RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status can be tested with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH). The 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) HER2 testing guidelines suggest initial HER2 testing using IHC and further testing IHC equivocal cases with ISH. However, many institutions perform both IHC and ISH on the same specimen. This study aims to analyze the concordance between HER2 IHC and ISH in order to evaluate the benefit of repeating HER2 testing on the same breast cancer specimens. METHOD: Patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer through BreastScreen NSW Sydney West program between January 2018 and December 2020 were identified and their HER2 IHC and HER2 ISH results on core needle biopsy (CNB) and surgical excisions (SE) were retrospectively collected. Specimens with both IHC and ISH results were then analyzed for agreement and concordance using unweighted kappa values. Equivocal IHC (2+) cases were excluded from concordance analysis. RESULTS: Overall, there were 240 invasive breast cancer specimens (CNB and SE) with both IHC and ISH recorded. Concordance between HER2 IHC and ISH was 100% (95% CI: 96.2-100%; κ = 1.00 (P < 0.001)). Of the IHC equivocal cases (n = 146), 94.5% were ISH negative. CONCLUSION: There was perfect positive concordance and agreement between non-equivocal IHC and ISH results. This reinforces that IHC alone can be utilized reliably for testing HER2 status of non-equivocal cases consistent with the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Inmunohistoquímica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hibridación in Situ , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Over the past few decades the benefits of assessing Quality of Life (QoL) and mental health in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) have steadily increased with limited studies relating to the most useful method to assess these patients. This study aims to identify, review, summarise, and evaluate the methodological quality for the most validated commonly used health-related QoL and mental health assessment measurements in diabetic patients. METHODS: All original articles published on PubMed, MedLine, OVID, The Cochrane Register, Web of Science Conference Proceedings and Scopus databases were systematically reviewed between 2011 and 2022. A search strategy was developed for each database using all possible combinations of the following keywords: "type 2 diabetes mellitus", "quality of life", mental health", and "questionnaires". Studies conducted on patients with T2DM of ≥ 18 years with or without other clinical illnesses were included. Articles designed as a literature or systematic review conducted on either children or adolescents, healthy adults and/or with a small sample size were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 489 articles were identified in all of the electronic medical databases. Of these articles, 40 were shown to meet our eligibility criteria to be included in this systematic review. Approximately, 60% of these studies were cross-sectional, 22.5% were clinical trials, and 17.5% of cohort studies. The top commonly used QoL measurements are the SF-12 identified in 19 studies, the SF-36, included in 16 studies, and the EuroQoL EQ-5D, found in 8 studies. Fifteen (37.5%) studies used only one questionnaire, while the remaining reviewed (62.5%) used more than one questionnaire. Finally, the majority (90%) of studies reported using self-administered questionnaires and only 4 used interviewer mode of administration. CONCLUSION: Our evidence highlights that the commonly used questionnaire to evaluate the QoL and mental health is the SF-12 followed by SF-36. Both of these questionnaires are validated, reliable and supported in different languages. Moreover, using single or combined questionnaires as well as the mode of administration depends on the clinical research question and aim of the study.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Adulto , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Salud Mental , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Skin abscesses are a common emergency presentation often requiring incision and drainage; however, issues with theatre access lead to delays in management and high costs. The long-term impact in a tertiary centre of a standardised day-only protocol is unknown. The aim was to evaluate the impact of day-only skin abscess protocol (DOSAP) for emergency surgery of skin abscesses in a tertiary institution in Australia and to provide a blueprint for other institutions. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analysed several time periods: Period A (July 2014 to 2015, n = 201) pre-DOSAP implementation, Period B (July 2016 to 2017, n = 259) post-DOSAP, and Period C (July 2018 to 2022, n = 1,625) prospectively analysed four 12-month periods to assess long-term utilisation of DOSAP. Primary outcomes were length of stay and delay to theatre. Secondary outcome measures included theatre start time, representation rates and total costs. Statistical analysis using nonparametric methods was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in ward length of stay (1.25 days vs. 0.65 days, P < 0.0001), delay to theatre (0.81 days vs. 0.44 days, P < 0.0001) and theatre start time before 10AM (44 cases vs. 96 cases, P < 0.0001) after implementation of DOSAP. There was a significant decrease in median cost of admission of $711.74 after accounting for inflation. Period C reported 1,006 abscess presentations successfully managed by DOSAP over the four-year period. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the successful implementation of DOSAP in an Australian tertiary centre. The ongoing utilisation of the protocol demonstrates the ease of applicability.
Asunto(s)
Absceso , Benchmarking , Humanos , Absceso/cirugía , Australia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Drenaje/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Histopathological biomarkers guide breast cancer management. Testing histopathological biomarkers on both core needle biopsy (CNB) and surgical excision (SE) in patients who are treated with upfront surgery is unnecessary and costly if there is high concordance between the two. This study investigated the concordance between CNB and SE for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2), tumor grade and Ki-67. METHODS: Histopathological biomarker information were retrospectively collected from preoperative CNB and SE on patients diagnosed with breast cancer through the BreastScreen Sydney West program over a four-year period between January 2017 and December 2020. Data were then analyzed to calculate percentage of agreement and concordance using kappa values for ER, PR, HER2, tumor grade and Ki-67. RESULTS: A total of 504 cases of invasive breast cancers were analyzed. There was substantial level of concordance for ER 96.7% (κ = 0.687) and PR 93.2% (κ = 0.69). Concordance for HER2 negative (IHC 0, IHC 1 +) or positive (IHC 3 +) tumor on CNB was 100% (κ = 1.00). Grade and Ki-67 showed moderate level of concordance, 72.6% (κ = 0.545) and 70.5% (κ = 0.453), respectively. CONCLUSION: ER, PR and HER2 show high level of concordance. CNB is reliable in determining histopathological biomarkers for ER, PR positive and HER2 positive or negative tumors indicating that retesting these on SE may not be necessary.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Antígeno Ki-67 , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrógenos , Receptores de Progesterona , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Trial demonstrated that early breast cancer patients with positive axillary sentinel lymph nodes treated with breast-conserving surgery and breast radiotherapy had no additional oncologic benefit of proceeding to an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The extent to which practice has changed in Australia remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the Z0011 trial on the management of positive axillary sentinel nodes at an Australian institutional level. We reviewed all breast cancer cases treated at the Sydney Adventist Hospital over a 10-year period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017. Patients who fulfilled the Z0011 trial criteria were selected. These patients were divided into two groups according to the year of surgery, before and after 1 January 2011 when the Z0011 study was published. Clinicopathologic data and axillary surgical management were compared. Of the 237 patients fulfilling the Z0011 trial criteria, there were 73 patients before and 158 patients after 1 January 2011. In the earlier group the rate of proceeding to an ALND following a positive sentinel node was 78.1% compared to 43.7% in the latter group (P < 0.0001). There was a significant decline in the rate of ALND over this 10-year period (r = -0.79, P = 0.006). The Z0011 trial has influenced the surgical management of the axilla leading to a significant reduction in the rate of an ALND in patients fulfilling the Z0011 trial criteria at our institution.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos , Metástasis Linfática/radioterapia , Anciano , Australia , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático CentinelaRESUMEN
Peripheral artery disease affects >200 million people worldwide and is associated with significant limb and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Limb revascularization is recommended to improve function and quality of life for symptomatic patients with peripheral artery disease with intermittent claudication who have not responded to medical treatment. For patients with critical limb ischemia, the goals of revascularization are to relieve pain, help wound healing, and prevent limb loss. The baseline risk of cardiovascular and limb-related events demonstrated among patients with stable peripheral artery disease is elevated after revascularization and related to atherothrombosis and restenosis. Both of these processes involve platelet activation and the coagulation cascade, forming the basis for the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies to optimize procedural success and reduce postprocedural cardiovascular risk. Unfortunately, few high-quality, randomized data to support use of these therapies after peripheral artery disease revascularization exist, and much of the rationale