A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of individual variability of depression.

BACKGROUND: This study is a secondary analysis of the trial by Callaghan et al. (2011), which reported higher antidepressant effects for preferred intensity (n = 19) vs. prescribed intensity (n = 19) exercise of three sessions/week over four weeks in depressed women. In particular, the present study sought to examine whether greater clinically significant individual change/recovery was observed in the preferred compared to the prescribed exercise group. METHODS: The reliable change index and the Ccutoff score criteria described by Jacobson and Truax (1991) were employed to determine clinical significance. These criteria examined if individual change in depression scores from pre- to post-intervention in the preferred intensity group were statistically significant beyond the standard error of difference derived from the active comparator prescribed group, and subsequently within a normal population range. Patients fulfilling the first or both criteria were classified as improved or recovered, respectively. RESULTS: Post-intervention depression scores of six patients in the preferred intensity exercise group (32%) demonstrated statistically reliable improvement (p < 0.05) and recovery. Half of this subgroup started as moderately depressed. No patient demonstrated a reliable deterioration in depression. Due to a small sample size, it was impossible to determine whether patients on psychiatric medication or medication-free patients were equally benefited from preferred intensity exercise. Thirteen patients in the preferred intensity group (68%) displayed non-statistically significant change in post-intervention depression scores (p > 0.05), although eight of them showed a non-significant improvement in post-intervention depression scores and three could not technically show an improvement in depression due to floor effects (baseline depression within normal range). CONCLUSIONS: Preferred intensity exercise of three sessions/week over four weeks led almost a third of the patients to record scores consistent with recovery from depression. Health professionals may consider that short-term preferred intensity exercise provides clinically significant antidepressant effects comparing favourably to exercise on prescription.

Novel ENT live telehealth and live video-otoscopy clinics in remote Australia: outcomes and comparisons to traditional clinic models.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 challenged the delivery of healthcare in Australia, disproportionately impacting vulnerable patients, including Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples and those living in remote regions. The otolaryngology service provided to remote Western Australia adapted to these barriers by altering clinical consultations to a digital model. METHODS: A review was undertaken of patients in regional Western Australia. Demographics and clinical outcomes from 20 live telehealth clinics were retrospectively reviewed and compared to 16 face-to-face clinics. RESULTS: The demographics of patients reviewed in both live telehealth and face-to-face clinics were similar, except for a larger proportion of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander patients utilising telehealth. The outcomes of patients reviewed through each model of care were comparable. Live video-otoscopy provided diagnostic quality images in 92 per cent of cases. CONCLUSION: The findings of our review suggest that, despite its limitations, a large proportion of ENT patients may be safely assessed through a live telehealth model.

Choice of reliable change model can alter decisions regarding neuropsychological impairment after sports-related concussion.

OBJECTIVE: Impaired neuropsychological test performance after concussion has been used to guide restraint from play, in particular using reliable change indices (RCI). It remains unclear which of the RCI is most appropriate. DESIGN: Athletes were assessed prospectively before and after cerebral concussion and compared with control athletes. SETTING: Athletes were assessed in a clinical office environment after referral from a Sports Physician. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-four Australian rugby league athletes were assessed preseason (time 1). INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-seven concussed athletes were assessed 2 days after trauma (time 2) and compared with 26 distribution-matched volunteer uninjured controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive performance was assessed on 5 neuropsychological measures of speed of information processing, psychomotor speed, and response inhibition. Four previously reported RCI models used in sports concussion were contrasted, as described by Barr and McCrea (2001) and Maassen et al (2006). RESULTS: Reliable change index models were marginally comparable in classifying the control sample. In the concussed sample, no one model seemed to be consistently more or less sensitive. Moreover, the same model could be most sensitive for one individual and least sensitive for another, even on the same test. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable change index models can yield different outcomes regarding whether an athlete has experienced cognitive impairment after concussion. Reliable change index model sensitivity to impairment depends on multiple test and situational factors, including test-retest reliability, differences in test and retest variances, and the individual's relative position on initial testing. In the absence of consensus, the clinician must use highly reliable measures with suitably matched controls if using an RCI.

Risk factors and management approach for deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery at a tertiary medical centre.

BACKGROUND: Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a rare but severe complication following cardiac surgery. Our study investigated the risk factors and treatment options for patients who developed DSWI at our institution between May 1988 and April 2008. METHOD: Data was collected prospectively in a database and information on demographics reviewed retrospectively on 5649 patients who underwent cardiac surgery during this period. RESULTS: The incidence of DSWI was 34/5649 (0.6%). These patients were older (mean age 66.1 vs. 64.5), more likely to die (in hospital mortality 11.8% vs. non DSWI group 1.8%) and had longer hospital stays (DSWI group mean stay 25 days vs. non DSWI group 9 days). Using Fisher's exact test the risk predictors for DSWI determined at our institution included diabetes managed with oral medications (p=0.021), previous cardiac surgery (p=0.038), BMI≥30 (p=0.041), LVEF≤30 (p=0.010), IABP usage (p=0.028) and homologous blood usage (p<0.001). Most commonly bilateral pectoralis major muscle flap (BPMMF) was used for treatment of DSWI (11/30, 36.7%). CONCLUSION: Ultimately our data was comparable to published data in the literature on known risk predictors.

Ten years of paediatric airway foreign bodies in Western Australia.

BACKGROUND: Whenever a paediatric airway foreign body (PAFB) is suspected, decisions may be difficult without a clearly defined or accepted treatment algorithm. History and examination are commonly non-diagnostic and the risks associated with either watchful waiting or proceeding to MLB are significant. This paper reviews a 10 year cohort of suspected PAFBs for the predictive utility of history, examination and investigations and subsequent positive findings at MLB. OBJECTIVES: STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of 127 children who underwent MLB for suspected PAFB between 2007 and 2016 were examined. The data was retrospectively reviewed for epidemiological details, history, examination, radiological findings and MLB outcomes. RESULTS: Sensitivity for PAFB on MLB with all three; history, examination and imaging (x-ray) positive for PAFB was 87.7%. Of the patients who were both symptom and sign positive (n = 96), chest x-ray findings did not significantly alter the chance of finding a PAFB. Chest x-ray had a low specificity (17%) in symptom and sign positive patients. Conversely, sensitivity of chest x-ray was high (88%), for symptom and sign positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: For a child with both signs and symptoms, xray is unlikely to assist in decision making around suspected PAFB. When only sign or symptom is present, positive imaging may significantly increase the chance that PAFB is the cause.For patients with a low suspicion of PAFB, consideration of a CT can be a helpful means of excluding a PAFB and avoiding an unnecessary general anaesthetic in this potentially high-risk group.A greater level of public awareness is needed with regards to appropriate food types for children and the importance of eating seated and supervised in order to reduce the risk of PAFB.

Pre-treatment wait time for head and neck cancer patients in Western Australia: description of a new metric and examination of predictive factors.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged pre-treatment wait times in head and neck cancer are associated with increased morbidity and reduced survival. Traditional metrics exclude delays prior to biopsy, which represents an important and measurable period of time. This study aims to describe total wait time for head and neck cancer patients in our institution, to define a more accurate representation of the clinically relevant pre-treatment wait time, and to evaluate predictive factors for prolonged wait times. METHODS: A retrospective review of head and neck cancer patients treated over 2 years in a tertiary referral centre was conducted. Patient demographics, referral symptoms, tumour details, treatment plan and key dates were analysed to identify total wait time and factors predictive of increased wait time. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-four patients were included. Mean total wait time from initial referral to treatment initiation was 71.6 (median 61) days. The period from referral to biopsy represented 29% of mean total wait time. Factors predictive of increased wait time included presenting symptom of hoarseness, laryngeal cancer and treatment with definitive radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that time from referral to biopsy represents a significant portion of total wait time, and we suggest that this be incorporated into future wait time metrics for improved clinical relevance. Furthermore, we have identified factors predicting increased wait time which can be targeted for future service improvement.

AJCC 8th Edition oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma staging - Is it an improvement on the AJCC 7th Edition?

OBJECTIVES: To explore the prognostic and discriminatory ability of the AJCC 8th Edition Oral Cavity cancer staging in a non-North American population, and compare it to the previously used AJCC 7th Edition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed at a tertiary referral Otolaryngology, Head Neck and Skull Base Department in Australia, from June 2002 to June 2017. Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma cases were staged according to AJCC 8th Edition, which was compared to AJCC 7th Edition staging, for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). DFS and OS were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: There were 118 patients treated for OSCC, with an average age of 61 years, 63% were male. Overall survival grouped by stage demonstrated statistically significant discrimination between cancer stages using both the AJCC 7th and AJCC 8th Editions. AJCC 7th Edition did not discriminate between stages for DFS. Conversely, AJCC 8th Edition did statistically significantly discriminate for DFS (p = 0.0002). The DFS for both Stage 4a and 4b was significantly worse than cases in Stage 1. AJCC 8th Edition T stage was statistically significantly related to DFS (p = 0.0199), while the AJCC 7th Edition T stage was not. CONCLUSION: The AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition includes both the depth of primary tumour invasion and extracapsular extension of lymph node metastases. The AJCC 8th Edition OSCC staging system showed improved disease-free survival discrimination between overall stages and between T categories, while AJCC 7th Edition did not.

Assessment of statistical change criteria used to define significant change in neuropsychological test performance following cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This paper compares four techniques used to assess change in neuropsychological test scores before and after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), and includes a rationale for the classification of a patient as overall impaired. METHODS: A total of 55 patients were tested before and after surgery on the MicroCog neuropsychological test battery. A matched control group underwent the same testing regime to generate test-retest reliabilities and practice effects. Two techniques designed to assess statistical change were used: the Reliable Change Index (RCI), modified for practice, and the Standardised Regression-based (SRB) technique. These were compared against two fixed cutoff techniques (standard deviation and 20% change methods). RESULTS: The incidence of decline across test scores varied markedly depending on which technique was used to describe change. The SRB method identified more patients as declined on most measures. In comparison, the two fixed cutoff techniques displayed relatively reduced sensitivity in the detection of change. CONCLUSIONS: Overall change in an individual can be described provided the investigators choose a rational cutoff based on likely spread of scores due to chance. A cutoff value of > or =20% of test scores used provided acceptable probability based on the number of tests commonly encountered. Investigators must also choose a test battery that minimises shared variance among test scores.

Clarifying Discrepancies in Responsiveness Between Reliable Change Indices.

OBJECTIVE: Several reliable change indices (RCIs) exist to evaluate statistically significant individual change with repeated neuropsychological assessment. Yet there is little guidance on model selection and subsequent implications. Using existing test-retest norms, key parameters were systematically evaluated for influence on different RCI models. METHOD: Normative test-retest data for selected Wechsler Memory Scale-IV subtests were chosen based on the direction and magnitude of differential practice (inequality of test and retest variance). The influence of individual relative position compared to the normative mean was systematically manipulated to evaluate for predictable differences in responsiveness for three RCI models. RESULTS: With respect to negative change, RCI McSweeny was most responsive when individual baseline scores were below the normative mean, irrespective of differential practice. When an individual score was greater than the normative mean, RCI Chelune was most responsive with lower retest variance, and RCI Maassen most responsive with greater retest variance. This pattern of results can change when test-retest reliability is excellent and there is greater retest variability. Order of responsiveness is reversed if positive change is of interest. CONCLUSION: RCI models tend to agree when the individual approximates the normative mean at baseline and test-retest variability is equal. However, no RCI model will be universally more or less responsive across all conditions, and model selection may influence subsequent interpretation of change. Given the systematic and predictable differences between models, a more rationale choice can now be made. While a consensus on RCI model preference does not exist, we prefer the regression-based model for several reasons outlined.

Comparability, reliability, and practice effects on alternate forms of the Digit Symbol Substitution and Symbol Digit Modalities tests.

The present study examined the comparability of 4 alternate forms of the Digit Symbol Substitution test and the Symbol Digit Modalities (written) test, including the original versions. Male contact-sport athletes (N = 112) were assessed on 1 of the 4 forms of each test. Reasonable alternate form comparability was demonstrated through establishing normality of form distributions and conducting pairwise form comparisons of means, variability, and intraclass correlations. Nonetheless, alternate forms are likely an insufficient means of controlling practice in speeded measures at brief (1-2 weeks) retest intervals. Reliable change indices demonstrated that practice must be accounted for in individual retesting.

Severity of sports-related concussion and neuropsychological test performance.

Concussion severity grades according to the Cantu, Colorado Medical Society, and American Academy of Neurology systems were not clearly related to the presence or duration of impaired neuropsychological test performance in 21 professional rugby league athletes. The use of concussion severity guidelines and neuropsychological testing to assist return to play decisions requires further investigation.

Airway obstruction secondary to large thyroid adenolipoma.

Adenolipoma of the thyroid gland is a rare benign neoplasm composed of normal thyroid and mature adipose tissue. Ordinarily, only a small amount of fat exists in a normal thyroid gland. CT and MRI may differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, and fine-needle aspirate often assists diagnosis. Surgical excision for adenolipoma is considered curative. We report the case of a 67-year-old man presenting with a large neck lump and evidence of airway obstruction. Imaging revealed a 97 × 70 mm left thyroid mass with retropharyngeal extension and laryngotracheal compression. Hemithyroidectomy was performed with subsequent histology confirming a large thyroid adenolipoma. The patient's symptoms resolved and he remains asymptomatic with no sign of recurrence 2 years postsurgery.

