Safety and efficacy of damoctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A: Results of an interventional, post-marketing study.

INTRODUCTION: Damoctocog alfa pegol (BAY 94-9027, Jivi® ) is an approved extended half-life factor VIII (FVIII) for treatment of previously treated patients with haemophilia A aged ≥12 years. We report the final results of an interventional, post-marketing study of damoctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A. METHODS: In this open-label, interventional, post-marketing, phase 4 trial (NCT04085458), previously FVIII-treated patients with severe haemophilia A aged ≥18 years received damoctocog alfa pegol for ≥100 exposure days (EDs). Patients initially received 45 IU/kg every 5 days (recommended) or 40 IU/kg twice-weekly. At Visit 3, patients' doses could be increased, or treatment frequency adapted. The primary endpoint was FVIII inhibitor development (titre ≥.6 Bethesda units). Secondary endpoints included anti-polyethylene glycol (PEG) antibody development, treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and annualized bleeding rate (ABR). RESULTS: Overall, 36 patients were enrolled; 32 patients received treatment, of whom, 27 completed the study. No patients developed FVIII inhibitors; three tested transiently positive for low-titre anti-PEG antibodies without clinical relevance. Three patients reported study-drug-related AEs of mild or moderate intensity. Two patients discontinued the study due to AEs. No deaths occurred. Most patients (70%) were treated with E5D/E7D regimens. The median (Q1;Q3) total ABR (N = 30) was 3.0 (.0;9.0) pre-study and 1.8 (.7;5.9) during the study. CONCLUSION: Damoctocog alfa pegol individualized prophylaxis regimens were well-tolerated with no immunogenicity concerns. ABRs improved following the switch from pre-study prophylaxis to damoctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis. These results support the favourable safety and efficacy profile of damoctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Damoctocog Alfa Pegol Prophylaxis in Patients with Haemophilia A Aged 12-<18 Years at Enrolment into PROTECT VIII.

INTRODUCTION: The phase 2/3 PROTECT VIII study demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety of damoctocog alfa pegol (BAY 94-9027; Jivi®), a B-domain-deleted recombinant factor VIII (FVIII), site-specifically PEGylated to improve its pharmacokinetic profile. We report a post hoc assessment of bleeding and safety outcomes in the subgroup of patients, aged 12-<18 years at enrolment. METHOD: PROTECT VIII was a multicentre, open-label study of previously treated males aged 12-65 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII <1%). Twelve patients were included in this analysis. All received damoctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis for the total time in study (median [range] time in study 4.0 [1.3-6.2] years). RESULTS: Overall median (Q1; Q3) total and joint annualised bleeding rates were 1.8 (0.4; 5.1) and 0.7 (0.2; 1.8), respectively, for the entire study. During the last 6 months of treatment, eight (66.7%) and ten (83.3%) out of 12 patients experienced zero total and joint bleeds, respectively. No patient developed FVIII inhibitors. No deaths or thrombotic events were reported. CONCLUSION: Efficacy and safety of damoctocog alfa pegol were confirmed in adolescent patients with haemophilia A, with data for up to 6 years supporting its use as a long-term treatment option in this group as they transition into adulthood.

Impact of timing of prophylaxis commencement, F8 genotype and age on factor consumption and health-related quality of life in patients with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: The timing of prophylaxis and F8 genotype can impact treatment outcomes in adults with severe haemophilia A (HA). AIM: To investigate how F8 genotype, timing, and type of prophylaxis influence arthropathy, bleeding rates, factor consumption and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with severe HA were enrolled. Bleeding events were recorded retrospectively during median 12.5 months. F8 gene variants were classified as null or non-null. Joint health and HRQoL were assessed with HJHS and EQ-5D-5L, respectively. RESULTS: The median age at prophylaxis start was 1.25 years in the primary prophylaxis group (N = 15, median age 26 years) and 31.5 years in the secondary group (N = 22, 45 years), respectively. There were significant differences in the medians of HJHS (4 vs. 20, p < .001), EQ-5D-5L index (0.9647 vs. 0.904, p = .022), EQ VAS (87 vs. 75, p = .01) and FVIII consumption (3883 vs. 2737 IU/kg/year, p = .02), between the primary and secondary groups, respectively. Median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 0 for both groups. Twenty-five null and thirteen non-null F8 gene variants were identified. In the secondary prophylaxis group, lower median FVIII consumption (1926 vs. 3370 IU/kg/year) was shown for non-null compared to null variants, respectively, with similar ABR and HJHS. CONCLUSION: Delayed prophylaxis start with intermediate dose intensity prevents bleeds but at a cost of more arthropathy and reduced HRQoL, compared to higher intensity primary prophylaxis. Non-null F8 genotype may allow lower factor consumption with similar HJHS and bleeding rates, compared to null genotype.