for the use of antiplatelet agents after endovascular peripheral revascularization is extrapolated from percutaneous coronary intervention literature. Consequently, guideline recommendations for antithrombotic therapy after lower limb revascularization are inconsistent and not always evidence-based. In this context, the purpose of this structured review is to assess the available randomized data for antithrombotic therapy after peripheral arterial revascularization, with a focus on clinical trial design issues that may affect interpretation of study results, and highlight areas that require further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is significant variation in the use of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics prior to left-sided elective colorectal surgery. There has been no consensus internationally. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the 2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were divided into four groups: those who had mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, mechanical bowel preparation alone, oral antibiotics alone and no preparation. The main outcome measures included overall, superficial, deep and organ/space surgical site infections. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leak, ileus and rate of Clostridium difficile. RESULTS: A total of 5729 patients were included for analysis. The overall surgical site infection rate (any superficial, deep or organ/space infection) was significantly lower in the mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics approach when compared to no preparation (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.36-0.59, P < 0.0001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics maintained a lower risk of overall surgical site infections. MBP and OAB also had a protective effect on anastomotic leak in both the laparoscopic and open cohorts (laparoscopic multivariable adjusted OR = 0.42 (0.19-0.94), P = 0.035; open multivariable adjusted OR = 0.3 (0.12-0.77), P = 0.012). Mechanical bowel preparation alone and oral antibiotics alone was not associated with a significant decrease in surgical site infections. There was no increase in C. difficile occurrences with the use of oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly minimised surgical site infections and anastomotic leak following both laparoscopic and open left-sided restorative colorectal surgery. Mechanical bowel preparation alone did not reduce surgical site infections. There was a trend to reduction in surgical site infections with oral antibiotics alone.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Catárticos/farmacología , Cirugía Colorrectal , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Heces , Laparoscopía , Administración Oral , Anciano , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) is a serious adverse event, preventable with appropriate care during and post-admission. Accurate measurement of in-hospital and post-discharge incidences is essential for implementation and evaluation of prevention strategies and monitoring. AIMS: To estimate in-hospital and post-discharge diagnosed VTE, trends and risk factors. METHODS: This was a population-based study in New South Wales, Australia, using linked hospital admission and emergency department data for 2010-2013 of adult patients with a minimum stay of 48 h. HA-VTE were diagnosed in-hospital or post-discharge (within 90 days). Multi-level modelling schemes produced adjusted rates and ratios for patient, admission and hospital-related characteristics. RESULTS: From 1 865 059 admissions, the HA-VTE incidence rate was 9.7 per 1000 admissions; 71% were diagnosed post-discharge, and 4.3% died with a greater risk for VTE diagnosed in hospital compared to post-discharge (8.4% vs 2.6%, P < 0.001). Compared with surgical patients, medical patients developed fewer HA-VTE (IRR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.58-0.63) but were more likely to be diagnosed post-discharge (OR = 2.19; 95% CI: 2.00-2.40). HA-VTE increased 6.5% over the period, driven by the 44% increase in in-hospital diagnoses and not by the 9% decrease in post-discharge diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: HA-VTE is a continuing burden, and diagnosis after recent hospital discharge is notably high. Incidence varies across patients and facilities, highlighting the need for individual VTE risk assessment. Inclusive measures and routine monitoring of HA-VTE incidence and mortality are essential for implementing best practice and assessing effectiveness of prevention strategies.
