions of female surgeons were among those who performed elbow (n = 25; 5%), shoulder (n = 24; 4%), and ankle (n = 8; 4%) arthroplasty. Hip (n = 66; 3%) and knee arthroplasty (n = 39; 2%) had the lowest female representation. Female surgeons had been practising for a median of 10.4 years since specialist registration compared to 13.7 years for males (p < 0.001). Northern Ireland was the region with the highest proportion of female arthroplasty surgeons (8%). A greater proportion of male surgeons worked in private practice (63% vs 24%; p < 0.001) and in multiple hospitals (74% vs 40%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Only 4% of surgeons currently contributing cases to the NJR are female, with the highest proportion performing elbow arthroplasty (5%). Female orthopaedic surgeons in the NJR are earlier in their careers than male surgeons, and are less involved in private practice. There is a wide geographical variation in the proportion of female arthroplasty surgeons.

13.
Acta Orthop Belg ; 79(6): 672-9, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24563973

RESUMEN

This study aimed to identify, by systematic review of the literature, whether intra-articular steroid injection before total joint replacement confers an increased risk of post-operative deep prosthetic infection. All studies assessing the incidence of deep prosthetic infection in patients who had undergone steroid injection in the same joint were included. A mixed meta-analysis and narrative review of 12 studies with 2068 participants was conducted. Steroid injection prior to total joint replacement was found to confer no increased risk of deep or superficial prosthetic infection (CI = 95%). We found no evidence of a link between injection and deep joint infection, and conclude that this is a safe procedure when conducted with aseptic precautions. We suggest a prospective randomised control trial to provide conclusive data on this question.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/inducido químicamente , Terapia Combinada , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología
14.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 23(3): 335-44, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23412284

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) and multidetector arrays in CT arthrography (MDCT) for assessing chondral lesions in the hip joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the published and unpublished literature databases was performed to identify all studies reporting the diagnostic test accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) of MRI, MRA or MDCT for the assessment of adults with chondral (cartilage) lesions of the hip with surgical comparison (arthroscopic or open) as the reference test. All included studies were reviewed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies appraisal tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals using a random-effects meta-analysis for MRI, MRA and MDCT imaging. RESULTS: Eighteen studies satisfied the eligibility criteria. These included 648 hips from 637 patients. MRI indicated a pooled sensitivity of 0.59 (95 % CI: 0.49-0.70) and specificity of 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.90-0.97), and MRA sensitivity and specificity values were 0.62 (95 % CI: 0.57-0.66) and 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.83-0.89), respectively. The diagnostic test accuracy for the detection of hip joint cartilage lesions is currently superior for MRI compared with MRA. There were insufficient data to perform meta-analysis for MDCT or CTA protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current limited diagnostic test accuracy of the use of magnetic resonance or CT, arthroscopy remains the most accurate method of assessing chondral lesions in the hip joint.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/diagnóstico , Cartílago Articular/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Artrografía , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/patología , Cartílago Articular/patología , Femenino , Articulación de la Cadera/patología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
15.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 23(1): 1-11, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23412402

RESUMEN

The Fixion(™) system (Disc-O-Tech Medical Technologies, Herzeliya, Israel), which is currently the only expandable nailing system available for use in the humerus, has a number of purported advantages over the standard locked humeral nail, including a reduction in operating and fluoroscopy time since locking screws are not required. A systematic review was undertaken of all published (AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE and Medline via the Ovid platform) and unpublished or grey literature research databases from inception until 1st December 2010. Demographic data, clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications were extracted from each study by two independent investigators, and each study underwent independent critical appraisal using the CASP appraisal tool. Thirteen studies were deemed eligible for review, identified from a total of 154 citations. These included a total of 176 patients with 180 fractured humeri treated with expandable nails. Overall, 7.8% of humeral fractures treated with an expandable nail went on to non-union. Intra- and post-operative device failure rate was found to be 1.1 and 2.8%, respectively. These data compare favourably to published data on the outcome of locked humeral nails. However, there were numerous methodological flaws in the current evidence base; there were no comparative studies, treatment groups were heterogeneous, and there was no blinding of assessors or patients. Initial data indicate that the expandable humeral nail may be an acceptable form of treatment for humeral fracture or impending fracture, but high-quality comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas no Consolidadas/etiología , Fracturas no Consolidadas/cirugía , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/complicaciones , Fracturas del Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Radiografía , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Knee Surg ; 36(2): 153-158, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34187065