Factors associated with physical activity in young people with haemophilia A on prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Physical activity (PA) is influenced by numerous factors, and the literature describing why people with haemophilia (PWH) are physically active or not is inconclusive. AIMS: To investigate factors associated with PA (mean min/day in light (LPA), moderate (MPA), vigorous (VPA) and total PA, and proportion meeting World Health Organization (WHO) weekly moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA) recommendations) among young PWH A. METHODS: Forty PWH A on prophylaxis from the HemFitbit study were included. PA was measured using Fitbit devices and participant characteristics were collected. Potential factors associated with PA were investigated by univariable linear regression models for continuous PA outcomes, and descriptively for teenagers meeting/not meeting WHO MVPA recommendations only, because all except one adult met PA recommendations. RESULTS: Mean age (n = 40) was 19.5 years (SD 5.7). Annual bleeding rate was nearly zero and joint scores were low. We found an increase of four min/day in LPA (95% confidence interval (CI) 1-7) per year increase in age. Participants with 'Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound' (HEAD-US) score ≥1 engaged in mean 14 min/day less MPA (95% CI -23.2 to -3.8), and 8 min less VPA (95% CI -15.0 to -0.4) compared to participants with HEAD-US score 0. Teenagers who met PA recommendations had slightly better joint status compared to those who did not meet recommendations. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that presence of mild arthropathy does not affect LPA but may have a negative impact on PA of higher intensities. Early start of prophylaxis may be an important determinant of PA.

Physical activity in Norwegian teenagers and young adults with haemophilia A compared to general population peers.

INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists on objectively measured habitual physical activity (PA) of young people with haemophilia (PWH). AIMS: To compare different outcomes of objective PA between young PWH A and controls using a commercial activity tracker. METHODS: We enrolled males aged 13-30 years with moderate and severe haemophilia A, without inhibitors on regular prophylaxis. PA was measured with the activity tracker Fitbit Charge 3 for 12 weeks. Control group data was obtained from ≈60,000 Fitbit users, matched on age, sex and measurement period. PA variables [steps, intensities, volume, activity types, exercise frequencies and proportion meeting the World Health Organization's moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) recommendations] were compared between groups descriptively and using Welch's two-sample t-test and two-sample test of proportions. RESULTS: Forty PWH A were enrolled (mean age 19.5 years, 50% teenagers, 50% adults, three (7.5%) with moderate and 37 (92.5%) with severe haemophilia). Mean daily steps and minutes MVPA were similar between PWH and controls. PWH spent more time in light PA (mean 227 vs. 192 min/day, P = .033) and exercised more frequently (mean 5.6 vs. 3.9 exercise sessions/week, P < .001). Among teenagers, 40% PWH and 8% controls reached MVPA recommendations, compared to 95% and 100% among adults. The most common type of PA was walking. CONCLUSION: This cohort of young PWH A on prophylactic treatment had PA levels comparable to controls. Still, a considerable proportion of teenagers did not meet the recommended weekly volume of MVPA, and we encourage clinicians to have a particular focus on promoting PA for this group.

Applicability of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on the management of acute coronary syndromes to older people with haemophilia A - A modified Delphi consensus by the ADVANCE Working Group.

