Validity of claims-based algorithms to identify neurodevelopmental disorders in children.

PURPOSE: To validate healthcare claim-based algorithms for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) in children using medical records as the reference. METHODS: Using a clinical data warehouse of patients receiving outpatient or inpatient care at two hospitals in Boston, we identified children (≤14 years between 2010 and 2014) with at least one of the following NDDs according to claims-based algorithms: autism spectrum disorder/pervasive developmental disorder (ASD), attention deficit disorder/other hyperkinetic syndromes of childhood (ADHD), learning disability, speech/language disorder, developmental coordination disorder (DCD), intellectual disability, and behavioral disorder. Fifty cases per outcome were randomly sampled and their medical records were independently reviewed by two physicians to adjudicate the outcome presence. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: PPVs were 94% (95% CI, 83%-99%) for ASD, 88% (76%-95%) for ADHD, 98% (89%-100%) for learning disability, 98% (89%-100%) for speech/language disorder, 82% (69%-91%) for intellectual disability, and 92% (81%-98%) for behavioral disorder. A total of 19 of the 50 algorithm-based cases of DCD were confirmed as severe coordination disorders with functional impairment, with a PPV of 38% (25%-53%). Among the 31 false-positive cases of DCD were 7 children with coordination deficits that did not persist throughout childhood, 7 with visual-motor integration deficits, 12 with coordination issues due to an underlying medical condition and 5 with ADHD and at least one other severe NDD. CONCLUSIONS: PPVs were generally high (range: 82%-98%), suggesting that claims-based algorithms can be used to study NDDs. For DCD, additional criteria are needed to improve the classification of true cases.

Age and multimorbidities as poor prognostic factors for COVID-19 in hemodialysis: a Lebanese national study.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 have been reported to be at higher risk for death than the general population. Several prognostic factors have been identified in the studies from Asian, European or American countries. This is the first national Lebanese study assessing the factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 mortality in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This is an observational study that included all chronic hemodialysis patients in Lebanon who were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from 31st March to 1st November 2020. Data on demographics, comorbidities, admission to hospital and outcome were collected retrospectively from the patients' medical records. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients were included. Mean age was 61.46 ± 13.99 years with a sex ratio of 128 males to 103 females. Around half of the patients were diabetics, 79.2% presented with fever. A total of 115 patients were admitted to the hospital, 59% of them within the first day of diagnosis. Hypoxia was the major reason for hospitalization. Death rate was 23.8% after a median duration of 6 (IQR, 2 to 10) days. Adjusted regression analysis showed a higher risk for death among older patients (odds ratio = 1.038; 95% confidence interval: 1.013, 1.065), patients with heart failure (odds ratio = 4.42; 95% confidence interval: 2.06, 9.49), coronary artery disease (odds ratio = 3.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.69, 6.30), multimorbidities (odds ratio = 1.593; 95% confidence interval: 1.247, 2.036), fever (odds ratio = 6.66; 95% confidence interval: 1.94, 27.81), CRP above 100 mg/L (odds ratio = 4.76; 95% confidence interval: 1.48, 15.30), and pneumonia (odds ratio = 19.18; 95% confidence interval: 6.47, 56.83). CONCLUSIONS: This national study identified older age, coronary artery disease, heart failure, multimorbidities, fever and pneumonia as risk factors for death in patients with COVID-19 on chronic hemodialysis. The death rate was comparable to other countries and estimated at 23.8%.

COVID-19-Associated Portal Vein Thrombosis Post-Cholecystitis.

This case study describes a 45-year-old Caucasian male with a past medical history of obesity, hypertension, and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, who in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, developed portal vein thrombosis (PVT) presenting as an acute abdomen after hospital discharge from a cholecystitis episode. PVT is a very infrequent thromboembolic condition, classically occurring in patients with systemic conditions such as cirrhosis, malignancy, pancreatitis, diverticulitis, autoimmunity, and thrombophilia. PVT can cause serious complications, such as intestinal infarction, or even death, if not promptly treated. Due to the limited number of reports in the literature describing PVT in the COVID-19 setting, its prevalence, natural history, mechanism, and precise clinical features remain unknown. Therefore, clinical suspicion should be high for PVT, in any COVID-19 patient who presents with abdominal pain or associated signs and symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of COVID-19-associated PVT causing extensive thrombosis in the portal vein and its right branch, occurring in the setting of early-stage cirrhosis after a preceding episode of cholecystitis.