Asunto(s)
Administración Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales/tendencias , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Femenino , Administración Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estadística como Asunto/tendenciasRESUMEN
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially preventable adverse effect of hospitalisation. Inter-hospital variation in the incidence of hospital-associated VTE (HA-VTE) and timing of diagnosis (in-hospital or post-discharge) in New South Wales public hospitals were examined. Large variations in incidence (22% risk difference) and post-discharge diagnosis (115% odds difference) were evident after adjustment for case mix, which only explained 59% and 32% of inter-hospital variation respectively. The need for improved compliance with best practice guidelines is reinforced.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We previously published the outcomes associated with the use of diagnostic laparoscopy to determine peritoneal breach for AASW patients without an immediate indication for laparotomy. Although this pathway was 100% sensitive there was a 54% non-therapeutic laparotomy rate. Another option that has been extensively reported is the clinical observation algorithm (COA) however, majority of the data originate from high-volume centres. We hypothesized that a COA would also be a safe option in an Australian setting, and reduce the rate of non-therapeutic operative intervention in managing AASW. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study examining patients with AASW admitted to a level 1 trauma centre in Sydney, Australia, between June 2021 and August 2023. Patient, injury, management and outcome data were collected from electronic medical records and the hospital trauma registry. Data were then analysed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the COA, complication rates and median hospital length-of-stay (LOS). RESULTS: A total of 48 patients presented with AASW. Of these patients, 11 (22.9%) proceeded to immediate laparotomy. Seven patients had a contraindication to COA and underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. Thirty patients were managed with the COA, with three (10%) patients subsequently requiring a laparotomy. Only one patient (3.3%) underwent a non-therapeutic laparotomy. There were no missed injuries. The COA sensitivity was 100%, specificity 92.7%, PPV 50% and NPV 100%. Patients managed with COA had no complications. Overall median hospital LOS was 1 day (1.0-2.3). CONCLUSION: A COA is a safe approach for evaluating patients with AASW in an Australian setting with adequate resources. It reduces the rate of non-therapeutic operative intervention and has acceptable outcomes compared with a diagnostic laparoscopy pathway.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to determine where health technology can support best-practice perioperative care for patients waiting for surgery. METHODS: An exploratory codesign process used personas and journey mapping in three interprofessional workshops to identify key challenges in perioperative care across four health districts in Sydney, Australia. Through participatory methodology, the research inquiry directly involved perioperative clinicians. In three facilitated workshops, clinician and patient participants codesigned potential digital interventions to support perioperative pathways. Workshop output was coded and thematically analysed, using design principles. RESULTS: Codesign workshops, involving 51 participants, were conducted October to November 2022. Participants designed seven patient personas, with consumer representatives confirming acceptability and diversity. Interprofessional team members and consumers mapped key clinical moments, feelings and barriers for each persona during a hypothetical perioperative journey. Six key themes were identified: 'preventative care', 'personalised care', 'integrated communication', 'shared decision-making', 'care transitions' and 'partnership'. Twenty potential solutions were proposed, with top priorities a digital dashboard and virtual care coordination. DISCUSSION: Our findings emphasise the importance of interprofessional collaboration, patient and family engagement and supporting health technology infrastructure. Through user-based codesign, participants identified potential opportunities where health technology could improve system efficiencies and enhance care quality for patients waiting for surgical procedures. The codesign approach embedded users in the development of locally-driven, contextually oriented policies to address current perioperative service challenges, such as prolonged waiting times and care fragmentation. CONCLUSION: Health technology innovation provides opportunities to improve perioperative care and integrate clinical information. Future research will prototype priority solutions for further implementation and evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Tecnología Biomédica , Atención Perioperativa , AustraliaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) is a potential additional source of donor kidneys. This study reviewed uDCD kidney transplant outcomes to determine if these are comparable to controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD). METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched. Data on demographic information and transplant outcomes were extracted from included studies. Meta-analyses were performed, and risk ratios (RR) were estimated to compare transplant outcomes from uDCD to cDCD. RESULTS: Nine cohort studies were included, from 2178 uDCD kidney transplants. There was a moderate degree of bias, as 4 studies did not account for potential confounding factors. The median incidence of primary nonfunction in uDCD was 12.3% versus 5.7% for cDCD (RR, 1.85; 95% confidence intervals, 1.06-3.23; P = 0.03, I 2 = 75). The median rate of delayed graft function was 65.1% for uDCD and 52.0% for cDCD. The median 1-y graft survival for uDCD was 82.7% compared with 87.5% for cDCD (RR, 1.43; 95% confidence intervals, 1.02-2.01; P = 0.04; I 2 = 71%). The median 5-y graft survival for uDCD and cDCD was 70% each. Notably, the use of normothermic regional perfusion improved primary nonfunction rates in uDCD grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Although uDCD outcomes may be inferior in the short-term, the long-term outcomes are comparable to cDCD.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Resultado del Tratamiento , Funcionamiento Retardado del Injerto/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Unplanned surgical readmissions are an important indicator of quality care and are a key focus of improvement programs. The aims of this study were to evaluate the factors that lead to unplanned hospital readmissions in patients undergoing general surgical procedures and to identify preventable readmissions. METHODS: A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2016 to 2020 at a tertiary hospital was conducted to identify patients undergoing a general surgical procedure. Various perioperative parameters were studied to identify risk factors and reasons for unplanned readmission. Preventable readmissions were identified. RESULTS: A total of 3069 patients underwent a general surgical procedure. Of these, the overall unplanned readmission rate was 8.8% (n = 247). The most common reason for readmission was associated with surgical site infections (n = 112, 44.3%) followed by pain (n = 50, 20.2%), with over 45% deemed as preventable readmissions. Factors associated with increased risk of readmission included older age, longer index length of stay, prolonged operative time, elective procedures, higher ASA score and contaminated procedures. CONCLUSION: Unplanned readmissions are more likely to occur in patients who develop postoperative complications. Understanding factors associated with readmissions may facilitate targeted quality improvement projects that reduce hospital readmission after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Readmisión del Paciente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Australia/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
Laparoscopic rectal surgery within the confines of a narrow pelvis may be associated with a high rate of open conversion. In the obese and morbidly obese patient, the complexity of laparoscopic surgery increases substantially. Robotic technology is known to reduce the risk of conversion, but it is unclear if it can overcome the technical challenges associated with obesity. The ACS NSQIP database was used to identify obese patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or robotic-assisted rectal resection from 2015 to 2016. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2. Morbid obesity was defined as a BMI greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2. The primary outcome was unplanned conversions to open. Other outcomes measures assessed included anastomotic leak, operative time, surgical site infections, length of hospital stay, readmissions and mortality. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 (IBM SPSS, USA). 1490 patients had robotic-assisted and 4967 patients had laparoscopic rectal resections between 2015 and 2016. Of those patients, 561 obese patients had robotic-assisted rectal resections and 1824 patients underwent laparoscopic rectal surgery. In the obese cohort, the rate of unplanned conversion to open in the robotic group was 14% compared to 24% in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.0001). Median operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group (248 min vs. 215 min, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in anastomotic leak or systemic sepsis between the laparoscopic and robotic rectal surgery groups. In morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2), the rate of unplanned conversion to open in the robotic group was 19% compared to 26% in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.027). There was no difference in anastomotic leak, systemic sepsis or surgical site infection rates between robotic and laparoscopic rectal resection. Multivariate analysis showed that robotic-assisted surgery was associated with fewer unplanned conversions to open (OR 0.28, P < 0.0001). Robotic-assisted surgery is associated with a decreased risk of conversion to open in obese and morbidly obese patients when compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, robotic surgery was associated with longer operative time and despite improvement in the rate of conversion to open, there was no difference in complications or length of stay. Our findings are limited by the retrospective non-randomised nature of the study, demographic differences between the two groups, and the likely difference in surgeon experience between the two groups. Large randomised controlled studies are needed to further explore the role of