Family-Focused Universal Substance Use Prevention in Primary Care: Advancing a Pragmatic National Healthcare Agenda.

This article advances ideas presented at a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine workshop in 2022 that highlighted clinical practice and policy recommendations for delivering universal, family-focused substance use preventive interventions in pediatric primary care. Pediatric primary care is a natural setting in which to offer families universal anticipatory guidance and links to systematic prevention programming; also, several studies have shown that offering effective parenting programs in primary care is feasible. The article describes a blueprint for designing a pragmatic national agenda for universal substance use prevention in primary care that builds on prior work. Blueprint practice schematics leverage efficacious family-focused prevention programs, identify key program implementation challenges and resources, and emphasize adopting a core element approach and utilizing digital interventions. Blueprint policy schematics specify avenues for improving cross-sector policy and resource alignment and collaboration; expanding, diversifying, and strengthening the prevention workforce; and enhancing financing for family-focused prevention approaches. The article then draws from these schematics to assemble a candidate universal prevention toolkit tailored for adolescent patients that contains four interlocking components: education in positive parenting practices, parent and youth education in substance use risks, a parent-youth structured interaction task, and parent and youth linkage to in-person and web-based prevention resources.

Pilot Trial of Online Measurement Training and Feedback in Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems.

OBJECTIVE: Pragmatic procedures for sustaining high-fidelity delivery of evidence-based interventions are needed to support implementation in usual care. This study tested an online therapist training system, featuring observational coder training and self-report fidelity feedback, to promote self-report acumen and routine use of family therapy (FT) techniques for adolescent behavior problems. METHOD: Therapists (N = 84) from nine substance use and mental health treatment sites reported on 185 adolescent clients. Therapists submitted baseline data on FT technique use with clients, completed a workshop introducing the 32-week training system, and were randomly assigned by site to Core Training versus Core Training + Consultation. Core Training included a therapist coder training course (didactic instruction and mock session coding exercises in 13 FT techniques) and fidelity feedback procedures depicting therapist-report data on FT use. Consultation convened therapists and supervisors for one-hour monthly sessions with an external FT expert. During the 32 weeks of training, therapists submitted self-report data on FT use along with companion session audiotapes subsequently coded by observational raters. RESULTS: Therapist self-report reliability and accuracy both increased substantially during training. Observers reported no increase over time in FT use; therapists self-reported a decrease in FT use, likely an artifact of their improved self-report accuracy. Consultation did not enhance therapist self-report acumen or increase FT use. CONCLUSIONS: Online training methods that improve therapist-report reliability and accuracy for FT use may confer important advantages for treatment planning and fidelity monitoring. More intensive and/or different training interventions appear needed to increase routine FT delivery.

What is the Status of Multi-Informant Treatment Fidelity Research?

OBJECTIVE: The precise measurement of treatment fidelity (quantity and quality in the delivery of treatment strategies in an intervention) is essential for intervention development, evaluation, and implementation. Various informants are used in fidelity assessment (e.g., observers, practitioners [clinicians, teachers], clients), but these informants often do not agree on ratings. This scoping review aims to ascertain the state of science around multi-informant assessment of treatment fidelity. METHOD: A literature search of articles published through December 2021 identified 673 articles. Screening reduced the number of articles to 44, and the final study set included 35 articles. RESULTS: There was substantial variability across studies regarding study design, how fidelity was operationalized, and how reliability was defined and assessed. Most studies evaluated the agreement between independent observers and practitioner-report, though several other informant pairs were assessed. Overall, findings suggest that concordance across fidelity informants was low to moderate, with a few key exceptions. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to draw clear conclusions about the degree to which single versus multiple informant assessment is needed to produce an accurate and complete picture of treatment fidelity. The field needs to take steps to determine how to leverage multi-informant assessment to accurately assess treatment fidelity.