INTRODUCTION: As people with haemophilia (PWH) receive better treatment and live longer they are more likely to encounter cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other comorbidities. ESC guidelines for the acute management of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are based on the non-haemophilia population. AIM: To review the guidelines and propose relevant adaptations for PWHA without inhibitors who are treated with prophylaxis and present with ACS. METHODS: As part of the ADVANCE Group, 20 European haemophilia experts used a modified Delphi approach to develop and gain consensus on proposed adaptations of the ESC guidelines for PWHA without inhibitors. RESULTS: Of the 32 Class I recommendations across both guidelines, adaptions were considered necessary and proposed for 15. The adaptions highlight the need to provide sufficient FVIII trough levels at the time of antithrombotic treatment in people with haemophilia A (HA) without inhibitors. Patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and requiring oral anticoagulation therapy or combined single antiplatelet plus oral anticoagulation therapy will require additional FVIII replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: In the absence of high-quality clinical evidence, the combined expert opinion used to develop these adaptions to the current ESC guidelines may help to guide clinicians in their treatment decisions when a PWHA presents with ACS.

Vaccine associated benign headache and cutaneous hemorrhage after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine: A cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Fatal complications have occurred after vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, a vaccine against Covid-19. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) with severe outcome is characterized by venous thrombosis, predominantly in cerebral veins, thrombocytopenia and anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies. Prolonged headaches and cutaneous hemorrhages, frequently observed after the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, have therefore caused anxiety among vaccinees. We investigated whether these symptoms represent a mild form of VITT, with a potential for aggravation, e.g. in case of a second vaccination dose, or a different entity of vaccine complications MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included previously healthy individuals who had a combination of headache and spontaneous severe cutaneous hemorrhages emerging after the 1st dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. Twelve individuals were found to meet the inclusion criteria, and a phone interview, cerebral MRI, assessment of platelet counts, anti PF4/polyanion antibodies and other laboratory tests were performed. RESULTS: None of the symptomatic vaccinees had cerebral vein thrombosis, hemorrhage or other pathology on MRI. Platelet counts were within normal range and no anti-PF4/polyanion platelet activating antibodies were found. Moreover, vasculitis markers, platelet activation markers and thrombin generation were normal. Furthermore, almost all symptoms resolved, and none had recurrence of symptoms after further vaccination with mRNA vaccines against Covid-19. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of headaches and subcutaneous hemorrhage did not represent VITT and no other specific coagulation disorder or intracranial pathology was found. However, symptoms initially mimicking VITT demand vigilance and low threshold for a clinical evaluation combined with platelet counts and D-dimer.

Surgical outcomes in patients with haemophilia A or B receiving extended half-life recombinant factor VIII and IX Fc fusion proteins: Real-world experience in the Nordic countries.

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative dosing recommendations vary across Nordic haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) for extended half-life (EHL) factor concentrates in haemophilia A/B (HA/HB) patients. AIM: To summarise Nordic real-world surgical experiences with EHL recombinant factor VIII/IX Fc (rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc) fusion proteins using retrospective data from clinical records at four HTCs in Finland, Sweden and Norway. METHODS: Factor dosing and surgical outcomes were recorded from HA/HB patients who underwent surgery and were treated with rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc. Perioperative factor dosing regimens were clinician-determined based on local practises. RESULTS: Twenty five surgeries were performed on 20 patients, all covered by bolus injections except one minor HA surgery; eight minor surgeries were in paediatric patients. Median preoperative rFVIIIFc dose for major HA surgeries (n = 8) was 48 IU/kg (range: 35-57), with total consumption up to Day 14 of 427 IU/kg (196-568). For the two major HB surgeries (in one patient), preoperative rFIXFc doses were 50 IU/kg and 20 IU/kg; total consumption up to Day 14 was 130 IU/kg and 40 IU/kg. Median preoperative rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc bolus doses for minor HA (n = 10) and HB (n = 4) surgeries were 50 IU/kg (24-79) and 47 IU/kg (40-71), with total consumption up to Day 5 of 138 IU/kg (49-404) and 100 IU/kg (43-125), respectively. Intraoperative and postoperative haemostatic responses were rated as at least good/excellent for 24/25 surgeries, with bleeding episodes reported in only three surgeries. CONCLUSION: Nordic real-world experiences suggest that EHL products can be used safely and effectively for peri-operative haemostasis. Further research is required to develop local dosing guidelines for optimised treatment schedules.