RESUMEN

Chondral injury is a serious consequence of patellar dislocation and patellofemoral instability (PFI). There is limited data on the relationship between radiological features such as sulcus angle and patellar height to the presence, location, and severity of chondral lesions. The purpose of this study was to determine the association of anatomical variants in patellofemoral instability with injuries sustained due to patellar dislocation. A cohort of 101 patients who had four or more episodes of dislocation or instability undergoing isolated arthroscopy or arthroscopies at the time of corrective realignment surgery were identified. The prevalence of chondral, ligamentous, and meniscal injuries was determined and correlated to the sulcus angle, tibial tubercle trochlear groove distance, and patellar height on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. A total of 101 patients was identified. At arthroscopy, the patella demonstrated the highest incidence of chondral injury (68%) followed by the trochlear groove (40%). Lateral meniscal injuries were noted in 6% of patients, medial meniscal injuries in 2%, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in 3%. Chondral injuries were graded using the Outerbridge criteria and there was a correlation between more severe chondral injuries and a greater tilt angle (p = 0.05). The occurrence of injury to the lateral meniscus was associated with a higher Insall-Salvati ratio (p = 0.05). More severe chondral injuries are seen in patients with a greater tilt angle.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos , Cartílago Articular , Luxaciones Articulares , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Luxación de la Rótula , Articulación Patelofemoral , Humanos , Luxación de la Rótula/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/patología , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/complicaciones , Cartílago Articular/diagnóstico por imagen , Cartílago Articular/cirugía , Cartílago Articular/lesiones , Rótula/patología , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/complicaciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Articulación Patelofemoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación Patelofemoral/cirugía , Articulación Patelofemoral/patología , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico por imagen , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Knee Surg Relat Res ; 35(1): 13, 2023 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37131234

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a common surgical procedure for treating patellar instability. The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine whether MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) leads to femoral tunnel enlargement (FTE). The secondary aims were to explore the clinical effects and risk factors of FTE. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Global Health, Embase), currently registered studies, conference proceedings and the reference lists of included studies were searched independently by three reviewers. There were no constraints based on language or publication status. Study quality assessment was conducted. 3824 records were screened in the initial search. Seven studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, evaluating 380 knees in 365 patients. Rates of FTE following MPFLR ranged from 38.7 to 77.1%. Five low quality studies reported FTE did not lead to detrimental clinical outcomes as assessed with the Tegner, Kujala, IKDC, and Lysholm scores. There is conflicting evidence regarding change in femoral tunnel width over time. Three studies (of which two had a high risk of bias) reported age, BMI, presence of trochlear dysplasia and tibial tubercle-tibial groove distance did not differ between patients with and without FTE, suggesting these are not risk factors for FTE. CONCLUSION: FTE is a common postoperative event following MPFLR. It does not predispose poor clinical outcomes. Current evidence lacks the ability to identify its risk factors. The reliability of any conclusions drawn is hindered by the low level of evidence of the studies included in this review. Larger prospective studies with long-term follow up are required to reliably ascertain the clinical effects of FTE.