Training Community Therapists in Core Elements of CBT and Family Therapy for Adolescent Externalizing Problems.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study tested pragmatic methods for training therapists in core techniques of two evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for adolescent externalizing problems: cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or family therapy (FT). Training methods were designed to help therapists accurately self-monitor their use of EBIs and increase delivery of EBIs with current clients. The study compared coder training only versus coder training plus fidelity-focused consultation. METHOD: Therapists (N = 42) from seven behavioral health clinics reported on 65 youth clients; four clinics elected to train in CBT and three in FT. Therapists were randomized to either coder training only, consisting of a 25-week observational coder training course (didactic instruction and mock session coding exercises in core EBI techniques); or coder training plus fidelity-focused consultation, consisting of direct-to-therapist fidelity measurement feedback along with fidelity-focused expert consultation. During the 25 weeks of training, therapists submitted self-report data on EBI use along with companion session audiotapes subsequently coded by observational raters. RESULTS: Compared to coder training only, coder training plus fidelity-focused consultation produced superior effects in therapist ability to judge the extensiveness of EBI techniques in online coding sessions, as well as therapist ability to self-rate use of EBI techniques with their own cases. In both conditions, therapists who trained in CBT showed a significant, though modest, increase in real-world delivery of core CBT techniques; this did not occur for FT. CONCLUSIONS: Pragmatic training and consultation methods show promise as viable and effective options for enhancing EBI fidelity monitoring and, for CBT, increasing EBI delivery.

Core Elements of Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavioral Health Problems: Validity Generalization in Community Settings.

OBJECTIVE: The core elements of family therapy for adolescent mental health and substance use problems, originally distilled from high-fidelity sessions conducted by expert clinicians, were tested for validity generalization when delivered by community therapists in routine settings. METHOD: The study sampled recorded sessions from 161 cases participating in one of three treatment pools: implementation trial of Functional Family Therapy (98 sessions/50 cases/22 therapists), adaptation trial of Multisystemic Therapy (115 sessions/59 cases/2 therapists), and naturalistic trial of non-manualized family therapy in usual care (107 sessions/52 cases/21 therapists). Adolescents were identified as 60% male and 40% female with an average age of 15.4 years; 49% were Latinx, 27% White Non-Latinx, 15% African American, 3% another race/ethnicity, 6% race/ethnicity unknown. Session recordings (n = 320) were randomly selected for each case and coded for 21 discrete family therapy techniques. Archived data of one-year clinical outcomes were gathered. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analyses replicated the factor structure from the original distillation study, retaining all four clinically coherent treatment modules comprised of all 21 techniques: Interactional Change (ICC = .77, Cronbach's α = .81); Relational Reframe (ICC = .75, α = .81); Adolescent Engagement (ICC = .72, α = .78); Relational Emphasis (ICC = .76, α = .80). Exploratory analyses found that greater use of core techniques predicted symptom improvements in one treatment pool. CONCLUSIONS: Core techniques of family therapy distilled from manualized treatments for adolescent behavioral health problems showed strong evidence of validity generalization, and initial evidence of links to client outcomes, in community settings.

Haitian and Haitian American experiences of racism and socioethnic discrimination in Miami-Dade county: At-risk and court-involved youth.

We examine how juvenile justice-involved youth of Haitian descent in Miami-Dade County cope with structural racism and its impact on their mental health. Drawing on longitudinal ethnography, psychosocial assessment data, and a family-based clinical intervention funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, this article explores youth narratives of discrimination prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We use critical race theory and theory of practice to understand youths' perceptions as racialized bodies and stigmatized selves, highlighting the experiences and perspectives of a particular black immigrant group, ethnic beings caught up in the everyday practices of racialization, sociocultural marginalization, and racism. We frame these experiences as a variation of the complex continuum of structural racism and racial domination in the US. These experiences have caused anger, fear, anxiety, chronic anticipatory distress, and hopelessness among youth of Haitian descent. We conclude with some recommendations for therapeutic support that encourages youth to process their experiences, promotes their development of a positive self-concept, and provides them with mind-body techniques to attenuate the physical impacts of discriminatory events. The clinical trial registration number for this study intervention is NCT03876171.

Caregiver Engagement in Outpatient Treatment for Adolescents in Community Settings: Construct and Predictive Validity of Family Therapy Techniques.

Caregiver engagement and participation in community-based outpatient treatment services for adolescents is generally poor, which is problematic given the integral role of caregivers prescribed by evidence-based treatments across orientations. The current study explores the psychometric and predictive properties of a set of caregiver engagement techniques distilled from family therapy, used by community clinicians in routine care. It highlights relational engagement interventions and adds to growing work distilling core elements of family therapy. The study examined caregiver engagement techniques observed in 320 recorded sessions and outcome data from 152 cases treated by 45 therapists participating in one of three randomized trials investigating delivery of family therapy for adolescent behavior problems in community settings. Construct and predictive validity of caregiver engagement coding items were analyzed to understand the degree to which they cohered as a single factor and predicted outcomes in predictable ways. Results demonstrated item reliability and construct validity of a Caregiver Engagement Techniques factor. Greater use of these techniques was associated with decreased adolescent substance use. Unexpected results suggested greater use of techniques was associated with worsening internalizing symptoms and family cohesion per youth-report only. Post-hoc analyses revealed additional complexities in the association between engagement techniques and outcomes. Caregiver engagement practices tested in the current study represent a unified treatment factor that may contribute to positive therapeutic outcomes for adolescents in some clinical domains. Further research is needed to understand predictive effects.

The comparative effectiveness of Core versus Core+Enhanced implementation strategies in a randomized controlled trial to improve substance use treatment receipt among justice-involved youth.

BACKGROUND: Most justice-involved youth are supervised in community settings, where assessment and linkage to substance use (SU) treatment services are inconsistent and fragmented. Only 1/3 of youth with an identified SU need receive a treatment referral and even fewer initiate services. Thus, improving identification and linkage to treatment requires coordination across juvenile justice (JJ) and behavioral health (BH) agencies. The current study examines the comparative effectiveness of two bundled implementation intervention strategies for improving SU treatment initiation, engagement, and continuing care among justice-involved youth supervised in community settings. Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) served as the conceptual framework for study design and selection/timing of implementation intervention components, and the BH Services Cascade served as the conceptual and measurement framework for identifying and addressing gaps in service receipt. METHODS: Part of a larger Juvenile-Justice Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (JJ-TRIALS) Cooperative, this study involved a multisite, cluster-randomized control trial where sites were paired then randomly assigned to receive Core (training teams on the BH Services Cascade and data-driven decision making; supporting goal selection) or Core+Enhanced (external facilitation of implementation teams) intervention components. Youth service records were collected from 20 JJ community supervision agencies (in five states) across five study phases (baseline, pre-randomization, early experiment, late experiment, maintenance). Implementation teams comprised of JJ and BH staff collaboratively identified goals along the BH Cascade and used data-driven decision-making to implement change. RESULTS: Results suggest that Core intervention components were effective at increasing service receipt over time relative to baseline, but differences between Core and Core+Enhanced conditions were non-significant. Time to service initiation was shorter among Core+Enhanced sites, and deeper Cascade penetration occurred when external facilitation (of implementation teams) was provided. Wide variation existed in the degree and nature of change across service systems. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate the criticality of early EPIS phases, demonstrating that strategies provided during the formative exploration and preparation phases produced some improvement in service receipt, whereas implementation-focused activities produced incremental improvement in moving youth farther along the Cascade.

Gaps in Screening Recommendations Must Be Addressed to Protect Youth and Adults from Substance Use-Related Harm.

Background: In June 2020, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued a final recommendation on screening for unhealthy drug use in adults and adolescents. It assigned a "B" rating on a recommendation for screening in primary care for adults when services for accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and appropriate care can be provided or referred, but declined to recommend the same for adolescents, concluding that current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms. Objectives: To examine and provide recommendations to address gaps in the USP ST recommendation on screening for unhealthy drug use. Results: The lack of recommendation to screen adolescents represents a critical gap and highlights the need for research on adolescent substance use screening. While research is limited, available evidence shows short-term benefits from youth screening and early intervention and no evidence of harm. The lack of recommendation for youth leaves practitioners without guidance and incentive to intervene with youth who use substances, discourages expansion/support of youth screening, and reinforces treatment barriers. The statement also lacks guidance to address barriers to implementing screening in adults. Despite promotion of the practice, implementation in primary care is sporadic. Providers should be made aware of implementation barriers and the clinical guides and training available to facilitate implementation. Conclusions/Importance: Screening and intervention are vital for addressing the addiction crisis, and USPSTF recommendations are critical for making preventive health care services accessible and affordable. These gaps must be addressed for the recommendation statement to reach its full life-saving potential.