Bone mineral density in haemophilia - a multicentre study evaluating the impact of different replacement regimens.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate if prophylactic treatment in severe haemophilia impact on bone mineral densisty (BMD) in adults with haemophilia A/B. METHODS: Subjects with haemophilia (n = 120) underwent bone-density measurement and clinical data was collected. BMD in subjects with severe haemophilia on high-dose prophylaxis (n = 41) was compared to BMD in subjects with mild haemophilia (n = 33) and to severe haemophilia treated with intermediate-dose prophylaxis (n = 32) or on-demand replacement therapy (n = 14). RESULTS: Subjects with severe haemophilia on high-dose prophylaxis showed BMD at total hip comparable to subjects with mild haemophilia (median BMD 955.8 and 977.4 mg/cm2 (P = .17), respectively). No difference in BMD was found related to type of prophylactic regimen (median BMD 955.8 and 942.4 mg/cm2 , in high-dose and intermediate dose groups, respectively; P = .70). Subjects with severe disease treated on-demand had significantly lower BMD compared to subjects on a high-dose prophylactic regimen (median BMD 771.8 and 955.8 mg/cm2 (P = .001), respectively). BMD decreased significantly with age, regardless of severity of haemophilia disease. In a multivariate analysis, adjusted for disease status and age, type of prophylactic regimen was not significantly associated with osteoporosis development. CONCLUSION: We show that BMD differs in persons with severe haemophilia on propylaxis as compared to those treated on-demand, but that type of prophylactic regimen does not reflect on BMD. The difference between treatment groups was mainly explained by an age difference between groups. However, patients on prophylaxis displayed a high degree of normal BMD not far from mild haemophilia at comparative age.

Clinical outcome and adherence rate in Scandinavian patients with intermediate-intensity prophylaxis before and after the switch of standard half-life FVIII products to BAY 81-8973.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment optimization in haemophilia A can be achieved by choice of FVIII product and knowledge of pharmacokinetics (PK), phenotype and adherence. A favourable PK profile of BAY 81-8973 (octocog alfa) (Kovaltry, Bayer AB) compared to other standard half-life (SHL) FVIII products has been suggested. AIM: To evaluate whether the switch to BAY 81-8973, using the same dosing schedule, impact factor consumption and bleed rates, taking arthropathy and adherence into account METHODS: Forty patients on prophylaxis with SHL (median age 40.5 years) attending the haemophilia treatment centres in Malmö and Oslo were enrolled. The annualised bleeding rate (ABR) and joint bleeding rate (AJBR) before and after the switch to BAY 81-8973 was calculated. PK analyses were performed with WAPPS-Hemo. Joint health status and treatment adherence were assessed. RESULTS: The median ABR and AJBR was 0 before and after the switch, at both centres. The median yearly factor consumption was 3,345 IU/Kg/year in the entire study group corresponding to intermediate-intensity prophylaxis in most patients and with significantly more used in Malmö (3,862 IU/Kg/year), compared to Oslo (2,337 IU/Kg/year) (P .006). There was no correlation between arthropathy and bleeding. The median BAY 81-8973 t½ was 15.15 h (range 7.5-29 h), with significant correlation to VWF levels, and 13.4 h after exclusion of VWF outliers. Adherence to treatment was 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Concentrate switch, using mainly intermediate-intensity regimens with high adherence rates, preserves excellent prophylaxis outcome using standard half-life FVIII products, indicating the value of individualized prophylaxis and close follow-up.

Immune tolerance induction in the era of emicizumab - still the first choice for patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors?

INTRODUCTION: The development of inhibitory antibodies is a severe complication of clotting factor replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A (HA). Current World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) guidelines for haemophilia care indicate that eradication of inhibitors is best achieved through immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy. AIM: The European Collaborative Haemophilia Network conducted a survey to determine whether ITI is still used in the routine management of patients with HA, and whether the availability of emicizumab prophylaxis has influenced treatment decisions. METHODS: The survey was conducted in late 2020/early 2021 in 18 centres representing 17 countries in the Europe/Middle East region treating a total of 4955 patients, and included sections specific to patient and centre demographics, treatment protocols (both ITI and prophylactic), inhibitor development and initiation of ITI, treatment success, and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: While our results indicate that ITI can still be considered a mainstay of treatment for patients with HA with inhibitors, less than daily dosing of ITI in combination with emicizumab prophylaxis is becoming commonplace across the spectrum of disease severity, with initiation being guided by bleeding patterns. The most frequently cited reasons for not initiating emicizumab prophylaxis were availability or reimbursement issues. CONCLUSION: ITI remains a mainstay for haemophilia treatment of patients with HA with inhibitors, but emicizumab has become a preferred first-line approach to protect against bleeds and represents an alternative to burdensome ITI in certain patient groups.