Specificity of reliable change models and review of the within-subjects standard deviation as an error term.

There is an ongoing debate over the preferred method(s) for determining the reliable change (RC) in individual scores over time. In the present paper, specificity comparisons of several classic and contemporary RC models were made using a real data set. This included a more detailed review of a new RC model recently proposed in this journal, that used the within-subjects standard deviation (WSD) as the error term. It was suggested that the RC(WSD) was more sensitive to change and theoretically superior. The current paper demonstrated that even in the presence of mean practice effects, false-positive rates were comparable across models when reliability was good and initial and retest variances were equivalent. However, when variances differed, discrepancies in classification across models became evident. Notably, the RC using the WSD provided unacceptably high false-positive rates in this setting. It was considered that the WSD was never intended for measuring change in this manner. The WSD actually combines systematic and error variance. The systematic variance comes from measurable between-treatment differences, commonly referred to as practice effect. It was further demonstrated that removal of the systematic variance and appropriate modification of the residual error term for the purpose of testing individual change yielded an error term already published and criticized in the literature. A consensus on the RC approach is needed. To that end, further comparison of models under varied conditions is encouraged.

Deriving reliable change statistics from test-retest normative data: comparison of models and mathematical expressions.

The use of reliable change (RC) statistics to determine whether an individual has significantly improved or deteriorated on retesting is growing rapidly in clinical neuropsychology. This paper demonstrates how with only basic test-retest data and a series of simple expressions, the clinician/researcher can implement the majority of contemporary RC model(s). Though sharing a fundamental structure, RC models vary in how they derive predicted retest scores and standard error terms. Published test-retest normative data and a simple case study are presented to demonstrate how to calculate several well-known RC scores. The paper highlights the circumstances under which models will diverge in the estimation of RC. Most importantly variations in individual's performance relative to controls at initial testing, practice effects, inequality of control variability from test to retest, and degree of reliability will see systematic and predictable disagreement among models. More generally, the limitations and opportunities of RC methodology were discussed. Although a consensus on preferred model continues to be debated, the comparison of RC models in clinical samples is encouraged.

Investigation of factors relating to neuropsychological change following cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: An analysis of neuropsychological impairment following cardiopulmonary bypass was performed in 55 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Neurocognitive function was measured preoperatively using the MicroCog: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning computer-based testing tool. Testing was repeated in the postoperative period immediately prior to discharge from hospital. Analysis of significant score decline was performed using the standardised regression-based technique. A patient was classified as overall impaired when > or = 20% of test scores were significantly impaired. The proposed marker of neurological damage S-100beta was also used. Prothrombin Fragment 1+2 (F1+2) was measured as a marker of thrombin development to test the hypothesis that excessive haemostatic activation may lead to thromboembolic damage to the brain. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: 32.7% of patients were classified as significantly impaired. No relationship was detected between F1+2 and any neuropsychological test score; however, the study was limited due to small sample size. F1+2 levels were higher in patients undergoing prolonged bypass times. Neuropsychological decline was significantly correlated with patient age, suggesting a degree of caution is warranted when operating on an elderly cohort. An unexpected relationship was detected between higher heparin concentrations and increased risk of neuropsychological impairment; however, this requires re-evaluation.

Test-retest norms and reliable change indices for the MicroCog Battery in a healthy community population over 50 years of age.

The increasing availability of computerized test batteries used to assess neuropsychological changes requires the availability of suitable test-retest normative data. Reliable change indices can then be used to evaluate significance of change in an individual's performance on retesting. We tested (N = 40) neurologically normal adults on three occasions (initially, two weeks, and three months) on the MicroCog: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning computerized testing instrument. Normative retest data are presented for two analytic techniques: the Reliable Change Index adjusted for practice and the Standardized Regression-Based technique. At two weeks, the correlation coefficients ranged from .49 to .84, with all scores demonstrating significant practice effects. At 3 months, coefficients ranged from .50 to .83, with all scores except Attention / Mental Control demonstrating significant practice compared to baseline. Regression equations were generated for all scores using age, sex, education level, and score at Time 1 as predictors. For all measures the only significant predictor was the Time 1 score. The reliable change indices and regression equations presented here can be used to determine the significance of change from predicted retest scores in a matched interventional cohort.