Therapist Adherence to Two Treatments for Adolescent Suicide Risk: Association to Outcomes and Role of Therapeutic Alliance.

In psychotherapy research, adherence refers to the extent to which therapists deliver a treatment as intended. This study examined whether therapist adherence to two different manualized treatments was associated with improved client outcomes and whether the association was moderated by therapeutic alliance. The study sample included 320 video recordings of therapy sessions from 118 cases in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing attachment-based family therapy (ABFT) with family-enhanced nondirective supportive therapy (FE-NST). Recordings were selected from early, middle, and late stages of treatment. The adherence measure consisted of 24 items representing essential therapist interventions from both treatments. Trained raters coded tapes from both therapies. Adolescent self-report of alliance was measured at session 4. Adherence to ABFT was associated with a significant increase in family cohesion at mid-treatment but not at posttreatment. Adherence to FE-NST was significantly associated with an increase in suicide ideation posttreatment. Using therapeutic alliance as a moderator, adherence to ABFT was significantly associated with a reduction in suicide ideation, family conflict, and higher client satisfaction posttreatment. Alliance did not positively affect the association of FE-NST adherence to outcomes. Findings suggest that adherence to ABFT interventions may be better linked to treatment outcomes when adolescents feel a strong alliance with their therapist. Implications for future research and therapist training are explored.

En la investigación sobre psicoterapia, la adhesión se refiere al grado en el cual los terapeutas brindan un tratamiento según lo previsto. Este estudio analizó si la adhesión del terapeuta a dos tratamientos estandarizados diferentes estuvo asociada con mejores resultados en los pacientes y si la asociación estuvo moderada por la alianza terapéutica. La muestra del estudio incluyó 320 videograbaciones de sesiones de terapia de 118 casos en un ensayo aleatorizado controlado donde se comparó la terapia familiar basada en el apego (TFBA) con la terapia de apoyo no directiva optimizada por la familia (TAND-OF). Se eligieron grabaciones de las etapas iniciales, intermedias y finales del tratamiento. El instrumento de medición de la adhesión consistió en 24 ítems que representaban intervenciones esenciales del terapeuta de ambos tratamientos. Un grupo de calificadores capacitados codificaron las grabaciones de ambas terapias. El autoinforme de alianza de los adolescentes se midió en la cuarta sesión. La adhesión a la TFBA estuvo asociada con un aumento considerable de la cohesión familiar en la mitad del tratamiento, pero no después del tratamiento. La adhesión a la TAND-OF estuvo asociada considerablemente con un aumento de la ideación suicida después del tratamiento. Utilizando la alianza terapéutica como moderadora, la adhesión a la TFBA estuvo asociada considerablemente con una reducción de la ideación suicida, el conflicto familiar y una mayor satisfacción del paciente después del tratamiento. La alianza no afectó positivamente la asociación de la adhesión a la TAND-OF con los resultados. Los resultados sugieren que la adhesión a las intervenciones de TFBA puede asociarse mejor con los resultados del tratamiento cuando los adolescentes sienten una alianza fuerte con su terapeuta. Se analizan las implicancias para futuras investigaciones y para la capacitación de los terapeutas.

Therapist Self-Report of Fidelity to Core Elements of Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems: Psychometrics of a Pragmatic Quality Indicator Tool.