Comparison of free-living physical activity measurements between ActiGraph GT3X-BT and Fitbit Charge 3 in young people with haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Measurement of physical activity (PA) using commercial activity trackers such as Fitbit devices has become increasingly popular, also for people with haemophilia (PWH). The accuracy of the Fitbit model Charge 3 has not yet been examined. AIMS: To compare the Fitbit Charge 3 against the research-grade accelerometer ActiGraph GT3X-BT in measuring average daily steps and minutes spent in different PA intensities. METHODS: Twenty-four young PWH wore a wrist-worn Fitbit Charge 3 and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X-BT simultaneously for seven consecutive days in free-living conditions. Correlation of and differences between the devices for daily averages of PA parameters were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient and paired t-test, respectively. Agreement between devices was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Twenty participants (mean age 21.8) were included in the analyses. We found moderate to high correlations between Fitbit and ActiGraph measured daily averages for all PA variables, but statistically significant differences between devices for all variables except daily minutes of moderate PA. Fitbit overestimated average daily steps, minutes of light, vigorous and moderate-to-vigorous PA. Bland-Altman plots showed a measurement bias between devices for all parameters with increasing overestimation by the Fitbit for higher volumes of PA. CONCLUSION: The Fitbit Charge 3 overestimated steps and minutes of light, moderate and moderate-to-vigorous PA as compared to the ActiGraph GT3X-BT, and this bias increased with PA volume. The Fitbit should therefore be used with caution in research, and we advise users of the device to be cognizant of this overestimation.

Anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in COVID-19 patients are associated with disease severity and pulmonary pathology.

Thromboembolic events are frequent and associated with poor outcome in severe COVID-19 disease. Anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies are related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombus formation, but data on these antibodies in unselected COVID-19 populations are scarce. We assessed the presence of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in prospectively collected serum from an unselected cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients and evaluated if elevated levels could give prognostic information on ICU admission and respiratory failure (RF), were associated with markers of inflammation, endothelial activation, platelet activation, coagulation and fibrosis and were associated with long-term pulmonary CT changes. Five out of 65 patients had anti-PF4/polyanion reactivity with OD ≥0.200. These patients had more severe disease as reflected by ICU admission without any evidence of HIT. They also had signs of enhanced inflammation and fibrinogenesis as reflected by elevated ferritin and osteopontin, respectively, during the first 10 days of hospitalization. Increased ferritin and osteopontin persisted in these patients at 3 months follow-up, concomitant with pulmonary CT pathology. Our finding shows that the presence of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in unselected hospitalized COVID-19 patients was not related to HIT, but was associated with disease severity, inflammation, and pulmonary pathology after 3 months.

Management of comorbidities in haemophilia.

With the introduction of clotting factor concentrates in the early 1970s, significant improvements in quality of life and life expectancy of persons with haemophilia (PWH) were realized. Unfortunately, as a result of transmission of HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) by contaminated concentrates in the 1980s, many of these gains were lost. Now with four decades of PWH unexposed to contaminated factor products and current treatments capable of suppressing and eliminating HIV and HCV, respectively, the survival rate is once again increasing. In addition to the usual comorbidities associated with advanced age in the general population, several specific issues occur in patients with bleeding disorders. This manuscript explores the incidence and management of the comorbidities of the ageing PWH with a focus on cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis.