robotic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Neoplasias del Recto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence demonstrates short-term benefits of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. The situation for rectal cancer is less clear. OBJECTIVES: This review assessed the use and short-term outcomes of elective open and laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer resections within an area health service. DESIGN: This was a multicenter, retrospective review of a prospective database. SETTINGS: All elective colon and rectal cancer resections in the western zone of Sydney South West Area Health Service from 2001 until 2008 were included. PATIENTS: Included were 1721 patients who underwent either a laparoscopic colon (n = 434) or rectal (n = 157) resection or an open colon (n = 742) or rectal (n = 388) resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: : Outcome measures included operating time, blood loss, adequacy of resection, conversion rate, intensive care unit admission, length of stay, and 26 acute postoperative complications. RESULTS: Patients were matched for age, sex, ASA, BMI, and tumor stage. Laparoscopic surgery increased in frequency. Fewer patients experienced a complication in both the laparoscopic colon (28.8 vs 54.4%; p < 0.0001) and rectal (41.4 vs 60.3%; p < 0.0001) group irrespective of age. Laparoscopic operating time for colon and rectal cancer was 24.1 minutes (p < 0.0001) and 25.8 minutes (p < 0.0001) longer, with a low conversion-to-open rate (6.5% and 8.3%; p = 0.44). Laparoscopic surgery resulted in fewer transfusions (0.4 vs 0.7 units; p = 0.0028) and length of stay (7 vs 10 days; p = 0.0011) for colon cancers, and reduced intraoperative hemoglobin drop (20.5 vs 24.8; p = 0.029) and intensive care unit admissions (26.8 vs 36.3%; p = 0.032) for rectal cancers. LIMITATIONS: : This was a nonrandomized study with rectal cancers more often resected with the open technique (71.2 vs 28.8%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within an area health service, elective laparoscopic resection for colon and rectal cancer had improved short-term outcomes in comparison with open surgery.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication following gynaecological surgery, with malignancy placing patients at an even greater risk. AIMS: To review the incidence of VTE following gynaecological surgery for suspected or confirmed malignancy with respect to prophylactic modalities and to assess the incidence and associated risk factors for bleeding complications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken between 2001 to 2006 on 1363 women undergoing surgery for suspected or confirmed gynaecological malignancy. Data on demographic details, diagnosis, radiotherapy/chemotherapy treatment, operative details, and hospital length of stay (LOS), thromboprophylaxis, in-hospital and 3-month readmission rates for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) were collected. RESULTS: Median age was 54 years (IQR 44-66) and hospital LOS 7 days (IQR 5-9). 51.6% had a new malignancy and 33.0% benign disease. All in-hospital VTE events (0.4%; 95% CI 0.2-1.0%) occurred in women with advanced malignancy. VTE rate was 1.5% (95% CI 1.0-2.3%) at 3 months. In-hospital and 3-month non fatal PE occurred in 0.4% (95% CI 0.2-0.9%) and 1.1% (95% CI 0.7-1.8%) respectively, with a fatal PE rate of 0.1% (95% CI 0.04-0.5%). Malignancy (OR 10.3; 95% CI 1.3-80.6; P = 0.026) and duration of surgery (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.4-3.2; P = 0.001) significantly increased bleeding risk. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital VTE risk is higher following gynaecological surgery for malignancy than for benign disease, despite the use of thromboprophylaxis. Given the higher non fatal PE rate after discharge and increasing trend towards shorter hospital LOS, extended prophylaxis in these patients should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/complicaciones , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparostomy or Open Abdomen (OA) has matured into an effective strategy in the management of abdominal catastrophe. Single prognostic factors have been identified in a previous systematic review regarding entero-atmospheric fistula (EAF). Unfortunately, no prognostic multivariable model for EAF exist. The aim was to develop and validate a multivariable prediction model from a retrospective cohort study involving three hospital's databases. METHODS: Fifty-seven variables were evaluated to develop a multivariable model. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for on a developmental data set from two hospitals. Receiver operator characteristics analysis with area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed on the developmental data set (internal validation) as well as on an additional validation data set from another hospital (external validation). RESULTS: Five-hundred and forty-eight patients managed with an OA. Two variables remained in the multivariable prediction model for EAF. The AUC for EAF on internal validation were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.58-0.86) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67-0.92) on external validation. CONCLUSIONS: A multivariable prediction model for EAF was externally validated and an easy-to-use probability nomogram was constructed using the two predictor variables. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; prognostic.