Therapist-report measures of evidence-based interventions have enormous potential utility as quality indicators in routine care; yet, few such tools have shown strong psychometric properties. This study describes reliability and validity characteristics of a therapist-report measure of family therapy techniques for treating adolescent conduct and substance use problems: Inventory of Therapy Techniques for Core Elements of Family Therapy (ITT-CEFT). Study participants included 31 staff therapists treating 68 adolescent clients in eight community-based mental health and substance use clinics. Therapists submitted ITT-CEFT checklists and companion audio recordings for 189 sessions. The ITT-CEFT contains 13 techniques identified as core elements of three manualized family therapy models that are empirically supported for the target group. Therapists also reported on their use of three motivational interventions, and independent observers coded the submitted recordings. ITT-CEFT factor validity was shown via confirmatory factor analyses of the tool's theoretical structure. Derived modules were: Family Engagement (four items; Cronbach's α = .72); Relational Orientation (five items; α = .74); and Interactional Change (four items; α = .66). Concurrent validity analyses showed fair-to-excellent therapist reliability compared to observer ratings (ICCs range .64-.75); they showed moderate therapist accuracy compared to observer mean scores, reflecting a tendency to overestimate delivery of the techniques. Discriminant validity analyses showed tool differentiation from motivational interventions. Results offer provisional evidence for the feasibility of using the therapist-report ITT-CEFT to anchor quality procedures for family therapy interventions in real-world settings.Trial Registration: The parent clinical trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov , ID: NCT03342872 (registration date: 11.10.17).

Online Training of Community Therapists in Observational Coding of Family Therapy Techniques: Reliability and Accuracy.

A foundational strategy to promote implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is providing EBI training to therapists. This study tested an online training system in which therapists practiced observational coding of mock video vignettes demonstrating family therapy techniques for adolescent behavior problems. The study compared therapists ratings to gold-standard scores to measure therapist reliability (consistency across vignettes) and accuracy (approximation to gold scores); tested whether reliability and accuracy improved during training; and tested therapist-level predictors of overall accuracy and change in accuracy over time. Participants were 48 therapists working in nine community behavioral health clinics. The 32-exercise training course provided online instruction (about 15 min/week) in 13 core family therapy techniques representing three modules: Family Engagement, Relational Orientation, Interactional Change. Therapist reliability in rating technique presence (i.e., technique recognition) remained moderate across training; reliability in rating extensiveness of technique delivery (i.e., technique judgment) improved sharply over time, from poor to good. Whereas therapists on average overestimated extensiveness for almost every technique, their tendency to give low-accuracy scores decreased. Therapist accuracy improved significantly over time only for Interactional Change techniques. Baseline digital literacy and submission of self-report checklists on use of the techniques in their own sessions predicted coding accuracy. Training therapists to be more reliable and accurate coders of EBI techniques can potentially yield benefits in increased EBI self-report acumen and EBI use in daily practice. However, training effects may need to improve from those reported here to avail meaningful impact on EBI implementation.Trial Registration: The parent clinical trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov , ID: NCT03342872 (registration date: 11.10.17).

Randomized Trial of Academic Training and Medication Decision-Making for Adolescents with ADHD in Usual Care.

Objective: This study tested two family-based interventions designed for delivery in usual care: Changing Academic Support in the Home for Adolescents with ADHD (CASH-AA), containing motivational interventions, homework management and schoolwork organization training, and family-school partnership building; and Medication Integration Protocol (MIP), containing ADHD psychoeducation, medication decision-making, and integrated medication management.Method: This study used a cluster randomized design to test CASH-AA + MIP versus CASH-AA Only for adolescents with ADHD in five sites. Therapists (N = 49) were site clinicians randomized to condition. Clients (N = 145) included 72% males; 42% White Non-Hispanic, 37% Hispanic American, 15% African American, and 6% more than one race; average age was 14.8 years. Fidelity data confirmed protocol adherence and between-condition differentiation.Results: One-year improvements were observed across conditions in several outcomes. Overall, CASH-AA + MIP produced greater declines in adolescent-report inattentive symptoms and delinquent acts. Similarly, among non-substance users, CASH-AA + MIP clients attended more treatment sessions. In contrast, among substance users, CASH-AA Only clients showed greater declines in caregiver-report hyperactive symptoms and externalizing.Conclusions: This study provides initial experimental support for family-based ADHD medication decision-making when coupled with academic training in usual care. The treatment protocols, CASH-AA and MIP, showed positive effects in addressing not only ADHD symptoms but also common co-occurring problems, and youth with substance use problems benefitted along with non-using peers.

DIfferences in Treatment Trajectories Between Two Profiles of Adolescent Systems Involvement.

Of adolescents utilizing behavioral health services, between 45% and 62% (Farmer et al., 2003; Merikangas et al., 2011) become involved in multiple systems (i.e., mental health, juvenile justice, child welfare, and education systems) to meet their behavioral health needs (e.g., Glisson & Green, 2006). Despite their involvement in treatment, these youths often still have unmet needs due to lack of integrated care across systems (e.g., Hawkins, 2009). Adolescent behavior problems may be conceptualized differently to account for the unique needs of youth involved in multiple systems. Using a sample of 433 youth in need of behavioral health treatment services, we: (1) identified distinct classes of systems involvement across four systems, (2) compared youth comprising these classes on demographics and DSM-IV diagnoses, and (3) examined changes in delinquency and substance use over time among the youth comprising the systems involvement class groupings. Using latent class analysis, we identified two distinct classes of adolescent systems involvement: one with heavy involvement in all systems and the other with high involvement in only the education and mental health systems. Latent growth curve analyses using most likely class membership as a predictor demonstrated that adolescents with heavy involvement in all systems showed significantly more decreases in delinquent activity than comparison youth, but less decreases in substance use over a one-year follow-up period. Our findings support that it is clinically useful to examine classes of multiple systems involvement. Treatment providers can use these findings identify whether or not their clients are heavily involved in all systems and tailor their approach accordingly. In addition, researchers can continue to parse out differences in treatment trajectories for multiple systems involved youth as well as the various factors impacting these differences.

Core Elements of CBT for Adolescent Conduct and Substance Use Problems: Comorbidity, Clinical Techniques, and Case Examples.

Adolescent externalizing problems (AEPs), including serious conduct problems, delinquency, and substance misuse, are the most common adolescent behavioral issues in specialty care. High rates of comorbidity between conduct and substance use problems necessitate multidomain treatment strategies that can effectively address the AEP spectrum. One strategy to increase delivery of evidence-based interventions for multiproblem youth in usual care is to focus on core elements of empirically supported treatments that can be judiciously applied to clients presenting with diverse clinical profiles. This article describes six core practice elements of the cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) approach for AEPs: (1) Functional Analysis of Behavior Problems; (2) Prosocial Activity Sampling; (3) Cognitive Monitoring and Restructuring; (4) Emotion Regulation Training; (5) Problem-solving Training; (6) Communication Training. Integrated delivery of these core CBT elements is illustrated in two case examples, and implications for treatment planning for youth with AEPs are discussed.

Benchmarking Treatment Adherence and Therapist Competence in Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Youth Anxiety Disorders.

Evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for youth are typically developed and established through studies in research settings designed to ensure treatment integrity, that is, protocol adherence and competence by therapists. An important question for implementation science is how well integrity is maintained when these EBTs are delivered in community settings. The present study investigated whether the integrity achieved by therapists in community settings achieved a benchmark set by therapists in a research setting when they delivered the same EBT-an individual cognitive-behavioral treatment (ICBT) for youth anxiety. Therapists (N = 29; 68.97% White; 13.79% male) provided ICBT to 68 youths (M age = 10.60 years, SD = 2.03; 82.35% White; 52.94% male) diagnosed with a principal anxiety disorder in research or community settings. Training and supervision protocols were the same across settings. Two independent teams of trained coders rated 744 sessions using observational instruments designed to assess ICBT adherence and competence. Both adherence and competence were higher in the research setting. Group differences in competence were consistent across treatment, but differences in adherence were most pronounced when treatment shifted to exposure, widely viewed as the most critical component of ICBT. When using the benchmarks from the research setting, therapists from the community settings fell short for indices of adherence and competence. However, given differences between therapists and clients, as well as the fact that treatment outcomes were similar across settings, our findings raise questions about whether it is appropriate to use treatment integrity benchmarks from research settings for community.

Core Elements of Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems: Empirical Distillation of Three Manualized Treatments.