Concomitant use of bypassing agents with emicizumab for people with haemophilia A and inhibitors undergoing surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery in people with haemophilia and factor VIII inhibitors is typically managed with perioperative administration of haemostatic agents to prevent or control the occurrence of bleeding events. Practical experience of surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving treatment with emicizumab is growing; however, the novelty of the situation means that standardised guidelines are lacking with regard to the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents, including dose and laboratory monitoring. AIM: To review approaches to haemostatic management during major and minor invasive procedures in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, and to provide recommendations for controlling bleeding events. METHODS: A search was conducted, limited to the past 4 years (January 2016-April 2020), pertaining to published evidence of surgery for patients receiving emicizumab. Publications identified from the search were manually reviewed to determine studies and case reports relevant for inclusion. RESULTS: Identified literature and practical experience of the authors were used to build a consensus of practical recommendations for the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents during the perioperative period for elective surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence base indicates that surgery can be successfully performed in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab and that bypassing agents can be used concomitantly. Data from prospective studies are required to further support recommendations for haemostatic management of surgery in patients receiving emicizumab.

Confirmed long-term safety and efficacy of prophylactic treatment with BAY 94-9027 in severe haemophilia A: final results of the PROTECT VIII extension study.

INTRODUCTION: The phase 2/3 PROTECT VIII main study demonstrated efficacy and safety of BAY 94-9027 (damoctocog alfa pegol; Jivi® ), a B-domain-deleted recombinant factor VIII (FVIII), site-specifically PEGylated to extend its half-life. AIM: To report the final efficacy and safety data for BAY 94-9027 from the PROTECT VIII extension. METHODS: Previously treated males aged 12-65 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII <1%) who completed the multicentre, open-label PROTECT VIII main study were eligible for the extension. Patients received either on demand or prophylaxis treatments (30-40 IU/kg twice weekly [2 × W], 45-60 IU/kg every 5 days [E5D], or 60 IU/kg every 7 days [E7D]) and could switch to any prophylaxis regimen (variable frequency) as needed. Annualised bleeding rates (ABR), zero bleeds and safety outcomes were included in this final analysis. RESULTS: At extension completion, patients (n = 121) received BAY 94-9027 for a median (range) total time of 3.9 (0.8-7.0) years. Median (Q1; Q3) total ABR was 1.49 (0.36; 4.80) for prophylaxis patients (n = 107), compared with 34.09 (20.3; 36.6) for on-demand patients (n = 14). Median total ABRs for 2 × W (n = 23), E5D (n = 33), E7D (n = 23) and variable frequency (n = 28) groups were 1.57, 1.17, 0.65 and 3.10, respectively. Of prophylaxis patients, 20.6% were bleed-free during the entire extension (median time, 3.2 years) and 50.0% were bleed-free during the last 6 months. No patient developed FVIII inhibitors. No deaths or thrombotic events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety of BAY 94-9027 was confirmed, with extension data supporting its use as a long-term treatment option for patients with haemophilia A.

Long-term outcomes of patients treated with rituximab as second-line treatment for adult immune thrombocytopenia - Follow-up of the RITP study.

RITP was a double-blind randomized, 78-week follow-up trial in which 109 adults with immune thrombocytopenias (ITP) who failed to achieve adequate response to steroids, were randomized to receive rituximab or placebo. Here, we provide the duration of response, splenectomy and mortality rates based on extended follow-up after completion of the RITP study. Extended follow-up data were retrospectively collected for 72 (83%) patients out of the 84 patients who were not splenectomized during the initial RITP study. For the present analysis, median [interquartile range] duration of follow-up after randomization was 72 [62-82] months. Median duration of response among patients who achieved an initial response was significantly longer in patients who received rituximab (8·2 [5·5-16·7] months) as compared to placebo (1·8 [1·3-3·6] months), P = 0·036. Overall, 35 patients underwent splenectomy (13 in the rituximab, and 22 in the placebo arm, P = 0·12). Eleven patients (10%) died during the study: five in the rituximab and six in the placebo arms, including four deaths from severe bleeding. Although most rituximab-treated patients eventually relapsed, a longer duration of response and a trend towards lower splenectomy rate were observed in rituximab-treated patients.

The impact of rivaroxaban on primary hemostasis in patients with venous thrombosis.

Factor Xa inhibitors are safe and effective alternatives to warfarin, but several studies indicate that rivaroxaban may cause a different risk profile for bleeding. For instance, while the risk of major bleeding in general may be lower with rivaroxaban than for warfarin, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding or abnormal uterine bleeding may be higher. The underlying mechanisms for these differences are not known, and the effect of rivaroxaban on primary hemostasis is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rivaroxaban on platelet function, P-selectin and von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen and activity. Patients with venous thrombosis assigned to 3 months of treatment due to temporary risk factors were included. Blood was collected both during (on-treatment) and 4-6 weeks after end of treatment (without treatment). The platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmission aggregometry. P-selectin was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and vWF antigen and activity by latex immunoagglutination assays. Platelet reactivity during on-treatment (trough- and peak concentration) was similar to values without treatment. There was a trend toward a reduction of P-selectin during rivaroxaban treatment (peak concentration) compared to value without treatment (p = 0.06). There were no differences in vWF antigen and activity between the different time-points. We found no difference in platelet reactivity or vWF antigen/activity during rivaroxaban treatment compared with values without treatment. Apart from possibly causing a reduction of P-selectin, rivaroxaban seems not to influence primary hemostasis.

Continuous infusion of simoctocog alfa in haemophilia A patients undergoing surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: There are two major principles for coagulation factor replacement in the clinical management of surgical procedures in patients with haemophilia, repetitive bolus injections every 6-12 hours or administration of coagulation factor concentrates by continuous infusion. AIM: The aim was to investigate the efficacy of simoctocog alfa (human-cl rhFVIII) delivered by continuous infusion for bleeding prophylaxis during surgery in patients with haemophilia A. METHODS: We investigated the use of continuous infusion with simoctocog alfa in haemophilia A patients undergoing major surgical procedures at Oslo University Hospital from September 2015 to March 2018. The objectives were haemostatic outcome, in vivo recovery, stability over time at room temperature (3 days) and inhibitor development. RESULTS: Simoctocog alfa demonstrated treatment success in terms of haemostatic efficacy in 100% of major surgeries used as CI: 87% (n=21) excellent; 13% (n=3) good. No erythrocyte transfusions were required in any patient, no adverse events occurred and no inhibitors developed. The product was stable for 3 days at room temperature without loss of activity. Mean in vivo recovery was 1.8 (0.3) (IU/mL/IU/kg). CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion with simoctocog alfa was found to achieve good/excellent haemostatic efficacy in all procedures. No adverse events occurred and no inhibitors developed.

BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis is efficacious and well tolerated for up to >5 years with extended dosing intervals: PROTECT VIII extension interim results.

INTRODUCTION: BAY 94-9027 is an extended-half-life, site-specifically PEGylated, B-domain-deleted recombinant factor VIII (FVIII). The PROTECT VIII main study demonstrated efficacy of bleed control using extended-interval prophylaxis with BAY 94-9027 for 36 weeks. AIM: To report long-term efficacy and safety of prophylaxis with BAY 94-9027 in a descriptive analysis of the ongoing PROTECT VIII extension with a total treatment time of up to >5 years. METHODS: Previously treated males aged 12-65 years with severe haemophilia A who completed the PROTECT VIII main study were eligible for the open-label extension. Patients received on-demand treatment or prophylaxis (30-40 IU/kg twice weekly, 45-60 IU/kg every 5 days, or 60 IU/kg every 7 days) and could switch regimens as needed. RESULTS: Patients (N = 121; on demand, n = 14; prophylaxis, n = 107) accumulated a median (range) of 3.9 years (297-1965 days) and 223 (23-563) total exposure days by 31 January 2018. During the extension, median (quartile [Q]1; Q3) annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for total bleeds were 1.6 (0.3; 4.6) for patients receiving prophylaxis and 34.1 (20.3; 36.6) for patients receiving on-demand treatment. ABRs for twice-weekly (n = 23), every-5-days (n = 33), every-7-days (n = 23) and variable frequency (n = 28) treatments were 1.7, 1.2, 0.7 and 3.1, respectively. Of prophylaxis patients, 20.6% were bleed-free throughout the extension (median time, 3.2 years), and 44.5% were bleed-free during the last 6 months. No patients developed FVIII inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis was efficacious and well tolerated with dosing intervals up to every 7 days for a median (range) of 3.9 years (0.8-5.4 years).