Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 38(9): 2091-2097, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36697927

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nighttime sleep disruptions negatively impact the experience of hospitalized patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of adopting a sleep-promoting nighttime clinical workflow for hospitalized patients on nocturnal disruptions and sleep. DESIGN: Survey-based pre- and post-intervention cross-sectional study using convenience samples. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized veterans on a 23-bed general medical ward at a tertiary Veterans Administration Hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Baseline sleep surveys (N=149) identified two major sources of interruptions: blood pressure checks at 4 am for telemetry patients and subcutaneous (SQ) heparin injections between 4:30 and 6 am for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Clinical workflow was restructured to eliminate these disruptions: moving 4 am blood pressure checks to 6 am and providing daily SQ enoxaparin at 9 am as an alternative to Q 8-h SQ heparin, which had prompted an injection between 4:30 and 6 am. The impact of these changes was assessed in a second round of surveys (N=99). MAIN MEASURES: Frequency and sources for nighttime sleep disruptions; percentage of patients reporting longer time to fall asleep, more interruptions, and worse sleep quality (vs. home) before and after restructuring nighttime clinical workflow. KEY RESULTS: After restructuring nighttime clinical workflow, medication administration as a source of nighttime disruption decreased from 40% (59/149) to 4% (4/99) (p<0.001). Blood pressure checks as a source of disruption decreased from 56% (84/149) to 42% (42/99) (p=0.033). Fewer patients reported taking longer to fall asleep in the hospital vs. home (39% pre-intervention vs. 25% post-intervention, p=0.021). Similarly, fewer patients experienced waking up more frequently in the hospital vs. home (46% pre-intervention vs. 32% post-intervention, p=0.036). Fewer patients reported sleeping worse in the hospital (44% pre-intervention vs. 39% post-intervention), though this trend was not statistically significant (p=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Nighttime disruptions in hospitalized patients frequently interfere with sleep. Restructuring of the clinical workflow significantly reduced disruptions and improved sleep.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes , Sueño , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Flujo de Trabajo , Sueño/fisiología , Centros de Atención Terciaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA