Premortem anticoagulation timing and dose in donation after circulatory death: multicentre study of associations with graft function.

BACKGROUND: In controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD), it is common to administer premortem heparin to potential donors. This practice remains controversial because there is limited evidence for it and there is the possibility of inducing hemorrhage. To our knowledge, no previous studies have assessed the effects of heparin timing and dose on graft function. METHODS: We performed a multicentre cohort study of consecutive DCD donors and the recipients of their organs. Anticoagulation administration was considered early if given near the time of withdrawal of life-sustaining measures and late if delayed until the onset of donor hypoxemia (oxygen saturation < 70%) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 60 mm Hg or mean blood pressure < 50 mm Hg). The anticoagulation dose was considered high if it was 300 units/kg or greater. RESULTS: Donor anticoagulation data were available for 301 kidney, 75 liver and 46 lung recipients. Heparin was administered in 92% of cases and was most commonly withheld in donors with cerebrovascular causes of death (p = 0.01). Administration was late in 59% and the dose was low in 27%. Among kidney recipients, there were no significant differences in need for dialysis, glomerular filtration rate over the first year after transplantation or graft survival on the basis of whether or not the donor received heparin, the timing of heparin administration or the dose of heparin. Among liver recipients, alkaline phosphatase concentrations over the first year were significantly higher among recipients who received organs from donors to whom lower doses of heparin had been administered. CONCLUSION: Premortem heparin is widely used in DCD cases, but there is variability in timing and dose, which was not associated with kidney outcomes in this study. Donor anticoagulation may have a greater impact in preventing biliary complications following liver transplantation.

Donation after circulatory determination of death in western Canada: a multicentre study of donor characteristics and critical care practices.

PURPOSE: Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) has been performed in Canada since 2006. Numerous aspects of donor management remain controversial. METHODS: We performed a multicentre cohort study involving potential DCD donors in western Canada (2008-2017), as well as recipients of their organs, to describe donor characteristics and critical care practices, and their relation to one-year recipient and graft survival. RESULTS: There were 257 patients in four provinces that underwent withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WLST) in anticipation of possible DCD. The proportion of patients that died within two hours of WLST ranged from 67% to 88% across provinces (P = 0.06), and was predicted by deeper coma (P = 0.01), loss of pupillary light or corneal reflexes (P = 0.02), and vasopressor use (P = 0.01). There were significant differences between provinces in time intervals from onset of hypotension to death (9-11 min; P = 0.02) and death to vascular cannulation (7-10 min; P < 0.001). There was inconsistency in pre-mortem heparin administration (82-96%; P = 0.03), including timing (before vs after WLST; P < 0.001) and dose (≥ 300 vs < 300 units·kg-1; P < 0.001). Donation after circulatory death provided organs for 321 kidney, 81 liver, and 50 lung transplants. One-year recipient and graft survival did not differ among provinces (range 85-90%, P = 0.45). Predictors of death or graft failure included older recipient age (odds ratio [OR] per year, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.01 to 1.07) and male donor sex (OR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.39 to 8.09), but not time intervals between WLST and cannulation or practices related to heparin use. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in critical care DCD practices in western Canada, but this has not resulted in significant differences in recipient or graft survival. Further research is required to guide optimal management of potential DCD donors.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le don d'organes après décès cardiocirculatoire (DDC) est pratiqué au Canada depuis 2006. De nombreux aspects touchant à la prise en charge des donneurs demeurent controversés. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude de cohorte multicentrique auprès de donneurs potentiels de DDC dans l'Ouest canadien (2008­2017), ainsi qu'auprès des récipiendaires de leurs organes, afin de décrire les caractéristiques des donneurs et les pratiques de soins intensifs, ainsi que la relation entre ces éléments et la survie à un an des récipiendaires et des organes greffés. RéSULTATS: Au total, 257 patients provenant de quatre provinces ont subi une interruption des traitements de survie en vue d'un possible DDC. La proportion de patients décédés dans les deux heures suivant l'interruption des traitements de survie allait de 67 % à 88 % dans toutes les provinces à l'étude (P = 0,06) et pouvait être prédite par une profondeur du coma plus importante (P = 0,01), la perte de la réaction pupillaire à la lumière ou des réflexes cornéens (P = 0,02), et l'utilisation de vasopresseurs (P = 0,01). Des différences significatives ont été observées entre les différentes provinces dans les intervalles de temps entre le début de l'hypotension et le décès (9­11 min; P = 0,02) et entre le décès et la canulation vasculaire (7­10 min; P < 0,001). Il y avait divergence dans l'administration d'héparine avant le décès (82-96 %; P = 0,03), notamment en ce qui concerne le moment d'administration (avant vs après l'interruption des traitements de survie; P < 0,001) et la posologie (≥ 300 vs < 300 unités·kg−1; P < 0,001). Le don après décès cardiocirculatoire a permis de procurer des organes pour 321 greffes rénales, 81 greffes hépatiques et 50 greffes pulmonaires. La survie à un an du récipiendaire et du greffon ne différait pas d'une province à l'autre (allant de 85 à 90 %, P = 0,45). Les prédicteurs de décès ou de la défaillance du greffon incluaient l'âge plus avancé du récipiendaire (rapport de cotes [RC] par année, 1,04; intervalle de confiance [IC] 95 %, 1,01 à 1,07) et un donneur de sexe masculin (RC, 3,35; IC 95 %, 1,39 à 8,09), mais pas les intervalles de temps entre l'interruption des traitements de survie et la canulation, ni les pratiques liées à l'utilisation d'héparine. CONCLUSION: Il existe une importante variabilité dans les pratiques de soins intensifs pour le DDC dans l'Ouest canadien, mais cette variabilité n'a pas résulté en différences significatives en matière de survie des récipiendaires ou des greffons. Des recherches supplémentaires sont nécessaires afin d'aiguiller la prise en charge optimale des donneurs potentiels de DDC.