Asunto(s)
Cavidad Abdominal , Fístula , Humanos , Nomogramas , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become standard of care in colorectal surgery. However, there is not a universally accepted colorectal ERAS protocol and significant variations in care exist between institutions. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of variations in ERAS interventions and complications on length of stay (LOS). METHODS: This study was a single-center review of the first 200 consecutive patients recruited into our prospectively collected ERAS database. The primary outcome of this study was to examine the rate of compliance to ERAS interventions and the impact of these interventions on LOS. The secondary outcome was to assess the impact of complications (anastomotic leak, ileus, and surgical site infections) on LOS. ERAS interventions, rate of adherence, LOS, readmissions, morbidity, and mortality were recorded, and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: ERAS variations and complications significantly influenced patient LOS on both univariate and multivariate analysis. ERAS interventions identified as the most important strategies in reducing LOS included laparoscopic surgery, mobilization twice daily postoperative day (POD) 0 to 1, discontinuation of intravenous fluids on POD 0 to 1, upgrading to solid diet by POD 0 to 2, removal of indwelling catheter by POD 0 to 2, avoiding nasogastric tube reinsertion and removing drains early. Both major and minor complications increased LOS. Anastomotic leak and ileus were associated with the greatest increase in LOS. CONCLUSION: Seven high-yield ERAS interventions reduced LOS. Major and minor complications increased LOS. Reducing variations in care and complications can improve outcomes following colorectal surgery.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation can be complicated by thrombosis in the early post-transplant period. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study examining risk factors, management, and outcomes of modern era SPK transplants. We reviewed 235 recipients over 10 years (January 1, 2008, to September 1, 2017). We used multivariate analysis to examine donor, recipient, and operative risk factors for thrombosis. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (17%) had a thrombosis diagnosed on postoperative imaging, but 61% of these patients (n = 25/41) did not lose their graft secondary to the thrombosis. Nine patients (22%) were managed with watchful waiting and serial imaging, 12 (29%) were managed with therapeutic anticoagulation, and 4 (10%) required laparotomy and graft thrombectomy. Sixteen of 235 pancreas grafts (6.8%) required pancreatectomy, and 10 of these cases occurred in the first half of the study, before 2012. The risk of thrombosis leading to graft loss increased 11.2-fold in recipients with a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) > 25 compared with others (odds ratio, 11.2; 95% CI, 1.1-116.7; P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of SPK transplants (61%) complicated by thrombosis of the pancreatic graft were salvaged by use of imaging, anticoagulation, and in select cases, laparotomy and graft thrombectomy.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Laparotomía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trombectomía/métodos , Espera Vigilante , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) is widely used in North America for benchmarking. In 2015, NSQIP was introduced to four New South Wales public hospitals. The aim of this study is to investigate the agreement between NSQIP and administrative data in the Australian setting; to compare the performance of models derived from each data set to predict 30-day outcomes. METHODS: The NSQIP and administrative data variables were mapped to select variables available in both data sets where coding may be influenced by interpretation of the clinical information. These were compared for agreement. Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the probability of adverse outcomes within 30 days. Models derived from NSQIP and administrative data were compared by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2240 procedures over 21 months had matching records. Functional status demonstrated poor agreement (kappa 0.02): administrative data recorded only one (1%) patient with partial- or total-dependence as recorded by NSQIP data. The American Society of Anesthesiologists class demonstrated excellent agreement (kappa 0.91). Other perioperative variables demonstrated poor to fair agreement (kappa 0.12-0.61). Predictive model based on NSQIP data was excellent at predicting mortality but was less accurate for complications and readmissions. The NSQIP model was better in predicting mortality and complications (receiver operating characteristic curve 0.93 versus 0.87; P = 0.029 and 0.71 versus 0.64; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: There is poor agreement between NSQIP data and administrative data. Predictive models associated with NSQIP data were more accurate at predicting surgical outcomes than those from administrative data. To drive quality improvement in surgery, high-quality clinical data are required and we believe that NSQIP fulfils this function.