Family therapy has the strongest evidence base for treating adolescent conduct and substance use problems, yet there remain substantial barriers to widespread delivery of this approach in community settings. This study aimed to promote the feasibility of implementing family-based interventions in usual care by empirically distilling the core practice elements of three manualized treatments. The study sampled 302 high-fidelity treatment sessions from 196 cases enrolled in 1 of 3 manualized family therapy models: multidimensional family therapy (102 sessions/56 cases), brief strategic family therapy (100 sessions/94 cases), or functional family therapy (100 sessions/46 cases). Adolescents were 57% male; 41% were African American, 31% White non-Hispanic, 9% Hispanic American, 6% another race/ethnicity, and 13% unknown. The observational fidelity measures of all three models were used to code all 302 sessions. Fidelity ratings were analyzed to derive model-shared treatment techniques via exploratory factor analyses on half the sample; the derived factors were then validated via confirmatory factor analyses supplemented by Bayesian structural equation modeling on the remaining half. Factor analyses distilled 4 clinically coherent practice elements with strong internal consistency: Interactional Change (6 treatment techniques; Cronbach's α = .93), Relational Reframe (7 techniques; α = .79), Adolescent Engagement (4 techniques; α = .68), and Relational Emphasis (4 techniques; α = .67). The 4 empirically derived factors represent the core elements of 3 manualized family therapy models for adolescent behavior problems, setting the foundation of a more sustainable option for delivering evidence-based family interventions in routine practice settings. Public Health Significance: Increasing implementation of high-fidelity family-based interventions would improve the quality of treatment services for adolescent conduct and substance use problems.

Addressing Maternal Depression, Substance Use, and Intimate Partner Violence in Home Visiting: a Quasi-Experimental Pilot Test of a Screen-and-Refer Approach.

This quasi-experimental pilot study describes preliminary impacts of the "Home Visitation Enhancing Linkages Project (HELP)," a pragmatic screen-and-refer approach for promoting identification of and linkage to treatment for maternal depression (MD), substance use (SU), and intimate partner violence (IPV) within early childhood home visiting. HELP includes screening for MD, SU, and IPV followed by a menu of motivational interviewing and case management interventions aimed at linking clients to treatment, designed for delivery within routine home visiting. HELP was piloted within four counties of a statewide home visiting system that were implementing Healthy Families America. HELP clients (N = 394) were compared to clients in five demographically matched counties that received usual Healthy Families services (N = 771) on whether their home visitors (1) identified MD, SU, and IPV risk; (2) discussed MD, SU, and IPV during home visits; and (3) made referrals for MD, SU, and IPV. All data were extracted from the program's management information system. A significant impact of HELP was found on discussion of risk in home visits for all three risk domains with large effect sizes (MD OR = 4.08; SU OR = 15.94; IPV OR = 9.35). HELP had no impact on risk identification and minimal impact on referral. Findings provide preliminary support for HELP as a way of improving discussion of client behavioral health risks during home visits, an important first step toward better meeting these needs within home visiting. However, more intensive intervention is likely needed to impact risk identification and referral outcomes.

Evidence Base on Outpatient Behavioral Treatments for Adolescent Substance Use, 2014-2017: Outcomes, Treatment Delivery, and Promising Horizons.

This article updates the evidence base on outpatient behavioral treatments for adolescent substance use (ASU) since publication of the previous review completed for this journal by Hogue, Henderson, Ozechowski, and Robbins (2014). It first summarizes the Hogue et al. findings along with those from recent literature reviews and meta-analytic studies of ASU treatments. It then presents study design and methods criteria used to select 11 comparative studies subjected to Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology level of support evaluation. These 11 studies are detailed in terms of their sample characteristics, methodological quality, and substance use outcomes. Cumulative level of support designations are then made for each identified treatment approach. These cumulative designations are virtually identical to those of the previous review: ecological family-based treatment, individual cognitive-behavioral therapy, and group cognitive-behavioral therapy remain well-established; behavioral family-based treatment and motivational interviewing remain probably efficacious; drug counseling remains possibly efficacious; and an updated total of 5 multicomponent treatments combining more than 1 approach (3 of which include contingency management) are deemed well-established or probably efficacious. Treatment delivery issues associated with evidence-based approaches are then reviewed, focusing on client engagement, fidelity and mediator, and predictor and moderator effects. Finally, to help accelerate innovation in ASU treatment science and practice, the article outlines promising horizons in improving youth identification and access, specifying and implementing pragmatic treatment in community settings, and leveraging emerging lessons from implementation science.