A closed claims analysis of vocal cord injuries related to endotracheal intubation between 2004 and 2015.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To provide a contemporary medicolegal analysis of claims brought against anesthesiologists for injuries related to endotracheal intubation. DESIGN: A retrospective study of closed claims data from the Controlled Risk Insurance Company (CRICO) Comparative Benchmarking System (CBS) database between 2004 and 2015. SETTING: Closed claims that occurred in any surgical specialty in which the patient was undergoing general anesthesia and anesthesiology was named as the primary responsible service. PATIENTS: Twenty claims were identified for analysis in 7 surgical specialties. Patient ages ranged from 45 to 76. Data regarding patient comorbidities and case history were obtained when available. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Data collected includes patient demographics such as age, outcome severity, alleged complication, plaintiff allegations, contributing factors to the injury, the surgical specialty in which the injury occurred, and the ultimate result of the claim (dismissed/denied/settled). MAIN RESULTS: Out of 20 claims, settlement payments were made in 10% of claims with a mean payment amount of $7669. Mean patient age was 55.6 years. Within severity of injuries, 65% of claims were classified as "Permanent Minor." The most common contributing factor in claims was "Technical Knowledge/Performance" and the most common plaintiff allegation was "Trauma from endotracheal tube placement." Bilateral vocal cord paralysis, unilateral (left-sided) vocal cord paralysis, and laryngeal nerve injury were the top alleged complications. The surgical specialty in which claims most often resulted was orthopedic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Injuries related to endotracheal intubation remain an ongoing challenge to anesthesiologists. Their etiology is often multifactorial and was found in this study to stem most commonly from technical errors and patient co-morbidities. A detailed discussion of risks with patients during the consent process, careful documentation of such discussion, and prompt referral to specialists when needed are critical. Understanding the patterns related to injuries during intubation is essential in order to develop strategies for improved patient safety and outcomes.

The Association Between Potential Opioid-Related Adverse Drug Events and Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery.

Introduction: Major colorectal surgery procedures are complex operations that can result in significant postoperative pain and complications. More evidence is needed to demonstrate how opioid-related adverse drug events (ORADEs) after colorectal surgery can affect hospital length of stay (LOS), hospital revenue, and what their association is with clinical conditions. By understanding the clinical and economic impact of potential ORADEs within colorectal surgery, we hope to further guide approaches to perioperative pain management in an effort to improve patient care and reduce hospital costs. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study utilizing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrative Database to analyze Medicare discharges involving three colorectal surgery diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) to identify potential ORADEs. The impact of potential ORADEs on mean hospital LOS and hospital revenue was analyzed. Results: The potential ORADE rate in patients undergoing colorectal surgery was 23.92%. The mean LOS for discharges with a potential ORADE was 5.35 days longer than without an ORADE. The mean hospital revenue per day with a potential ORADE was $418 less than without an ORADE. Any type of open surgery had a statistically significant higher potential ORADE rate than the matched laparoscopic case (P < .001). Clinical conditions most strongly associated with ORADEs in colorectal surgery included septicemia, pneumonia, shock, and fluid and electrolyte disorders. Conclusion: The incidence of ORADEs in colorectal surgery is high and is associated with longer hospital stays and reduced hospital revenue. Reducing the use of opioids in the perioperative setting, such as using multimodal analgesia strategies, may lead to positive outcomes with shorter hospital stays, increased hospital revenue, and improved patient care.

"SIMBurns": A high-fidelity simulation program in emergency burn management developed through international collaboration.

Acute management of a severely burned patient is an infrequent and stressful situation that requires medical knowledge as well as immediate coordinated action. Many adverse events in health care result from issues related to the application of 'non-technical' skills such as communication, teamwork, leadership and decision making rather than lack of medical knowledge. Training in these skills is known as Crisis Resource Management (CRM) training. In order to create well-prepared burn teams, it is critical to teach CRM principles through high-fidelity simulation (HFS). While CRM teaches foundational non-technical skills, HFS incorporates lifelike, whole-body, fully-responsive mannequins in order to provide a realistic emergency situation. The aim of the study is to describe the development of a novel high-fidelity simulation course called "SIMBurns: High Fidelity Simulation Program for Emergency Burn Management" that uses CRM as its foundation and is focused on management of burn injuries. The course was designed by a panel of simulation and burns experts from Meyer Children's Hospital in Italy and Birmingham Children's Hospital in the U.K. Simulation Program experts were certified by Boston Children's Hospital's Simulation Program. In this paper, we describe the course's design, development, structure, and participant's assessment of the course. Since the creation of the SIMBurns course in 2013, 9 courses have been conducted and 101 participants have attended the course. The course was well-received and its "Overall Satisfaction" was rated at 4.8/5. The primary objective in the SIMBurns course - to teach teamwork and CRM skills to medical staff involved in emergency burn care - was also met at 4.8/5. Participants felt that the course developed their ability to interact with other team members, further improved their understanding of how to appropriately use resources, emphasized the importance of role clarity and developed their communication skills. Additional quantitative and qualitative analyses obtained from participants were also reviewed after each course. The SIMBurns course aims to contribute to the education of those in healthcare in order to improve patient safety and to continue advancing the education of our emergency burn care teams.