18.
Rheumatol Int ; 32(11): 3339-51, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22821333

RESUMEN

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of functional impairment and pain. Proprioceptive defects may be associated with the onset and progression of OA of the knee. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of proprioceptive exercises for knee OA using meta-analysis. A systematic review was conducted on 12th December 2011 using published (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, PubMed, PEDro) and unpublished/trial registry (OpenGrey, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Current Controlled Trials and the UK National Research Register Archive) databases. Studies were included if they were full publications of randomized or non-randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing a proprioceptive exercise regime, against a non-proprioceptive exercise programme or non-treatment control for adults with knee OA. Methodological appraisal was performed using the PEDro checklist. Seven RCTs including 560 participants (203 males and 357 females) with a mean age of 63 years were eligible. The methodological quality of the evidence base was moderate. Compared to a non-treatment control, proprioceptive exercises significantly improved functional outcomes in people with knee OA during the first 8 weeks following commencement of their exercises (p < 0.02). When compared against a general non-proprioceptive exercise programme, proprioceptive exercises demonstrated similar outcomes, only providing superior results with respect to joint position sense-related measurements such as timed walk over uneven ground (p = 0.03) and joint position angulation error (p < 0.01). Proprioceptive exercises are efficacious in the treatment of knee OA. There is some evidence to indicate the effectiveness of proprioceptive exercises compared to general strengthening exercises in functional outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/rehabilitación , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Propiocepción/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 20(12): 2367-79, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22270676

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) and computed tomography arthrography (CTA) for the detection of chondral lesions of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints. METHODS: A review of published and unpublished literature sources was conducted on 22nd September 2011. All studies assessing the diagnostic test accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) of MRI or MRA or CTA for the assessment of adults with chondral (cartilage) lesions of the knee (tibiofemoral/patellofemoral joints) with surgical comparison (arthroscopic or open) as the reference test were included. Data were analysed through meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies assessing 2,592 knees from 2,509 patients were included. The findings indicated that whilst presenting a high specificity (0.95-0.99), the sensitivity of MRA, MRI and CTA ranged from 0.70 to 0.80. MRA was superior to MRI and CTA for the detection of patellofemoral joint chondral lesions and that higher field-strength MRI scanner and grade four lesions were more accurately detected compared with lower field-strength and grade one lesions. There appeared no substantial difference in diagnostic accuracy between the interpretation from musculoskeletal and general radiologists when undertaking an MRI review of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral chondral lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Specialist radiological imaging is specific for cartilage disease in the knee but has poorer sensitivity to determine the therapeutic options in this population. Due to this limitation, there remains little indication to replace the 'gold-standard' arthroscopic investigation with MRI, MRA or CTA for the assessment of adults with chondral lesions of the knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Asunto(s)
Artrografía/métodos , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/patología , Cartílago Articular/patología , Articulación de la Rodilla/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/diagnóstico por imagen , Cartílago Articular/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
20.
Injury ; 53(7): 2470-2477, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35643557

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The establishment of national trauma networks have resulted in significant benefits to injured patients. Older people are the majority of major trauma patients and there is need to study variations in care and performance against clinical metrics for them. We aim to describe this patient group in terms of injury, demographics, episode of care assessment and variation between component regions of the Major Trauma Network of England and Wales. METHOD: The Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database was analysed from April 2017 to March 2019. Patients aged 65 years and above with injury severity score (ISS) greater than eight were selected for analysis. Patients were compared by care pathway in terms of first and second treating hospitals and by demographics, injury mechanism, severity, physiology at arrival to hospital (including Glasgow Coma Score (GCS)) and mortality, where known, at discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-three thousand three hundred and forty-seven older injured patients (median age 82.5 years and 58.2% female), were treated in 165 hospitals within the 17 regional trauma networks over the two-year study period. Aside from GCS and gender, all other patient characteristics were significantly different between networks and specifically, a large variation between the network with the highest proportion of older patients (60.4%) and that with a preponderance of younger patients (40.2%) is seen. 84% of cases were due to a fall <2 m and 36.7% of cases had a brain injury. 73.5% of cases had one or more comorbidities. DISCUSSION: We have increased the understanding of how older patients contribute to and are managed by a national trauma service. We have demonstrated variation in numbers and patient characteristics throughout regional trauma networks. We have detailed the whole patient episode, allowing us to comment on disparities in management such as senior review and access to specialist clinical care settings. Older patients dominate United Kingdom major trauma and considerable variations and shortfalls have been identified. Work is needed to focus on the whole clinical episode for these patients both to improve outcome and patient experience but to also to ensure sustainable clinical care in a resource deplete era.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas , Heridas y Lesiones , Accidentes por Caídas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA